Why Dodge Didn't Ditch Pushrod V8s For DOHC Engines
The cars that launched this surge of success have some surprisingly old underpinnings. The LX platform these cars rode on was based on a 1990s Mercedes-Benz E-Class, although it was thoroughly updated over time. Similarly, Hemi V8s are old-fashioned pushrod engines, not modern dual overhead cam (DOHC) designs like the Ford Coyote 5.0 that powers the Mustang GT.
In hindsight, it's clear that these were strong choices for Dodge and its muscle car lineup. Still, the question remains -- why did Dodge stick with pushrod V8s, a design which the company first introduced in the Firepower V8 way back in 1951? The answer comes down to several factors that made this design popular in the original muscle car era and remain just as relevant today as they were back then.
Read more: These Cars Are Going To Age Terribly
Torque Is King
For a muscle car to sell, it has to drive one. That means providing gobs of tire-smoking torque rather than putting all the eggs into the horsepower basket.
Since horsepower is the result of torque multiplied by engine speed, a small, low-torque engine like the Honda S2000 can still produce significant horsepower numbers by revving to almost 9,000 RPM. The alternative is to favor the other side of the equation by keeping the RPMs down and maximizing torque. This is where the pushrod V8 shines. While its design prevents it from achieving high RPMs, a big V8 can still move a lot of air just because of its large size.
Another factor that is a disadvantage for horsepower but an advantage for torque is that the Hemi V8 only has two valves per cylinder, not four like most DOHC engines. This limits airflow and horsepower at high RPMs, but since a pushrod V8 can't do high RPMs anyway, that's not an issue. Instead, this restriction increases the speed of air flowing into the cylinders. This causes the air and fuel to mix more effectively, combust more efficiently, and produce more torque.
Of course, just because it's a little harder to make big horsepower from a pushrod Hemi V8 doesn't mean it can't be done.
Packaging And Cost
While muscle car torque was a big reason for keeping the pushrod V8, there were other factors as well. For starters, it's a relatively simple design with a single camshaft that drives the entire valvetrain, rather than four in a DOHC V8. That also eliminates several gears and timing belts or chains. The single timing chain is quite short, since the camshaft is right next to the crankshaft. This design also means that upgrading to a hotter cam involves replacing one camshaft instead of four, which is both easier and less expensive.
Eliminating the extra complexity of a DOHC V8 also reduces the engine's weight. It makes the engine smaller as well -- particularly the heads. They only need to contain the pushrods, rockers, and valves instead of the entire valvetrain, camshafts and all, like a DOHC engine. This makes the engine easier to fit under the hood, both in the vehicles they're intended for as well as other cars that they may (almost) fit into, such as this audacious Hellcat Miata.
The final benefit of the pushrod V8 is its cost, as it is simply less expensive to build than a DOHC V8. If this can save the manufacturer even a few hundred bucks per engine, it adds up to a substantial savings across hundreds of thousands of cars and Ram trucks over several years of production. The Dodge Hemi V8 might be gone, but it's certainly not forgotten. In fact, the Hemi V8 may not even be gone after all -- we hope that's true.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jaguar Land Rover to recall over 121,500 US vehicles due to suspension knuckle issue, NHTSA says
(Reuters) -Tata Motors-owned Jaguar Land Rover is recalling more than 121,500 vehicles in the United States due to cracked suspension knuckles in the front, the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said on Wednesday. The recall includes Range Rover and Range Rover Sport vehicles, NHTSA said.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mobile traffic signals to be removed
MOBILE, Ala. (WKRG) — A few intersections in downtown Mobile will soon lose some of its traffic signals. Theodore man killed in deadly crash According to a release from the City of Mobile, work will begin on Monday, Aug. 11, to remove traffic signals as part of the Downtown Street Optimization Plan. The City of Mobile and Downtown Mobile Alliance, along with the leadership of 'renowned urban planner,' Jeff Speck, created the plan to make downtown safer and more efficient for commuters of all kinds. Starting on Monday, 26 signals in low-volume intersections will be removed and replaced with four-way stops. The $1.1 million project also plans to install ADA ramps and restripe crosswalks. The signals scheduled for removal will flash red beginning on Wednesday, Aug. 13, for 90 days to allow traffic engineers to observe motorists' behavior and give time for drivers and cyclists to adjust to the new patterns. Baldwin County tasing incident leads to arrest, officials say The project, set to be completed in Spring 2026, will be completed in stages so as not to disrupt the downtown area. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CarParts.com Inc (PRTS) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strategic Gains Amidst Market Challenges
Release Date: August 12, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Inc (NASDAQ:PRTS) achieved positive adjusted EBITA in June, indicating that strategic initiatives are beginning to deliver tangible results. The mobile app and retention-driven e-commerce revenue reached record levels, with the app now accounting for 12% of e-commerce revenues. High margin fee income continues to grow, supported by increased adoption of services like products and shipping protections. Investments in machine learning-based search algorithms are strengthening Inc (NASDAQ:PRTS)'s competitive edge. Marketing efficiency improved with better customer acquisition cost and less reliance on Google product listing ads. Negative Points The influx of non-compliant products from China continues to distort the competitive landscape. Tariffs and inflation are weighing on consumer demand, particularly in discretionary categories. The company reported a GAAP net loss of $12.7 million, compared to a loss of $8.7 million in the prior year period. Gross margin declined to 32.8% from 33.5% in the prior year period, primarily due to product mix and the impact of tariffs. The marketplaces segment remains under pressure, contributing to the softness in overall performance. Q & A Highlights Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with PRTS. Q: Can you provide an update on the strategic alternatives process? A: David Mignon, CEO: We are fully engaged in the process and confident it is nearing completion. We are evaluating several transaction structures, including a potential sale of the company and strategic investments. However, there is no assurance of reaching a transaction, and we will not provide further updates unless a definitive agreement is reached. Q: How are tariffs impacting your business, and what measures are you taking to mitigate these effects? A: David Mignon, CEO: Approximately 20% of our private label products are imported from China, with tariffs ranging from 55% to 75%. We are mitigating impacts through cost concessions, dynamic pricing, and supply chain optimization. We are also exploring domestic sourcing options to reduce exposure to import-related volatility. Q: What were the key drivers behind the improved performance in Q2? A: David Mignon, CEO: Key drivers included record levels of mobile app and retention-driven e-commerce revenue, growth in high-margin fee income, improved conversion rates, and marketing efficiency. These gains reflect a more profitable acquisition mix and increased operating leverage from our vertically integrated supply chain. Q: Can you elaborate on the decision to close the Virginia facility? A: David Mignon, CEO: Due to excess capacity in our distribution network, particularly after the success of our Las Vegas facility, we decided to close the Virginia facility to align operational fixed costs with volume. This move, along with other streamlining efforts, is expected to generate approximately $10 million in annualized cost savings. Q: What are your priorities for the remainder of the year? A: David Mignon, CEO: Our priorities include expanding our product offering, monetizing website visits with high-margin fee income, scaling our B2B offering, growing our mobile app business, and protecting our balance sheet by managing cash flow and inventory levels amidst tariff uncertainties. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio