
Union campaigner: I was cancelled by trans rights activists
'I'd contacted a lawyer before for advice but then dropped it. Then recently, a friend of mine died and it prompted me to change my mind. She had also been an active trade unionist who had found herself hounded and humiliated for her beliefs. The Supreme Court ruling aligned with my perspective and yet my union issued a statement rejecting it. When I saw what was happening to Sandie Peggie, it made up my mind.
'I'm suing them because of my belief system. I believe in a materialist and collectivist approach to politics and this ran contrary to my beliefs. Someone needs to burst this bubble in the unions and I'm now prepared to do this.'
Ms Macdonald is a retired member of the PCS, the UK's biggest civil servants' union. In a period spanning more than 20 years, she rose to become one of its leading activists and, for several years, a full-time lay official.
She was vice-chair of the Scotland Committee, a co-ordinating body for all branches and groups across the civil service. And she became the first (and so far only) female chair of the National Standing Orders Committee. She was a regular speaker at TUC and STUC conferences and sat on the national appeals committee, addressing members' disputes and conduct issues.
Read more:
However, three years ago, an extraordinary series of events sickened her surrounding her distinguished life membership award.
'The DLM award was for my contribution to the union, including having been the only female chair of the National Standing Orders committee, as well as all my contributions at branch level and on the National Women's Forum. Some people, though, considered me to be a transphobe and had written to the general secretary to say they didn't think I should receive it because of this.
'These honours are awarded after you retire and I knew nothing of a campaign to have my nomination rejected. I was told that someone had gone to the NEC claiming falsely to have evidence from Twitter and Facebook that I was a transphobe.
'The NEC said they needed to examine this evidence. And so my nomination was put back to another meeting. I was completely oblivious to all of this.
'I was also nominated for a DLM in my Scottish Government group. A lot of them thought the same, though, and so I didn't get it because of my alleged transphobia. It didn't even get to a vote as the president felt the strength of feeling against me was so bad.
'Someone was despatched to tell me why I wouldn't be getting the DLM award. It had all been done and dusted behind my back. I had no opportunity to respond. They'd also heard that my national award was under review. The knowledge of this apparently helped swing others in the room.
'One member phoned to tell me that she was in tears at what was being said about me: they hinted I was racist and homophobic as well as transphobic. I'd devoted over 20 years of life to the union, only to discover that I was regarded as a nothing purely because of my advocacy for women's protected rights.'
Ms Mackenzie believes that trans activism has become the de facto policy of her union and that it directly threatens women's rights.
'I'd begun to notice a change in the nature of the motions in the equality section occurring around 2016,' she recalls. 'When you're on the National Standing Orders committee, you get a wide oversight of the state of the union. You're seeing every motion from every branch and you have to determine if they're competent and within the rules. I was the only female on it and there are no women on it now.
'Among those being put forward, there were suddenly many concerning trans rights. I began to fear some of the demands within these motions might be in breach of the Equality Act 2010 and carried the potential to bring the union into disrepute.
'Whenever I started to talk about issues from a woman's perspective someone in meetings would always say 'and transwomen'. But these were biological men. I assumed that more people would speak up. But as time passed I felt I needed to try to understand this ideology more.'
She says as the campaign by trans activists to cancel her award proceeded, it was accompanied by moves to humiliate her in public.
'A few days before I was due in Brighton to pick up my award, I broke my ankle badly. So, they said I could accept my award by video link. I said I couldn't do this as I was in a lot of pain. I'd had two plates inserted and was housebound for months.
'So, they said I could be invited to come back to get the award at another time. Then, they suggested making the presentation at the president's reception at that year's STUC conference. However I heard nothing.
'At the conference when my nomination went forward, I was told, for the first time ever, a ballot had been organised to ratify it from the floor.
'So they decided to put it to a vote and ballot papers were actually produced. From my perspective this was the worst kind of discrimination.
Fiona Macdonald had wanted to hear Mark Serwotka speak. (Image: PA)"It was Mark Serwotka's last conference (past general secretary) and I wanted to hear him speak so I was viewing this at home. I knew nothing about the vote. I could see people saying I shouldn't receive this award. And although the president was dismissing them it was a shock to hear all this when you didn't even know beforehand that it would take place.
