
Ayotte, hospitals settle bitter suit over Medicaid tax scheme
Gov. Kelly Ayotte announced the settlement that Attorney General John Formella's team had negotiated with the New Hampshire Hospital Association, Dartmouth Health and Concord Hospital that all had sued the state over its Medicaid Enhancement Tax (MET) program.
'This agreement is a win for our state, for rural health care access, and, most importantly, for patients,' Ayotte said in a statement.
'I am proud of my team's tireless efforts to reach a deal, and I thank Dartmouth Health, Concord Hospital, and the Hospital Association for coming back to the table to deliver the best possible outcome for everyone.'
This was the third time hospitals had sued over changes to the reimbursement. Two Superior Court judges in the past had ruled the Medicaid tax to be unconstitutional because it's imposed on the state's 26 acute-care hospitals, but not on other providers, such as rehab or day surgery facilities.
As with the previous two suits, hospital executives held further talks with state officials after the suit to reach a deal.
'This agreement is an important step toward ensuring that Dartmouth Health can continue to provide critical care to our patients and communities where and when they need it,' said Dr. Janet Conroy, CEO and president of Dartmouth Health.
'We value our partnership with the state and are grateful for Governor Ayotte's support to reach a resolution. We look forward to continued collaboration in support of a strong, sustainable healthcare system for our patients.'
According to state officials, the agreement is a 'budget neutral solution' that would deliver $1 billion in total payments to hospitals over the next three years, consistent with what hospitals had requested.
In turn, the state would receive $60 million more in benefits compared to previous proposals.
'We are pleased that we were able to reach a settlement agreement with Governor Ayotte that will help strengthen the Medicaid program, support hospitals and other essential providers, and most importantly ensure continued care for the patients and communities who count on our hospitals to be there for them when they are needed most,' said Steven Ahnen, president of the NHHA.
In 1991, the state imposed the Medicaid Enhancement Tax on hospitals to qualify the state for bonus matching grants from the federal government. Under the plan, the state pays back the hospitals for nearly all that they paid out in taxes, often on the same day.
The state received more than $300 million in annual reimbursements from Washington that it must spend on the federal/state Medicaid program.
The Biden administration ordered all states to change the hospital tax and payment arrangements that critics here always called a 'scam.'
Federal officials are requiring states to also make direct payments to the hospitals to receive the qualifying federal help, rather than just impose a tax on hospitals and then pay them back.
Since a 2018 settlement, hospitals, in the aggregate, had received 91% back of what they paid the state.
Former Gov. Chris Sununu last summer directed state officials to lower that reimbursement to 80% and to direct more grants to mental health, substance abuse and federally qualified health care centers that were financially beleaguered.
In her two-year state budget plan offered last February, Ayotte stuck with the 80% model for 2026-27.
Ahnen said this would have given the state $137 million more than it receives currently, while the hospitals would have gotten $70 million less than they do now.
The state's 11 largest hospitals as a group would have lost $100 million, Ahnen said.
To ramp up the pressure for a deal, Dartmouth Health, Concord Hospital and other major hospitals withheld the April 15 tax payment putting at risk the state's ability to generate the bonus federal match.
'We are encouraged that through this agreement with the state of New Hampshire quality, affordable health care will continue to be available to the patients and communities we serve at Concord Hospital Health System,' said Robert P. Steigmeyer, president and CEO of the Concord hospital system.
'We remain committed to working with state leaders to uphold our community-focused, charitable mission — now and for generations to come.'
This deal puts in the rearview mirror some tough rhetoric from Ayotte after the hospitals had filed a suit.
'Unfortunately, the plaintiffs are only focused on driving more money to billion-dollar corporations and have resorted to playing political games and misleading the public,' Ayotte said at the time. 'They should return to the table and come to an agreement that benefits all Granite Staters.'
The 'big beautiful bill' the U.S. House passed by one vote earlier this week to restore Trump tax cuts also would limit such Medicaid Enhancement Taxes to 5%.
This could cost this state and the hospitals each tens of millions of dollars in lost revenue.
Ayotte, a former U.S. senator, told reporters she won't overreact to the House proposal.
'When it's working its way through the process, it's hard to react to what the impact will be on New Hampshire,' Ayotte said.
Many Senate Republicans led by Sen. Josh Hawley of Arkansas have said they would oppose any significant cuts to Medicaid as part of this global federal budget agreement.
What's Next: The House Ways and Means Committee meets Tuesday on legislation (SB 249) that deals with this reimbursement scheme. The panel may decide to amend that bill to include terms of this settlement.
