CNN's Scott Jennings Shares Tense Firsthand Account from Israel
This picture taken from Nuseirat, in the central Gaza Strip, shows rocket trails in the sky late on ... More June 13, 2025, after Iran struck Israel with barrages of missiles following a massive onslaught that targeted the Islamic republic's nuclear and military facilities. (Photo by EYAD BABA/AFP via Getty Images)
As Iran and Israel trade missile fire in one of the most volatile military escalations in recent Middle East history, CNN commentator and conservative political strategist Scott Jennings is experiencing the crisis firsthand.
Jennings, who traveled to the country for a tour of key cities and sites tied to the October 7 Hamas attacks, has moved between hotels in northern Israel and the capital city of Jerusalem over the past few days — finding himself stranded amid closed airports, emergency alerts, and incoming fire. On Sunday afternoon, he posted the following tense dispatch on social media: 'Sirens in Jerusalem now… hearing booms as we head to shelter.'
In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Jennings expanded on the unfolding chaos around him. He told a reporter about how he'd been standing on his hotel balcony prepping for a CNN interview when the crisis unfolded. 'In fact,' he told the reporter, 'I'm looking at a military jet fly overhead right now.' As air raid sirens pierced the early morning air in Tiberius, on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee, hotel staff ushered guests into designated safe zones. Just days earlier, Jennings had taken cover in a Jerusalem bomb shelter during dinner — a space that Jennings described as a tiny room, crammed with people.
The situation rapidly intensified over the weekend. After an Israeli strike reportedly killed key Iranian military leaders and targeted nuclear scientists, Iran's ballistic missile response triggered a new round of alerts and lockdowns.
Jennings told THR he was ordered not to leave his hotel and has no idea when he'll be able to fly out. 'Airspace is closed, airports are closed. The thing we know the least about is how are we going to get out of here.'
Even as he seeks shelter, meanwhile, Jennings has taken to X (formerly Twitter) with pointed commentary. In a tweet early Sunday morning US time, he laid out a hawkish case for a broader confrontation with Iran — one he believes that President Trump is positioned to deliver:
Calling it a 'once-in-a-generation chance to make the world safer,' Jennings ended his post with a forceful call to action: 'Bomb Fordo. Destroy the Iranian Octopus. Restore deterrence. Win the Nobel.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel kills IRGC intelligence chief and deputy, Iranian state media says
Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency has confirmed the death of the Islamic Revolutionary Corps intelligence chief Mohammad Kazemi and his deputy Hassan Mohaqiq. It added that a third IRGC intelligence officer, Mohsen Bagheri, was also killed in the strike in Tehran. They were reportedly killed in an Israeli strike on Sunday. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had already stated earlier that Kazemi and Mohaqiq had been killed. Israel and Iran launched attacks on each other for the third day in a row on Sunday, killing scores of civilians, and raising fears of a wider conflict. As the death toll continues to rise, both sides have threatened to unleash even greater force. At least 14 people have been confirmed dead in Israel. Iranian state media announced on Sunday that the death toll of Israel's attacks on Iran had climbed to 224 since Friday, adding that the majority were civilians. For the first time, Iran also launched a daytime barrage against Israel. At least one of the missiles launched on Sunday evening hit a building in the coastal city of Haifa, injuring four people, bringing the number of wounded across the country to 15. Israelis have now been told they can leave shelters, after the missile attack caused several light injuries and damage in both the north and south of the country. In Iran, images from the capital showed the night sky lit up by a huge blaze at a fuel depot after Israel began strikes against its oil and gas sector. Meanwhile, US-Iran nuclear talks were called off on Sunday, and a US official says that President Donald Trump has rejected a plan by the Israelis to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Stock Market Today: Dow, Oil Futures Rise; Israel-Iran Conflict Enters Fourth Day — Live Updates
The escalating conflict between Iran and Israel is in the spotlight, and is likely to jostle with global trade tensions for attention at the G-7 leaders' meeting in Canada. Israel and Iran struck at each other's energy facilities over the weekend, bringing the conflict closer to an industry vital to the global economy. The attacks have been limited, but oil prices have risen on the risk of greater damage, and the fighting has affected tanker traffic and supply flows. Israel's military said it had also hit command centers of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, and it has delivered a blow to Tehran's nuclear program. U.S. crude oil futures extended gains early Monday, having surged over 7% Friday to settle at the highest level in four months. Stock futures also rose, while gold futures pared back from Friday's record highs. President Trump is set to join European and other leaders at the G-7 summit in Alberta. He is expected to discuss trade with the prime ministers of Canada and Japan separately on the sidelines. Canada's Mark Carney has said that meeting will determine how close the U.S. and Canada are to a tariff deal, and warned he is ready to implement further levies if talks stall.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Why many Israelis support attacking Iran
