logo
How China Has Been Blocking India's UNSC Actions Since The 2000s

How China Has Been Blocking India's UNSC Actions Since The 2000s

NDTV2 days ago

In the India-Pakistan strategic dynamic, China has emerged as an inextricable third actor, turning a bilateral rivalry into a triangular matter. While military escalation in the subcontinent does not align with Beijing's strategic interests, its pro-Pakistan leanings often manifest on international platforms. Most recently, China blocked the designation of The Resistance Front (TRF), an alleged offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), following the 2025 Pahalgam attack. This move reflects a longstanding pattern: China has consistently complicated New Delhi's diplomatic efforts to isolate Pakistan-based groups in global forums.
As India seeks broader consensus on counterterrorism designations, particularly at the UN Security Council (UNSC), China has frequently intervened by blocking or delaying the listing of individuals affiliated with anti-India groups such as LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). A 'technical hold' in the UNSC sanctions process allows a member state to indefinitely delay designation without a formal veto. For decades, China has exploited this to delay, if not deny, sanctions on Pakistan-linked terror architecture without triggering a diplomatic confrontation.
The symbolic framing of China-Pakistan relations, famously described by former Pakistani Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani as 'higher than mountains, deeper than oceans, stronger than steel, and sweeter than honey", for now has translated into sustained strategic cover for Pakistan on the international stage. Chinese media's description of terrorism in India, such as the Pahalgam attack, as a case of 'shooting' by local gunmen against civilians, further supports the Pakistani narrative of the conflict.
'Technical Holds'
China's pattern of using 'technical holds' in the UNSC 1267 Sanctions Committee can be traced to the early 2000s. After the 2001 Indian Parliament attack, India began pushing for international sanctions against Pakistan-based outfits. While China supported the designation of groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, it remained reluctant to target individuals associated with these anti-India groups, most notably JeM chief Masood Azhar, who was finally listed in 2019. India's first formal request to enlist Azhar came in 2009, following the Mumbai attacks and was followed up in 2016, 2017, and 2019. While international pressure eventually influenced this reversal after two decades, the exclusion of any reference to the Pulwama attack in the final listing allowed China to maintain that Azhar's designation was based on his long-standing links to terrorism rather than a specific attack on India.
Over time, the Pathankot attack of 2016 and the Pulwama suicide bombing in 2019 resulted in intensified Indian diplomatic efforts targeting Pakistan-based terrorist leaders and groups. All efforts were impeded by China's technical holds, despite co-sponsorship by France, the UK, and the US. At large, this trend continues. In 2023, Beijing blocked a joint India-US proposal to list Abdul Rauf Asghar and other anti-India terrorists.
Double Standards
This stands in contradiction to China's own counterterrorism posture against separatist and Islamist groups that threaten Chinese nationals and investments in Pakistan, including in major cities like Karachi. In 2021, a suicide bomber affiliated with the Baloch Liberation Army's (BLA) Majeed Brigade attacked a convoy carrying Chinese engineers and workers, killing three Chinese nationals near the Jinnah International Airport and the Chinese consulate area in Karachi. China has also raised similar concerns with the Taliban administration in Afghanistan regarding the alleged presence of Uyghur militant groups, such as the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM). This antithetical approach serves dual purposes - mitigating pressure on Pakistan's influential military establishment while keeping India preoccupied with cross-border security challenges.
The SCO Factor
China's selective counter-terror posture also plays out in other multilateral groupings like the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which remains a key arena for its regional influence. With India and Pakistan inducted as full members in 2017, China portrayed the bloc as a pan-Asia alternative to Western-led groupings. But India's strong stance against cross-border terrorism and leanings towards the QUAD bloc have complicated that narrative.
India's limited participation in the SCO, especially since 2019, is increasingly shaped by the grouping's silence on cross-border terrorism allegations against Pakistan. India's decision to downgrade its summit participation to a virtual format in 2023 further challenges China's efforts to position the SCO as a counterweight to US influence in the region. For China, India's continued engagement in the SCO remains crucial for maintaining the bloc's diplomatic credibility. India could continue framing Chinese obstructionism as a significant concern for global counterterrorism efforts with the aim of raising the reputational and diplomatic costs of China's inaction, without relying solely on the UNSC system.
India's widening engagement with QUAD, involving Australia, Japan, India, and the US, through military exercises and joint dialogues, will also keep China on edge by signalling a strengthened Indo-Pacific alliance countering the Chinese regional influence.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Has Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir been invited for Trump's military parade? Why?
Has Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir been invited for Trump's military parade? Why?

First Post

time30 minutes ago

  • First Post

Has Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir been invited for Trump's military parade? Why?

Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir is reportedly arriving in the US on Thursday. During his visit, he will attend the US Army's celebrations to mark its 250th anniversary on Saturday (June 14) in Washington, DC. The trip comes amid recent escalation of tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad and American President Donald Trump's claim that he brokered a ceasefire between the rival neighbours read more Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir (C) prays after laying wreath on the martyrs' monument during a guard of honor ceremony at General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi on May 21, 2025. Photo by Handout/ Pakistan's Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR)/AFP Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir is reportedly set to visit the United States this week. He will be attending the US Army's celebrations to mark its 250th anniversary on Saturday (June 14) in Washington, DC. The US Army will organise a parade on the streets of the American capital on the date coinciding with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. The presence of Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Munir at the celebrations will come over a month after strikes and counterstrikes between India and Pakistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But what's behind his visit? Let's take a closer look. Pakistan's Asim Munir to visit US Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir, who was recently promoted to field marshal, will join other military leaders in Washington, DC, for the US Army's celebrations on Saturday, top intelligence sources have told CNN-News18. He is likely to arrive in the US on Thursday (June 12), the report said, citing sources at the Pakistani Embassy in Washington, DC. Munir's first visit to the US as Pakistan's army chief was in 2023 when he met the then American Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun and UN Secretary-General António Guterres. Reacting to the visit at the time, New Delhi had said: 'Our concerns for Pakistan's support to terrorism, its support to cross-border attacks is well-known. We would hope that other countries would also take counter-terrorism seriously.' In April, a US delegation had met Munir in Rawalpindi and discussed regional security and cooperation in the defence sector, according to a statement by Pakistan's Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR). Why is the Pakistan army chief going to US? Asim Munir's trip to the US has garnered attention amid Pakistan's tensions with India. However, his visit might not have an India angle but concern Islamabad's all-weather ally, China. As per the CNN-News18 report, Washington has doubts about Pakistan's neutrality due to its closeness to China through schemes like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). In view of the present geopolitical environment, the US may not view Pakistan as a 'credible or neutral mediator', sources said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD America is opposed to China's expanding influence in the world, especially in Asia. The Trump administration is also expected to nudge Pakistan to act against terrorist groups targeting Afghanistan and India during Munir's visit, as per the report. On its part, Islamabad could urge the US for assurances against the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which it accuses of using Afghan soil to launch attacks on Pakistan — a charge rejected by Kabul. Pakistan, which is rich in lithium, copper, gold, and rare earth minerals, is eager for investment from foreign powers. This comes as it is wary of a potential debt trap linked to Beijing's BRI. At $15 billion, China is already Pakistan's biggest bilateral lender. Munir's trip is also aimed at improving the strained security relationship between the US and Pakistan. The Pakistan army chief could also push for Washington's mediation on Kashmir, a move India is unlikely to approve of. A man sits beside a poster featuring Pakistani Army Chief General Syed Asim Munir, along a road in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, on May 14, 2025. File Photo/AFP After claiming that he brokered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan last month, Trump offered to mediate to resolve the Kashmir issue. New Delhi dismissed the US president's remarks, with the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) reaffirming India's position that all issues related to the Union Territory must be settled bilaterally between the two neighbours. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We have a long-standing national position that any issues pertaining to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir have to be addressed by India and Pakistan bilaterally. That stated policy has not changed. As you are aware, the outstanding matter is the vacation of illegally occupied Indian territory by Pakistan,' MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said during a briefing. Protests during Munir's US visit? Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party has threatened to protest in the US during Munir's visit. PTI's Secretary for Overseas Affairs, Sajjad Burki, called for a protest outside the Pakistan embassy in Washington on Saturday. 'Let the White House know that any deal with this government is not acceptable to the people of Pakistan,' Burki wrote on X. According to Pakistani daily Dawn, the US and Pakistani officials have not been tight-lipped about Munir's trip, likely due to security concerns and diplomatic caution, given the protest calls. India-Pakistan tensions While Munir's visit has more to do with the US-China rivalry, it comes against the backdrop of the recent conflict between India and Pakistan. Tensions between the two rival neighbours peaked after Indian strikes on nine terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) under Operation Sindoor post the Pahalgam terror attack. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After four days of conflict, the two countries agreed to a ceasefire , for which Trump took credit. In fact, the US president declared the ceasefire half an hour before Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri's announcement. India has since reiterated its anti-terrorism stance and held Pakistan responsible for the April 22 Pahalgam attack. During his recent Europe visit, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar told Politico: 'We are not going to live with it. So our message to them is that if you continue to do the kind of barbaric acts which they did in April, then there is going to be retribution, and that retribution will be against the terrorist organisations and the terrorist leadership.' 'We don't care where they are. If they are deep in Pakistan, we will go deep into Pakistan,' he added. Jaishankar also alleged that Pakistan is continuing to train and unleash 'thousands' of terrorists against India. 'It (Pakistan) is a country very steeped in its use of terrorism as an instrument of state policy. That is the whole issue,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies

Spy Case: Jyoti Malhotra To Remain In Jail As Court Rejects Her Bail Plea
Spy Case: Jyoti Malhotra To Remain In Jail As Court Rejects Her Bail Plea

