
‘Woke' university accused of no-platforming academic over Israel views
Prof Eric Kaufmann was invited to participate in a debate with other professors by the Cardiff Academic Freedom Association (CAFA) at the city's university last month.
However, a coalition of Left-wing groups organised a protest over his attendance, accusing him of being a 'genocide apologist'.
As a result, CAFA was hit with a £1,300 bill by university officials to cover the costs of security for the event. Prof Kaufmann criticised the university's decision as 'cowardly', saying it was 'horrible' to charge the group.
'Basically, it's a spineless administration,' he said. 'They are trying to no-platform people whilst claiming they are not no-platforming people. This is a classic example of no-platforming. We are all told woke is dead, but clearly it's not.'
The Canadian professor of political science at the University of Buckingham has been accused of being a 'genocide apologist' over his views on the Israel-Gaza conflict.
In a recent post to X, he wrote: 'A number of things can be true at once: 1) Hamas are violent terrorists; 2) Many Palestinians support Hamas for tribal reasons, against their interests; 3) Israel has the right to defend itself, but; 4) Israel is committing atrocities and must rise above to end spiral of violence.'
In response to CAFA inviting Prof Kaufmann to debate, groups including Cardiff Stop The War Coalition, Caerdydd Students for Palestine, Europe Palestine Network, Stand Up 4 Palestine and Black Lives Matter Cardiff organised protests.
In a poster circulated on social media they wrote: 'Eric Kaufmann calls student protest a threat to free speech – but he uses his platform to excuse genocide in Palestine and smear student voices as anti-Semitic.
'He talks about 'cancel culture' but denies mass slaughter. He defends 'debate' while vilifying dissent. We're here to call him out and to show that our free speech matters too. Join the protest.'
Irrespective of the protests, Prof Kaufmann was unable to attend the event for personal reasons. However, CAFA still had to pay the security bill of £1,341.12 on top of room hire at £300.
University of Oxford professors Nigel Biggar, from the Faculty of Theology and Religion, and Naomi Waltham-Smith, from the Faculty of Music, and Prof Jo Phoenix, a professor of criminology from the University of Reading, attended the debate.
Prof Alice Sullivan, a gender critical academic and professor of sociology at University College London, who authored a report concluding that UK universities have failed to protect gender-critical academics from bullying and career-threatening restrictions on their research, also criticised Cardiff University.
'That's a pattern of behaviour from Cardiff,' she said. 'They [CAFA] are not an external group. Universities should be facilitating academics to hold these kinds of events, not putting barriers in their path.'
A CAFA spokesman said that its members 'have been the subject of extreme threats' and confirmed that the Free Speech Union met the charge of more than £1,600, enabling the debate to go ahead.
They added: 'For the second year running, Cardiff University imposed a disproportionately high charge for room hire and security. We are disappointed with this decision. As far as we are aware, this is not common practice in British universities and, in our opinion, it does not help advance academic freedom at Cardiff University.'
A Cardiff University spokesman said: 'CAFA is strictly independent of the university. It is not affiliated to the university. This is confirmed on their website. Therefore, any request to book a room at the university for a CAFA event would be managed by the university's conferencing and events team as it will be considered as an external event not as an internal university event.
'The university conferencing and events team discuss costs, invoicing, organisation, logistics and will liaise with other university teams such as compliance and risk, campus security, room bookings, as to the specific requirements required to run the event.
'This is done in accordance with our code of practice on freedom of speech and our event and external speaker policy. The speakers, organisation and management of the event – including any associated costs like additional security – would be for CAFA to manage.
'This was made clear to CAFA on both occasions they've held speaking events at the university. CAFA agreed to abide by the expected standards of conduct set out in our code of practice and meet all the associated costs.
'The university will not unreasonably refuse to allow events unless a conflicting legal provision is identified as a reason to refuse or restrict an event. In line with our commitment to freedom of speech we have a duty to enable challenging issues to be discussed provided it's done within the law, and with respect and tolerance.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Should we be preparing for World War Three? Shock poll reveals 86% of Brits don't have enough supplies to last ONE DAY in a crisis as government urges citizens to stockpile tinned food, batteries and torches
The Government has urged Brits to stock up on basic supplies as a shock poll has revealed 86 per cent of us don't have enough to last us even one day in a crisis. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden has advised people to stockpile tinned food, batteries and torches in case of an emergency. However, the poll by Savanta found only 14 per cent of Brits have enough supplies in their homes to get them through just one day of a crisis. It also found 48 per cent of Brits do not have reserves of bottled water to use in the event of a power cut that cuts off gas and water supply. Just 24 per cent of us have an FM radio, only 55 per cent own a torch and 66 per cent have enough non-perishable food to last three days. Whilst giving The Mirror's political editor a tour of The National Situation Centre - the government's top-secret crisis control room - Mr McFadden said there needs to be a 'more candid' conversation about the potential risks Britain is facing. 'It's sensible to have a couple of torches, a battery or a wind-up radio, perhaps some spare batteries, a couple of bottles of water. 'We saw what happened to Spain and Portugal earlier this year, when power went out for about 24 hours. 'If something like that happens it does make sense to have that kind of thing at home.' He said this advice was 'proportionate' and reassured people that they do not need to start constructing nuclear bunkers in their gardens. The National Situation Centre, also known as SitCen, was set up in 2021 after the Covid pandemic highlighted how under-prepared the UK is for coping in an emergency situation. It was modelled on the Situation Room inside the White House, where President Donald Trump was recently pictured conducting talks over Iran. SitCen was built in a classified location near Cobra - where the Prime Minister holds emergency meetings. Inside, analysts pour over data and make meticulous calculations to help ministers respond to a range of potential crises - from future pandemics to terror attacks. This autumn, SitCen will be used as a hub for a drill which will prepare the country for another pandemic. It will see a trial for emergency alerts sent to people's phones warning them of a risk to human life - the second time the technology has been tested. Millions of Brits will receive the practice alert at around 3pm on September 7. Mr McFadden said 'hopefully' we will never find ourselves in a situation where they would need to deploy a real emergency alert, but it is 'useful to have' just in case.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Liz Truss accuses Kemi Badenoch of not telling the truth about Tory failures as former PM hits back at Conservative leader over her mini-budget criticism
