
Canadian election view and impact on the North Country defined
PLATTSBURGH — Monday's national election in Canada left the region with lots to mull in terms of how it played out and how it will affect the North Country and the rest of the nation.
Longtime Political Science Professor at SUNY Plattsburgh Dr. Harvey Schantz, analyzed the election on Tuesday, a day after Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney appeared to have won a somewhat surprising victory over Conservative Party challenger Pierre Poilievre.
Here is what Schantz said:
Indirect Election
Selection of the Canadian Prime Minister is an indirect election in which voters elect members of parliament and then legislators vote for their party leader to be the Prime Minister. With a Parliament of 343 seats, a majority of 172 seats is the minimum necessary to elect a government.
CBC television news called the election for the Liberal Party at 10:11 PM Monday, remarking that the outcome marks a fourth straight 'mandate' for the Liberal Party. However, it is still not yet clear whether the Liberal Party will form a majority government or a minority government in alliance with another political party.
The election results are generally viewed as a unique reversal of political fortunes, with the Conservative Party slipping badly and the Liberal Party snatching victory from almost certain defeat. In the last weeks of the campaign, though, polls began to show a decline in the Liberal Party lead.
The Liberal Party victory, according to analysts, resulted from the replacement of Justin Trudeau with Mark Carney as their party leader and Carney's campaign focus on President Donald Trump, who inserted himself into the campaign by calling for Canada to be the 51st state and initiating Canadian tariffs.
Carney made standing up to Trump the most important issue in his campaign and this issue emphasis is believed redounded to his benefit. By contrast, the Conservative candidate Poilievre had hoped that after an extended period of Liberal Party dominance, the contest would be a time for a change election.
Americans' Views
A total of 60% of U.S. adults, according to an April 7, Yougov poll, reported that the Canadian election was either 'very important' or 'somewhat important' to them. Americans' views of the Canadian election were incorporated into their prior political ideologies and attitude towards President Donald Trump.
When asked for whom they would vote for in the Canadian election, Democrats said 39% for the Liberal Party of strongly anti-Trump candidate Carney and only 4% of their votes for Conservative Party candidate Poilievre. On the other hand, Republicans would vote 48% for the Conservative Party and only 5% for the Liberal Party.
Americans are concerned with Trump's actions towards Canada. According to a Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos Poll, released after April 22, 53% of American adults agree that 'Trump is serious…when he talks about the U.S. trying to take control of Canada.' Fully 75% of Democrats take Trump's threat seriously as compared to only 35% of Republicans and 49% of independents.
In our region, the Northeast, 57%, the highest of any region, feel that Trump is serious about taking over Canada. Only 13% of American adults 'would support' U.S. efforts to take control of Canada, including 27% of Republicans, 9% of Independents, and only 4% of Democrats. In the Northeast, 13% would support such a move.
Canadian Views
Canadians have a jaundiced view of their relationship with the U.S., according to a Yougov poll released shortly after April 2, with 44% calling it 'unfriendly' and 20% calling the U.S. an 'enemy.'
By contrast only one-quarter of Canadians characterized their relationship with the U.S. in positive terms, with 15% calling the U.S. an ally and 10% calling the relationship 'friendly.' Only 19% of Liberals used ally or friendly to characterize the U.S. relationship, as compared to 39% of Conservatives who did so.
Fully 71% of Canadians agreed that 'diversifying trade partners' would be an effective response to U.S. tariffs, with supporters of both major parties agreeing over 70 percent. Other measures viewed as effective by 64 to 65 percent of Canadians included 'stop selling US liquor,' 'stop selling oil,' 'stop selling electricity,' and 'retaliatory tariffs.'
Liberals averaged 73% support for these four measures, while Conservatives averaged 60.5% support for these retaliatory moves against the United States.
Impact on U.S. Relations and Region
'As I've been warning for months,' Carney said in his victory speech.
'America wants our land, our resources, our country. Never. These are not idle threats. President Trump is trying to break us, so that America can own us. That will never happen.'
Carney repeated his earlier claims that the old Canadian relationship with the United States characterized by close economic integration is over.
'We have to look out for ourselves.'
Carney's victory speech pointed to tough economic negotiations between Canada and the United States, an assertion of full Canadian sovereignty over their territory, and diversification of Canadian economic markets, with less reliance on the United States.
Already the leaders of Australia, France, and Ukraine, as well as China and India, reports the Washington Post have expressed interest in strengthening economic ties with Canada.
