Middle Eastern Headlines at 2:15 p.m. GMT
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
14 Things People Say When They're Picking A Fight On Purpose
Ever had someone just pick a fight out of the blue, and you're left wondering what sparked it? You're not alone. Sometimes people go on the offensive for reasons that have nothing to do with the actual trigger. Whether it's stress, unresolved issues, or plain old boredom, these conflicts can leave you feeling frustrated and confused. Let's break down some things people say when they're itching for a fight, and why these phrases might be more loaded than they appear. 1. "Why Are You Always Like This?" This phrase immediately puts you on the defensive. It suggests there's something fundamentally wrong with your behavior, even if you're just being yourself. Saying "always" implies a pattern, making you feel like you're in a rerun of a show you never wanted to watch. Dr. John Gottman, a relationship expert, notes that phrases like this can lead to defensiveness, one of the "Four Horsemen" that predict relationship breakdowns. It's not just an attack on your current action; it's a critique of your character, making you feel like you need to defend your very existence. Once you're cornered into defending yourself, the actual issue often gets lost in translation. The person who said it may not even care about what they're critiquing; they just want to pick a fight. It's a diversion tactic, shifting the focus from whatever the real problem might be. This can leave you feeling like you're trapped in a maze with no way out. Understanding the underlying intent can help you navigate these verbal landmines more effectively. 2. "You Never Listen To Me." This statement is a classic way to ignite a conflict. It's accusatory and sweeping, making you feel like you're inadequate. It forces you to reflect on every conversation you've ever had with this person, trying to pinpoint where you went wrong. The problem is that it doesn't offer specifics, leaving you guessing what the root issue might be. Without a clear example, it's tough to address the problem constructively, and you're both left spinning in circles. Feeling attacked, you might start listing all the times you did listen, which can escalate the situation. The conversation derails into a tit-for-tat, and the original concern is left unresolved. Often, the real issue isn't about listening at all; it's about feeling undervalued or ignored. Instead of engaging in defensive maneuvers, try asking them what they need from you. It can change the direction of the conversation into something more productive. 3. "You're So Sensitive." Being called sensitive can feel like a slap in the face, especially when you're just expressing your feelings. It delegitimizes your emotions, making them seem like an overreaction. Dr. Elaine Aron, who specializes in studying sensitivity, points out that sensitivity can be a strength, fostering empathy and deep connections. However, in a fight, this phrase aims to make you question your emotional responses, pushing you to react more strongly. It's a punch disguised as an observation, forcing you to justify your feelings rather than addressing the actual issue at hand. This tactic can make you feel isolated and misunderstood, as if your emotions are invalid. It's a diversion, intended to derail the conversation from the actual issue. Rather than diving into a debate over your sensitivity, steer the conversation back to the real topic. Question why your emotions are being brought into the argument in the first place. It's a way to regain control and shift the focus back to what truly matters. 4. "I Guess You Think You're Perfect." This is a loaded statement designed to provoke. It suggests arrogance on your part, even if that's far from the truth. By accusing you of thinking you're perfect, it puts you in a no-win situation. Any attempt to defend yourself can be twisted into further evidence of your alleged arrogance. It takes the focus off the issue and turns it into a personal attack, making it harder for you to engage constructively. Responding to this effectively requires a bit of finesse. Acknowledge that no one is perfect, including yourself. This can defuse the situation, showing that you're open to constructive dialogue. It redirects the conversation back to resolving the issue at hand rather than dwelling on personal shortcomings. Keeping the focus on problem-solving rather than personal attacks can help calm the storm. 5. "You Always Make Everything About You." This accusation can come out of nowhere, blindsiding you and putting you on the defensive. The word "always" is key here—it's another sweeping generalization that paints you as self-centered. Psychology professor Dr. Lisa Firestone suggests that such statements can stem from past grievances that haven't been aired properly. Instead of discussing specific instances, the accuser opts for a blanket statement that's hard to counter. It leaves you scrambling to prove your selflessness, all while the real issue goes untouched. The statement itself is often more about the accuser's feelings than any real pattern of behavior on your part. They might feel sidelined or neglected, making it less about your actions and more about their emotions. Rather than arguing over the accusation, focus on understanding their perspective. Ask what specifically made them feel this way and work from there. It shifts the dialogue from blame to understanding, which is far more productive. 