Scots have ‘voted for change', says Starmer following Labour's surprise win
The Prime Minister congratulated his winning candidate Davy Russell and looked ahead to next year's Scottish Parliament election, saying it is a chance to 'turbo charge delivery'.
Mr Russell took the seat vacated by the death of Scottish Government minister and SNP MSP Christina McKelvie.
Posting on social media on Friday morning, Sir Keir said: 'People in Scotland have once again voted for change.
'Next year there is a chance to turbo charge delivery by putting Labour in power on both sides of the border.
'I look forward to working with you.'
Labour's candidate, who is the deputy lord lieutenant of Lanarkshire, beat out SNP candidate Katy Loudon – who fell to her third defeat since 2023.
The win comes against the backdrop of national polls which place Scottish Labour in third place behind the SNP and Reform UK – and will undoubtedly give a boost to Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar's bid to become first minister in next year's election.
The Nigel Farage-led Reform UK saw a surge which took them into third place, just 800 votes away from the SNP, but fell short of expectations that they may place second.
Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice also reacted to the results, saying his party is 'delighted'.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, he said: 'It's truly remarkable.
'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result.'
At the election count earlier, Tice told the PA news agency he was 'thrilled to bits' with the result.
When the votes were counted, Russell polled 8,559, with Loudon coming second on 7,957, ahead of Reform's Ross Lambie, who secured 7,088 votes.
Speaking to PA after the declaration, Sarwar said: 'I think people need to change the script, because we've proven the pollsters wrong.
'We've proven the commentators wrong, we've proven the bookies wrong.
'We've proven John Swinney wrong and so many others wrong too.'
In the final weeks of the campaign, the First Minister said it was a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform, but Sarwar asked what it says about a Government that has been in power for 18 years and 'all it has to offer in a campaign is vote SNP to stop Farage'.
Russell had faced criticism for his perceived lack of media appearances, but Sarwar said such arguments were borne of 'an element of classism and elitism'.
Speaking from the stage after his win, Russell said: 'Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse has voted tonight to take a new direction with Scottish Labour.
'Like the people here in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, and right across Scotland, we all feel we have been let down by the SNP.'
The newly-minted MSP also hit out at Reform, saying the win 'sent a message to Farage and his mob tonight – the poison of Reform isn't us, it isn't Scotland and we don't want your division here'.
While First Minister Swinney said Loudon had 'fought a superb SNP campaign' and that he was 'clearly disappointed' they were unable to win.
'Labour won by an absolute landslide in this area less than a year ago – we came much closer tonight, but the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do,' he added.
'Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
14 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Kate Forbes quitting means Stephen Flynn leading SNP ‘more likely'
Polling expert Sir John Curtice has had his say on the latest developments within the SNP Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) KATE Forbes' departure from Holyrood sets the stage for Stephen Flynn to become the next leader of the SNP, the UK's top elections guru has said. And her decision to quit could see the Nats avoid another 'heavily divisive' leadership contest, Sir John Curtice said. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up 2 Kate Forbes 2 Stephen Flynn Asked what the impact of the deputy first minister leaving Holyrood was for the SNP, he told The Scottish Sun: 'It increases the probability that Stephen Flynn is the next leader of the SNP. 'What could have been another quite heavily divisive party contest - and the one between Yousaf and Forbes certainly didn't do the SNP any good with the wider public - that prospect has now disappeared. 