Sirens, gauges and flood prevention: What the Texas Legislature could do in response to Hill Country disaster
Lawmakers will return to Austin July 21 for a special session ordered by Gov. Greg Abbott, who sets the agenda for these 30 day legislative sprints. The governor has promised flood response will be at the top of the list and suggested lawmakers will have wide latitude to consider a 'top to bottom' response.
'We want to make sure that when we end that session, we end it making sure these communities are better, more resilient and have the resources that they need for the next chapter of their lives,' Abbott said at a press conference in Hunt on Tuesday. He added that the House and Senate will form committees as soon as this week.
Already, leaders of both chambers are laying out possible solutions. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who oversees the Senate, called for more sirens to warn people of approaching floodwaters and said the state should chip in the funds for communities that can't afford them.
House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican from Lubbock, said his chamber would work with experts to identify and fund solutions like flood gauges, alert systems and escape plans.
'I want to assure you, the Texas House will be organized. We will be ready,' Burrows said Tuesday. 'We stand willing and able to listen to the community and experts and do all that we can to help.
As the floodwaters receded in the Hill Country, revealing the devastation from a nearly 30-foot wall of water ripping through towns, summer camps and RV parks, questions are beginning to emerge about when and whether people were warned about the flood risks they faced that weekend.
Officials in Kerr County — the epicenter of the flood wreckage — have said the county's size, and the remoteness of its communities, make it difficult to reach people to warn them before a disaster strikes. A decade ago, Kerr County officials considered building an early flood warning system and repeatedly asked the state for help funding the $1 million project. That funding never came, and the project fizzled, the Houston Chronicle reported.
Now, after more than 100 people died, including 30 children, and with 161 people missing in Kerr County alone, state leaders are signaling they will approve money for flood-prone areas to install these sorts of warning systems. Patrick said in an interview Monday that sirens 'up and down these flash flood alleys' might have saved lives.
'Absolutely we can fund these,' Patrick said, adding he'd want them in place by next summer. 'If the cities can't afford it, we'll do it.'
State Sen. Paul Bettencourt, a Republican from Houston, said on X on Tuesday that he would file a bill to install these 'old-tech' sirens, saying too many people ignore or silence 'new-tech' phone alerts.
'It's time to go back to what worked and still does in Tornado Alley,' Bettencourt said.
The Guadalupe River also needs more flood gauges and a radar rainfall system to better track rising waters, Phil Bedient with Rice University's Severe Storm Prediction, Education, & Evacuation from Disasters Center, said in an op-ed this week.
The area also needs a modern flood tracking computer system, like those used in Houston, that would give local officials 'near-instantaneous flood predictions — showing, for instance, whether a hospital or nursing home is likely to be inundated,' Bedient said.
In 2016, when Kerr County began its aborted attempts at upgrading its flood warning systems, the county's emergency manager, Tony Leonard, said 'the only warning system is me getting up in the middle of the night and looking at it.'
And it's not just rural counties like Kerr. Bedient noted that San Antonio recently had deadly flooding and also needed more gauges, along with better alerts and escape plans.
Burrows cited Bedient's op-ed in his post about special session plans, indicating he would consult with him and other experts in crafting a response. Local officials have said they'll welcome the assistance, while encouraging lawmakers to ensure any legislation is tailored to specific areas.
'We need a practical warning system that will work for this area, and the key word there is practical,' Kerrville Mayor Joe Herring told the Tribune, adding that this area had challenges people from other areas might not consider, like lack of cell service, remote campgrounds and terrain that would make evacuations difficult.
Other lawmakers are calling to revive House Bill 13, which never got a hearing in the Senate during the regular session. The bill, authored by GOP Rep. Ken King of Canadian after last year's Panhandle wildfires, would have created a new government council to establish emergency response plans and give counties grants for emergency communication equipment.
'Lives depend on early notification, and the ability to reach Texans quickly and clearly is essential to saving lives during fast-moving disasters,' Rep. Drew Darby, a Republican from San Angelo, said in a letter to Abbott Tuesday.
Darby's district was also hit by flooding; Rep. Wes Virdell, who represents Kerrville, voted against HB 13, but told The Tribune he would reconsider that vote in light of what happened.
