logo
An ode to the remarkable people who make up the federal government

An ode to the remarkable people who make up the federal government

Washington Post20-03-2025
I have a special place in my heart for the Samuel J. Heyman Service to America Medals, known as the Sammies, the highest awards given to federal employees. I met my wife at the 2005 Sammies; that year, one of the top honors was given to Terence Lutes.
You almost certainly haven't heard of Lutes, but every year, right around now, you are probably grateful for his existence. He was the person at the Internal Revenue Service who spearheaded the adoption of electronic filing — one of the most significant changes (and improvements!) in the way that Americans interact with the government. E-filing may now seem obvious, but of course nothing just happens — someone in some meeting somewhere had to say, 'What if we used this internet thing for taxes?' And then a whole bunch of nameless someones had to also agree and then work together for years to make it happen.
Lutes does not make an appearance in 'Who Is Government?,' a new book edited by Michael Lewis, but he very well could have. The book, an outgrowth of a project led by The Washington Post's now-departed Opinions editor David Shipley, examines some of the remarkable people who make up the federal workforce — career civil servants who have accomplished the extraordinary in quiet ways, people whose jobs are normally buried layers below any partisan rancor.
Perhaps never before has there been a book better timed or more urgent.
Lewis assembled a group of notable writers — Casey Cep, Dave Eggers, John Lanchester, Geraldine Brooks, Sarah Vowell and W. Kamau Bell — and let them loose to find an interesting federal worker to write about. (I was a contributing columnist for The Washington Post last year but had nothing to do with this project.) Together, they paint a vivid and detailed portrait of the people behind the smooth day-to-day functioning of our federal government — and our lives.
These workers see themselves as being called to a higher purpose, to serve their fellow Americans and to actually make our country greater in some highly specific way. Christopher Mark of the Department of Labor, for instance, a former coal miner, helped prevent roof falls in mines by developing industry-wide preventive standards and practices. Heather Stone of the Food and Drug Administration, who tracks and compiles data about exotic diseases, helped save the life of a child whose brain was being eaten by an amoeba.
Page after page, the book breaks down the cynical caricature of the federal government that has persisted over the years and been amplified in recent months. It shows that far from being riddled with and corrupted by waste, fraud, abuse and laziness, the federal government is (or was) filled with people working hard — people painfully aware that they're stewarding government resources, doing so artfully under tight constraints, all of whom could be doing something for more money elsewhere.
Lewis's 2018 book, 'The Fifth Risk,' a clarion call of the importance of government, was a runaway success, and the 'Who Is Government?' project was meant to make the case amid an ominous election season that a second Trump presidency would pose a major threat to the basic foundations of our government.
It's no longer a hypothetical threat. Since taking office, President Donald Trump has unleashed haphazard and far-ranging cuts to the federal workforce — including an attempt to dismantle the federal institute that supports libraries, the parent of Voice of America and the nonpartisan Wilson Center think tank, as well as agencies that support minority businesses, mediate labor disputes, work to end homelessness and aid economically struggling communities.
Considering that the contributors to the book chose their subjects nearly a year ago, and that most of the pieces were published before Trump won his second term, it's incredible how much of the book feels like a not-so-subtle indictment of what's happening now — of the avarice, corruption and destruction unfolding inside the federal government at the hands of Trump, Elon Musk and their U.S. DOGE Service wrecking crew, such as the indiscriminate firings, the politicization of nonpartisan agencies, and the illegal cessation of congressionally authorized work and missions.
One of the workers highlighted in the book is employed in the National Archives, an agency now under attack from Trump. We meet the team of IRS criminal investigators who were instrumental in putting dark-web marketplace founder Ross Ulbricht behind bars. (Ulbricht was serving a life sentence for narcotics and money laundering, in a case that involved a murder-for-hire plot, only to be pardoned by Trump on his second day in office as part of a paean to the cryptocurrency world.)
The book also reminds us that while Musk and Trump grandstand about how government should learn from the private sector, government actually in some cases is better. Cep profiles the head of the National Cemetery Administration, part of the Department of Veterans Affairs, which — as its name hints — runs the nation's veterans cemeteries. In survey after survey, its customers (the families of veterans) have given it the highest satisfaction rating of any entity in the United States, public or private — 12 points higher than Costco's stunningly high rating of 85.
Lewis trumpets himself a bit more than necessary in his introduction — he is not exactly the first person to discover that the U.S. government is filled with interesting and honorable stories — but the profiles themselves serve as a balm for the chaos of our government right now. To read them — each takes about 20 minutes — is to drift into an alternate universe filled with the most thoughtful and caring people doing hard things for all the right reasons.
'Who Is Government?' will remind you why government is so important, of the thousands of small ways that it shapes and secures our lives for the better. As former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel says: 'The quality of life we have, it's all government. Government touches you a hundred times before breakfast, and you don't even know it.' The book shows — in specific ways — how much safer and more secure daily life is today than it was even a generation or two ago.
But more than that, the book is filled with a thousand reminders of why we have government: Because no one else will do these things. There is no profit motive in much of the work, no private business that will step in and spend years or decades solving these difficult challenges. As Eggers notes — in words written months ago that feel so prescient — 'No billionaires will fund work like this because there's no money in it. … If [government was] not doing it, it would not be done.'
We have government because we want our country to be a great place to live, work and play. What fills me with dread reading this book is that the next reminder we will get about the importance of government in our daily lives will come not in a laudatory, artful profile but in a crisis, when we find out that the person who should have been watching or monitoring or doing this one very specific task we've never thought about is no longer there.
Garrett M. Graff is a journalist, historian and author of nine books, including 'Watergate: A New History.'
The Untold Story of Public Service
Edited by Michael Lewis.
Riverhead. 243 pp. $30
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Even With Tons of Money, ICE Finds Obstacles in Hiring 10,000 New Agents
Even With Tons of Money, ICE Finds Obstacles in Hiring 10,000 New Agents

