logo
Their synagogue taught them to build peace. An antisemitic attack is testing their resilience

Their synagogue taught them to build peace. An antisemitic attack is testing their resilience

Yahoo04-06-2025
Fifteen minutes outside of downtown Boulder, Colorado, sandwiched between a golf course and a marsh, is Congregation Bonai Shalom.
In Hebrew, bonai shalom means 'builders of peace,' and the congregation welcomes both Jews and non-Jews to participate in all aspects of the community.
But that peace was shattered when an antisemitic attack at an event in support of hostages in Gaza left six members of the congregation injured, including one woman who was a Holocaust survivor.
The attack, the latest in a wave of antisemitic violence that has stretched from coast to coast, has further horrified the Jewish community.
'The fact that in 2025 someone can just literally try to burn Jews to death on the streets of Boulder, Colorado, is shocking,' Congregation Bonai Shalom Rabbi Marc Soloway said.
'We're grieving.'
Six others were injured in the firebombing attack. Some suffered severe burns.
The suspected attacker, Mohamed Soliman, has been charged with hate crime and attempted murder.
The emotional trauma is 'immense,' Soloway said.
'I still feel ripples,' he said, telling CNN's Erica Hill the whole Jewish community is 'traumatized.' One congregant is 'touch-and-go' with horrific burns all over her body, Soloway said. The attack, he added, brought back 'horrendous memories' of our own Jewish history.
Barbara Steinmetz, who escaped the Holocaust as a child, was one of the congregants injured in Sunday's attack. Steinmetz said her family fled Europe in the 1940s, according to the CU Independent, the student news website for the University of Colorado Boulder.
Her father, she said, applied for asylum to countless countries before the Dominican Republic accepted them. The family immigrated to the United States years later, and she moved to Boulder in 2006. Steinmetz was honored by the Boulder Jewish Community Center in 2020 for creating positive change throughout Boulder County.
Jonathan Lev, executive director at the Boulder Jewish Community Center, said the victims were pillars who helped build the community.
'They bring to life what Jewish life can be,' he said.
After what happened on Sunday, he said, 'how could you not be scared?'
The shock traveled to Pittsburgh, where Michael Bernstein, chair of the board for the Tree of Life, said it felt all too familiar — and brought back recent memories.
In 2018, a gunman killed 11 worshippers and wounded six others at the Tree of Life Synagogue. It was the deadliest-ever attack on Jewish people in the United States.
'The hearts of our community, I know, are aching right now,' Bernstein told CNN's Bianna Golodryga. 'We know what happens when an attack like this shatters a community.'
The Boulder Jewish Community Center, just down the road from Congregation Bonai Shalom, is hosting a community vigil Wednesday night.
'Healing begins with coming together in community,' a joint statement from leaders in the Boulder Jewish community said.
'We're resilient,' Soloway added. 'We're here for each other, and we'll get through it.'
He said peaceful walks for the Israeli hostages in Gaza, like the one his congregants were participating in on Sunday, should continue.
Congregation Bonai Shalom's calendar is packed with summer events. There are shabbat services and bar mitzvahs. On Thursday, there's a conversation about immigration scheduled. A poetry and reflection meeting is planned for the end of the month.
A Boulder Jewish Festival will still take place on Sunday despite the attack.
We are 'taking steps to reimagine the event in a way that helps our community heal and feels grounded in the reality' of the attack, the Boulder Jewish community's statement said.
Continuing to celebrate the Jewish community and traditions is part of the healing process, said Maggie Feinstein, the director of a healing partnership founded in Pittsburgh after the Tree of Life shooting.
She encouraged those affected by the attacks to lean into Jewish joy and ritual.
'Don't shy away from that, even though that was what somebody tries to tear apart,' Feinstein said. 'If we stop the ritual of joy, then it's hard to be resilient.'
Lev, the Boulder Jewish Community Center executive director, said the community is choosing to respond to the grief and threat with 'love, connection and community.'
Soloway said he and his congregation have received 'outpourings of love from other faith partners.'
'They're here for us, we're here for each other,' he said.
His congregation already had an event planned for Friday before Sunday's attack. The session, planned before the attack, is timely.
Reverend Pedro Senhorinha Silva, Soloway's friend, is scheduled to lead a reflection called 'Joy Comes in the Morning.'
The session, the congregation said, will explore how to hold grief in one hand and joy in the other.
CNN's Alisha Ebrahimji and Shimon Prokupecz contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Several Texas Democrats join Rep. Nicole Collier in chamber protest
Several Texas Democrats join Rep. Nicole Collier in chamber protest

