Pet Owners Duty-Bound To Prevent Harm Caused By Their Pets: Calcutta High Court
Last Updated:
The offence under IPC Section 289 centres on negligent handling of animals and the probable danger they pose, not just actual injury, the High Court observed
A pet owner is undeniably duty-bound to exercise a certain degree of care and take sufficient steps to prevent their pet from causing harm, the Calcutta High Court has said.
Referring to Section 289 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which deals with negligent conduct with respect to animals, the High Court said, 'This section unequivocally imposes a duty on the owner or possessor of an animal to take adequate measures to prevent any probable danger to human life or grievous hurt from such animal."
The High Court further observed that the provision specifically uses 'knowingly or negligently omits", emphasising either actual knowledge of the animal's harmful propensity or a lack of due care in its management.
This observation was made by the High Court while dealing with a case concerning the quashing of a complaint, wherein the complainant was allegedly attacked by 10 to 12 pet dogs while on the roof of his residential building.
The complainant, one Dipan Banerjee, stated in the FIR that the alleged attack caused him to lose balance, fall, and sustain injuries. He specifically averred that these pet dogs were not properly chained and roamed freely, thereby creating a perilous environment and posing a significant threat to human life.
Noting that the complaint highlighted a broader concern regarding the practice of keeping 'many dogs… unchained on the roof of a housing", which, if true, could indeed pose a 'threat to human life" regardless of immediate physical injury, the High Court refused to quash the complaint.
'Quashing the proceedings at this juncture would amount to stifling a legitimate prosecution based on contentious factual claims. The Trial Court is the appropriate forum to delve into the nuances of the evidence, assess witness credibility, and determine the allegations' veracity," it said.
Referring to the allegation, the High Court also said that the case did not fall into categories where the allegations were so absurd or inherently improbable that no prudent person could reasonably conclude there were sufficient grounds for proceeding against the accused.
Cause Title: Suman Ray @ Suman Roy -Vs- State of West Bengal & Anr.
First Published:
May 29, 2025, 15:14 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court refuses urgent hearing on plea for protection of theatres screening 'Thug Life' in Karnataka
The Supreme Court on Monday (June 9, 2025) refused to grant an urgent hearing on a plea seeking protection against alleged threats over the screening of Kamal Haasan's film "Thug Life" in Karnataka theatres. A Bench comprising Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Manmohan asked the theatre association from Karnataka to approach the Karnataka High Court instead. A lawyer, appearing for the petitioner, referred to open threats from fringe groups opposing the screening of the film in Karnataka, and said "there are open threats by fringe elements and they are saying theatres will be set on fire." Justice Mishra, while refusing to grant an urgent hearing, said, "Install fire extinguishers" and asked the petitioner to move the High Court. "Thug Life" released in cinema halls across the country on June 5. The Tamil movie, which reunites the 70-year-old actor with filmmaker Mani Ratnam after 1987's "Nayakan", could not be released in Karnataka after Mr. Haasan's comments about Kannada language sparked a major controversy. It was also released in Telugu, Hindi and Malayalam.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
'Okay with my daughter abusing...': Sharmishta Panoli's father hits back after influencer gets bail
The father of influencer Sharmishta Panoli, who was granted interim bail by the Calcutta High Court, has spoken out following her arrest over controversial social media comments related to Operation Sindoor. The 22-year-old was arrested by Kolkata Police from Gurugram and accused of hurting religious sentiments with allegedly communal remarks made in a video posted online. Days after she was granted bail, her father, Prithviraj Panoli, shared a post on X, quoting Urdu poet Allama Iqbal's song 'Saare Jahan Se Accha'. Referencing a verse which calls for no religious animosity, Panoli said, "He preached this to the secular Hindustan and then became one of the founding voices for Islamic Pakistan." Defending his daughter, Panoli urged others to follow in her footsteps. After a social media user urged him to discourage his daughter from using "inappropriate or offensive language", he hit back, saying he was "ok" with his daughter abusing 'Pakistani terrorists.' "I am OK with my daughter abusing Pakistani terrorists who killed innocents in the name of religion. She only used some words what many maulanas preach openly. Are you OK for her getting rape threats for that despite apologising? Did you raise your voice against that? If yes, I am with you," he wrote. A 22-year-old law student from Pune, Sharmishta Panoli, found herself at the centre of controversy after she allegedly made remarks about Bollywood celebrities' silence on 'Operation Sindoor.' The video quickly went viral, drawing sharp backlash online, with many accusing her of spreading hate speech. Panoli also received threats in the comments section of her post. Following the uproar, she deleted the video from Instagram and issued a public apology. In her statement, she expressed regret and stated that she never intended to hurt anyone's religious sentiments. She also deleted her previous posts. Panoli's arrest by Kolkata Police triggered a political storm in West Bengal, with the Opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) slamming the move as 'selective enforcement' of the law.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Thane builder duped of Rs 2.7 crore in loan fraud; police launch probe
THANE: Police have registered a case against a man for allegedly cheating a builder from Maharashtra's Thane district of Rs 2.7 crore after promising a business loan at a lower interest rate, an official said on Sunday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The 68-year-old complainant from Ambernath, who runs a construction business along with his two sons, needed a Rs 25 crore loan. An acquaintance subsequently introduced him to the accused, who hails from Nashik, the official from Shivajinagar police station said. The accused promised to arrange the Rs 25 crore loan at 7 per cent annual interest through his company and signed an agreement with the victim's firm on August 4, 2017, he said. As per the agreement, the victim was to pay a 10 per cent service charge of Rs 2.5 crore. Between August 2017 and January 2019, the victim transferred a total of Rs 2.7 crore over three instalments into the bank accounts linked to the accused's company, the official said. Despite repeated follow-ups, the promised loan was never sanctioned, and the accused kept delaying repayment of the advance, he said. "We registered an FIR on Friday against the accused under sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code, based on a detailed written complaint from the victim. He claims the accused misrepresented himself as a loan facilitator and siphoned off funds meant for business expansion," the official said. "We are gathering evidence and verifying all the bank transaction details provided by the complainant," the police added.