To understand why, it is helpful to consider the timing of the Israeli attack. Since 1979, Iran has gradually positioned itself as Israel's main enemy. The revolutionary Islamic regime has viewed Israel as a foreign implant in the region and its leaders have openly called for Israel's destruction. (It is difficult to think of another instance in which one sovereign state calls for the destruction of another, highlighted by the fact that the two don't even share a border.) Israel, for its part, has responded with a series of sabotage operations and targeted killings against Iranian security and nuclear figures over the years. Advertisement Over the past decade, Iran has accelerated plans to encircle Israel with a 'ring of fire,' believing that arming paramilitary forces like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis with missiles, rockets, and drones would lead to Israel's annihilation. And though the leader of Hamas, Yahya Sinwar, launched his murderous plan on Oct. 7 without the full participation from Hezbollah and Iran that he had hoped for, most Israelis directly link Iran — which funded, armed, and trained Hamas — to the attack. That attack is what touched off the bloody conflict that has now lasted 20 months. Advertisement Iran's nuclear program, which has included attempts at developing military nuclear capabilities over the years, is seen by the Israeli public and its leaders as the epitome of these efforts to destroy Israel. and believed that Israel needed to be able to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. In other words, almost no one in Israel believes that nuclear weapons in the hands of the current regime are anything other than a major danger. So why did Israel wait until now? Over the years, the possibility of attacking Iran's nuclear facilities has come up from time to time, Advertisement For its part, the United States did not demonstrate a willingness to join in, and even now, it seems happy to allow Israel to act on its own — at least as long as Iran doesn't directly target American interests. In addition, over the years, Iran has built deterrent capabilities against Israel, consisting mainly of its enormous missile arsenal and, even more so, the one it placed on Israel's northern border in the hands of Hezbollah. Various Israeli governments have repeatedly decided that the cost was not worth the benefit of independent action. So what changed? Four key factors have contributed to Israel's decision to attack last week. The first was the loss of Iran's deterrent power. Israel's surprisingly successful attacks against Hezbollah in October 2024 removed most of the missile threat from the north and, more importantly, broke the spirit of the group — which was built by Iran in large measure to deter Israel from attacking its nuclear program. This demoralization was illustrated by Second, the United States has changed. President Trump, who withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018 and ordered the Advertisement Third, Iran's nuclear program was getting closer to the nuclear threshold. When the nuclear deal was in full force, Iran was kept a year away from the ability to enrich uranium to military grade. But by the time of the Israeli attack, Finally, there is the change brought about by the war itself. Hamas's attack on Oct. 7 and the events that followed created enormous fear of one kind in Israeli leadership circles while breaking down the barrier of another kind of fear. The fear of taking comprehensive, reality-altering action that characterized pre-war Israel, has been replaced by fear of any enemy building up its strength under the cover of short-term quiet. Many in Israel, in both security and political circles, have become convinced that Israel must act with maximum aggression toward enemies that challenge its existence. This is partly why Israel continues to hold territory in Syria and Lebanon, and why many Israelis believed that now was a window of opportunity that had to be exploited to act against Iran. The direct confrontation between the two countries that began after Israel's Advertisement Although it is too early to know how this phase of the direct war between Iran and Israel will end, Netanyahu could well emerge with the upper hand. He almost certainly believes this will benefit him politically after two years in which he struggled to restore his status. And yet, despite the deep cynicism many Israelis feel toward their prime minister, it is difficult to find prominent voices expressing opposition to the current operation against Iran. But if they are looking for a way to distinguish themselves from the prime minister, Netanyahu's political rivals now have room to act. The key must be to ask how to exploit the achievement created by the June 13 attack. Unlike Netanyahu and his allies, they must make it clear that weakening Iran should be used to promote political accords in our war-torn region — arrangements that should include the Palestinians.
