Republican Tariffs On Imported Auto Parts May Be Even Worse For Your Wallet Than Tariffs On Cars
President Trump announced 25 percent tariffs on all imported cars Wednesday night, presumably — at least in part — to distract from his cabinet's ongoing national security scandal. That's bad news for anyone who needs to buy a new car, but in addition to repeating the absolutely ridiculous claim that these tariffs "[address] a critical threat to U.S. national security," the White House confirmed the tariffs will also apply to imported auto parts. It's still entirely possible Trump will blink, and the tariffs won't go into effect, but assuming they do, that's going to be bad news for your wallet. Possibly even worse than the tariffs on imported cars.
If the tariffs were just on new cars, that would, of course, make those cars a lot more expensive. From there, it's just basic economics. Demand for cars built in the U.S. goes up, dealers start charging more for those cars, and now everyone's paying more for new cars regardless of where they were built. That, in turn, pushes more people to look at used cars, driving up the cost of those vehicles, and since it's so hard to opt out of car ownership in the U.S., we all end up paying more whether we buy new, used, imported or domestic. Still, you can't pay more for something you don't buy, so theoretically, you could avoid the entire boondoggle by sticking with your current car and fixing whatever breaks between now and whenever Trump leaves office. Not so much anymore.
Read more: Hertz Is Selling Its Fleet Of Rental Tesla Model 3s For Cheap
The Trump administration claims it's still working out the details, so it's going to be difficult to get hard numbers, but the White House has said the tariffs will apply to "key automobile parts," including "engines, transmissions, powertrain parts, and electrical components." They also plan to include "processes to expand tariffs on additional parts if necessary." It also isn't clear what "if necessary" means, especially since the White House claims the tariffs "[address] a critical threat to U.S. national security."
Previously, the White House blamed fentanyl trafficking, even though almost none of the fentanyl brought into the U.S. comes from Canada. In fact, a DNI threat assessment that was released just this month doesn't even mention Canada at all, much less in relation to fentanyl. Now they claim it's because the domestic auto industry is vital to national security, so "excessive imports" are therefore a national security threat. Trump, of course, negotiated the USMCA during his first term and would therefore be responsible for creating that national security threat, but I've given up on logic with these people.
The White House also made sure to highlight our country's "trade deficit in automobile parts" and said USMCA-compliant parts will be tariffed, as well, just as soon as the Secretary of Commerce figures out how to do that. So it's pretty clear that while imported vehicles are the main focus, Republicans intend to drive up the cost of parts, too. That means every repair you have to do to keep your car on the road will take more money out of your pocket.
If, by some miracle, your car doesn't need any repairs before Trump leaves office, the Republican tariffs will probably still cost you more in the form of pricier insurance. After all, when cars cost more and repairs get more expensive, insurance rates go up. Back in February, NBC News reported that according to one analysis, a conservative estimate of how much tariffs would raise insurance rates by the end of the year was eight percent, bringing the annual average cost to insure a vehicle to $2,502.
"When people think about tariffs, they typically think about goods they might get from somewhere else," the author of the Insurify analysis, Matt Brannon, told NBC News. "Many times, we don't think about services like car insurance."
That analysis also appears to have just looked at how tariffs on Canada and Mexico would impact insurance rates. The tariffs Trump announced last night apply to all countries, which means there's a good chance insurance rates will climb even higher. Exactly how high is unclear, but with about 60 percent of replacement parts reportedly coming from Canada, China and Mexico every year, don't be surprised if your insurance premium climbs by double digits.
Just like we're seeing from Trump voters negatively impacted by Republicans indiscriminately firing hundreds of thousands of federal workers, don't be surprised when Trump voters insist they didn't vote for everything to get more expensive. Unfortunately for those voters, they absolutely did vote for this. As outlined by PBS before the election, Trump made it clear throughout his campaign that, if elected, big tariffs were coming. In September, he claimed, "Tariffs are the greatest thing ever invented." He also referred to himself as "Tariff Man" on the campaign trail.