'There could actually be a relatively smooth succession. I'm not quite sure that's what's going to happen but that is one possible way of playing this out.' Nats Westminster chief Mr Flynn is set to give up his seat as an MP to run for Holyrood in 2026, with Nats insiders expecting a leadership challenge within the next five years. Find out what's really going on Register now for our free weekly politics newsletter for an insightful and irreverent look at the (sometimes excruciating) world of Scottish Politics. Every Thursday our hotshot politics team goes behind the headlines to bring you a rundown of key events - plus insights and gossip from the corridors of power, including a 'Plonker' and 'Star' of the Week. Sign up now and make sure you don't miss a beat. The politicians would hate that. SIGN UP FOR FREE NOW John Swinney has insisted he plans on staying on as SNP leader and First Minister until beyond 2031 - despite rumours he was set to stand down next May before becoming party chief. Mr Flynn's most likely opponent in any contest is rumoured to be housing secretary Mairi McAllan, an arch-Sturgeonite and career politician backed by Mr Swinney and the party establishment. But some question whether she is ready for a tilt at the leadership. Sir John added: 'She is very much a work in progress.' Kate Forbes picks her biggest scandal of the SNP's time in power The speculation about a future contest comes after Ms Forbes shocked the Scottish political world on Monday by announcing she would step down as an MSP at May's Holyrood election. She was tipped to replace Mr Swinney as SNP chief after narrowly losing out to Humza Yousaf in the 2023 leadership race and doing a backroom deal agreeing to support Mr Swinney last year. Ms Forbes hinted this week she could make a return to frontline politics in 20 years after citing missing time with her young daughter as her main reason for standing aside. But Sir John said her departure was a sign the SNP is struggling to attract and keep talented politicians - and said the current crop were not close to the quality brought into Holyrood by Alex Salmond almost 20 years ago. He said: 'In 2007 there had been gathered into the fold of the SNP an unusually talented group of politicians. Salmond, Sturgeon, MacAskill, Mike Russell, etc. They were all very good. 'The SNP have clearly found it difficult to bring into the party a similarly talented group of individuals. Forbes was clearly standing out, Flynn clearly stands out. 'Beyond Swinney himself and arguably Forbes, there's nobody else there as yet who's really made a name for themselves. 'And Forbes going to that extent, at least, underlines the fact that the SNP doesn't have the luxury of as many highly talented individuals as it did have 20 years ago.'
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer accuses Palestine Action of targeting Jewish-owned businesses
Palestine Action has targeted Jewish-owned businesses, Sir Keir Starmer has claimed. The Prime Minister made the comments at a meeting of Labour's national executive committee (NEC), saying that the now banned protest group had a history of 'targeting Jewish-owned businesses'. The comments were first reported by Ann Black, an NEC member, who said she had passed on concerns about the Government decision to proscribe Palestine Action to the Prime Minister. She added that Sir Keir insisted that the ban on the group was 'not intended to stifle debate on Palestine'. This weekend, a large-scale protest is expected to take place in London in support of Palestine Action, with police warning that anyone 'showing support' for the group faced arrest. A source told The Times that Sir Keir said at the NEC meeting: 'It's not just the RAF bases, they've planned and attacked Jewish-owned businesses.' He reportedly went on to say there were 'some incidents that were well known, and others that were not'. Earlier this week, an activist allegedly associated with Palestine Action was remanded in custody accused of vandalising two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. It is estimated that the full cost of repairing the two planes will be around £7m. A spokesman for the Prime Minister said: 'Those who seek to support this group may not yet know the true nature of this organisation. 'But people should be under no illusion, this is not a peaceful or non-violent protest group, and we're also clear that their activities do not reflect or represent the thousands of people across this country who continue to exercise their fundamental right to protest on different issues.' Some backbench Labour MPs openly spoke out against the Government's decision to proscribe the group under antiterrorism laws when the Home Secretary announced the move in July. Clive Lewis said that in Britain there had been a 'long history… of direct action which pushes the boundaries of our democracy'. Richard Burgon said that the move risked 'criminalising thousands of volunteers and supporters'. The Prime Minister has also been forced to defend his announcement last week of a plan to recognise a Palestinian state in September, unless Israel meets certain conditions.