6. "I'm Not The Problem Here." This phrase is a clear sign that the other person is not willing to take any responsibility. It immediately sets a confrontational tone, implying that all the blame lies with you. Even if there's shared responsibility, this statement dismisses any potential for a balanced conversation. It shuts down constructive dialogue and leaves you feeling cornered. When someone is unwilling to acknowledge their part, it becomes difficult to find a resolution. In this scenario, any attempt to discuss the real issue becomes sidetracked by personal defenses. The situation can quickly escalate into a blame game, with both parties talking past each other instead of to each other. Instead of getting sucked into this vortex, try to steer the conversation back to the issue at hand. Highlight the importance of both parties contributing to the solution. This can create a more balanced atmosphere where both of you can speak openly. 7. "Why Can't You Be More Like [Someone Else]?" Comparisons like this are a surefire way to spark conflict. It immediately makes you feel inadequate and undervalued, as if you're being measured against an impossible standard. Research from Dr. Brené Brown shows that comparisons can trigger feelings of shame and disconnection, making productive conversations difficult. By bringing someone else into the mix, the focus shifts from the current issue to your perceived shortcomings. It's not a fair fight; it's a rigged game where you're set up to lose. Instead of embracing the challenge, you may find yourself becoming defensive. This statement can make you dig in your heels, reinforcing the divide rather than bridging it. The key is to redirect the conversation away from comparisons and back to the real issue. Highlight your unique strengths and ask how they can contribute to resolving the problem. It's a way to bring the focus back to what matters, rather than who you're not. 8. "You're Overreacting." Being told that you're overreacting can feel invalidating, as it trivializes your emotions. It suggests that your feelings are out of proportion to the situation, making you question your judgment. The underlying message is that you're the problem, not the issue at hand. It's a dismissive tactic that can leave you feeling small and misunderstood. This phrase can shift the focus from the actual problem to your emotional state, complicating any attempt to resolve the issue. In response, you might feel the urge to defend your emotions, inadvertently escalating the conflict. The conversation shifts from the issue at hand to a debate over your emotional responses. This can make it difficult to address the original concern and find a resolution. Instead of engaging in this emotional tug-of-war, try to steer the conversation back to the facts. Focus on what can be done to address the real problem, rather than dwelling on emotional reactions. 9. "You Just Don't Get It." This statement is a conversation stopper. It immediately places you on the outside, suggesting you lack understanding or insight. It's a subtle way to suggest intellectual or emotional inferiority, leaving you with little room to maneuver. When someone says this, they're not just challenging your viewpoint; they're dismissing it entirely. It can feel like a dead end, making it hard to engage in any meaningful dialogue. The frustration is palpable, often making you feel defensive. Your natural response might be to demand clarification, but that rarely leads to constructive conversation. The key is to dig deeper and ask them to explain their perspective without getting defensive. Encourage them to share what you're supposedly missing, which can open up the lines of communication. It's a way to turn the confrontation into a learning opportunity, bridging the gap that "You just don't get it" creates. 10. "I Should Have Known Better." This phrase carries a heavy load of regret and accusation. It's essentially saying they wouldn't be in this mess if it weren't for you. It implies they've compromised by trusting you, and now they're paying the price. While it might seem like they're blaming themselves, the undercurrent is that you're the real culprit. It's a passive-aggressive way of holding you responsible for their disappointment or frustration. The weight of this statement can trigger a defensive response, leading to arguments rather than solutions. It can feel like you're being held accountable for someone else's choices, which isn't fair. Instead of accepting blame that isn't yours, encourage an open dialogue about what went wrong for both parties. Focusing on shared responsibility can help shift the conversation from blame to collaboration. It's about creating a space where both parties can express their perspectives and work towards a resolution. 11. "Whatever, Do What You Want." This phrase might seem like a nonchalant surrender, but it often carries an undercurrent of resentment. It's dismissive, indicating the person has given up on reaching a consensus. While it may sound like they're giving you freedom, it's more about relinquishing responsibility. The implication is that they've stopped trying to engage constructively, leaving you to navigate the situation alone. It's an emotional withdrawal that can feel more like punishment than freedom. Faced with this, your instinct might be to assert your independence, which can further distance you from the real issue. It shifts the dynamic from collaboration to autonomy, which can hinder resolution. Instead of letting the conversation end there, try to re-engage them in dialogue. Express that you value their input and would prefer to find a mutual solution. This can encourage them to re-enter the conversation and work towards a resolution together. 12. "You're Impossible To Deal With." This statement is a direct challenge to your character, suggesting you're inherently difficult. It closes down the conversation by implying that there's no point in trying to resolve the issue. When someone says this, they're not just critiquing your behavior; they're dismissing any chance of collaboration. It's a verbal shut door, indicating they see no value in further discussion. Such phrases can leave you feeling isolated and frustrated, as if there's no way forward. In response, you might feel the need to defend yourself, which can escalate the situation. The conversation moves from problem-solving to character defense, which isn't productive. Instead of accepting this characterization, focus on reopening the dialogue. Acknowledge their frustration and ask what can be done to make the situation more workable for both parties. It's about turning "impossible" into a challenge that both of you can tackle together. 