KINSELLA: Could boring be Carney's superpower in next election? Bank on it
Tough act to follow.
Jean Chretien, that is. Following Canada's best living speech-maker is a pretty tall order. Newly minted Liberal Leader Mark Carney was never going to beat Chretien at the podium.
And, actually, now that we are on the subject, Carney's daughter Cleo was actually a bit better than her old man, too. She was charming and fun.
Carney? He ain't going to set the world on fire with his speechifyin', Virginia. Personally, I've been more excited by bowls of Cream of Wheat. I didn't fall asleep during Carney's victory lap, but I gave it some serious consideration.
https://twitter.com/JosephAngolano/status/1898873329345294823
But we all knew that already about Carney, the former governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England. He got hired to do those jobs — and he did them well, by all accounts — precisely because he was not a flame-breathing ideologue. He was a banker. So let's be honest with ourselves: When you go in to the bank to talk about your mortgage, do you want the person on the other side of the desk to sound and look like Kid Rock in the midst of two-week bender in Vegas? Nope.
In other words, Carney's bland, boring banker persona is not his weakness: Paradoxically, it is actually his secret power. At a time when the world is quite literally on fire and when we are facing a threat to our very existence, being dull is arguably a big asset, not a liability.
So there are three main reasons why the Carney Grits have obliterated Pierre Poilievre's 30-point lead. One, Justin Trudeau left and the country was quite happy about that. Two, voters suspect the Conservatives secretly (and some not so secretly) love Trump.
Three, Carney is a typical Canadian: He is calm, collected and courteous. He is the polar opposite of the ugly American — in this case, Trump. Carney reminds us of our better selves. We don't want a prime minister who acts like the guy we despise.
LILLEY: Carney's Liberal coronation is just what Trudeau ordered
Mark Carney wins federal Liberal leadership by landslide, to be next PM
But there is a risk in all of that, of course. The Canadian who has given Trump pause — more than any other — is Doug Ford. Ford has been anything but polite about Trump. He has been very direct and very tough about the American president — threatening to cut off his power, removing American booze from LCBO shelves, going on Fox News to growl about betrayal. Ford has metaphorically taken Trump into the boards, many times, and Canadians have cheered every single time.
That, then, is the danger that Carney faces. And it is the worry that many Canadians will have, too: That the new Grit leader will be the typical Canadian. And when Trump treads on his loafers, Carney will be the one who says he's sorry. As some Canadians are wont to do.
Right now, we want a fighter — like Ford, like Chretien, like Don Cherry. We don't want to become the doormat of North America. Knowing this, and toward the end of his speech, Carney talked about dropping his gloves in a hockey fight. But literally no one can picture Carney dropping his gloves for a fight. (He was a backup goalie, after all.)
In future leaders debates, the aforementioned Poilievre and Bloc Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet are going to make mincemeat of Carney. But as my Postmedia colleague Tasha Kheiriddin said to me on my podcast this week, that still may not matter. Sometimes voters want a leader like Ontario's 'Brampton Billy' Davis — someone calm, cool and collected. Not Bob Probert.
Who will be the one who fights best for Canada? That's what elections are for. We are going to decide that. And the election, if the Liberals are smart — and not all of them are dumb — will happen very soon. Conservatives may think it is wise to keep demanding an election right away, but I don't think they are.
What if Trump abruptly calms down? What if someone medicates him? The best asset of the Liberal party, right now, is the rabid, crazier-than-an-outhouse-rat Trump. Why do Tories think having an election now is in their interest? Why not wait until the fall, when Trump has inevitably moved on to some other issue?
Liberals won't wait. They've benefited from Trudeau's departure, yes. They aren't going to wait for Trump to move on to his next chew toy.
They are going to go now — because even with a bland banker at the helm, they might just pull this off, the biggest political comeback in recent Canadian political history.