Trump's actions have led to a backlash among Canadians toward the United States, both in their attitudes and economic behavior as 61% of Canadians claimed to 'have already started any form of boycotting American companies,' including 78% who claim to have boycotted 'food grown in the U.S.,' and 65% 'alcohol distilled in the U.S.,' as reported by the Yougov poll of Canadians.
In northern New York and nationally, there has been a reported drop in Canadian tourism as well.
The election results suggest that our local economic and political leaders will have, at least for the time being, a more difficult time stimulating the cross-border economy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Defying Trump, National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet is still at work
President Donald Trump's latest attempt to assert control over an elite American cultural institution has turned into a high-stakes Washington stand-off. In defiance of Trump's announcement last Friday that he was firing her, Kim Sajet — the director of the Smithsonian Institution's National Portrait Gallery — has continued to report for work, conducting meetings and handling other museum business as she did before, according to several people familiar with her activities who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter. Writing on Truth Social, Trump had declared he is firing Sajet because she 'is a highly partisan person' and because she is a 'strong supporter of DEI,' a reference to diversity, equity and inclusion. He said her replacement would be named shortly. Trump has not provided a legal reasoning to support his authority to fire Sajet. Two top congressional Democrats have asserted the president does not have legal authority for the firing. In a joint statement, House Administration Committee ranking Democrat Joe Morelle of New York and House Appropriations Committee ranking Democrat Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut said: 'President Trump has no authority to fire employees of the Smithsonian Institution — including the Director of the National Portrait Gallery. The dismissal of Director Sajet is unacceptable and has the same legal weight as the President's prior attempts to undermine the Smithsonian's independence: absolutely none. Should the White House require a copy of the Constitution, we would be more than happy to provide one.' Sajet's refusal to abide by Trump's decision sets up a test of the bounds of presidential authority over the Smithsonian, a sprawling complex of 21 museums, 14 education and research centers and the National Zoo. It is not a traditional government agency nor part of the executive branch, and hiring and firing decisions have historically been handled by the Smithsonian's secretary, rather than its Board of Regents. The Smithsonian's current secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch III, is widely expected to discuss the president's attempt to oust Sajet when regents meet next Monday. In an only-in-Washington twist, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. — who has been presented with major questions at the Supreme Court regarding the limits of presidential authority since Trump took office — is the chancellor of the Smithsonian and a member of its board. A Trump White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A Smithsonian spokesperson declined to comment. In February, Trump made another foray into American arts when he took over control of the Kennedy Center, dismissing his predecessor's appointees to its board, who then installed him as chairman and replaced the institution's director with a political ally with scant experience in the arts. The Smithsonian differs from the Kennedy Center because presidents don't appoint members to its board, which is composed of a mix of officials from all three branches of government and members of the public. But Trump is not without allies on the Smithsonian board, including Vice President JD Vance who, like Roberts, is an ex-officio member. Trump's move against Sajet follows an executive order he issued on March 27 titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' which aims to 'restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness.' A 35-year-old special assistant and senior associate staff secretary, Lindsey Halligan, was among the order's architects — instigated, in part, by her early-2025 visit to the show 'The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture,' an exhibition at the Smithsonian American Art Museum, which shares a building with the Portrait Gallery. The order calls for Halligan and Vice President JD Vance to 'remove improper ideology' from the Smithsonian and 'prohibit expenditure on exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race.' 'President Trump's attempt to fire the National Portrait Gallery Director is outrageous and represents yet another disturbing example of his relentless effort to control American art and culture,' said Rep. Chellie Pingree (Maine), ranking Democrat of the House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee, which oversees the Smithsonian, in a statement. 'Despite what the President may think, America's cultural institutions are not run by dictatorial impulses.' On Tuesday a White House official provided The Post a list of 17 instances in which, the White House argued, Sajet was critical of Trump or outspoken about her support for diversity, equity and inclusion. The list included her donations to Democratic politicians and advocacy groups; a social media post praising Anthony Fauci; the caption for the museum's presidential portrait of Trump mentioning his two impeachments and 'incitement of insurrection' for the events of Jan. 6, 2021; and numerous quotes from interviews in a variety of publications about her efforts to represent a broad swath of Americans within the gallery's walls. One item on the list was a quote in a 2019 USA Today story about Black artists demanding representation in American artistic institutions: 'We owe it to Americans to reflect them because we owe it to accurate history,' Sajet says. 