Ukrainian soldier branded with ‘Glory to Russia' burned on his skin while in Russian captivity
The unidentified soldier, one of those recently released in a huge prisoner swap between the warring nations, was seen with scars and stitches from his chest to his abdomen in the photos released online Monday and authenticated by Ukrainian intelligence.
It shows the words 'Glory to Russia' branded in Russian on the right side of his wounded stomach.
Advertisement
The picture was taken by a doctor who examined the soldier after he was returned from captivity as part of a prisoner exchange between Ukraine and Russia, the Ukrainian outlet Hromadske reported.
3 A Ukrainian soldier reportedly had the words 'Glory to Russia' burned on his skin while in Russian captivity.
'Unfortunately, this is a real photo,' Ukrainian military intelligence spokesperson Andriy Yusov told the publication.
Advertisement
'During an examination at one of the regional centers where the guys are undergoing rehabilitation, the doctor simply couldn't stand it, took a picture of it and posted it online.
'This is evidence of what our defenders are going through in captivity,' Yusov said.
Around 90% of returned Ukrainian captives surveyed claimed that they were neglected in terms of food and medical care by the Russians, Yusov claimed, adding that many of the soldiers were suffering from critical weight loss.
3 Ukraine and Russia carried out the latest round of prisoner swaps this week.
AFP via Getty Images
Advertisement
'This is visually very visible and there is a difference in the state in which the occupiers return to Russia and the state in which the Ukrainian defenders return,' he said.
On Monday, Ukraine and Russia carried out the first round in the latest prisoner swap, exchanging soldiers under the age of 25.
3 Russian President Vladimir Putin is yet to meet with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images
The exchange of more than 1,200 prisoners of war each, which would also include gravely wounded soldiers, was a days-long process, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said.
Advertisement
This was part of an agreement made between Moscow and Kyiv during the latest round of peace talks between the two countries held in the Turkish city of Istanbul on June 2.
A second group of POWs was exchanged on Tuesday, Ukrainian media reported.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
7 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump Is Having Trouble Prosecuting His Enemies
In November 2017, less than a year into his first term as president, Donald Trump publicly confronted a depressing reality. The traditions of Justice Department independence, he lamented in a radio interview, limited his ability to order an investigation of Hillary Clinton. It was 'the saddest thing,' he said. 'I'm not supposed to be doing the kind of things I would love to be doing, and I am very frustrated by it.' This time around, Trump is not similarly encumbered. During the interregnum between his terms, MAGA's would-be philosophers built out the intellectual architecture for a presidential takeover of the Justice Department. Once Trump was back in office, the new administration set about filling DOJ leadership with loyalists and firing anyone who might object to abuses of power. The president, insistent that he was the victim of persecution by federal law enforcement, now seeks to turn the same apparatus against his enemies. In a representative Truth Social post last month, he shared an AI-generated video of Barack Obama being handcuffed by FBI agents and dragged out of the Oval Office. But Trump's plan to leverage the DOJ for his campaign of revenge is not generating the results he might have hoped for, and not just because Obama remains a free man. The Justice Department has been slow to move forward with the investigations Trump demanded, hemmed in by the constraints of the legal system. Federal prosecutors targeting protesters and Democratic politicians have been dealt embarrassing defeats. American criminal law appears to be a less flexible tool in the hands of an authoritarian than Trump hoped—at least for now. Attorney General Pam Bondi identified herself right away as an enthusiastic participant in the president's personal-retribution project, launching a 'Weaponization Working Group' in February that would examine past investigations of Trump. In recent weeks, the department appears to have moved toward a potential criminal investigation of officials involved in the 2016 probe of Russian election interference. Outside the Justice Department, the Office of Special Counsel has opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who, from 2022 to 2024, oversaw the two federal criminal prosecutions of Trump for potential violations of the Hatch Act, which restricts political activities by government employees. (Despite its name, the Office of Special Counsel is an independent agency with no relationship to Smith's old shop.) Jonathan Chait: Trump's desperate move to quiet the Epstein scandal This is one model of law enforcement as a weapon: specific targeting of preexisting villains. Around the country, meanwhile, federal prosecutors handpicked by Trump are experimenting with another: cracking down on dissent. Anti-ICE protesters, and even Democratic elected officials pushing for oversight of immigration enforcement, have faced criminal charges. Attorney General Robert Jackson famously warned in 1940 that the federal prosecutor 