In addition to better flood warnings, the special session will also provide lawmakers an opportunity to look at Texas' flood mitigation systems.
After Hurricane Harvey in 2017, the Texas Legislature passed three significant bills directing more than a billion dollars to flood control and emergency response. As a result of that legislation, the Texas Water Development Board issued its first statewide flood plan in 2024, to address the needs of nearly 6 million Texans — almost 20% of the state population — living in areas susceptible to flooding.
The 265-page report recommended $55 billion worth of projects to further evaluate flood risks, better manage floodplains and mitigate the effects of future flooding. The Flood Infrastructure Fund, created after Harvey, has only committed $669 million to these projects so far.
Last session, lawmakers passed a historic $20 billion investment in the state's water infrastructure. But as part of that bill, the Flood Infrastructure Fund will be moved into the larger Texas Water Fund, and some experts worry it will result in less funding for flood mitigation as projects to increase water supply and improve aging infrastructure take precedence.
'Are we going to be putting enough into the water fund to be able to cover all the things that we need?' asked Perry Fowler, the executive director of the Texas Water Infrastructure Network. 'While it's still a significant amount, it wasn't as much as everyone hoped for, that we actually need to meet those demands.'
The Flood Infrastructure Fund can still receive other funding, separate from the water funding approved during the regular session. Since that money will be rolled out slowly — $1 billion a year until 2047 — Fowler said he hopes legislators will consider allocating more to the state's flood mitigation systems during the special session.
'It's sad when you have to depend on a tragedy to move the needle,' Fowler said. 'But there are a lot of competing interests out there, so sometimes this is what it takes to make progress, unfortunately.'
Lawmakers are also expected to provide some short-term relief to help communities across the Hill Country recover from the floods. The economic toll is estimated to be between $18 and $22 billion, Accuweather said, accounting for damage to homes, businesses, tourism losses and the costs of recovery.
Abbott has committed to getting local officials what they need, and thanked the federal government for its swift response. President Donald Trump issued a major disaster declaration for the area, allowing people to access grants for temporary housing and home repairs, and low-cost loans for other needs.
Lawmakers have previously dipped into the state coffers to help with local disaster recovery, with a large chunk of the $1.7 billion Harvey package reserved for needs like repairing damaged buildings and infrastructure.
But people who lost everything in the floods say they need significant assistance to rebuild their lives.
Lorena Guillen owns Blue Oak RV Park and Howdy's Restaurant on the same riverfront property in Kerrville. She awoke to a raging torrent and saw RVs getting swept away, including one with a family stuck inside. She is still struggling with trauma as she considers what the future looks like for her business.
'I pay $9,000 a week in payroll, and I have employees who are relying on that income because they lost things too,' she said, standing amid the wreckage Monday. 'I need someone to help me make payroll, help me rebuild, and it's going to cost so much money.'
Some experts hope to see lawmakers give cities and counties more tools to limit development in floodplains. Camp Mystic, the Christian girls summer camp that lost at least 27 campers and counselors, and other summer camps in the area, were built in high-risk flood zones. RV parks are often pushed into these areas as well.
'We can't have this race to the bottom where some places are just the Wild West, and they're able to build whatever they want while others are trying to be responsible stewards of safety and lower property damage,' Andrew Rumbach, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute who studies climate risk, told the Tribune this week.