13. "I'm Done Talking About This." When someone says they're done talking, it's a signal they're not interested in finding a solution. It's a way to shut down the conversation and exit the dialogue altogether. This phrase often masks deeper issues that haven't been addressed, leaving unresolved tension. It leaves you hanging, feeling like there's no way to move forward. Instead of closure, it creates a communication gap that can widen over time. Your first reaction might be to push for more dialogue, but that can lead to further resistance. The more you push, the more the other person might dig in their heels. Instead of trying to force a conversation, suggest revisiting the issue later when emotions have cooled. Give both parties the time to reflect and come back with a fresh perspective. It's about creating space for a more productive conversation down the line. 14. "This Is Pointless." Saying a conversation is pointless undercuts any effort to resolve the issue. It communicates a sense of hopelessness, implying that no solution exists. This phrase is often used to express frustration when someone feels unheard or misunderstood. Instead of encouraging collaboration, it puts a damper on efforts to work things out. It's a verbal endgame, suggesting that continued dialogue is a waste of time. When faced with this, you might feel disheartened and inclined to give up. The challenge is to find a way to reignite the conversation without dismissing their feelings of futility. Acknowledge their frustration and propose a change in approach to tackle the issue. This can open the door to creative problem-solving, turning "pointless" into an opportunity for new strategies. It's a way to breathe life back into a conversation that feels stalled. Solve the daily Crossword
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Israel, under pressure, allows more aid into Gaza, but U.N. says it's a fraction of what's needed
A life-line for Gaza's roughly 2 million displaced inhabitants was back in operation on Monday, with convoys of trucks on the move. They were carrying urgently needed food aid after a sudden reversal of policy by Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government announced over the weekend that it would enable more food and medicine to enter the war-torn Palestinian territory after images of hungry people and malnourished children drew international condemnation. Israel has also permitted humanitarian air drops. On Sunday, Israel, Jordan and the UAE all parachuted pallets of aid into the ruins of Gaza. The drops look dramatic, but they're expensive, inefficient and potentially dangerous. People have been hurt and even killed by the heavy pallets during past air drops over the territory. To meet the need, the bulk of the aid will have to come into Gaza by truck. Each truck can carry between 4 and 10 times as much as a parachute. After 22 months of war, including months when Israel blocked all aid coming into Gaza, people are so hungry that they're looting the convoys. Video from over the weekend showed men clambering to pull bags of flour off trucks before they could reach aid depots. International charities have a new name for it — "self-distribution" — and it's a graphic depiction of the level of desperation in the Palestinian enclave. On Sunday, 120 trucks worth of aid moved into Gaza. At least as much was expected to arrive on Monday — but it's not nearly enough. Before the war started, more 500 trucks per day was the norm. Maryam Yahya is one of the roughly 2 million Gazans trying to survive in a tent. "We haven't seen a thing," she said. "No aid... from land, air or anywhere else." Meanwhile, the war rages on. Israel's military has said it will pause the fighting in heavily populated areas from 10 a.m. until 8 p.m. local time, for an unspecified number of days. But there have been more reports of people being shot trying to access food. In a statement on Monday, the U.N. agency tasked with helping Palestinians, UNRWA, welcomed Israel's declaration of humanitarian pauses and the easing of restrictions on aid entering Gaza, but it stressed that much more was needed. UNRWA warned that, according to its data, "1 in every 5 children is malnourished in Gaza City. More children have reportedly died of hunger; bringing the death toll … to over 100." "We hope that UNRWA will finally be allowed to bring in thousands of trucks loaded with food, medicine and hygiene supplies. They are currently in Jordan and Egypt waiting for the green light," the agency said. "Opening all the crossings and flooding Gaza with assistance is the only way to avert further deepening of starvation among the people of Gaza. What's needed is at least 500/600 trucks of basics every day." The Israeli military has also said it will secure safe routes for aid trucks to deliver and distribute their loads through Gaza. It's something that the U.N.'s aid agencies have been pushing for and, if it works, it will allow much needed food to finally reach the people who so badly need it.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
UAE military plane drops humanitarian and relief aid into Gaza
UAE and Jordan carried out on Sunday the first airdrops of humanitarian aid into Gaza in months. One Emirati and two Jordanian military planes took off from Jordan loaded with 25 tonnes of humanitarian and relief aid which was dropped over Gaza. Solve the daily Crossword