'has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America.' Still, prosecutorial authority has limits. A prosecutor has to find a crime to charge in the first place. If the offense is serious enough, the prosecutor must also be able to persuade a grand jury to issue an indictment. And if the defendant refuses to plead guilty, the prosecutor must persuade a petit jury to convict. These are far from insurmountable barriers; on the contrary, as criminal-justice reformers have long argued, the deck is stacked in favor of the prosecution. But the Trump administration keeps tripping up on them anyway. After June protests against ICE raids in Los Angeles, the office of Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli filed more than 35 felony prosecutions, mostly for alleged assault of federal officers. But the Los Angeles Times and Bloomberg report that prosecutors were unable to persuade a grand jury to indict in several cases, as is required for felony charges. Court records show that in the weeks following the protests, the office moved to dismiss at least eight cases and downgraded another five to misdemeanors. (In one instance, the office charged a case as a felony, dropped it to a misdemeanor, and then recharged it as a felony a month and a half later, this time with an indictment in hand. Prosecutors have secured indictments in at least 12 cases, though two of those were later dismissed and a third indictment originally identified the defendant by the wrong name.) For context, in 2016, the last year for which data are available, the Bureau of Justice Statistics recorded only six refusals by grand juries out of roughly 180,000 cases pursued by federal prosecutors around the country. In more ordinary times, the old saying that a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich is not far off. On the opposite coast, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey has dealt with an embarrassment of its own. The office's interim leader, Alina Habba (until recently one of Trump's personal lawyers), filed trespassing charges against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka after he attempted to visit an ICE detention facility in his city. 'NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW,' Habba trumpeted on X. Two weeks later, however, prosecutors moved to dismiss the charges. The magistrate judge handling the case chastened the office over its failure to 'thoughtfully consider the implications of your actions before wielding your immense power.' (Baraka, sitting in the courtroom during the hearing, was overheard commenting afterward, 'Jesus, he tore these people a new asshole.') Bondi, meanwhile, is struggling to respond to the president's demands to prosecute people involved in perpetrating what Trump calls the 'Russia hoax.' The biggest challenge there is that there was no hoax; as both Special Counsel Robert Mueller and a bipartisan Senate intelligence report concluded, Russia really did try to help Trump win the 2016 election. For that matter, even if the Justice Department could somehow identify a crime, any number of legal issues could trip up a prosecution—including the fact that the conduct in question took place almost 10 years ago, well past the typical five-year window for charging an offense. According to The New York Times, the attorney general was caught unawares by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's release of documents from 2016, and displeased about the political pressure from the right to launch an investigation in response. Despite an exciting headline from Fox News—'DOJ Launching Grand Jury Investigation Into Russiagate Conspiracy Allegations'—all Bondi appears to have done is ask prosecutors to possibly present grand jurors with evidence. When a grand jury will actually convene, and indeed whether it ever will, is not clear. Bondi's hedging on Russia hints at a broader awareness within the Justice Department that securing indictments, much less guilty verdicts, may be a problem. In May, Ed Martin, the crusading Trump supporter who is now leading the Justice Department's Weaponization Working Group, suggested that if the department were unable to charge 'bad actors' with crimes, it would settle for naming and shaming them publicly. (This would be a departure from long-running department policy, which holds that 'no legitimate governmental interest' is served by publicly voicing allegations against individuals without an accompanying criminal case.) Similarly, the investigation of Jack Smith might be a tacit admission of how little the administration has to go on here: The harshest penalty that the Office of Special Counsel could demand would be Smith's dismissal from government service, but he has already resigned. Shane Harris: The 'Russia hoax,' revisited These challenges are similar to ones that Trump ran into during his first term. In fact, the FBI's 2016 election-interference investigation was already the subject of an investigation by Special Counsel John Durham, which began in 2019. Despite MAGA hype, Durham's probe was a flop: He brought three criminal cases concerning alleged wrongdoing around the Russia investigation, two of which ended in acquittals by juries. (A third led to a former FBI lawyer being sentenced to probation after pleading guilty to having altered an email.) And a shaky criminal probe into former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, whom Trump had seized on as a symbol of the nefarious 'deep state,' quietly ground to a halt