logo
LI psychic charged under little-used NY anti-fortunetelling law after allegedly scamming a woman out of $62K

LI psychic charged under little-used NY anti-fortunetelling law after allegedly scamming a woman out of $62K

New York Post3 days ago
A self-proclaimed Long Island psychic was charged with grand larceny and fortunetelling — a little-used misdemeanor in New York — after allegedly scamming a senior citizen out of tens of thousands of dollars, officials said.
Hemanth Kumar Muneppa, 33, of Queens, was arrested at a bank in Hicksville, where employees spotted the alleged scam as the victim — who had already been bilked for $20,000 — was trying to withdraw $42,000 more to pay for psychic services, officials said.
The unidentified woman had received her first pricy reading days earlier, and returned for additional services at Anjana Ji on South Broadway, where Muneppa demanded another $42,000 and drove her to a nearby bank to withdraw it.
Advertisement
Muneppa was arrested at a bank in Hicksville.
Nassau County Police
Lucky for her, the financial institution's alert employees warned the woman she was most likely being scammed and alerted the cops.
Anjana Ji is a psychic service that advertises astrology, 'evil spirit removal,' 'love spell caster,' and more, according to its website.
Prosecutors said Muneppa 'knowingly and unlawfully engaged in a scheme to defraud and obtain money from the victim by falsely representing himself as a fortune teller with the power to combat evil and dark spirits.'
Advertisement
Muneppa pled not guilty to the charges at his arraignment Friday and released without bail, however is forced to wear an ankle monitor.
The fortunetelling charges are a rarity in Nassau County, and broader New York, with the law stating that unless it is purely for entertainment purposes, receiving money to tell fortunes or give readings is a crime at the state level.
Prosecuting fortunetelling can be difficult, even through grand larceny statutes, and has been challenged on grounds that it violates the First Amendment, according to the Columbia Undergraduate Law Review.
Advertisement
'It is virtually impossible to prove that a fortune teller, who insists that her actions are spiritual or possibly religious in nature, does not actually believe in her practices,' the article from May says.
Another accused fortuneteller was busted in New York City earlier this week for allegedly bilking some one out of $50,000 over a few years with bogus reading — and was initially charged under the law.
But the little-used charged was dropped when Pamela Ufie, 28, was arraigned and she wound up being charged with one count of grand larceny and two counts of fraudulent accosting, according to court documents.
Officials are asking anyone who may have been a victim of Muneppa or Anjana Ji in the alleged fortune-telling scam to contact the Nassau County Police Second Squad at 516-573-6200.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Banishing a reporter: Trump escalates battle with Wall Street Journal over Epstein story
Banishing a reporter: Trump escalates battle with Wall Street Journal over Epstein story

Chicago Tribune

time5 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Banishing a reporter: Trump escalates battle with Wall Street Journal over Epstein story