Prospects: Now that all the major parties are on board, the Legislature will follow suit and with some legislation embrace these terms.
klandrigan@unionleader.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
10 hours ago
- New York Post
RFK Jr. claims food stamps are fueling diabetes epidemic, wants to block their use for soda, candy
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claimed food stamps are fueling diabetes – as he called Sunday to block the taxpayer-funded welfare program for being used to buy soda and candies. 'Taxpayers should not be financing that,' Kennedy said on the 'Cats Roundtable' on WABC 770 AM radio. He said 18% of federal food stamps to poor families is spent 'on candy and sugared drinks' even as nearly 40% of children now have juvenile diabetes. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claimed that food stamps are fueling the rise in diabetes. Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images 'We are actually paying for people to get diabetes,' RFK told host John Catsimatidis. Sugary and fatty foods also contribute to obesity. American taxpayers are paying twice, RFK said — beginning with funding the purchase of food stamps, or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The program issues electronic benefits that can be used like cash to purchase food. 'We're paying again when they get [treated] through Medicaid and, ultimately, Medicare. We are poisoning them with sugars and ultra-processed food,' RFK said. Kennedy called on SNAP recipients to be barred from using it to pay for things like soda or candy. Christopher Sadowski SNAP helps low-income working people, senior citizens, the disabled and others feed their families. Eligibility and benefit levels are based on household size, income and other factors. Kennedy said the Trump administration is making headway, noting that 14 states have signed waivers that restrict the purchase of non-nutritious items like soda and candy. 'These waivers are a key step in ensuring that taxpayer dollars provide nutritious options that improve health outcomes within SNAP,' the US Dept. of Agriculture said.


Boston Globe
12 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump's Medicaid cuts deal a damaging blow to federally qualified health centers
Experts said federally qualified health centers were already on shaky financial ground, as the funding they receive for the care they provide has not kept up with rising costs, such as personnel and medical technology. Advertisement Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' signed on July 4 includes over the next 10 years. The new law is projected to cause Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up 'This kind of was the last straw,' Edward D. Shanshala, CEO of Ammonoosuc Community Health Services. In New Hampshire, about — receive health insurance through Medicaid. In Massachusetts, about 300,000 people are at risk of losing their health coverage over the next decade, and the state stands to lose about $3.5 billion in funding, Advertisement Shanshala said the health center in Franconia, which serves about 1,400 patients, will shutter by year's end. He said Ammonoosuc Community Health will lose about $524,000 of its $11.5 million operating budget due to Medicaid cuts. Closing the Franconia location will save about $230,000, he said. 'It is all we can do at this time and a decision we are forced to make, not one we want to make,' he said in a letter to staff. Franconia patients will be able to receive care at Ammonoosuc's locations in Whitefield or Littleton, 10 to 20 miles farther away for most patients, according to Shanshala. 'What about people who have transportation barriers, who might walk to my office?' said Buddensee. 'I do have patients who do that, who can't drive or don't have a license or a vehicle.' Buddensee said along with her patients, she's been saddened and disappointed about the closure. The new federal law includes work requirements for some Medicaid recipients and increased reporting requirements for enrollments and renewals, The Franconia health center isn't the only closure. Riverbend Community Mental Health announced in July it will close a supportive 'The things that are happening within the Medicaid world right now are very, very concerning and have the potential to really make it difficult for people to get the care they need,' said Lisa K. Madden, CEO of Riverbend. Advertisement The Mascoma Community Health Center in Canaan, N.H., will close at the end of October because of federal funding changes, issues with Medicaid reimbursement, high operating costs, and low patient volumes. 'Both the federal and state changes to Medicaid and the subsidies to the Affordable Care Act marketplace insurance played a big role in our decision to close,' said Ted Bolognani, CEO of HealthFirst, which has run the Canaan health center for about the last two years. New Hampshire's new state budget contained Georgia J. Maheras, senior vice president of policy and strategy at the Bi-State Primary Care Association, which covers New Hampshire and Vermont, said that since the pandemic health centers have been dealing with expenses rising faster than revenue. 'With that background, this legislation is very concerning ... it is likely that there would be additional site closures across northern New England and the country,' she said. Modeling has indicated that about a third of patients on marketplace plans will lose insurance, while 10 percent to 25 percent of Medicaid beneficiaries could lose coverage, according to Maheras. That amounts to about New Hampshire Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan said they expect about 46,000 New Hampshire residents to lose Medicaid. Another 10,000 could lose marketplace insurance, according to Shaheen. Advertisement 'In Franconia and Concord, Granite Staters are already beginning to see the devastating ways in which the Republican budget bill will hurt New Hampshire families and rip away access to health care — and sadly this is only the beginning,' Hassan said. The New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services is reviewing the impacts of state and federal legislation on the Medicaid program, spokesperson Jake Leon said. Leon did not respond to questions about the recent closures in New Hampshire or whether others are at risk of closing. 