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment former Tory justice minister Chris Philp finds huge boat of illegal migrants crossing the Channel
Former Tory justice minister Chris Philp has poked holes at Labour's new migrant returns deal after witnessing two 'massively packed' small boats entering UK waters while French officials 'made no attempt' to stop them. Mr Philp, who now serves as shadow Home Secretary, today posted a series of videos taken aboard a chartered ship in the English Channel. After seeing one migrant boat being 'shadowed' by a French warship and then another just ten minutes later, the incandescent politician said it showed the Anglo-French deal was a failure, adding that occupants of the boats were 'coming to a hotel near you soon'. He said: 'On the very day Labour's flagship Channel deal was meant to kick in, I watched French ships escort illegal migrants straight into British waters. 'Labour's migrant surrender deal with France is in shambles and today has proven that it will have no deterrent effect whatsoever.' Last month Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer pledged migrants would be 'detained and returned to France in short order' under the agreement. But a determined Mr Philp explained he would spend the day trying to discover 'if the Government really has sorted out' the issue of illegal migrants arriving in the UK from across the English Channel. Within minutes, he is informed that French patrol vessel Minck had turned directly towards the shore of Calais in anticipation of a migrant boat getting ready to leave. He said: 'So you can see the migrant boat in the water absolutely rammed full of illegal immigrants crossing the Channel and we see right next to it a French warship shadowing it across, making no attempts to stop it at all. 'That French warship has been with it about three hours now. They could have stopped that illegal migrant boat near the French shore if they had chosen to, like the Belgians do, the Australians do. 'They could have stopped it, but instead they are shadowing it across, escorting it into British waters.' He added that within the next two hours the migrants would reach British waters. Within minutes, Mr Philp then spotted a second migrant boat, with around 80 people aboard. 'The Government's new deal they announced is obviously having no effect whatsoever. '[The migrants] are clearly not deterred by the government's deal. I can see the evidence in front of my eyes,' the politician added, before witnessing UK Border Force vessel Typhoon approaching the French warship to pick up the migrants. Mr Philp added: 'They should return all the people - if you return all the people then they won't attempt the crossing in the first place.' He witnessed the scenes on the first day of Labour's new migrant returns deal, which had already suffered a bumpy introduction after one minister appeared to contradict the terms of the treaty. Cabinet minister Lisa Nandy said on Wednesday that small boat migrants sent back under the deal would see their human rights claims heard after being sent back to France. However, it later emerged that some types of human rights cases would, in fact, block the Home Office from being able to remove migrants in the first place. Asked whether human rights challenges amounted to a loophole in the plan, Culture Secretary Ms Nandy said: 'That's not the case at all. 'The deal that we've struck will allow… us to send people back to France who have human rights claims. 'Those claims will be heard in France.' She told Sky News: 'I know that the Conservative Party has been saying that this is a loophole. It isn't and we're really confident about that.' However, the treaty clearly sets out how small boat migrants cannot be sent back to France if they have 'an outstanding human rights claim'. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron confirmed the new deal last month after a Downing Street summit The Home Office confirmed some human rights claims will block migrants' removal until they have been concluded in full. It will include cases which cannot be formally 'certified' by officials as 'clearly unfounded'. A Home Office spokesman said: 'Not everyone will fall within the scope of certification. 'No doubt there will be examples where people who file a human rights claim will fall outside the scope of certification and that would have to be heard.' It was a narrower interpretation of the circumstances than those set out by Ms Nandy, and legal proceedings could take months or even years to wrap up. The Mail has learned pro-migrant groups have begun informal discussions about launching a joint legal action against Labour's plan – just as they did against the Tories' Rwanda scheme. Sources said there had already been 'a certain amount of co-ordination' between charities and other groups, with details of the treaty still being analysed. The Free Movement website, which offers advice to immigration lawyers, has published an analysis of the new measures which says: 'Legal challenges will be more difficult than for Rwanda, however there are still likely to be grounds on which some people can resist removal to France. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper repeatedly refused to say how many migrants will be returned under the deal because it 'could help the smuggling gangs' 'For example, if the inadmissibility decision was wrong, if people have family in the UK, or had experiences in France which make it inappropriate to send them back.' Meanwhile, the French interior ministry led by Bruno Retailleau - who signed the treaty alongside Home Secretary Yvette Cooper - declined to answer questions about the deal. It is unclear whether the Home Office had detained any of the new arrivals for possible removal to France. Officials had previously described how migrants would be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate in Kent, for initial screening. Those selected would be sent to short-term detention facilities for further screening, and then on to an immigration removal centre. Under the terms of the treaty the UK must hand France the names of those to be removed within 14 days of their arrival. The French government then has up to 28 days to respond. Labour's deal with France came a year after Sir Keir scrapped the Tories' Rwanda asylum scheme as one of his first acts in office. The Rwanda deal, designed to deter Channel crossings and save lives, was ready to finally get off the ground after more than two years in legal limbo.