Time​ Magazine

timean hour ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Even With Tons of Money, ICE Finds Obstacles in Hiring 10,000 New Agents

The new recruitment page on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 's website shows a drawing of a white-bearded Uncle Sam pointing to the viewer. 'America has been invaded by criminals and predators,' the page reads. 'We need YOU to get them out.' The pitch emphasizes that a college degree isn't needed, and says recruits could be offered up to a $50,000 signing bonus and $60,000 in student loan repayment. The offers are part of a supercharged recruitment campaign that will take years to meet its goal. Republicans in Congress just allocated $30 billion to ICE to hire 10,000 new officers so it can ramp up deportations. But the Administration's interest in boosting ICE's headcount from 20,000 to 30,000 is bumping up against multiple challenges, including finding applicants who are both qualified and willing to live in parts of the country where ICE is intent on deploying more agents. 'You're talking three years before you see a significant increase of ICE agents on the street, which is the end of the administration,' predicts John Sandweg, who was the acting director of ICE during the Obama administration. To spread the word, ICE is attending job fairs, college campuses and law enforcement recruiting events. Last week, Dean Cain, the 59-year-old actor who played Superman on TV in the 1990s, put his fame behind the recruitment effort, posting a video on X that he had signed up with ICE as an honorary officer. 'I felt it was important to join with our first responders to help secure the safety of all Americans, not just talk about it. So I joined up.' ICE's stepped-up recruitment effort comes as deportation and arrests are not keeping pace with the Administration's goals of arresting 3,000 immigrants a day and deporting 1 million people in Trump's first year in office. In the first week of its new recruitment campaign, the Department of Homeland Security said it received more than 80,000 applications. There are signs that most of those applicants were not what the agency was looking for. Within days, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced that ICE was waiving its age limits for agents, accepting applicants as young as 18 and older than 40. Previously, people applying to ICE could not be younger than 21, and no older than 37 or 40, depending on the position. Trump's top White House advisor on the border, Tom Homan, told reporters on Aug. 6 that ICE wasn't having trouble recruiting, and he defended the decision to eliminate the age limits. 'There are a lot of roles at ICE for people who are over 40,' Homan said. 'Just because someone comes in and they're 55—maybe they can't carry a badge and a gun, they can certainly do administrative duty, they can do targeting on the intelligence team.' At the end of July, ICE sent an email to thousands of retired federal law enforcement agents under the subject line, 'return to mission.' The email promised that retired federal officers could continue to receive their pension payments even as they started taking a new paycheck from ICE. 'ICE is in vital need of reinforcement and your laterally applicable skillset will be pivotal in accomplishing our goals,' the email reads. 'By returning to federal service with ICE, you are providing an honorable, indispensable service to our nation.' Sandweg says it's a 'pretty creative solution' to lure back retired law enforcement officers because they won't need as much training on firearm use and other aspects of the job. But there aren't enough retired agents to fill the thousands of positions they're looking to fill, he says. And for new hires, it takes time to train new deportation officers on how to properly carry a gun and conduct arrests. Such training for ICE agents takes place at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC) in Glynco, Georgia. That's created a bottleneck because there are only so many instructors and space to train new officers. 'The administration wants boots on the ground as quickly as possible to ramp up arrests and ramp up deportations, but you can't just bring them in off the street,' Sandweg says. 'You've got to hire, background check, once they're on board and cleared for a security clearance, you've got to get them down to FLETC.' To address the bottleneck, DHS is working to create smaller training centers in cities around the country, Secretary Noem said on Aug. 8 during a press conference in Lombard, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago. 'We may do a training right here closer to home so they aren't away from their families for so long,' Noem told reporters. Advertisement ICE's aggressive recruitment efforts are already alarming sheriffs around the country who are concerned that the agency's lucrative offers will peel away local officers already working on the street. But the agency's recruiting challenge goes beyond training. Geography is also an obstacle. Under the Trump Administration, ICE aims to find and arrest more immigrants to deport in cities run by Democrats like New York and Chicago and Los Angeles. It's those same communities where it's harder for ICE to poach law enforcement in the area because local police already pay better, says Muzaffar Chishti, a senior fellow at the Migration Policy Institute. Moreover, many of ICE's harsh actions in the past few months—showing up at court houses and workplaces to arrest people, often while masked—has further chipped away at the public perception of ICE nationally, but especially in those cities. 'People do not just get attracted to jobs just for the money,' says Chishti. 'There are other factors that come into play—location, people's perception of the status of the job, people's perception of how they are perceived in the job. All those are a bit of a problem for ICE today.'