Disclosure: Rice University has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
Shape the future of Texas at the 15th annual , happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin! We bring together Texas' most inspiring thinkers, leaders and innovators to discuss the issues that matter to you. Get tickets now and join us this November.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
20 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
U.S. and European Union announce a trade framework
EDINBURGH, Scotland — The United States and the European Union reached a tariff deal Sunday after a brief meeting between President Trump and European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen. A White House deadline was days away from imposing punishing import taxes on the 27-member EU, which is America's leading global trading partner. 'It was a very interesting negotiation. I think it's going to be great for both parties,' Trump said. The make-or-break talks were meant to head off trade penalties — and promised retaliation from Europe — that could have sent shock waves through economies around the globe. Trump and Von der Leyen held private talks at one of Trump's golf courses in Scotland, then emerged a short time later saying they had reached an 'across the board' agreement. In remarks before the session, Trump pledged to change what he characterized as 'a very one-sided transaction, very unfair to the United States.' 'I think the main sticking point is fairness,' he said while also noting, 'We've had a hard time with trade with Europe, a very hard time.' Von der Leyen had said the U.S. and EU combined have the world's largest trade volume, encompassing hundreds of millions of people and trillions of dollars. Trump said the stakes involved meant a deal should be pursued. 'We should give it a shot.' Von der Leyen said Trump was 'known as a tough negotiator and deal maker,' which prompted the president to interject, 'But fair.' She said that, if the agreement is successful, 'I think it would be the biggest deal each of us has ever struck.' For months, Trump has threatened most of the world with large tariffs in hopes of shrinking major U.S. trade deficits with many key trading partners. More recently, he had hinted that any deal with the EU would have to 'buy down' the currently scheduled export tax rate of 30%. The Republican president pointed to a recent U.S. agreement with Japan that set tariff rates for many goods at 15% and suggested the EU could agree to something similar. Asked whether he would be willing to accept tariff rates lower than that, Trump said, 'No.' As for the threat of retaliation from the Europeans, he said: 'They'll do what they have to do.' Their meeting came after Trump played golfed for the second straight day at his Turnberry course. The president's five-day visit to Scotland is built around golf and promoting properties bearing his name. A small group of demonstrators at the course waved American flags and raised a sign criticizing British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who plans his own Turnberry meeting with Trump on Monday. Other voices could be heard cheering and chanting, 'Trump! Trump!' as he played nearby. On Tuesday, Trump will be in Aberdeen, in northeastern Scotland, where his family business has another golf course and is opening a third next month. The president and his sons plan to help cut the ribbon on the new course. Joining Von der Leyen were Maros Sefcovic, the EU's chief trade negotiator; Bjorn Seibert, the head of Von der Leyen's Cabinet; Sabine Weyand, the commission's directorate-general for trade; and Tomas Baert, head of trade and agriculture at the EU's delegation to the U.S. The deadline for the Trump administration to begin imposing tariffs has shifted in recent weeks but was now firm, the administration said. 'No extensions, no more grace periods. Aug. 1, the tariffs are set, they'll go into place. Customs will start collecting the money and off we go,' U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told 'Fox News Sunday.' He added, however, that even after that, 'people can still talk to President Trump. I mean, he's always willing to listen.' Without an agreement, the EU said it was prepared to retaliate with tariffs on hundreds of American products, including such diverse items as beef, auto parts, beer and Boeing airplanes. If Trump eventually made good on his threat of tariffs against Europe, it could mean that items including French cheese, Italian leather goods, German electronics and Spanish pharmaceuticals would be more expensive in the United States. The U.S. and Britain, meanwhile, announced a trade framework in May and a larger agreement last month during the Group of 7 meeting in Canada. Trump says that deal is concluded and that he and Starmer will discuss other matters, though the White House has suggested it still needs some polishing. Weissert writes for the Associated Press.


Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
Some Republicans aren't backing down from Epstein transparency push
Amid bipartisan calls for transparency and a cascade of Epstein-related headlines, some GOP lawmakers are holding the line — while others are urging more sunlight from the Trump administration. The big picture: The case of the disgraced financier, who died in 2019, has taken on new life under the second Trump administration, creating splinters in the president's base and dominating conversations on Capitol Hill. While some Republicans are falling in line with President Trump and making calls to move on, others are defying leadership and joining in with Democrats by continuing to criticize the administration's handling of the case. Driving the news: Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who are leading a bipartisan charge to force a House vote on releasing files related to Epstein, were optimistic on Sunday's political talk shows that their measure would succeed. "It will pass," Khanna said on NBC's "Meet the Press." Massie warned on ABC's "This Week" that if a vote doesn't come to the floor, the GOP could feel political punishment in 2026, cautioning voters could "check out" because "Republicans didn't keep their promise." And with the House breaking for its weeks-long recess, Massie predicts the pressure will only build: "I don't think it's going to dissipate like the speaker hopes that it will." Yes, but: House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) argued in a Sunday interview with NBC's Kristen Welker that the lawmakers' discharge petition is "not the right approach," contending it doesn't build in "adequate protections" for victims. "House Republicans insist upon the release of all credible evidence and information related to Epstein in any way, but we are also insisting upon the protection of innocent victims," he said. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), echoed Johnson on "Meet the Press," saying he's "on board" to "release as much as you can, protecting victims the best you can." The other side: Massie, responding to the DOJ's conclusion that releasing further materials could hurt victims, told Welker, "That's a straw man." He continued, "Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted and that no child pornography will be released, so they're hiding behind that." Catch up quick: Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to "produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval" earlier this month. But a federal judge on Wednesday struck down the administration's request to unseal grand jury transcripts in connection with an investigation into Epstein, writing that the court's "hands were tied." And while Trump has said Bondi should release"credible" information, he's repeatedly bashed what he has dubbed the "Jeffrey Epstein Hoax" and blamed his political rivals for "making up" the files. Zoom out: While some Republicans and MAGA-friendly figures have turned up the heat on the administration, other Trump allies have echoed the president's targeting of his predecessors. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) sparred with CNN's Jake Tapper Sunday over Epstein's controversial plea deal with federal prosecutors in Florida, arguing the agreement was struck under the Obama administration.

