Is this man's greatest friend of all? AI creates Britain's idea of the perfect designer dog
Floppy ears, a curly tail and thick, brown fur… meet Bernie, the ultimate dog created by AI.
This adorable four-legged friend is the perfect pal for every UK household—a crossbreed combining the favourite canine features of a nation of dog-lovers.
From nose to tail, researchers from Burns Pet Nutrition quizzed 2,000 dog owners on every aspect of Fido's physique then fed the findings into an AI-powered image maker.
Respondents were shown dozens of pooch pics spanning a variety of breeds from Huskies to Chihuahuas and Poodles. The results gave birth to Bernie - man's ultimate best friend.
And, the study suggest Brits may be slowly losing their love for so-called designer dogs like Frenchies, Pugs and Dachshunds that often suffer a variety of congenital health problems.
Bernie's big brown eyes - like those of a Spaniel - were the favourite for half (50%) the respondents. A recent study showed dogs with dark eyes appear more approachable [1].
One in three Brits [36%] prefer blue eyes, commonly associated with Huskies, and one in 10 (14%) like heterochromia iridis or different colours, a quirk seen mostly in Border Collies.
Bernie has a long, thin nose like a Border Collie, the favourite of more than a third (37%) of Brits. Jack Russells (20%) and Labradors (26%) were also popular.
Flat-faced pooches are no longer in vogue. French Bulldogs, the most popular breed in Britain six years ago, was chosen by only around one in 10 (16%) of respondents.
The results may also reflect a shift in awareness around canine health. Flat-faced breeds such as Pugs and French Bulldogs, while still beloved by many, have come under increasing scrutiny for the health challenges they face.
Often suffering from overheating, dental problems, and even eye conditions due to the structure of their skulls.
The preference for longer-nosed breeds like Border Collies suggests a growing public understanding of how facial structure can impact a dog's well-being.
When it comes to his coat, Bernie's has thick fur like a Siberian Husky or Newfoundland, favoured by (35%) of Brits. Smooth hair like a Basenji was marginally less popular (33%).
Bernie's thick, glossy fur mirrors that of dogs with nutrient-rich diets—a testament to the importance of high-quality food.
Just like humans, dogs benefit from a balanced intake of essential fatty acids, vitamins, and proteins. A well-fed dog not only feels better on the inside but also looks healthier on the outside, with a shinier, thicker coat and less skin irritation.
Bernie's upturned curly 'sickle tail' is similar to that of a long-haired chihuahua. It was the overwhelming favourite picked by two-fifths (42%) of respondents in the survey.
Another big pooch preference was for floppy ears like a Labrador, chosen by close to two-fifths (39%) of people. Less than a quarter (23%) opted for the 'button' ears of a Jack Russell.
Medium-sized dogs are the stand-out favourite from the survey, voted for by two-fifths (43%) of Brits. Bernie is the same height as an Australian Sheepdog.
And, his general body shape is more closely linked to a Labrador, which was chosen by a third (33%) of Brits. Followed closely by Cockerpoos, chosen by just over a quarter (27%).
The study highlighted a slight generational divide. Gen Z and Millennials would prefer a medium-sized Labrador type dog, with husky blue eyes and short-hair like a Dachshund.
The ideal dog for older age groups would be a similar size to an Airedale with brown eyes and a shorter coat.
Laura Crotch Harvey, Nutrition Manager at Burns Pet Nutrition, said: 'Dogs have changed so much over the past few centuries, and this gives an insight into how they continue to change.'