News18

time31 minutes ago

  • News18

Spy Case: Jyoti Malhotra To Remain In Jail As Court Rejects Her Bail Plea

Last Updated: Malhotra, who ran "Travel with JO" on YouTube, is accused of being an asset for Pakistani intelligence. A Haryana court on Wednesday denied bail to social media influencer Jyoti Malhotra, who was arrested on suspicion of espionage last month. Hisar Police arrested Malhotra on suspicion of espionage on May 16 and she was subsequently remanded to five days of police custody by the court. Following the completion of the remand, the court extended the custody by four more days after the police sought to question her further. On May 26, the court remanded her to judicial custody for 14 days. Why Was Jyoti Malhotra Arrested? Malhotra was arrested at the New Aggarsain Extension and booked under provisions of the Official Secrets Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The police have claimed Pakistani intelligence operatives were developing Malhotra as an asset. Police sources had previously said she was in touch with Ehsan-ur-Rahim alias Danish, a staffer at the Pakistani High Commission, since November 2023. India expelled Danish on May 13 for allegedly indulging in espionage. Who Is Jyoti Malhotra? Malhotra, who hails from Hisar, ran a YouTube channel 'Travel with JO". The 33-year-old influencer has 377k subscribers on YouTube and 132k followers on Instagram. The video is mostly of her roaming the streets and describing her experience as an Indian walking the streets of Lahore. But, it also shows that she is surrounded by gunmen armed with AK-47s, and she was followed by the security cover wherever she visited. At one point, officials even blocked traffic movement for her convenience. First Published: June 11, 2025, 16:32 IST

Why Mamata invoked PoK as Modi govt's ‘missed opportunity'
Why Mamata invoked PoK as Modi govt's ‘missed opportunity'

India Today

time32 minutes ago

  • India Today

Why Mamata invoked PoK as Modi govt's ‘missed opportunity'

West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, on June 10, questioned the Narendra Modi government's handling of national security following the terror strike in Kashmir's Pahalgam and suggested that India had missed a rare strategic opportunity to take control of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) during the subsequent military offensive.'There was a need to teach them a lesson; and we salute the bravery of our armed forces. India had an opportunity to take control of PoK,' Mamata said in the legislative mincing words in holding the Centre accountable for the April 22 Pahalgam attack, she said: 'The Pahalgam attack is the result of the Centre's callousness. Why were no security forces or police personnel present at the site?' She also took a swipe at the prime minister, remarking that 'PM Modi is only busy advertising himself', and accused the BJP of 'trying to politicise the valour of the armed forces'.Mamata unequivocally praised the armed forces for their precision strikes inside Pakistan. Her government moved a resolution in the legislative assembly condemning the Pahalgam massacre and hailing India's military response. Though the resolution conspicuously omitted the term 'Operation Sindoor', it recorded the assembly's 'gratitude and appreciation for the coordinated efforts of the Indian armed forces in destroying major terrorist infrastructures in Pakistan and PoK'.advertisement 'This House strongly condemns this brutal attack [in Pahalgam] and at the same time salutes the discipline, dedication and courage shown by different wings of the Indian armed forces in combatting terrorist activities and safeguarding the sovereignty of the nation,' the resolution stated, also acknowledging the 'extraordinary display of unity, compassion and resilience' by the people of Jammu and Kashmir in the aftermath of the tragedy. Mamata also questioned why the perpetrators of the Pahalgam attack hadn't been apprehended comments, especially her assertion about PoK and criticism of the Centre's diplomatic failure, gained attention. 'Not sure if our international diplomacy is having issues. Pakistan received loans from the IMF (International Monetary Fund) instead of being cornered globally,' she said, expressing doubt over India's ability to isolate Pakistan on the world the resolution was passed unanimously, it drew sharp criticism from the BJP. Party leader Agnimitra Paul questioned the omission of the term 'Operation Sindoor' in the official resolution. 'What kind of appreciation is this when the name Operation Sindoor hasn't even been mentioned in the resolution?' she asked, implying political double accused Mamata and the Trinamool Congress of posturing for international audiences. 'On the one hand, she is sending Abhishek Banerjee in the all-party delegation. He, while abroad, is painting a good picture that the Trinamool Congress is with the central government and our prime minister. However, the moment he comes back to India, he begins to demean and abuse our PM. Under whose leadership was all of this achieved?' she BJP's counterattack extended to Leader of the Opposition in the assembly Suvendu Adhikari, who accused the Trinamool Congress of failing to maintain consistency in its stance. While Adhikari's remarks were not included in the assembly proceedings, his party's criticism made clear that the political fallout of the Pahalgam attack and its military aftermath was far from Trinamool MLAs moved a breach of privilege motion against Adhikari for allegedly making defamatory remarks outside the assembly and claiming that Mamata Banerjee had 'praised Pakistan' more eloquently than Pakistan prime minister Shehbaz Sharif. Ministers, including Chandrima Bhattacharya and Sovandeb Chattopadhyay, signed the motion, with Firhad Hakim expected to join in. Assembly speaker Biman Banerjee confirmed receipt and may refer it to the privilege committee. Earlier, Adhikari had been suspended in February for unparliamentary the debate continues over how the government had handled the April 22 terror strike and Pakistan thereafter, Mamata's speech in the legislative assembly has shifted attention to strategic questions about India's foreign policy, domestic security gaps, and the Centre's 'missed opportunities' in leveraging military momentum for long-term geopolitical to India Today Magazine

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store