
How China Has Been Blocking India's UNSC Actions Since The 2000s
In the India-Pakistan strategic dynamic, China has emerged as an inextricable third actor, turning a bilateral rivalry into a triangular matter. While military escalation in the subcontinent does not align with Beijing's strategic interests, its pro-Pakistan leanings often manifest on international platforms. Most recently, China blocked the designation of The Resistance Front (TRF), an alleged offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), following the 2025 Pahalgam attack. This move reflects a longstanding pattern: China has consistently complicated New Delhi's diplomatic efforts to isolate Pakistan-based groups in global forums.
As India seeks broader consensus on counterterrorism designations, particularly at the UN Security Council (UNSC), China has frequently intervened by blocking or delaying the listing of individuals affiliated with anti-India groups such as LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). A 'technical hold' in the UNSC sanctions process allows a member state to indefinitely delay designation without a formal veto. For decades, China has exploited this to delay, if not deny, sanctions on Pakistan-linked terror architecture without triggering a diplomatic confrontation.
The symbolic framing of China-Pakistan relations, famously described by former Pakistani Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani as 'higher than mountains, deeper than oceans, stronger than steel, and sweeter than honey", for now has translated into sustained strategic cover for Pakistan on the international stage. Chinese media's description of terrorism in India, such as the Pahalgam attack, as a case of 'shooting' by local gunmen against civilians, further supports the Pakistani narrative of the conflict.
'Technical Holds'
China's pattern of using 'technical holds' in the UNSC 1267 Sanctions Committee can be traced to the early 2000s. After the 2001 Indian Parliament attack, India began pushing for international sanctions against Pakistan-based outfits. While China supported the designation of groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, it remained reluctant to target individuals associated with these anti-India groups, most notably JeM chief Masood Azhar, who was finally listed in 2019. India's first formal request to enlist Azhar came in 2009, following the Mumbai attacks and was followed up in 2016, 2017, and 2019. While international pressure eventually influenced this reversal after two decades, the exclusion of any reference to the Pulwama attack in the final listing allowed China to maintain that Azhar's designation was based on his long-standing links to terrorism rather than a specific attack on India.
Over time, the Pathankot attack of 2016 and the Pulwama suicide bombing in 2019 resulted in intensified Indian diplomatic efforts targeting Pakistan-based terrorist leaders and groups. All efforts were impeded by China's technical holds, despite co-sponsorship by France, the UK, and the US. At large, this trend continues. In 2023, Beijing blocked a joint India-US proposal to list Abdul Rauf Asghar and other anti-India terrorists.
Double Standards
This stands in contradiction to China's own counterterrorism posture against separatist and Islamist groups that threaten Chinese nationals and investments in Pakistan, including in major cities like Karachi. In 2021, a suicide bomber affiliated with the Baloch Liberation Army's (BLA) Majeed Brigade attacked a convoy carrying Chinese engineers and workers, killing three Chinese nationals near the Jinnah International Airport and the Chinese consulate area in Karachi. China has also raised similar concerns with the Taliban administration in Afghanistan regarding the alleged presence of Uyghur militant groups, such as the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM). This antithetical approach serves dual purposes - mitigating pressure on Pakistan's influential military establishment while keeping India preoccupied with cross-border security challenges.
The SCO Factor
China's selective counter-terror posture also plays out in other multilateral groupings like the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which remains a key arena for its regional influence. With India and Pakistan inducted as full members in 2017, China portrayed the bloc as a pan-Asia alternative to Western-led groupings. But India's strong stance against cross-border terrorism and leanings towards the QUAD bloc have complicated that narrative.
India's limited participation in the SCO, especially since 2019, is increasingly shaped by the grouping's silence on cross-border terrorism allegations against Pakistan. India's decision to downgrade its summit participation to a virtual format in 2023 further challenges China's efforts to position the SCO as a counterweight to US influence in the region. For China, India's continued engagement in the SCO remains crucial for maintaining the bloc's diplomatic credibility. India could continue framing Chinese obstructionism as a significant concern for global counterterrorism efforts with the aim of raising the reputational and diplomatic costs of China's inaction, without relying solely on the UNSC system.