Hopefully, health and well-being will be front of mind alongside appearance, helping future generations of dogs to live a happy and healthy life'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Meera Syal: When Dad mistook me for Mum, I played along not to upset him
Dad would often think I was my mother when she was younger, instead of his daughter. So I'd go along with that as it calmed and reassured him. That has to be the aim. Sometimes, five minutes later after he'd stopped being distressed, he'd find his own way back and know who I was. I came to believe that actually, there are many different kinds of reality in life. I mean, how do we know who's in the right one? Him or me? It becomes quite a Matrix kind of question! I had to open my mind a little bit to try and find the understanding and compassion – and go with whatever he was giving me. When a loved one has dementia it's a long, slow goodbye. You're losing them bit by bit. It's like a little light going off gradually, or a mechanism winding down. You become the parent, not the daughter. While that is certainly awful, there can be many moments of joy along the way, when the light is still on. For Dad, the thing that never left him until the very end, was his passion for music. He loved ghazals, Indian poetry and ballads, which we played and he would sing along. We also put old films from the 1950s and 60s from his youth on the iPad, essentially making our own memory pack for him. Photographs and anything that keeps the memories and the connections going is useful. Dad always had a great sense of humour, so we tried to make him laugh, and be upbeat. Mum visited my dad in the care home every single day and they had a routine, where they'd practise throwing and catching a ball (to keep up his motor skills) and then look at old photos together. You find your own ways of connecting, but the Alzheimer's Society is an amazing resource of information and advice, and through the Dementia Friends network, we found incredible volunteers who would even offer to give relatives a break by sitting and talking to your loved one. Dad was in the care home for six years, so it became the new normal in some ways. You learn to live with the upset, but I hated that in their golden years, when they should have been growing old together, they were separated, with Dad remaining in the home until he died in 2018. When I remember my Papa, I don't try to forget his illness; you can't, it's part of the journey we all had together. I just hope we did everything we could to make his quality of life as good as we could in those last years. You reach a stage where it's actually worse for the family than it is for the person with the disease, because they're in their own world. I took advice about genetic testing, but looking at the rest of my family history, it's highly unlikely to be genetic. There's no history of dementia on my father's side, his older brother is still alive and well, his own father died in his mid-nineties unaffected by dementia. My mother's own mum died at the grand age of 103 (in India!) and she has sisters who are still alive with all their faculties. Losing my parents has made me more health conscious. I'm alert to the increased risks in South Asians of hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular health. And actually there's now more awareness of the massive link between gum disease and Alzheimer's. My father suffered with terrible gums for many, many years. The older I get I take better care of myself, watching my cholesterol levels and cardiovascular health and I regularly exercise and look after my gums with hygienist appointments three times a year. I can't change my genetic hand down, but I can try my best with my lifestyle to try and prevent my kids going through this with me one day.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
University of Derby students 'losing' disability support
Disabled students at the University of Derby are calling for more specialist support to be available during their studies, after the university made changes to its disability support.A group called the Independent Disabled Students Network (IDSN), which was formed to challenge decisions made by the university, said there had been a "significant reduction in disability support across the university".Sonja Brown, 58, a disabled student, told the BBC: "It's stressful and frustrating that we weren't considered. I feel like I'm a second class citizen and that they couldn't speak to me and get my point of view."The university denied removing any support for students with disabilities. The IDSN group claim the university has scrapped deadline extensions, extra time in examinations and single-diagnosis support plans for Earnes, 28, a student and founder of the group said: "To date, the university has not issued a formal policy or public statement clarifying the current position on support entitlements. "Multiple students have raised complaints, and we have started to rely on Freedom of Information requests to access basic information about policies that directly affect our ability to study."Sonja, who is studying a masters degree in international tourism and hospitality, says she lost support that was previously available to her during her undergraduate studies."I was here from 2020 to 2023. I had a Disabled Students' Allowance (DSA) in place and got support and extensions. "I came back in September 2024 to find I still have my support plan but not my extensions, because they want to make it a level playing field. "Not only do I have a hidden disability, I've got a physical disability. "It just means more stress for us. If I had known about the changes at the open day, I would have considered going to another university." Rosie Henrick, 25, a disabled psychology student who is autistic, has ADHD and general anxiety disorder, says the changes are taking a toll on their said: "It has a psychical and mental negative impact. I've been getting a lot more high heart rate notifications. I'm very stressed out."I don't think I can be there next year if they don't change stuff."I get good grades but I also don't want my health to decline. It definitely is, and I've been noticing it."George Butler, 19, a disabled civil engineering student who also acts as a student representative said: "It's a lot more mental stress for disabled students. "To expect more and more of a person that you're taking more and more away from, means they'll be able to work less." The group is also challenging the university over its decision to introduce fares to the Unibus, a bus service that is free for students and staff until 31 July Cassidy, 32, a disabled health and social care student, said: "We've had some reviews with the walking routes that they've suggested for people. "It's not appealing to a disabled student because there's not very good walkways, hardly any lighting and no dropped kerbs. "It's really damaging for a disabled student. Not only do they see physical support being removed from their educational system, but they're also seeing actual barriers to getting to the university as well."A lot of disabled students have extra things they have to pay for such as care, extra food, medications or whatever else may be affecting them personally. "To have an extra charge on top, I find it really difficult for them. I've heard people say they wouldn't come in as much, and that to me doesn't seem very welcoming to disabled students."A spokesperson for the university said: "The university has not removed any support for its students with disabilities. "Historically we applied a blanket approach whereas now we are improving our support and providing a bespoke service which aims to ensure each student has what they need to thrive."The option of providing extensions to deadlines or extra time in exams, remains for those students with a disability for whom this is an appropriate support mechanism."The university also confirmed the Unibus charges were implemented following "consultation with students and will help towards environmental sustainability goals".It added: "Disabled students may be entitled to support with travel via certain government benefits and can contact our Disability Advisers who can provide advice and guidance on how to access this."