Miami Herald
39 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Fury over Epstein files follows Congress home as summer break begins
WASHINGTON - As members of the U.S. House traveled back to Capitol Hill for their final work week ahead of the summer break, U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Rome, issued a warning. Writing on social media, Greene warned that the MAGA base is angry that Republicans were breaking their promise to release files associated with the sex trafficking investigation of deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. After years of being told the documents contained bombshells that would bring down well-connected Democrats, they wanted results. "The base will turn and there's no going back," she continued. "Dangling bits of red meat no longer satisfies. They want the whole steak dinner and will accept nothing else." But President Donald Trump sent Republican leaders a very different message, urging them to stand down on compelling the release of Epstein files. He said anything to the contrary was playing into Democrats' hands and would risk his wrath. Caught in the middle, House Speaker Mike Johnson mostly chose inaction and even sent members back home a day early. The issue is unlikely to die down with a base that remains dissatisfied and an ongoing bipartisan effort to force a vote on the House floor. House leaders shut down that effort by adjourning a key legislative committee, meaning very little legislative business was accomplished in the final days before the recess. U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter is among the many GOP members who agree with Trump that there is no need to vote now on releasing Epstein documents while the White House, at Trump's direction, is working to make some files public. Carter lamented that serious government spending decisions await lawmakers when they return in September partially because votes on appropriations bills were postponed during the turmoil. "It's unfortunate that we didn't get them done before the August break, but it just means we're going to have work that much harder in September," Carter, R-St. Simons Island, said. U.S. Rep. Barry Loudermilk said he understands the public interest in the Epstein files but that has to be measured against needs to protect the privacy of young victims and people whose names might be in the documents but who may not be accused of wrongdoing. "My question is: What is it that you want released?" the Cassville Republican said. "And do you know it's there? We keep talking about an Epstein list: What is that list?" No one reflects the tightrope Republican members must walk more than freshman lawmaker Brian Jack, who served as Trump's political director during his first term and who remains close with him. Jack, R-Peachtree City, was among three Republicans who voted with Democrats to subpoena the Department of Justice's Epstein-related documents. Those subpoenas will nowbe issued. The week prior, Jack voted to block a separate Democrat-led measure that would have forced a vote on the House floor on releasing the Epstein files. He has declined to speak publicly about the votes. While Republicans canceled committee meetings to avoid more tough votes on Epstein, Democrats saw an opportunity to take advantage of an issue that could have long-term impact. Congressman Hank Johnson, D-Lithonia, had a viral moment when he posted video on social media playing Jason Isbell's "Dreamsicle" on his guitar with the lyrics changed to highlight the Epstein controversy. He said it proves Republicans will do anything Trump wants them to do, even if it means shutting down the House early. But Johnson said that inaction isn't all bad. "He's doing nothing but increasing prices for the people of this country while taking away their rights at the same time," Johnson said. "So, to stop this Congress from passing additional legislation is a good thing." U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath had a slightly different take. She said Democrats were right to push for the release of Epstein documents, but she warned that the Epstein controversy risks becoming a distraction from kitchen-table issues, such as the cost of housing and health care. "It's all important, yes, but let's not take our eyes off of what's most important to the American people every single day," the Marietta Democrat said. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.