India's widening engagement with QUAD, involving Australia, Japan, India, and the US, through military exercises and joint dialogues, will also keep China on edge by signalling a strengthened Indo-Pacific alliance countering the Chinese regional influence.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
19 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India would strike deep into Pak if provoked by terror attacks: Jaishankar
India would strike deep into Pakistan if provoked by terrorist attacks, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has warned, asserting that there will be retribution against the terrorist outfits and their leaders in case of barbaric acts like the Pahalgam attack. Jaishankar, who is travelling to Europe a month after India launched Operation Sindoor in response to the Pahalgam terror attack, also said that Pakistan was training "thousands" of terrorists "in the open" and "unleashing" them on India. "We are not going to live with it. So our message to them is that if you continue to do the kind of barbaric acts which they did in April, then there is going to be retribution, and that retribution will be against the terrorist organisations and the terrorist leadership," he told Politico on Monday. "We don't care where they are. If they are deep in Pakistan, we will go deep into Pakistan," he added. Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22 which claimed 26 lives. India carried out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. The on-ground hostilities from the Indian and Pakistan sides that lasted for four days ended with an understanding of stopping the military actions following talks between the directors general of military operations of both sides on May 10. Jaishankar warned that the root causes of the conflict remain unchanged. "It (Pakistan) is a country very steeped in its use of terrorism as an instrument of state policy. That is the whole issue," he was quoted as saying by the Politico. When asked if the conditions that led to the outbreak of war last month were still in place, he said: "If you call the commitment to terrorism a source of tension, absolutely, it is." When asked about losses, Jaishankar said the relevant authorities would communicate on the matter when they were ready. He said that India's fighter aircraft and missiles had inflicted far more extensive damage on the Pakistani Air Force than vice versa, forcing Pakistan to sue for peace. "As far I'm concerned, how effective the Rafale was or frankly, how effective other systems were to me the proof of the pudding are the destroyed and disabled airfields on the Pakistani side," he said. "The fighting stopped on the 10th for one reason and one reason only, which was that on the 10th morning, we hit these eight Pakistani, the main eight Pakistani airfields and disabled them," he said, adding that images are available in Google showing runways and those hangars which have taken the hit. During his week-long visit to Europe, Jaishankar will also hold talks with leaders of the European Union, Belgium and France to boost bilateral ties and reaffirm India's policy of zero-tolerance against terrorism.


Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
A forgotten cricketing bond between India and Pakistan
Considering the current dire relations between India and Pakistan, it's hard to believe that not too long back — 1996 to be precise — a combined India-Pakistan cricket XI faced Sri Lanka in Colombo in a show of Asian sporting and diplomatic solidarity. And even more surprisingly, 70 years before that, a combined Hindu-Muslim team took on the mighty MCC (Marylebone Cricket Club) in Bombay (now Mumbai) during a historical tour of India. The possibility now of a bilateral cricket series in the near or distant future in any of the three formats is well-nigh impossible. But it was not always like that. The first major step back was after the terror attack on Mumbai in November 2008, which resulted in 178 fatalities. Just months earlier, in the inaugural season of the IPL (Indian Premier League), a number of Pakistani cricketers had been warmly received by their franchise fans across the length and breadth of India. The horrors of 26/11, however, meant that they would never again be seen in the world's most popular T20 franchise league. The last time India and Pakistan met in a Test match was at Bengaluru in December 2007. But it was the combined administrative and financial clout of the Indian and Pakistani cricket boards in 1987 — now at loggerheads — and 1996 (plus Sri Lanka that year) that pulled the rug from under the feet of the 'Big Two' of world cricket: England and Australia. After hosting the first three World Cups in England (1975, 1979, 1983), the power centre had moved to the sub-continent, and subsequently, exclusively to India. That the Indian and Pakistan cricket boards joined hands to host the 1987 (Reliance) World Cup and the 1996 (Wills) World Cup, with Sri Lanka as well, was a triumph of cricket diplomacy. There was another twist in 1996. On the eve of the World Cup, Sri Lankan capital Colombo, which was to host many matches, was hit by a massive bomb blast, which killed over 80 people. This spooked the Australian and West Indian teams, who boycotted their matches in Colombo and forfeited their points. As a counter and to show that the Sri Lankan capital was safe, the PILCOM (Pak-Indo-Lanka Joint Management Committee) organised a match in Colombo against the hosts. But the team was no ordinary one. It was a joint India-Pakistan team (named Wills XI after the sponsors) captained by India's Mohammad Azharuddin and including Sachin Tendulkar and Wasim Akram. It contained six Pakistanis and five Indians, with Anil Kumble winning the Man of the Match award for his match-winning spell of 4 for 12. The team was met with great enthusiasm not only by Sri Lankan fans who warmly appreciated the gesture of South Asian solidarity, but also by the cricket fraternities of both India and Pakistan. But there was a similar match 70 years earlier in pre-Partition India, staged at the Bombay Gymkhana, between the MCC, which toured India in the 1926-27 season, and 'Hindus and Muslims', which ended in a draw in December 1926. While motley English teams had been touring India since 1889-90, this was the first which had an official stamp, MCC being the custodians of the game in England and a huge voice in world cricket too. Captained by Arthur Gilligan, the idea behind the tour was to gauge India's eligibility for Test status, which was duly granted in 1929 (India played its first Test match at Lord's