logo
Flight from Chch to Fiji diverted after technical issue

Flight from Chch to Fiji diverted after technical issue

Photo: File / Getty Images
A Fiji Airways flight from Christchurch had to be diverted to Auckland after a technical issue on Tuesday afternoon.
Flight FJ450 was scheduled to depart Christchurch for Nadi at 1.15pm but was an hour late.
The Boeing 737 was then forced to divert to Auckland where it landed at 3.44pm.
In a statement, Fiji Airways said a replacement aircraft was dispatched last night to take the passengers to Nadi.
"The safety of our guests and crew is our highest priority," the airline said.
"We sincerely apologise for the disruption and appreciate our customers' patience and understanding.
"Our teams are in direct contact with all impacted guests and providing necessary support."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited?
Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited?

NZ Herald

time3 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited?

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited? Good business sense using consumer psychology. Photo / Getty Images Every city has its signatures. In Ho Chi Minh City it was someone pointing at my sneakers and offering to clean them. In Da Nang it was, 'Taxi, sir?' and in Hội An it's been, 'Want a boat ride?' We have resolutely fought off all efforts to part us from our money. Well, most efforts. It was our first afternoon in Hội An, a historical port city in central Vietnam, home to a Unesco world-heritage ancient town. We'd gone in search of a particular tailor, recommended to us by our hotel and breathless English tourists on TikTok. At the first street corner, I got out my phone to check directions, and 15 minutes later we were at a completely different tailor, having been expertly waylaid by one of their 'scouts', who'd seen us and asked if she could offer directions … The next day we did a lantern-making class at our hotel, led by the ever-patient tutor, Moon. Moon asked us what we had planned and made a few recommendations, including one for dinner at the Citadel restaurant at which a friend of hers worked. That evening, we followed her advice and had a frankly delightful evening marked by fantastic food, an absolutely lovely waitress, Anna, and regular check-ins from Gray, the manager (who also happens to be a Kiwi). As with every restaurant we visited, we had to force ourselves to sit back and enjoy the experience; at no point did we ever feel like we had to rush to finish, pay, and give up our table to the next customer. Not like, ahem, at home in Wellington. What do these latter examples have in common? Bloody good business sense based on friendliness and strategic use of consumer psychology. Having recently hosted friends visiting Wellington from overseas, my heart was warmed by hearing them say how friendly New Zealanders are, but it's a step change to Vietnamese hospitality. For example, first and last impressions count or, in technical terms, primacy and recency. We make impressions incredibly quickly and largely unconsciously, and research shows that, while we care deeply about how good the chef is, we have to be drawn in first to find out. That can hang entirely on the rapport we sense from our first encounter. When we left the restaurant, Anna farewelled us by our names (which she remembered several days later when we happened to pass by). That's a personal touch that leaves a positive impression. Ever started to feel tense because wait staff check in on you a little too frequently? Or neglected because they don't check in at all? That's another tricky balance, and one that requires a bit of intuition about the best time to stop by. Another thing Citadel did well, but almost every other restaurant we ate at didn't, was a sensibly curated set of options. Ever eaten at the American restaurant chain The Cheesecake Factory? The menu runs to more than 200 items and around 20 pages. It is frankly exhausting. You get to a point where you no longer care what you order, you just want to make it stop. Psychology researchers Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper are probably best associated with the notion of this 'paradox of choice'. In a particularly well-known experiment they showed that people may be more likely to head over to a counter offering 24 types of jam than a counter with only six, but people were 10 times more likely to buy jam when the number of types available was reduced from 24 to six. Why? Because what if you make the wrong choice? The more choices, the harder the decision, and the greater the likelihood of buyer's remorse. So in keeping with this research, we broke our holiday rule and went back to the Citadel and its more limited number of choices a second time.

Jane Clifton: When Bali isn't Instagrammable enough for an influencer
Jane Clifton: When Bali isn't Instagrammable enough for an influencer

NZ Herald

time5 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Jane Clifton: When Bali isn't Instagrammable enough for an influencer

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Instagram-ready: Lempuyang Luhur temple in Bali. Photo / Getty Images Is there a steeper learning curve than that scaled by the influencer Zoe Rae, who recently left Bali in high dudgeon because, 'it's not how it looked on Instagram'? She huffed off to Dubai, which apparently – and without wishing to deter anyone – does look how it does on Instagram. By all means laugh, but in influencer parlance, she stood in her truth and called Bali out as a lived experience she did not choose to include in her truth stance. It would be nice to think that in her ingenuous absurdity, she could be the priceless catalyst to re-frame the whole influencer/lifestyle brand/selfie-core firmament. Might her unwanted lived experience mark the moment that curated content looped so far round the bend that it actually recognised its own backside and got such a fright that it remembered that thing called reality? There have been indications that the movement to curate away real life's tiresomeness was getting out of hand. One website has taken it upon itself to rate the attractiveness of diners at various New York restaurants, enabling other diners to spare themselves the horror of going somewhere where merely ordinary-looking people might lurk. One can imagine Rae's surprise at seeing actual, uncurated Indonesians in Indonesia, and some aesthetically unpleasing and even unsanitary vistas. But the chance this shock might spark a general fact check beyond the Insta-lens in influencer-land seems sadly faint. Reality curation will be with us for the foreseeable future, and is increasingly impervious to fact checking by the legacy media, according to CNN's senior correspondent Donie O'Sullivan. He has been covering QAnon, deep-fake news, online conspiracy theories and the general run of alternative 'my truth' media in the United States for several years. He warns that influencers and online media communicators have overtaken the mainstream/ legacy media – print and broadcast – in their sphere of influence. From Piers Morgan – usually fact adjacent if bumptiously opinionated – to Joe Rogan, a major vector for fact Teflonism, alternative news outlets draw mass audiences, and their fans do not trust the old media when it tells them they're getting important facts wrong. Speaking in Dublin recently, Kerry-born O'Sullivan said he fared better in the US than many another mainstream reporters because his Irish accent ('and me being short and fat') meant he didn't seem like a typical TV reporter, and could often break the ice with a natter about which Irish county his interviewees' forebears came from. Many of those attending Donald Trump rallies generally distrust and even despise the likes of CNN, O'Sullivan says. The important thing now, he says, is to give people with fact-resistant views a hearing and show them some empathy – hard as it is when they say, for instance, that Covid never existed. Though unhappy when TV and print began giving movements such as QAnon coverage, he now believes the anxiety over platforming was a mistake, as it served only to pump up the alternative news sources now overwhelming the information market. O'Sullivan says he's now convinced that giving alternative views a hearing is necessary, and that while CNN and others still have a responsibility to furnish the facts as well, it's vital they resist any whiff of being crusaders in the process. He also suspects audiences now increasingly appreciate longer-form interviews – Rogan's run to three hours – which legacy media conspicuously shies from, fearing low attention spans. If deep-state conspiracy thinking and Trumpian mercantilism are lifting mass-audiences' consumption of long-run information programmes, that could at least be a spinoff benefit. But the truthier end of the media is increasingly curated by the off button. O'Sullivan has himself been curated away, being among those journalists temporarily barred from X by owner Elon Musk. Nevertheless, like Bali, he does exist.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store