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Several Texas Democrats join Rep. Nicole Collier in chamber protest

Several Texas Democrats joined state Rep. Nicole Collier (D) on Tuesday to protest new guidelines preventing party members from leaving the House chambers without a police escort and signed agreement. Democratic State Reps. Mihaela Plesa, Morales Shaw, Rhetta Bowers, Cassandra Garcia Hernandez and Salman Bhojani joined Collier and House Minority Leader Gene Wu on the floor after their Monday overnight in rebuke of GOP lawmakers' redistricting efforts. Several members tore up their 'permission slips' outside the chamber. Texas lawmakers will vote on whether to add five new congressional seats on Wednesday after a group of Democrats fled the state for 15 days seeking to prevent a quorum, the number of present legislators required to proceed with votes. 'Yesterday, I left in custody and I came back in custody, because I stand with Nicole Collier and Gene Wu,' Shaw said. 'This is illegitimate, this is a wrongful use of power, and I will not condone it, and I don't want to be a part of setting a very bad and low precedent for future legislators,' she added. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) said Monday lawmakers who leave the floor would have to agree to be shadowed by a Department of Public Safety officer until Wednesday morning. 'This is a blatant violation of our freedoms as Texans, as Americans and as duly elected officials,' Bowers said, as reported by CNN. Collier gained national attention over her decision to remain inside the House chamber overnight instead of leaving with an officer. 'I refuse to comply with this unreasonable, un-American and unnecessary request,' Collier, who spent two nights on the House floor, told CBS News. The Democrat said she received a call from former Vice President Harris encouraging her to continue her efforts in the Lone Star State. 'She said, 'Keep going.' She said, 'Don't give up. Stand strong. Stand tall, and don't back down,''she told CNN's Dana Bash on 'The Arena.'

Why International Recognition of a Palestinian State Actually Matters
Why International Recognition of a Palestinian State Actually Matters

Atlantic

time21 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Why International Recognition of a Palestinian State Actually Matters