in 1932). The joint team had seven Hindus and four Muslims, and was captained by Palwankar Vithal, the brother of the celebrated left-arm spinner Palwankar Baloo, who had been the lone bright spot with 100 wickets on the disastrous 1911 All-India tour of England. The failure of that 1911 team set back by many years India's chances of gaining official Test status, but Baloo's inclusion was remarkable in that he was a Dalit and one of the early heroes of Babasaheb Ambedkar. His younger brother Vithal (one of four cricket-playing siblings) captaining the joint team against the MCC was another sign that Indian cricket was able to rise above caste and religious considerations. There had been two earlier matches played by the combined Hindus and Muslims team, in 1917 and 1922, both at the Bombay Gymkhana and both against a joint Europeans and Parsis team, the latter being the first community to take to cricket in India. But neither was as high-profile as the 1926 match. Long before the IPL captured the imagination of Indian cricket fans, it was the cricket tournament held in Bombay between 1892-93 to 1945-46 that had a huge following. What was unusual about this tournament, which grew from a match-up between the Europeans and the Parsis to the Pentangular with five teams competing, was that it was fought between the various religious communities of India — Hindus, Muslims, Parsis, Europeans and the Rest (consisting of Indian Christians, Buddhists, Sikhs and the occasional Jew). Such tournaments on religious grounds were also held in Sind and Lahore, pre-Partition. But it was the 'Bombay Tournament' which had the biggest names and drew huge crowds first at the Bombay Gymkhana and then at the Brabourne Stadium from the late 1930s. It was this high-profile tournament that attracted the attention and ire of Mahatma Gandhi, who led a campaign for its abolishment as he felt a sporting event held on communal grounds sent the wrong signals to the British Raj when he had launched his Quit India movement. Though his campaign was ultimately successful, players from both sides and spectators too always attested to the fact that there was never any ill-feeling between the players and the fans on opposing sides. If anything, it brought the communities closer together. Such a sporting event has never been staged before or after. The writer's latest book, What If…? Indian Cricket's Counter-Factual History was released last month


Hans India
24 minutes ago
- Hans India
In Belgium, EAM Jaishankar exposes nefarious designs of rogue state Pakistan
Brussels: External Affairs Minister (EAM) S. Jaishankar apprised the Indian community in Belgium and Luxembourg about the efforts being made by the government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in countering cross-border terrorism and ensuring the progress and prosperity of the country. In a lively interaction with the Indian diaspora residing in the European nations, the EAM also discussed with them the steady progress of India-Belgium ties and engagement with the European Union. "Terrorism is not a particular country's problem. This is a challenge for everyone. But what distinguishes this challenge from India is that often in various countries, a group or set of forces does it. It is very rare to have a country that openly uses it as a state policy. Terrorism happens in Europe, but no neighbouring European countries do terrorism as a declared state policy,' he said during the interactions, exposing the Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism. He stressed that the menace of terrorism has affected India more than any other country in contemporary times, adding that India is more determined to fight against terrorism. Reflecting on the message of Operation Sindoor, EAM said, "Focus of Operation Sindoor was to hit Muridke and Bahawalpur, the two most prominent and openly declared notorious centres of terrorism in Pakistan. For decades, from these two places, terror attacks were launched against India. But this time India was determined to send the message that India will find the terrorists and eliminate them wherever they are". Additionally, during the address, EAM also asserted the significance of the enhancement of ties between India and Europe. "To give you a context of what I am doing, I think all of you living in Belgium, living in almost the center of Europe, will understand today that lots of things are happening in the world, particularly in respect to Europe itself, and there is much sharper interest in Europe to build stronger ties with India," Jaishankar said "We always had a good political understanding as it was one of the earliest countries to establish diplomatic relations with India. Politically, things have always been smooth for us; but our effort now is not just to be satisfied with what we have, but to intensify our cooperation with different countries--particularly, I would say, the economic cooperation, the people-to-people linkages, and also the well-being of the community," he added. He highlighted that much like India, Europe is also moving towards the Indian concept of 'Atmanirbhar Bharat', trying to address their problems on its own. "I think a part of it is the direction in which the world is going. There is an increase in the sense that, look, all countries in a way used to speak about Aatmanirbhar Bharat. I think there is also Aatmanirbhar Europe now in the making--Europe, which realises that there are many problems of Europe that have to be addressed by Europe itself," he added. "That they have to stand more on their own feet and therefore they need stronger relationships with other countries, and I think that is very much the kind of thinking which is there in the process," he stated. Furthermore, EAM Jaishankar lauded the Indian community for their contribution in various parts of the world. "I take the opportunity to underline that in the last decade, under the leadership of PM Narendra Modi, the Government of India has put special value on the Indian diaspora. We see you as a key to our interaction with the world," he stated The External Affairs Minister is on an official visit to France, EU and Belgium from June 8 to 14 to further deepen India's friendly relations and give renewed momentum to ongoing cooperation in diverse areas. India-Belgium collaboration currently spans various domains like trade and investment, green energy, technology, pharmaceutical, diamond sector, and strong people-to-people ties. During his visit to Belgium, the EAM also met his Belgian counterpart, besides interacting with the members of the Indian community.