without charges being filed. It's difficult to say exactly what happened in the McCabe case because of strict rules around grand-jury secrecy, but one possibility is that jurors declined to issue an indictment. Still, the jury system will not always act as a defense against abuses. The same day that Baraka's case was dismissed, Habba announced her intent to indict Democratic Representative LaMonica McIver for 'forcibly impeding and interfering with federal officers' when attempting to shield Baraka from arrest. A grand jury returned the indictment. McIver has pleaded not guilty, but others might make different calculations: The overwhelming majority of criminal cases end with plea deals, because defendants decide against taking their chances in court. Meanwhile, the Justice Department recently sent out grand-jury subpoenas targeting New York Attorney General Letitia James over investigations by her office into Trump and the National Rifle Association. Fox News reports that another investigation may be under way into Trump's claims of supposed mortgage fraud by James and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff. Even if the harassment of James and Schiff goes nowhere, criminal investigations like these can be a grueling experience for the defendant, especially given the enormous cost of paying for a defense lawyer. A jury is in essence a democratic institution, requiring citizens to exercise their judgment in a model of shared deliberation that is at odds with Trump's autocratic tendencies. In the colonial era, grand juries sometimes refused to indict protesters against the Crown; in the decades before the Civil War, both grand and petit juries nullified prosecutions under the Fugitive Slave Act. Yet although the American jury system can be a powerful tool in the fight for self-government, it has not always been a reliable one. Juries also helped build the foundations of the Jim Crow South by shielding white Southerners from legal accountability for racial terror. So far, the system has held up against Trump's encroachment. But the rapid erosion of democratic life in the United States over the past six months is a reminder of how quickly things can change.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
U.N.: Syrian factions committed 'widespread and systematic' attacks on civilians in coastal violence
BEIRUT (AP) — A U.N.-backed commission that investigated sectarian violence on Syria's coast earlier this year found that there was 'widespread and systematic' violence against civilians perpetrated by some government-affiliated factions, but found no evidence that it was directed by the central government. An extensive report released Thursday by the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria examined the violence that began with clashes between armed groups aligned with former Syrian President Bashar Assad and the new government's security forces in March. It then spiraled into sectarian revenge attacks and massacres that killed hundreds of civilians from the Alawite religious minority to which Assad belongs. The violence came months after Assad was ousted in a lightning rebel offensive in December and at a time when the country's new rulers were attempting to forge a new national army out of a patchwork of former insurgent factions. 'Widespread and systematic' violations The commission named several government-affiliated factions whose members allegedly took part in 'extrajudicial killings and torture and ill-treatment of primarily the civilian population of Alawi majority villages and neighborhoods in a manner that was both widespread and systematic" during the coastal violence. They include the 62nd and 76th divisions of the new Syrian army, also known as the Sultan Suleiman Shah Brigade and the Hamza Division — both of them formerly part of a coalition made up of Turkish-backed armed factions in northwest Syria. The report also singled out the 400th Division, made up of former brigades of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, an Islamist rebel group that was formerly led by Syria's current interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa. However, the report said the commission "found no evidence of a governmental policy or plan to carry out such attacks." It also found that pro-Assad armed groups had committed 'acts that likely amount to crimes, including war crimes" during the violence. A separate investigation into the coastal violence ordered by the government released its findings last month. It concluded that some members of the new Syrian military had committed 'widespread, serious violations against civilians,' but said there was no evidence that military leaders had ordered those attacks. The government investigation found that more than 1,400 people, most of them civilians, were killed. In a letter in response to Thursday's U.N. report, Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani said the government takes 'serious note of the alleged violations' detailed in it the report and said that the recommendations — which included increased screening of recruits to the security forces and recruiting from minority communities — 'will serve as a roadmap for Syria's continued progress.' How the violence unfolded The U.N. commission's report noted that in the leadup to the coastal violence in March there had been scattered clashes between pro-Assad and new government forces as well as increasing incidents of 'harassment and violations" against Alawite communities, "including killings, abductions, looting or occupation of property.' In early March, pro-Assad armed groups launched a series of attacks on the General Security forces of the new government along the coast. During the clashes that followed, pro-Assad fighters also overran hospitals, shot at and abducted journalists coming to cover the conflict, and in at least one case shot and killed women and children, the report said. With the General Security forces overwhelmed, tens of thousands of fighters from allied factions, as well as armed civilians, converged on the coast. Many began raiding houses in Alawite-majority areas, where in many cases they 'asked civilians whether they were Sunni or Alawi' and 'Alawi men and boys were then taken away to be executed,' the report found. 