France, Britain, Canada, Australia, and Malta all say they are preparing to recognize a state of Palestine at the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in September. They would join another 147 UN countries that already do so. In some senses, the move is symbolic: It will not change the realities on the ground in the Middle East, at least not in the short term. But it is a major step nonetheless. No Israeli-Palestinian 'peace process' is currently under way, the countries pledging recognition noted in their statements. This is because Israel refuses to speak with the diplomatic representative of the Palestinian people, the Palestine Liberation Organization. In effect, Israel has held the PLO and its subsidiaries—the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and the Fatah political party—responsible for the actions of all Palestinians, including the PLO's extremist archrival, Hamas. (The United States, for its part, has never had a bilateral relationship with the Palestinians.) The struggle for Palestinian statehood has been long and arduous. The PLO and PA, to be sure, have sometimes gotten in their own way. In the West Bank, the PA has overseen a corrupt system that leaves little space for civil society. And the PLO has squandered several potential opportunities to pursue statehood, especially an overture in 2008 by then–Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. But both groups have maintained a commitment to negotiation over violence, and have honored the 1993 recognition of Israel by Yasser Arafat, the PLO's former leader. The Western nations' formal acknowledgment of a Palestinian state under the leadership of the PLO will boost the idea that this kind of diplomacy, rather than the armed struggle of Hamas, is the path that can actually result in Palestinian independence and citizenship for the stateless millions in the occupied territories. From the December 2024 issue: My hope for Palestine International recognition will do as much to rebuke Hamas's maximalist demands as it will those of the Israeli right, dealing a blow to expansionist aspirations in the West Bank, the only territory that has any realistic chance of becoming a Palestinian state. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long been characterized by a basic asymmetry: The international recognition of Jewish national rights in Palestine has never been matched by a demand for Palestinian national rights. This was the case as far back as the British government's 1917 Balfour Declaration and the British mandate for Palestine, which took effect several years later. Palestinians may have had an opportunity in 1947 to create their state through a UN partition resolution. In retrospect, they should have accepted the proposal, but their rejection at the time is understandable. Jews made up about 33 percent of the population and owned a mere 6 percent of privately held land in Mandatory Palestine; the UN partition resolution would have allotted the proposed Jewish state more than 56 percent of the territory. Two decades later—after multiple wars—Israel declared itself a state that would come to control the entire territory, including East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip, all of which have populations that are majority Palestinian Arab. Roughly 800,000 Palestinians were expelled or fled in 1947 and 1948, followed by another 300,000 in 1967. Almost none have been allowed to return. In 1968, Palestinians resurrected an independence movement that wrested decision making away from Egypt and other Arab countries that had been humiliated in the Six-Day War. Their crushing defeat gave Palestinians a measure of self-determination through the establishment of a renewed autonomous PLO. In the '80s, the PLO evolved into the vehicle of a drastically reduced Palestinian aspiration: the establishment of an independent Palestinian state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip, all territories Israel had occupied since 1967. ​​The First Intifada, or uprising, against Israeli rule in the occupied territories, which began in 1987, gave the PLO an opportunity to greatly expand its presence there, but it also seeded a new group of rivals, the Muslim fundamentalists of Hamas. A breakthrough seemed possible in the aftermath of the Cold War. In 1993, PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat wrote to Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin affirming that, on behalf of the Palestinian people, the PLO recognized Israel and its right to exist free from attacks and threats. Rabin responded with a letter to Arafat recognizing the PLO as a legitimate interlocutor and undertaking to negotiate with it. But he didn't recognize a state of Palestine, and the 1993 Oslo Accords with Israel did not specify the goal of Palestinian statehood or acknowledge the Palestinians' right to a state. In the summer of 2000, U.S. President Bill Clinton convened a summit at Camp David. Accounts vary on what Israel, then led by Prime Minister Ehud Barak, offered. But the Palestinians who attended came away convinced that they were being asked to accept an archipelago of quasi-independent Bantustans within a greater Israel. Because of an internal leadership crisis, among other failings, the Palestinians presented no detailed counteroffer. And Clinton entirely backed Israel. The violent Second Intifada against Israeli rule in the occupied territories began on September 28, 2000. Nonetheless, negotiations resumed that fall. In late December, Clinton unveiled what is still the most reasonable framework yet proposed for an agreement that would end the conflict. But Israel suspended the negotiations pending elections early in 2001. The right-wing former General Ariel Sharon became prime minister, and the talks were not resumed. In subsequent years, some hopeful signs for Palestinian statehood persisted. In 2002, President George W. Bush endorsed establishing a Palestinian state, and his administration voted for UN Security Council Resolution 1397, which, for the first time, explicitly called for two states 'side by side within secure and recognized borders.' Palestinian divisions intensified, however, after the 2005–06 elections resulted in the acrimonious pairing of a Fatah/PLO leader, Mahmoud Abbas, with a Hamas-dominated Parliament. In 2007, Hamas violently seized control of Gaza, precipitating a split with the West Bank that continues to this day. Jeffrey Goldberg: Sinwar's march of folly The Palestinians had one more potential chance at statehood through negotiations. In 2008, Olmert, the Israeli prime minister, offered an agreement that the PLO, led by Abbas, considered broadly reasonable. However, Abbas doubted that Olmert was speaking on behalf of Israel, or even his own government, given that most members of his cabinet reportedly opposed his proposal. Moreover, the Palestinian negotiators could not get anything in writing. The deal also included Palestinian concessions on issues such as refugees, and Abbas ran the political risk of being seen to accept concessions while ultimately being left with nothing if Israel didn't follow through. Neither Olmert nor Abbas was willing to take the issue directly to the Israeli public, and the negotiations fizzled. Since that time, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has dominated the Israeli political scene and dedicated himself to preventing any movement toward Palestinian statehood. He exploited the rift between Fatah in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza, seeking to keep both in power and at each other's throats, and thereby unable to advance their respective visions of independence. The Hamas attack of October 7, 2023, betrayed the folly of this policy. But it also hardened the position of the Israeli right that to live next to any Palestinian state would be an intolerable security risk. In the nearly two years that war has raged in Gaza, Netanyahu has become ever more explicit in his refusal of a two-state solution. Just last month, he ruled out the prospect of Palestinian statehood, saying that it would only serve as a platform for the elimination of Israel. The Israelis claim that recognition would reward Hamas and terrorism. But the opposite is true. Pretty much the only thing Hamas and Fatah agree on is that they are all Palestinians. Other than that, the disagreements are almost total: The PLO is a secular national movement that still seeks a negotiated peace with Israel through diplomacy, and to establish a small Palestinian state in the occupied territories. Hamas is an Islamist party and militia that wants a theocratic Muslim government in not just the occupied territories but also what is now Israel. In Palestinian politics, the binary is so stark that virtually anything that strengthens one group weakens the other. Recognizing a Palestinian state under the authority of the PLO harms Hamas and rewards the patient diplomacy and commitment to peace of its rivals in Fatah. Already, the PLO has benefited from an apparently minor change in its status at the UN in 2012, from 'observer' to 'non-member observer state.' This gave it standing at the International Criminal Court and suggests what international recognition—something Israel cannot take away—can accomplish: the potential protection of key multilateral instruments and institutions, and thus the potential frustration of Israeli ambitions for further annexation. While the world's eyes have been fixed on the horrors of war in Gaza, far-right Israeli officials, led by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, have effectively taken charge of West Bank, where they are stoking conflict by encouraging right-wing settlers to confront Palestinian villagers. When Donald Trump won the U.S. presidency last year, Smotrich celebrated, saying that the opportunity had come to annex the West Bank. The Israeli military has displaced 40,000 Palestinians in the territory, according to the United Nations, and extremist settlers have continued to harass and attack villagers. International recognition of Palestinian statehood could seriously complicate Israel's designs on the West Bank. Britain has said that it will recognize Palestine if the Gaza war continues into September, but France and Canada appear focused on discouraging Israeli annexation in the West Bank. Each is sending a clear message to Israel: End the war in Gaza, and more important, do not expand formalized control of the West Bank, the only territory that could become a true state for Palestinians. Pushing back against Israeli annexation efforts is crucial to reviving the possibility of a two-state solution. Canada, Australia, Britain, France, and Malta are not asking or expecting Israel to withdraw from the West Bank tomorrow. But they clearly understand the danger that further settlement there poses to the Palestinian independence movement. Netanyahu and his allies know this too. Smotrich has his eyes firmly on annexation, having recently announced new settlements surrounding Jerusalem that he says will 'bury' any potential for a Palestinian state. The world must act as if a two-state solution is not merely necessary, but possible. International recognition of a Palestinian state is a key start. Without such a state alongside Israel, these two beleaguered peoples, the whole region, and the entire world will be sentenced to further decades, and possibly centuries, of bloodshed and oppression. Shrugging, walking away, and accepting this outcome cannot be an option.

