Temu under EU scrutiny for illegal goods on its platform
According to the Commission, its preliminary findings indicate a high risk for EU consumers to encounter unsafe or non-compliant goods on Temu, including products such as baby toys and small electronics.
'Evidence showed that there is a high risk for consumers in the EU to encounter illegal products on the platform,' the Commission said in an official statement. 'Specifically, the analysis of a mystery shopping exercise found that consumers shopping on Temu are very likely to find non-compliant products among the offer, such as baby toys and small electronics.'
The Commission criticized Temu's risk assessment procedures, calling them inadequate and overly general. According to EU regulators, the company's evaluations were based on broad industry trends rather than the specific risks present on its own platform.
If the Commission's findings are confirmed, Temu would be in breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA) — sweeping legislation designed to make large digital platforms more accountable for user safety in the EU.
'Such a decision could entail fines of up to 6% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the provider and order the provider to take measures to address the breach,' the Commission said.
A spokesperson for the Commission confirmed that Temu will be allowed to respond to the allegations in the coming weeks, though no exact deadline was given.
A Temu representative said the company plans to 'cooperate fully' with EU authorities throughout the process.
The announcement pertains to one aspect of a wider investigation into Temu's operations under the DSA. The platform is also under scrutiny for other possible breaches, including the use of addictive interface designs, the opacity of its recommendation algorithms, and insufficient data access for independent researchers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
EU AI Act doesn't do enough to protect artists' copyright, groups say
As the European Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act)comes into force, groups representing artists say there are still many loopholes that need to be fixed for them to thrive in a creative world increasingly dominated by AI. The AI Act, celebrated for being the first comprehensive legislation to regulate AI globally, is riddled with problems, these organisations say. Groups like the European Composer and Songwriter Alliance (ECSA) and the European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (GESAC) argue that it fails to protect creators whose works are used to train generative AI models. Without a clear way to opt out or get paid when tech companies use their music, books, movies, and other art to train their AI models, experts say that their work is continually at risk. 'The work of our members should not be used without transparency, consent, and remuneration, and we see that the implementation of the AI Act does not give us,' Marc du Moulin, ECSA's secretary general, told Euronews Next. 'Putting the cart before the horse' The purpose of the AI Act is to make sure AI stays 'safe, transparent, traceable, non-discriminatory and environmentally friendly,' the European Commission, the European Union's executive body, says in an explainer on the law. The law rates AI companies based on four levels of risk: minimal, limited, high, or unacceptable. Those in the unacceptable range are already banned, for example AIs that are manipulative or that conduct social scoring, where they rank individuals based on behaviour or economic status. Most generative AI falls into a minimal risk category, the Commission says. The owners of those technologies still have some requirements, like publishing summaries of the copyrighted data that companies used to train their AIs. Under the EU's copyright laws, companies are allowed to use copyrighted materials for text and data mining, like they do in AI training, unless a creator has 'reserved their rights,' Du Moulin said. Du Moulin said it's unclear how an artist can go about opting out of their work being shared with AI companies. 'This whole conversation is putting the cart before the horse. You don't know how to opt out, but your work is already being used,' he said. The EU's AI Code of Practice on General-Purpose (GPAI), a voluntary agreement for AI companies, asks providers to commit to a copyright policy, put in place safeguards to avoid any infringements of rights, and designate a place to receive and process complaints. Signatories so far include major tech and AI companies such as Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. AI providers have to respect copyright laws, the Commission says The additional transparency requirements under the AI Act give artists clarity on who has already used their material and when, du Moulin added, making it difficult to claim any payment for work that's already been scraped to train AI models. 'Even if the AI Act has some good legal implications, it only works for the future – it will not be retroactive,' Du Moulin said. 'So everything which has been scraped already … it's a free lunch for generative AI providers who did not pay anything'. Adriana Moscono, GESAC's general manager, said some of her members tried opting out by sending letters and emails to individual AI companies to get a license for their content, but were not successful. 'There was no answer,' Moscono told Euronews Next. 'There was absolute denial of the recognition of … the need to respect copyright and to get a license. So please, European Commission, encourage licensing'. Thomas Regnier, a Commission spokesperson, said in a statement to Euronews Next that AI providers have to respect the rights holders when they carry out text and data mining, and if there have been infringements, they can settle it privately. The AI Act 'in no way affects existing EU copyright laws,' Regnier continued. Mandate licence negotiations, groups ask Du Moulin and Moscono are asking the Commission to urgently clarify the rules around opting out and copyright protection in the law. 'The code of practice, the template and the guidelines, they don't provide us any capacity to improve our situation,' Moscono said. 'They're not guaranteeing … a proper application of the AI Act'. The advocates said the Commission could also mandate that AI companies negotiate blanket or collective licenses with the respective artist groups. Germany's Society for Musical Performing and Mechanical Reproduction Rights (GEMA) filed two copyright lawsuits against AI companies OpenAI, the parent of ChatGPT, and Suno AI, an AI music generation app. While not directly related to the AI Act, Du Moulin says the verdict could determine to what extent AI companies could be bound to copyright laws. The Commission and the European Court of Justice, the EU's high court, have also signalled that they will review the text and data mining exemption in the copyright legislation issued in 2019, Du Moulin said. New AI companies have to make sure they are compliant with the AI Act's regulations by 2026. That deadline extends to 2027 to companies already operating in the EU.