Even if some of his more extreme ideas, such as placing a 60-percent tariff on Chinese imports, hitting Mexican imports with a 100-percent tariff, 200-percent tariffs on John Deere and using tariffs to get rid of the income tax, never happen, it was clear from the beginning that a Trump win last November meant increased tariffs once he took office. And while it's possible for companies to move production to the U.S. to avoid the tariffs, that takes time, even in the best of circumstances. You can't build a billion-dollar plant overnight, and the auto industry runs on a complex international supply chain that regularly sees parts travel across multiple borders before they end up in completed vehicles. Higher prices were guaranteed.
Trump's advisors are also pro-tariff, and even if they weren't, tariffs have been one of the few things Trump has consistently supported for decades. Forget the tariffs he implemented during his first term, including steel tariffs that CBS News reports Ford's then-CEO Jim Hackett said "took about a billion dollars of profit from [Ford]." As the New York Times reported in 2019, Trump has advocated in favor of tariffs since at least the late 1980s. Trump instituting more aggressive tariffs using legally sketchy at best emergency declarations in his second term was as predictable as finding out he cheated on Melania. So whether they're willing to admit it or not, everyone who voted for Trump in November absolutely voted for this.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Venezuelans in Florida react to Trump's new travel ban
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks, with one of the countries being Venezuela. Venezuelans in Florida reacted to the ban, with one worrying about their visa.

20 minutes ago
Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials
KALAMAZOO, Mich. -- Michigan Republicans are suing the battleground state's top elections executive over access to election training materials. The lawsuit filed Thursday is the latest escalation in a brewing dispute that began when the GOP took majority control of the state's House of Representatives last year. Since winning control of the chamber in the 2024 election, statehouse Republicans have repeatedly scrutinized the state's election processes and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2026. The conflict comes as some state Republicans echo past false claims of election fraud in Michigan, which was a prime target of President Donald Trump and his backers after his 2020 election loss. Republicans on the chamber's Oversight Committee subpoenaed Benson in April, seeking access to training materials for local clerks and staff who administer elections, including access to the Bureau of Elections' online learning portal. Benson's office released some requested materials in response to the subpoena, but not all, citing cybersecurity and physical security concerns related to administering elections and the voting process. The office has said it needs to review the online portal for 'sensitive information" and make redactions. 'Since the beginning of this saga, Secretary Benson has asked lawmakers to let a court review their request for sensitive election information that, in the wrong hands, would compromise the security of our election machines, ballots and officials,' Michigan Department of State spokesperson Cheri Hardmon said in a statement Thursday. House Republicans say the goal of reviewing the material is to ensure clerks are trained in accordance with Michigan law. The House voted along party lines in May to hold Benson in contempt for not completely complying with the subpoena. The request for training materials originally came from GOP state Rep. Rachelle Smit, who has pushed false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Smit is the chair of the House elections committee, which was renamed to the Elections Integrity Committee with the new Republican majority. 'Secretary Benson has proven she is unwilling to comply with our subpoena and Michigan law,' Rep. Smit said in a statement Thursday. 'She's skirted the rules and done whatever she could to avoid public scrutiny. It's become overwhelmingly clear that she will never release the training materials we're looking for without direction from a court." The lawsuit asks the Michigan Court of Claims to intervene and compel Benson to comply with the subpoena. 'The public interest is best served if the constitutional order of the State of Michigan is preserved and the Legislature can properly perform its duty to regulate the manner of elections in the state and, if deemed necessary, enact election laws for the benefit of Michigan residents,' the lawsuit says. Benson gained national attention for defending the results of the 2020 election in the face of Trump's attempts to undercut the outcome nationwide and in Michigan. Multiple audits — including one conducted by the then-Republican-controlled Michigan Senate — concluded former President Joe Biden won the state in 2020 and that there was no widespread or systemic fraud. Benson has remained a subject of GOP scrutiny this year. A Republican state representative introduced three articles of impeachment against Benson on Tuesday, and several of the accusations continue to cast doubts on the results of the 2020 election. With Democrats in control of the state Senate, it's unlikely the impeachment articles will result in a conviction.

21 minutes ago
Detained Columbia graduate claims ‘irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release
NEW YORK -- A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the 'irreparable harm' caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the 'most immediate and visceral harms' he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. 'Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident wrote. 'When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep.' He also cited potentially 'career-ending' harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy advisor. Even his mother's visa to come to the U.S. to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. 'As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States,' he wrote. 'Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?' Spokespersons for the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his U.S. citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil — that his beliefs may pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy — could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against .