President Donald Trump on Monday followed up his lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over last week's Jeffrey Epstein story by banishing one of the newspaper's reporters from Air Force One for an upcoming Scotland trip. The moves reflect Trump's aggressiveness toward media who displease him — even a media magnate, Rupert Murdoch, with outlets that have been friendly to him in the past. Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Journal and Murdoch on Friday because of the newspaper's article about a sexually suggestive letter bearing Trump's name that was included in a 2003 album compiled for alleged sex trafficker Epstein's birthday. The president has denied having anything to do with it. On Monday, the White House said it was removing a Journal reporter from the pool covering the president's trip this weekend to his golf courses in Turnberry and Aberdeen in Scotland. The Journal's Tarini Parti had been scheduled to cover him on the trip. 'Due to the Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. The Journal declined comment on the action. It's a tactic the Trump White House has used before. It restricted the access of journalists from The Associated Press to press events when the news outlet would not change its style guidelines to reflect Trump's renaming of the Gulf of Mexico. That launched a legal battle that is wending its way through the courts. The defamation lawsuit is another tool Trump has used against media outlets. He has sued CBS News for its editing of a '60 Minutes' interview with former opponent Kamala Harris; ABC News for a false statement made by George Stephanopoulos in a story regarding a New York writer who had accused Trump of sexual abuse; and Meta after it removed Trump's social media accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. In each of those cases, Trump won multimillion-dollar settlements. But in those instances, news was only one part of a major corporation's business. In the case of Murdoch and News Corp., news is the chief part of his business. The Journal has vowed to fight. It's also the first time Trump has sued for defamation as a sitting president, and it's not clear whether any president has done that in the past. 'There's nothing inherently wrong with a president bringing a libel suit,' said noted free speech attorney Floyd Abrams. 'But this claim certainly seems like nothing more or less than an effort to suppress speech that our president finds discomforting. That's not why we have libel law. It's why we have a First Amendment.' It's all part of a broader pattern of trying to intimidate news organizations that report stories Trump does not like, said Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. 'These are lawsuits that have no hope of actually succeeding as lawsuits, but nevertheless have the potential to chill media organizations from doing what all of us need them to do,' Jaffer said. Not every news organization has bowed down; '60 Minutes,' in fact, did some notably tough stories about the early days of Trump's second administration. But it's impossible to quantify stories that weren't done because of fear of a fight with the White House, he said. The Wall Street Journal leans conservative editorially, but hasn't been afraid to take Trump on in both its opinion and news sections. Other Murdoch outlets — Fox News Channel and the New York Post — are much friendlier to him. Ever since the administration announced that it would not be releasing additional government files from the case against Epstein, factions of Trump's base supporters have turned on him. That has put some normally supportive news outlets in a difficult position. Fox News largely avoided the story after Trump suggested his allies stop wasting time on it. But Fox's Howard Kurtz reported on The Wall Street Journal lawsuit on his 'Media Buzz' show Sunday, saying that by doing so, 'the president has drawn extra attention to the Journal's reporting.' The president's battle with the press has taken on several dimensions. He has been fighting to take away government support for news organizations like Voice of America, and last week the Republican-controlled Congress voted to take away federal funding from NPR and PBS because the president says their news programming is biased against conservatives.

Banishing a reporter: Trump escalates battle with Wall Street Journal over Epstein story
Banishing a reporter: Trump escalates battle with Wall Street Journal over Epstein story

San Francisco Chronicle​

time5 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Banishing a reporter: Trump escalates battle with Wall Street Journal over Epstein story

President Donald Trump on Monday followed up his lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over last week's Jeffrey Epstein story by banishing one of the newspaper's reporters from Air Force One for an upcoming Scotland trip. The moves reflect Trump's aggressiveness toward media who displease him — even a media magnate, Rupert Murdoch, with outlets that have been friendly to him in the past. Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Journal and Murdoch on Friday because of the newspaper's article about a sexually suggestive letter bearing Trump's name that was included in a 2003 album compiled for alleged sex trafficker Epstein's birthday. The president has denied having anything to do with it. On Monday, the White House said it was removing a Journal reporter from the pool covering the president's trip this weekend to his golf courses in Turnberry and Aberdeen in Scotland. The Journal's Tarini Parti had been scheduled to cover him on the trip. 'Due to the Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. The Journal declined comment on the action. The defamation lawsuit is another tool Trump has used against media outlets. He has sued CBS News for its editing of a '60 Minutes' interview with former opponent Kamala Harris; ABC News for a false statement made by George Stephanopoulos in a story regarding a New York writer who had accused Trump of sexual abuse; and Meta after it removed Trump's social media accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. In each of those cases, Trump won multimillion-dollar settlements. But in those instances, news was only one part of a major corporation's business. In the case of Murdoch and News Corp., news is the chief part of his business. The Journal has vowed to fight. It's also the first time Trump has sued for defamation as a sitting president, and it's not clear whether any president has done that in the past. 'There's nothing inherently wrong with a president bringing a libel suit,' said noted free speech attorney Floyd Abrams. 'But this claim certainly seems like nothing more or less than an effort to suppress speech that our president finds discomforting. That's not why we have libel law. It's why we have a First Amendment.' News organizations have reacted in varied ways It's all part of a broader pattern of trying to intimidate news organizations that report stories Trump does not like, said Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. 'These are lawsuits that have no hope of actually succeeding as lawsuits, but nevertheless have the potential to chill media organizations from doing what all of us need them to do,' Jaffer said. Not every news organization has bowed down; '60 Minutes,' in fact, did some notably tough stories about the early days of Trump's second administration. But it's impossible to quantify stories that weren't done because of fear of a fight with the White House, he said. The Wall Street Journal leans conservative editorially, but hasn't been afraid to take Trump on in both its opinion and news sections. Other Murdoch outlets — Fox News Channel and the New York Post — are much friendlier to him. Ever since the administration announced that it would not be releasing additional government files from the case against Epstein, factions of Trump's base supporters have turned on him. That has put some normally supportive news outlets in a difficult position. Fox News largely avoided the story after Trump suggested his allies stop wasting time on it. But Fox's Howard Kurtz reported on The Wall Street Journal lawsuit on his 'Media Buzz' show Sunday, saying that by doing so, 'the president has drawn extra attention to the Journal's reporting.' ___