Israel set to approve 'largest' gas supply deal in its history to Egypt
Israel set to approve 'largest' gas supply deal in its history to Egypt

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Israel set to approve 'largest' gas supply deal in its history to Egypt

The Israeli government is set to finalise a major gas supply agreement with Egypt, involving the export of 22% of resources from Leviathan, Israel's largest gas field, and 13% of the country's total natural gas to Cairo over several years. The deal comes after two years of delays and is expected to be signed in the next two weeks. New Energy, a partner in the Leviathan field, described the agreement as the "largest" in the history of the Hebrew state, noting that it will triple Israeli exports by 2028. The company announced that Egypt will buy 130 billion cubic metres of Israeli gas until 2040, worth up to $35 billion (€30bn). The project is an amendment to the 2019 agreement signed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, which stipulated the export of only around 60 billion cubic metres by the early 2020s. The project allows Israel to increase natural gas production and export it to Asian and European markets, while at the same time guaranteeing Egypt a stable supply for its power plants and supporting the country's liquefied natural gas (LNG) sector. Stages of the deal and quantities of gas NewMed Energy (formerly known as Delek Drilling) confirmed that the deal will take place in phases, with Cairo first buying the gas through Egyptian importers Blue Ocean Energy, with 20 billion cubic metres starting in the first half of 2026, and an additional 110 billion cubic metres after the expansion of Leviathan's production is completed, according to the Hebrew newspaper Globes. The company described the deal as pivotal, as it will allow the field's production capacity to expand from 21 billion cubic metres to 23 billion cubic metres per year, strengthening Leviathan's position as one of the most important gas sources in the region. Related Top UK CEOs richer than ever: FTSE 100 boss pay breaks records for third year EU signs €500 million loan to safeguard Ukraine's energy security ahead of winter Export plan for Israel's domestic economy By 2035, Israel will export 60% of the gas produced in the field, while 40% will be allocated to the domestic market to meet the needs of new power plants. In 2024, the field produced about 11 billion cubic metres of gas, 50% of which was exported to Egypt, while the rest was distributed between Israel's domestic economy and Jordan. In terms of gas supply to the Israeli economy, NewMed Energy confirmed that the expansion will ensure that from the 2040s, Leviathan will be Israel's main source of gas, providing the bulk of the country's natural gas consumption until the end of the field's life. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store