More Than 100,000 Americans Apply to Join ICE: DHS
More Than 100,000 Americans Apply to Join ICE: DHS

Epoch Times

timean hour ago

  • Epoch Times

More Than 100,000 Americans Apply to Join ICE: DHS

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has received more than 100,000 job applications from Americans, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on Aug. 12. 'Our country is calling you to serve at ICE. In the wake of the Biden administration's failed immigration policies, your country needs dedicated men and women of ICE to get the worst of the worst criminals out of our country,' DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement.

The EPA wants to roll back climate regulations. Here's how Hoosiers can have a say
The EPA wants to roll back climate regulations. Here's how Hoosiers can have a say

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The EPA wants to roll back climate regulations. Here's how Hoosiers can have a say

Hoosiers have limited time to voice their opinions as the U.S. EPA prepares to roll back rules meant to curb the effects of greenhouse gas emissions. The announcement in Indianapolis last month to rescind a major climate rule was one of the Trump administration's many pushes to deregulate major greenhouse gas polluters — in this case, the transportation industry. And with a rich history of auto manufacturing, Indiana stands to benefit, according to a statement made by U.S. Rep. Jim Baird during the announcement. Meanwhile, Americans will become more vulnerable, said Shannon Anderson, the director of advocacy at Earth Charter Indiana. While greenhouse gas emissions are not directly toxic to human health, they are the driver behind human-caused climate change, which is exacerbating the frequency and intensity of natural disasters across the globe. 'People sometimes feel like climate change is a problem that's coming later, but we're starting to experience it now,' Anderson said. She pointed to extreme heat events and increased flooding across the continent. Sam Carpenter, the executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, warned denial of climate science is bad for individual Hoosiers, communities, and the economy. The EPA has regulated greenhouse gases for over 15 years, but now the agency wants to quash a 2009 ruling that anchors its ability to fight climate change. The agency will no longer regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants or oil and gas operations. And all greenhouse gas standards for new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines will be repealed, according to the EPA. Before the ruling is finalized, the public has until Sept. 15, 2025, to submit comments on the proposal. Indiana's role in greenhouse gas emissions Indiana's greenhouse gas emissions — which come from compounds like carbon and methane — are hefty compared to similar states. Indiana releases the most energy-related greenhouse gases per capita in the Midwest and eighth in the nation, according to the HEC. About 21 percent of Indiana's total emissions come from the state's transportation sector. But as a desire to mitigate climate change impacted consumer choice and federal policy, like the Inflation Reduction Act, Indiana became a leader in electric vehicle manufacturing. Related industries now employ over 240,000 Hoosiers. The repeal of greenhouse gas emission standards could reduce the incentives helping Indiana pursue electric vehicles and battery manufacturing. 'We were starting to get a foothold in the U.S. under the Inflation Reduction Act, and Indiana has benefited mightily from those investments,' said Carpenter of HEC, nodding to the state's push toward clean energy. 'That's all being kind of pushed away through the current stance of denial on climate change. And so, it really has impacts on our health, on our communities, and in our economy.' How to get a word in Despite the agency's new stance on regulating greenhouse gases, 74 percent of Americans think that carbon dioxide should be regulated as a pollutant, according to the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. Anderson thinks the EPA will soon have to face the masses during the required public comment period, where the agency must consider input before the ruling is finalized. 'We know there are so many Americans who stand with us on this issue, and it won't even take all of them to speak out on this, but as many as possible that are willing to just take a minute to write a public comment, to send a message to their legislators, that can be tremendously powerful,' Anderson said. The EPA is "going to have to acknowledge that they are flying in the face of overwhelming public consensus.' The public can submit written comments to the EPA through an online portal, email or by mail. Earth Charter Indiana also created a toolkit to help Hoosiers find out how to comment and contact their elected officials. Comments are due Sept. 15, 2025. IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. Sophie Hartley is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach her at or on X at @sophienhartley. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: The EPA is rescinding climate regulations. Here's what that means for you Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store