Homeland Security Agents Stunned by Pro-Palestine Arrest Orders
Homeland Security Agents Stunned by Pro-Palestine Arrest Orders

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Homeland Security Agents Stunned by Pro-Palestine Arrest Orders

Officers from the Department of Homeland Security who arranged the arrests of foreign university students over their pro-Palestinian speech claimed that the orders they received were so unusual, they weren't sure if they were legal, Politico reported Tuesday. U.S. District Judge Willliam Young heard testimony from four veteran DHS officers as part of a lawsuit alleging that the Trump administration is implementing a policy of 'ideological deportation,' violating the First Amendment rights of non-citizens in the United States. Across the country, federal judges have ordered the release of multiple students and faculty detained as part of Donald Trump's crackdown on pro-Palestinian speech. Darren McCormack, a special agent with Homeland Security Investigations, said orders to arrest Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University grad student and green card holder, came from the very top. 'Somebody at a higher level than the people I was speaking to had an interest in him,' said McCormack, who oversaw Khalil's arrest. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had attempted to justify Khalil's months-long detainment and pending removal by claiming he was a threat to U.S. foreign policy interests because he would create a 'hostile environment' for Jewish students. McCormack said he'd been instructed to surveil Khalil ahead of his arrest, leading McCormack to consult with ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations office in New York, which typically handles deportation arrests. 'We historically in recent times had not enforced those laws,' McCormack said. 'I wanted to confirm there was a legal basis for arrest.' When asked why ERO wasn't responsible for carrying out the arrest, McCormack said he didn't have an answer. 'I wondered why HSI was effecting this arrest and not ERO,' he said. 'I still don't know.' Brian Cunningham, an assistant special agent at HSI in Boston, said there had been 'a lot of hands in the fishbowl' regarding the horrific arrest of Rümeysa Öztürk, the Tufts University grad student who was swarmed by six masked plainclothes officers on the street in Somerville, Massachusetts. Cunningham also said the orders for that arrest came from somebody high up. 'I can't recall a time that it's come top-down like this with a visa revocation, under my purview anyway,' he said. 'I did contact our legal counsel to make sure that we're on solid legal ground.' 'The operation kind of developed pretty quickly,' he added. Öztürk was detained over an op-ed she'd written for the school paper that advocated for the school to make good on student resolutions to acknowledge the genocide in Gaza and to divest from Israel. Cunningham, who said that he'd skimmed the op-ed, testified that he 'didn't see anything in the op-ed that suggested she'd committed a crime.' He admitted he didn't have 'much experience, if any' with conducting a deportation arrest. 'Most of my career as an agent and as a supervisor has been in enforcement of drug laws, drug smuggling, money laundering,' Cunningham said. 'That's changed recently,' he added. He said that shortly after Trump entered the White House, HSI had several meetings about prioritizing immigration enforcement. Inside ICE, staff members from the HSI division, which typically focuses on transnational crime, are now being moved to ERO, in what some perceive to be a retaliatory move for HSI distancing itself from the agency's deportation arm.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store