"I was sitting at home following a big operation. The disappointment and hurt at hearing all this stuff being said was extreme.
'This was further discrimination on the basis of my beliefs. It's why I'm suing them. I asked them a year later what had happened about my award, but didn't get a reply. I couldn't believe that people I'd been friendly with vanished when I looked to them for support. I just broke down. I called a friend and said I couldn't believe this was happening and that no-one had thought to tell me.'
'He said he didn't realise how bad it had all got. So many of them were involved in other aspects of union work.'
Ms Macdonald wrote to the general secretary, Fran Heathcote, to ask what had happened to her award two years after she was meant to receive it, only to be told by Ms Heathcote that she didn't know she hadn't received it.
'She suggested that I could choose a local meeting where I could receive it. I responded that I'd feel uncomfortable about going to a local meeting where I'd been intimidated by some of their members. That's when they said they would send it in the post. I found that deeply offensive. It seemed designed to humiliate me further."
This final insult, she says, was the culmination of almost a decade of serial abuse Ms Macdonald says she suffered within the PCS for rejecting trans ideology. When she began to fear that some of this would hurt women she began to get involved in Facebook discussions with other union members.
Read more Kevin McKenna:
'I remember chatting to some people who were saying that 'transwomen are women'. I said to them: 'If I think I'm a cat, who's to say I'm not if you're only going on the evidence of people's feelings'. You need to be more scientifically sound about this. This is when I realised I'd made a target for my back.
'The first in-person meeting I went to was organised by Women's Place UK on Leith Walk in a venue called Out of the Blue. I was trying to say that this issue will be bad news for unions because it looks like we'd be in breach of the Equality Act and expose us to action further down the line. I was also calling on women to become involved in the debate to defend themselves.
'When I got there, a group called 'Sisters Uncut' were waiting outside banging pots and pans.
'One of the speakers was a de-transitioner, Gill Campbell. There was also a woman who'd been threatened with having her child taken from her because she wouldn't affirm that child in her desired gender. These women's testimonies were really painful to listen to, shocking actually.
'The wrath that the de-transitioning woman faced and the family who had been destroyed because a school and the social workers were targeting her for not affirming her child's new identity was very distressing. This is when I realised what no debate actually means. There were politicians and trans activists outside literally trying to drown them out.'
By then though, she felt that the genie was out of the bottle and couldn't be put back in.
She now began receiving casual threats on Facebook, including 'Pride is watching you' from, she says, the LGBT cohort inside the PCS. She'd noticed others were getting the same treatment. 'It was quite menacing,' she says.
'A climate of fear had been created inside the union. We were meeting in secret in people's kitchens and by Zoom. A lot of women were terrified. They were right to be: they were losing their jobs and their positions in the union. They were being hounded.'
Fiona Macdonald now believes that if it hadn't been for the intervention of Mark Serwotka and his successor as general secretary, Fran Heathcote, that her Distinguished Life Membership award would have been cancelled completely.
'Leadership sometimes means though, that you have to stand up and say unpopular things,' she says. 'History will record who stood against oppression and many trade union leaders will be remembered for staying silent or joining with the discrimination.
