State minister rebukes Rafizi over ‘entry ban' remark
Sarawak minister Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah says Rafizi Ramli's 'jab' at the state was unfortunate given the relationship between the federal and state governments.
PETALING JAYA : A Sarawak minister has criticised Rafizi Ramli for implying that he may be denied entry into the state once again if he loses the PKR deputy presidency race and steps down from the Cabinet.
State minister Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah said Rafizi's remarks were uncalled for.
'We have a good relationship with both Pakatan Harapan and PKR at the federal level and are together in the unity government,' the Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) leader told FMT.
'Why take a jab at us?'
Karim, the information chief of GPS lynchpin Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu, insisted that the Sarawak government, which has autonomy over immigration, has always exercised its right to deny entry into the state responsibly.
He said only individuals with malicious intent—particularly those who seek to sow division through racial and religious discord—would be barred from entering Sarawak.
'If Rafizi is no longer a minister and behaves himself when in Sarawak, of course we will not bar him,' said Karim.
Between 2013 and 2018, the Sarawak government barred Rafizi and other PH leaders from entering the state.
The ban was later reviewed after PH formed the federal government in 2018.
At a PKR election campaign event last Saturday, Rafizi suggested that he might be banned from entering Sarawak if he loses his party post and stands down as minister.
AdChoices
ADVERTISING
The economy minister previously said he would relinquish his ministerial post and the party's deputy presidency if he were to lose to his challenger, Nurul Izzah Anwar, at the PKR polls, scheduled to be held today.
On Sunday, home minister and PKR colleague Saifuddin Nasution Ismail took issue with Rafizi remarks, pointing out that Sarawak was a key partner of the federal government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
25 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Appeals court to decide Aug 19 on activist's challenge to online speech law under Communications and Multimedia Act 1998
PUTRAJAYA, June 11 — The Court of Appeal has fixed August 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier today. Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words 'offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is 'obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with 'intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In September 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words 'offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a 'permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making 'offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective. — Bernama
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
MARA, MOHE team up to monitor scholars in US amid new Trump-era policies, says Asyraf Wajdi
KUALA LUMPUR, June 11 — Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA) will work closely with the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) to closely monitor the situation involving its scholars in the United States following the introduction of new policies under President Donald Trump's administration. Its chairman, Datuk Dr Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki, said that so far, MOHE has assured that the impact on Malaysian students in the US remains minimal. 'We are working closely with the ministry because this is a government-to-government issue. We are concerned about our scholars in the US, as policies can change at any time, but the most important thing is to avoid exposing them to greater risks. 'Alhamdulillah, we hope there will be no adverse effects on our students. Let them complete their studies first. However, for new scholars, we have decided to put a hold on sending them there for now,' he told reporters after the MARA-Petronas Automotive Entrepreneur Development Programme (PUMP) here today. Asyraf said this when asked to comment on the potential impact of the new US tariffs and policies on Malaysian students pursuing education in the country. On June 1, Asyraf announced that MARA had decided to halt sending students to the US starting this year and had begun discussing with students at its preparatory colleges to explore alternative study destinations. This move comes in the wake of the Trump administration's directive to suspend visa processing for all foreign students and considerations to screen new applicants based on their social media activity. — Bernama
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Musk admits Trump criticisms ‘went too far,' expresses regret after public clash
WASHINGTON, June 11 — Elon Musk, the world's richest person and Donald Trump's former advisor, said today he regretted some of his recent criticisms of the US president, after the pair's public falling-out last week. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote on his social media platform X. Musk's expression of regret came just days after Trump threatened the tech billionaire with 'serious consequences' if he sought to punish Republicans who vote for a controversial spending bill. Their blistering break-up—largely carried out on social media before a riveted public on Thursday last week—was ignited by Musk's harsh criticism of Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful' spending bill, which is currently before Congress. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk—one of the Republican Party's biggest financial backers in last year's presidential election—to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' Trump, who also branded Musk 'disrespectful,' told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. — AFP