'I'm not interested in only having a museum for some people.' The list additionally took issue with remarks Sajet has made in support of the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements, and criticism of Columbus Day and her rejection of one artist's 2016 portrait of Trump as 'too political.' It notes that Sajet has commissioned artworks about Mexican immigration and 'the complications of ancestral and racial history.' It was critical of her 2013 decision to use '50 percent of all money spent on art' to 'support diverse artists and portrait subjects.' Since its founding 179 years ago, the Smithsonian, which receives about 60 percent of its budget from federal appropriations and grants, has generally operated independently, although there have been several controversies in which museums have altered exhibitions in response to outside criticisms, including from politicians. Museum directors, such as Sajet — holders of some of the most prestigious positions in American arts — are not paid with federal funds, instead drawing their salaries from the Smithsonian's trust fund. Hours after Trump's post, Bunch told Smithsonian staff in an email obtained by The Washington Post that the White House also sent new details of proposed cuts to the institution's budget, slashing it by 12 percent and excluding funding for its Anacostia Community Museum and its forthcoming National Museum of the American Latino, Bunch said. On Saturday, at the Portrait Gallery and SAAM's joint family Pride celebration, a trio of visitors strolled the central courtyard in neon vests emblazoned with 'Hands off the arts' on the back — closely watched by a Smithsonian staff member, who hovered nearby. 'I'm outraged' by Sajet's firing, said Karen Nussbaum, 75, of Washington. 'There's a place for a political expression in art, but not political control of art.' 'I think the next step is controlling what artists think and do,' said Cynthia Cain, 60, of Washington, 'and that's not acceptable.' Sophia Nguyen and Janay Kingsberry contributed to this report.

Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
James Altucher: 'America Just Hit the AI Reset Button'
New briefing reveals how Trump and Musk are quietly building the most powerful artificial intelligence system in U.S. history — and why July 1 could mark a major turning point BALTIMORE, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- In a new briefing, tech entrepreneur and bestselling author James Altucher reveals a development he says will 'change America forever.' At the center of it is Project Colossus — a classified supercomputer initiative led by Elon Musk's xAI — and backed by sweeping support from President Donald Trump. A Presidential Reversal with Massive Implications Altucher says the shift began with one of Trump's first presidential actions in 2025. 'In one of his FIRST acts as President… Donald Trump overturned Executive Order #14110.' This decision reversed Biden-era restrictions on AI research, which Altucher claims had 'prevented us from unleashing its true power.' 'Trump also announced the LARGEST AI investment in history… Stargate… a massive, AI data center and infrastructure project.' Hidden Inside a Warehouse in Memphis Altucher's report reveals a facility in Tennessee that, until now, has gone largely unnoticed. 'Right here, inside this warehouse in Memphis, Tennessee… lies a massive supercomputer Musk calls 'Project Colossus.'' 'It contains not just one or two… but 200,000 units of Nvidia's all-powerful AI chips… making it the most advanced AI facility known to man.' 'The fastest supercomputer on the planet.' — Jensen Huang, Nvidia CEO July 1: 'When It All Changes' According to Altucher, time is short. A critical update to Colossus is imminent. 'That's when I predict Elon could announce a major update to this new AI project. One that some say will essentially 10X its power – overnight.' Altucher refers to this moment as a 'second wave' of AI — what he calls: 'Artificial Superintelligence.' 'This second wave… will rival all of the great innovations of the past. Electricity… the wheel… even the discovery of fire.' A Warning… and a Milestone Altucher closes his briefing with a quote from Vladimir Putin to stress the stakes: 'Whoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world.' — Vladimir Putin He believes Project Colossus may determine whether America leads — or falls behind — in the AI race. About James Altucher James Altucher is a computer scientist, entrepreneur, and bestselling author. A pioneer in AI since the 1980s, he previously worked on IBM's Deep Blue supercomputer and developed early AI trading systems on Wall Street. His latest research uncovers critical breakthroughs in AI infrastructure and the political forces accelerating its rise. Media Contact:Derek WarrenPublic Relations ManagerParadigm Press GroupEmail: dwarren@


Washington Post
25 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Bipartisan deals on voting and election changes are rare. It just happened in one swing state
LAS VEGAS — Facing a legislature dominated by Democrats, Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo stood before Nevada lawmakers earlier this year with a message that some did not expect to go far: 'Set aside partisan politics.' It was a plea that might have seemed more aspirational than realistic, given the country's deep polarization. Yet it set the stage for one of the session's most unexpected outcomes — a bipartisan agreement to bring voter ID requirements to the perennial battleground state by next year's midterm elections.