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Progress unravelled, and millions left vulnerable: how British aid cuts threaten British health too
Right now, aid reductions across the globe are jeopardising decades of progress against preventable diseases, leaving millions of people vulnerable. This retreat from global health threatens to unravel hard-won advances against diseases we have nearly conquered. Polio, which paralysed hundreds of thousands of children annually just 40 years ago, has been eliminated in most parts of the world. Meanwhile, there has been a resurgence of diseases such as measles and cholera in populations besieged by conflict and climate emergencies. Britain faces a critical choice: follow this global trend of disengagement or stand firm as a bulwark for international health security. I understand the tough trade-offs the government must make to get public spending under control, but the stakes extend beyond humanitarian concerns to our own national interests. Last year, the detection of poliovirus in UK sewers threatened our own children and delivered a reminder that diseases respect no borders. Our protection at home depends directly on our commitment to efforts abroad. Yet the government's budget spending review promises precisely the wrong direction. By slashing international aid to a 25-year low – from 0.5% of gross national income to just 0.3% – to finance increased defence spending, the government paradoxically risks undermining our own domestic health security. In real terms, this would gut our development assistance by 40% in just four years. Such draconian cuts would severely undermine all major global health initiatives. Of course, fiscal prudence is necessary, but how can we ignore the humanitarian and strategic costs of these reductions? Even beyond self-protection, a strong global health budget surely reflects our deepest values. No child should die from a disease we can prevent. Threats to global health inevitably become threats to Britain's health, and all our protection depends on maintaining our international leadership in this field. Now, as vulnerable children face renewed threats from these very diseases, polio stands as a glaring example of what is at stake. In 1988, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) was formed – a landmark public-private partnership led by national governments alongside partners including Rotary International, the World Health Organization and Unicef. This collaborative effort is crucial for tackling a major health threat such as polio. Since worldwide vaccination efforts began, an estimated 20 million children who would have been paralysed are walking today, and approximately 1.6 million deaths have been averted. This is remarkable, but fragile, progress. In 2024, the number of children paralysed rose in Pakistan and Afghanistan, the two remaining endemic countries. In grim examples of how conflict can upend everything, polio paralysed a child in Gaza for the first time in two decades last year and continues to afflict families in Sudan. Not investing in polio could translate to 200,000 new cases of the disease every year, including in countries where it has long been eradicated, and cost the world billions. Pound for pound, prevention has consistently proved to be a 'best buy' compared with endlessly responding to outbreaks. The financial case for continued investment in polio eradication is unassailable. Yet the global eradication agenda faces a critical funding gap of about £1.7bn to meet its overall £5bn target. The UK has invested £1.3bn since 1988 and is one of the effort's staunchest backers. Support is needed now more than ever. At its core, the GPEI is a partnership. To abandon our commitments now, on the threshold of ending polio for good, would undermine decades of investment, leave millions of children unprotected and ultimately cost more in the long run. We have the tools to end polio for good, along with strong public backing: last month, more than 85,000 people across the UK participated in the Rise Together movement challenge in support of efforts to end the disease. As Britain faces its most challenging fiscal scrutiny in decades, the decisions made today will define our country's economic success – as well as our reputation as stewards of a safer, healthier world for all. The budget spending review presents an opportunity to state unequivocally that the UK will maintain a long-term commitment to protecting children worldwide, including our own, from preventable diseases. The choice before us is clear. We can honour a proud tradition of global health leadership by maintaining our commitment to eradicate polio once and for all, or we can retreat at the very moment victory is within reach. Sarah Champion is the Labour MP for Rotherham