Euronews
15 hours ago
- Euronews
Surviving retirement: Where do older Europeans get their money?
Older people had lower average disposable incomes than the total population in 28 European countries in 2022, according to the OECD. Luxembourg was the only exception among the 29 countries included in the analysis. Pensioners face financial difficulties in many countries and some people aged 65 and over continue to work as a result. But how exactly do the income sources of older people vary across nations? According to OECD data, two-thirds (66%) of the income of people aged 65 and over in Europe comes from public payouts, which are mainly state pensions and benefits. That's on average across 27 countries in 2020 or the latest available year. Work is the largest income source after public transfers, accounting for 21% of disposable income for older citizens. Capital income, such as personal pensions and savings, follows at 7%, and private occupational pensions at 6%. The share of public payouts in incomes ranges from 41% in Switzerland to 86% in Belgium. Public transfers also account for at least three-quarters of income for older people in Luxembourg (83%), Austria (82%), Finland (80%), Czechia (76%), Italy (76%), and Portugal and Greece (both 75%). Besides Switzerland, this share is below 50% in the UK (42%), the Netherlands (43%), and Denmark (45%). Among Europe's five largest economies, France has the highest share of public transfers in older people's incomes at 78%, while the UK has the lowest at 42%. The share is 76% in Italy, 72% in Spain, and 68% in Germany. With the exception of Finland, the Nordic countries have lower shares of public transfers. The share is 52% in Sweden, and 58% in both Norway and Iceland. In Turkey, an EU candidate country, 57% of older people's income comes from public transfers. Private occupational transfers exist only in 7 countries Private occupational pensions (pensions, severance payments, death grants, etc.) are not common across Europe. Among 27 countries, only seven note them as a source of income for older people. The Netherlands has the highest share, where they account for 40% of income, followed by the UK at 33% and Switzerland at 29%. Three Nordic countries also include private occupational pensions. They make up 19% of income in Sweden, 15% in Denmark, and 14% in Norway. Germany is the last country in this group, with private occupational pensions accounting for just 5% of income. How does the share of capitals vary? The portion of income that comes from capital — mainly private pensions and personal savings — varies significantly across Europe, ranging from less than 1% in Slovakia to as much as 23% in Denmark. In several countries, this share is at least 10%. These include Turkey and Switzerland (both 16%), France (15%), Sweden (12%), the UK (11%), and Finland, Norway, and Iceland (each at 10%). The share of capital in older people's income is less than 5% in several countries. Work remains a key income source for older people The share of work in the income of older people is significant in many European countries, exceeding one-third in several. It ranges from 7% in France to 40% in Latvia. Work accounts for over 32% of income for older people in Slovakia (36%), Lithuania (35%), Estonia and Poland (both 34%), and Iceland (32%). Work still makes up at least one-fifth of older people's income in several countries, including Turkey (27%), Hungary (26%), Slovenia (23%), Ireland and Czechia (22% each), and Greece, Portugal (21% each), and Spain (20%). Older people in France, Luxembourg, Finland, and Belgium are among the least reliant on work, with employment income accounting for less than 11% of their total income. Key findings: Varied social security systems Varying levels of the four income sources for older people, most of whom are pensioners, show the diversity of social security systems across Europe. Key insights from the data include: Old age poverty remains a significant issue in several European countries, and major pension disparities continue to exist across the continent. As life expectancies increase, policymakers face growing challenges to ensure adequate support for ageing populations while keeping deficits at economically sustainable levels.
Local France
16 hours ago
- Local France
French wine industry warns of ‘brutal' impact from US tariffs
Brussels and Washington struck a trade deal at the weekend which will see most EU exports including France's cherished wines and spirits face a 15 percent US levy. 'The impact of this duty will be all the more brutal as it goes hand in hand with the decline of the US dollar in the United States,' Gabriel Picard, president of the French wine and spirits exporters' federation FEVS, said in a statement. He estimated that the combined effect 'could lead to a 25 percent reduction' in wine and spirits sales in the United States, representing a loss of €1billion. A drop in exports would also affect 600,000 jobs in the wine and spirits industry in France, the statement said. 'Negotiations must continue,' Picard said. 'The situation cannot remain as it is.' Jean-Marie Fabre, president of the union of independent winegrowers of France, urged France to continue negotiations. 'We hope to be granted an exemption,' he told broadcaster RMC. Advertisement The tariffs could reduce consumption of French champagne in the United States, warned Maxime Toubart, the co-president of the Interprofessional Champagne Wines Committee (CIVC). This would impact employment both in the United States and in France, he added. The EU said Thursday it expected its wine sector to be hit along with most European products, but negotiations were ongoing to secure a carve-out. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on Thursday that France wanted to obtain 'guarantees' for its wines and spirits.