'Most victims were men of Alawi background, aged between 20 to 50 years, though women and children as young as one year old were also killed during house raids,' the report said. In some cases, the bodies were then desecrated, and family members were prevented from burying their dead. The report also found that there had been widespread cases of robbery and looting by armed groups. Allegations of abduction and sexual assault The commission also investigated reports of kidnapping of Alawite women and found 'credible information' of at least six cases in the weeks preceding and following the main outbreak of violence in March. It is investigating 'dozens' of other reports. In at least two of the confirmed cases, the victims were 'abducted for the purpose of forced marriage,' while in other cases, the kidnappers demanded ransoms from the victims' families. In one particularly disturbing case prior to the coastal clashes, the report said masked men dressed in black and wearing black headbands inscribed with 'There is no god but God' abducted a woman from the street and gang-raped her, then sold her to an older man to whom she was forcibly married. 'The Commission is not aware of any individuals being arrested or prosecuted yet in connection with these abductions,' the report said. Another threat to the political transition The investigation into the coastal violence comes as Syria is reeling from another outbreak of sectarian violence last month that has again threatened the country's fragile political transition after nearly 14 years of civil war. This time, clashes broke out in the southern Sweida province between government forces and local Bedouin tribesmen on one side, and fighters from the country's Druze minority on the other. Hundreds were killed and tens of thousands displaced, and allegations have surfaced of government fighters executing Druze civilians and looting and burning houses. The government has again launched an investigation into the allegations, but minority communities have become increasingly wary of the Sunni Muslim-led authorities. Last week, representatives of Syria's various ethnic and religious groups held a conference in Kurdish-controlled northeastern Syrian city and called for the formation of a decentralized state and the drafting of a new constitution that guarantees religious, cultural and ethnic pluralism.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
NY POSTcast Daily Debrief: Kohberger's ‘living hell,' Trump wants more control of DC Police and Zelensky on US- Russia summit
Here is a brief recap of all the great stories you'll find in today's NY POSTcast. But there are so many MORE details in the pod (and even more headlines!) Click the links below to listen or subscribe where you get your podcasts! Bryan Kohberger's Prison Hazing a 'Living Hell' Bryan Kohberger was transferred to his permanent prison home just a few weeks ago after a judge slapped him with multiple life sentences for slaughtering four University of Idaho students in 2022. Evidently Kohberger is not too popular in prison. He's reportedly already complaining about harsh treatment from his fellow inmates. President Trump to Ask Congress for Extension of DC Police Control President Trump is already eyeing an extension to the 30-day limit of the power he has to federalize DC police officers and he's counting on a Congressional crime bill to do it. He also wants the legislation to include funding for 'the finest grasses' for city parks and money to fix crumbling roads in the district. Trump and Zelensky speak ahead of Friday's Summit Ahead of Friday's historic meeting with Vladimir Putin, President Trump spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky yesterday, calling it 'very friendly.' Zelensky told reporters that he and President Trump are of one mind heading into this, saying that the number one goal is a ceasefire. Both leaders seem to agree that a ceasefire is what has to come first – before almost anything else – including security guarantees that Ukraine says it needs to move forward. Hosted by acclaimed Emmy-winning journalist Caitlyn Becker, the NY POSTcast sets you up to tackle your weekdays with insight into the biggest news stories impacting your life all in one neat little podcast your day with the news only the New York Post can deliver. You'll get the headlines you need and the stories you want. Every episode includes a deep dive into a headline impacting your world plus, the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime, and everything in between. It's smart, it's fast, and it's fearless. Your daily news download from the New York Post — keeping you informed AND entertained. Find the NY POSTcast wherever you get your podcasts.