Liz Truss has accused Kemi Badenoch of 'repeating spurious narratives' rather than telling the truth about Tory failures. The former prime minister said she believes the Tory Party will be in 'serious trouble' unless it starts to admit failures over the economy and human rights during its last spell in government. It follows Mrs Badenoch's remarks that Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves were making 'even bigger mistakes' than Ms Truss had in her mini-Budget in September 2022 – a month before she quit No 10. 'It is disappointing that instead of serious thinking like this, Kemi Badenoch is instead repeating spurious narratives,' Ms Truss wrote in the Telegraph. 'I suspect she is doing this to divert from the real failures of 14 years of Conservative government in which her supporters are particularly implicated.' She described as 'a fatal mistake' the decision not to repeal Labour legislation including the Human Rights Act, accusing modernisers of wanting to be 'heirs to Blair'. She also took aim at Michael Gove and Dominic Cummings, saying that 'draconian lockdowns' caused huge damage, adding that the economy 'was wrecked with profligate Covid spending' by then chancellor Rishi Sunak. The war of words risks sparking a row within the party, Ms Truss added that the 'huge increase in immigration has been a disaster'. Mrs Badenoch previously kept criticisms of Ms Truss private, telling her shadow cabinet in January that it would be helpful if her predecessor made fewer interventions. But on Saturday she made her first major public criticism of the ex-Tory prime minister, saying Labour had not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget. She said the bond markets are 'increasingly jittery about the levels of borrowing today', and warned that the 'mismanagement' of the economy will have 'real consequences' on workers. Writing in The Telegraph, she said: 'For all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget and are making even bigger mistakes. 'They continue to borrow more and more, unable and unwilling to make the spending cuts needed to balance the books.' Ms Truss hit back at the comments, saying it was Mrs Badenoch who had not learned the lessons of the mini-budget. She tweeted: 'Kemi has not learned the lessons of the Mini Budget, which is that when Conservative MPs fail to back tax cuts, fracking and welfare restraint, they get booted out of office. 'The Bank of England has since admitted that two thirds of the market movement in 2022 was down to their failure to regulate pensions properly. 'Kemi Badenoch needs to do the work and actually analyse what happened in 2022 and hold the Bank of England to account.' The weeks following Ms Truss's mini-budget saw adverse market reaction and mortgage costs soar. She was ejected from office after just 49 days - becoming Britain's shortest-serving prime minister. Since entering office, Labour has been highly critical of Ms Truss's handling of the economy. Ms Truss hit back at the comments, saying it was Mrs Badenoch who had not learned the lessons of the mini-budget. At the start of this year, the ex-PM's lawyers sent a letter to No10 insisting Sir Keir's claim that she 'crashed the economy' is defamatory. But Downing Street said the PM would not soften his language about Ms Truss's premiership. Sir Keir's official spokesman said at the time: 'There's only so much I can talk about previous administrations, but you've got the Prime Minister's language which he absolutely stands by in relation to the previous government's record, and you don't have to take it from the Prime Minister.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Water regulator Ofwat to pour £75million of taxpayers' cash into telling households how to save water... while billions of litres wasted daily due to leaky pipes
Water regulator Ofwat is to splurge up to £75 million of bill-payers' cash telling households how to save water – despite billions of litres being wasted every day due to leaky pipes. The watchdog, which ministers have vowed to scrap, is set to launch the multi-million-pound advertising and information campaign to reduce water usage by homes and businesses. Ofwat said the campaign will be funded by water bills – which are already set to rise by an average of £123 this year. Meanwhile, an average of three billion litres of water – equivalent to 1,200 Olympic sized swimming pools – is being wasted daily in England and Wales due to leaky pipes, research by the House of Commons Library for the Liberal Democrats found this year. Government figures also show that household water use is already falling – down by an average of four litres per person per day over the past two years. Ofwat chief executive David Black, who was paid £250,000 including pension last year, told MPs that the campaign would be 'cheaper than the alternative of building major new sources of supply' if it succeeds. But John O'Connell, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'Taxpayers won't miss this lecturing regulator once it's abolished. For decades, Ofwat has failed to balance the competing priorities of keeping bills low and ensuring investment, while also being slow to some of the excesses of water executives.' An Ofwat spokesman insisted customers would only pay a small amount on their bills as a result of the campaign. They said: 'The campaign is part of a much larger strategy to deliver 30 new reservoirs and water supply projects, along with the roll-out of a further 10 million smart meters and water labelling. 'The average customer will only pay 62p per year for the delivery of the campaign, during which time leakage is set to reduce by a further 17 per cent.' The campaign will be funded by up to £75 million over five years, and will support 'a large-scale campaign on efficient water use covering England and Wales and both household and business sectors', documents revealed. Environment Secretary Steve Reed announced last month that regulator Ofwat would be scrapped, as part of measures to pull overlapping water regulation by four different bodies into one 'single powerful' regulator responsible for the whole sector. Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said: 'Labour and Ofwat need to learn how to turn off the tap of wasteful spending on lecturing the public and instead focus on mending.'