'While it may take some time to determine the full impact, the Department routinely communicates with Medicaid beneficiaries and providers and will continue to do so,' Leon wrote in an email. Federally qualified health centers are required to see all patients, regardless of their ability to pay. That means uninsured patients can still receive care, but the health center is unable to charge insurance for their visit and instead charges a sliding fee as low as $5 to $10. 'It is a significant potential loss of revenue to the health center,' said Alison L. Croke, CEO of Wood River Health, a health center with three locations in Rhode Island that she said stands to lose about $500,000 in revenue as a result of federal cuts. The health center is barely breaking even as it is, even after laying off staff and freezing salaries last year, Croke said. 'Health centers are kind of teetering on the edge there, and so if we're pushed over that cliff with a half a million dollar loss in revenue, there are some tough choices that we would need to make,' she said. Advertisement For health centers with multiple locations, shuttering some centers is one way to reduce costs, Croke said. 'Hospitals and pretty much every other provider are already under some strain in Rhode Island, and any sort of further reductions are going to further destabilize the system,' said Howard Dulude, interim president of the Hospital Association of Rhode Island. He said federal cuts may disrupt services, staffing, and access to care. Hospital closures are a concern the organization is monitoring closely, he said. Michael A. Curry, CEO of Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, said about 47 percent of patients served by members of his organization are Medicaid recipients at risk of losing coverage. 'That's a significant threat to your financial model as a health center,' he said. He said the 52 health centers represented by his organization are committed to avoiding outright closures. 'With these Medicaid cuts, health centers will have to figure out a way to change their operations, to adjust to the loss of revenue, the disruption of access to Medicaid, and then figure out how to operate a health center without those resources,' Curry said. 'That's a daunting task for any business.' Amanda Gokee can be reached at


Los Angeles Times
a day ago
- Los Angeles Times
Unsolicited requests from friends or family and other red flags
Dear Liz: I have a younger friend who has asked me to leave them a condo I own. I would prefer the condo remain in my daughter's name, and designate that the income from the condo go to my friend after my death. Is there a way to do this? Answer: Your friend just handed you a massive red flag. Please heed this warning that they may not be trustworthy. Generally speaking, people shouldn't be asking for bequests for themselves. That's especially true when the request is unsolicited — in other words, if you didn't open the door by requesting what they might want from your estate. Someone who feels comfortable enough to ask for a handout after your death may have no compunction about helping themselves to your money while you're still alive. Financial elder abuse is a huge problem, and the perpetrators are often people the victim knows such as friends, family and caregivers. Please tell your daughter about this request, and consider going together to an estate planning attorney. The attorney can make sure your estate plan is in order and discuss ways you can protect yourself from schemers and fraudsters. Dear Liz: My wife and I have health insurance through the Affordable Care Act exchange. With the enhanced tax credit ending this year, our insurance bill could go up from $500 a month to about $2,000 a month. Are there any good options or plans you can recommend? Would filing taxes separately help if my wife's income made her eligible for MediCal? Answer: ACA premiums for next year have not been set, although the cost of coverage is expected to rise sharply after Congress ended enhanced premium tax credits that made coverage more affordable. The Peterson Center on Healthcare and KFF estimate that out-of-pocket premium payments will increase about 75% on average next year because of this change. In addition, insurers are asking for premium increases to cover rising healthcare costs and tariffs may further add to the cost of drugs, medical equipment and supplies. Shop carefully during open enrollment, and consider a plan with a higher deductible to help control costs. You also could talk to a tax pro about ways to reduce your income in 2026, if it will help you qualify for a premium subsidy. Just filing your taxes differently won't get your wife qualified for MediCal, which is California's Medicaid health insurance program for low-income people. MediCal looks at household income when determining eligibility. Actually being separated might work, but discuss this option with an attorney and a tax pro since it will have many legal and tax implications. Dear Liz: Hello. I'd like to use my IRA for charitable donations when I'm required to make minimum distributions. The problem I've encountered is that I want to use a debit card for donations. I prefer to donate to small art organizations, which are set up for online donations and definitely not paper checks. I found one brokerage that offers an IRA with a debit card but when I spoke with them, they said it can't be used for charitable donations. I'm at a loss. Do you know of any way to make charitable donations from my IRA with a debit card? It's 2025! Surely someone has figured this out. Answer: You've missed a key component of how this particular tax break works. Qualified charitable contributions allow people 70½ and older to donate money from their IRAs directly to charity, without the money being taxed. The donations can count toward the required minimum distributions that must otherwise begin at age 73 (or 75 for those born in 1960 and later). Note the word 'directly.' The transfers must go straight from the IRA to the charity, without passing through your hands. The IRA custodian will be the one to send the money, either through electronic transfer or check. Liz Weston, Certified Financial Planner, is a personal finance columnist. Questions may be sent to her at 3940 Laurel Canyon, No. 238, Studio City, CA 91604, or by using the 'Contact' form at