And Chretien, who I know rather well, would smile about that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Newsom: Pentagon lying over LA to justify National Guard deployment
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Monday accused the Defense Department of 'lying to the American people' in justifying deploying National Guard troops to the state to quell Los Angeles protests against federal immigration raids, asserting that the situation intensified only when the Pentagon deployed troops. 'The situation became escalated when THEY deployed troops,' Newsom posted to X, referring to the Pentagon. 'Donald Trump has manufactured a crisis and is inflaming conditions. He clearly can't solve this, so California will.' Newsom was responding to a post from DOD Rapid Response on X, a Pentagon-run account, which claimed that 'Los Angeles is burning, and local leaders are refusing to respond.' President Trump on Saturday deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area amid the ICE protests, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying the decision was made due to 'violent mobs' attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations.' While protests have intensified in recent days, devolving at times into violence, the majority of gatherings have been largely peaceful. Still, California National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles on Sunday morning, with some 300 deployed on the ground later that day at three locations: Los Angeles proper, Paramount and Compton. White House officials have sought to highlight images of burning vehicles and clashes with law enforcement to make the case that the situation had gotten out of control. 'The people that are causing the problem are professional agitators. They're insurrectionists. They're bad people. They should be in jail,' Trump told reporters on Monday. In addition, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has threatened to deploy approximately 500 U.S. Marines to the city, with U.S. Northern Command on Sunday confirming the service members were 'prepared to deploy.' The use of American troops has rankled California officials, who have said the federal response 'inflammatory' and said the deployment of soldiers 'will erode public trust.' Newsom also has traded insults with Hegseth, calling him 'a joke,' and that the idea of deploying active duty Marines in California was 'deranged behavior.' 'Pete Hegseth's a joke. He's a joke. Everybody knows he's so in over his head. What an embarrassment. That guy's weakness masquerading as strength. . . . It's a serious moment,' Newsom said in an interview with podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen. The tit-for-tat continued when chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell then took to X on Monday to attack Newsom. 'LA is on FIRE right now, but instead of tackling the issue, Gavin Newsom is spending his time attacking Secretary Hegseth,' Parnell wrote. 'Unlike Newsom, [Hegseth] isn't afraid to lead.' Newsom, who has formally demanded the Trump administration pull the National Guard troops off the streets, has declared the deployment 'unlawful' and said California will sue the Trump administration over its actions. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation,' David Sapp, Newsom's legal affairs secretary, wrote in a letter to Hegseth on Sunday. 'Accordingly, we ask that you immediately rescind your order and return the National Guard to its rightful control by the State of California, to be deployed as appropriate when necessary.' In the past 60 years, a U.S. president has only on one occasion mobilized a state's National Guard troops without the consent of its governor to quell unrest or enforce the law. That was in 1965, when former President Lyndon Johnson sent Guard members to Selma, Ala., to protect civil rights protesters there.
San Francisco Chronicle
16 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest
President Donald Trump's ban on travel to the United States took effect Monday. Demonstrators outside Los Angeles International Airport held signs protesting the ban affecting citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. At Miami International Airport, passengers moved steadily through an area for international arrivals. Tensions are escalating over the Trump administration's campaign of immigration enforcement. The new ban applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mass. Sen. Warren: DOGE accessed ‘sensitive' student loan data at Education Dept., calls for probe
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she wants to know how the quasi-governmental Department of Government Efficiency gained access to 'sensitive' student loan information at the U.S. Department of Education. On Monday, Warren and U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, both Democrats, called for the agency's acting inspector general to find out how that breach happened. They were joined by Democratic senators from eight states, including U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut. Warren said lawmakers learned of the potential breach of systems at Federal Student Aid after DOGE, which was helmed until recently by tech titan Elon Musk, infiltrated the agency. In response, Education Department officials revealed that DOGE workers 'supported' a review of the FSA's contracts. As a part of that review, one employee was granted 'read-only' access to two internal systems that held sensitive personal information about borrowers. The agency said it had since revoked that access. But, according to Warren, it did not explain why that access had been revoked, or whether the employee had continued access to other databases. 'Because of the [Education] department's refusal to provide full and complete information, the full extent of DOGE's role and influence at ED remains unknown,' the lawmakers wrote in a June 8 letter to René L. Rocque, the agency's acting inspector general. That 'lack of clarity is not only frustrating for borrowers but also dangerous for the future of an agency that handles an extensive student loan portfolio and a range of federal aid programs for higher education,' the lawmakers continued. Warren, Markey and their colleagues have called on Roque's office to determine whether the department adhered to the Federal Privacy Act, which dictates how the government can collect and use personal information. They also asked Roque to 'determine the impact of DOGE's new plans to consolidate Americans' personal information across government databases.' 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says All Ivy League schools are supporting Harvard lawsuit — except these 2 Embassies directed to resume processing Harvard University student visas Over 12,000 Harvard alums lend weight to court battle with Trump in new filing Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Read the original article on MassLive.