A spokesperson for the PCS said: 'PCS notes that this matter may be the subject of litigation. Accordingly, we will not be offering any comment at this time.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Edinburgh Reporter
31 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Charities criticise offshore wind farm decision
Conservation charities have criticised The Scottish Government's decision to grant consent for an offshore wind farm that they say could threaten some of the nation's globally important seabird colonies. RSPB Scotland has described the decision to grant consent for SSE Renewables' proposed Berwick Bank wind farm in the outer Firth of Forth as 'catastrophic' and warned it could 'catapult some species towards extinction'. Scotland's largest conservation charity, The National Trust for Scotland, said the decision was 'deeply disappointing' and would 'further erode Scotland's reputation as a nation that cares for its environment'. The charities had called for the plans to be refused, predicting that the development, close to known established colonies like the Bass Rock and St Abb's Head, will over its lifetime kill tens of thousands of seabirds including kittiwakes, puffins and gannets. Although Scottish Ministers require the developers to demonstrate that 'sufficient seabird compensation' will be put in place before the project can start, conservationists said it was 'not clear how the thousands of seabirds predicted to be killed can be compensated for'. Anne McCall, Director of RSPB Scotland, said: 'This is a very dark day for seabirds. It is a terrible decision on a really bad development. 'Berwick Bank would be catastrophic for Scotland's globally important seabirds which are already facing alarming declines. 'In addition, its impacts are so damaging they will make the relative impacts of other wind farms significantly higher. 'This one wind farm is going to make it really challenging to accelerate renewable projects across Scottish seas. 'We are incredibly concerned that Scottish Government have granted consent for a project which could catapult some of Scotland's most-loved seabird species towards extinction. 'RSPB Scotland recognises climate change is one of the biggest threats to seabirds, but there needs to be seabirds left to save. 'We support nature-positive offshore wind, in the right locations with minimised impacts on wildlife and measures to restore and protect seabird populations. 'But this is predicted to be one of the most damaging wind farms for birds we are aware of anywhere on the planet.' Berwick Bank is a proposal by SSE Renewables of more than 300 turbines covering 1000 square kilometres, off the East Lothian and Scottish Borders coastline. It is anticipated to generate 4.1 gigawatts (GW) of energy, which could generate enough electricity each year to power every household in Scotland around twice over, using turbines stretching 355 metres high to the blade tip. The Scottish Government's own assessment estimates that the project will kill 261 gannets, 815 kittiwakes, 2808 guillemots, 66 puffins and 154 razorbills in the first year of operation, with this level of mortality continuing throughout the 35-year lifetime of the development. McCall added: 'We will be carefully scrutinising the details of the consent documents over the coming hours and days and considering what further steps we will take.' Scotland is home to internationally important seabird populations, including 60% of great skuas and almost half (48%) of the world's Northern gannets, with one of the biggest colonies on Earth found at the Bass Rock. Research has shown that 70% of seabird species in Scotland are in decline, even before the significant impact of avian flu (Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza or HPAI). Last year, five more UK seabirds were added to the UK Red list of most conservation concern, meaning they are at risk of extinction or require urgent conservation action. Scotland has more than 50% of the UK population of each of these five species. RSPB Scotland said that since the Berwick Bank site was first identified around 15 years ago numerous other projects had come forward, most of which were 'much less damaging to seabirds'. Diarmid Hearns, the National Trust for Scotland's Interim Director of Conservation & Policy, said: 'Today's decision by Scottish Ministers is deeply disappointing. More than that, we fear it will also be the cause of significant harm to the seabird colonies of St Abb's Head National Nature Reserve and elsewhere on the coastline. 'As we observed in our submission, the proposed mitigations by the developers fell far short of alleviating the expected impacts in terms of fatalities and disruption. Indeed, the Scottish Government's own Chief Scientific Advisor Marine and a review panel drawn from the Scottish Science Advisory Council came to the same conclusion. 'We look forward to hearing more about the detailed seabird compensation plan that is a condition of the approval, as soon as this is available. If this is not adequate — and it needs to be a major improvement on what is currently proposed — then the development should not proceed. 'At the National Trust for Scotland we are supportive of the drive towards renewable energy, but not at the expense of the very nature and habitats this effort is supposed to help save in the face of climate change… 'This is not a good decision for nature and further erodes Scotland's reputation as a nation that cares for its environment and recognises its importance to our collective future.' Harry Huyton, CEO of the marine conservation and education charity The Scottish Seabird Centre, said the decision was 'devastating news for seabirds'. He added: 'The Scottish Seabird Centre and nature charities across Scotland have repeatedly called on the Scottish Government to refuse consent for Berwick Bank and to instead back lower impact wind farms. 'It's deeply disappointing that these concerns — and the advice of the Government's own adviser, NatureScot, who also objected to the development — appear to have been ignored.' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes defended the decision, and said: 'Ministers have given the Berwick Bank wind farm application extremely careful consideration. 'The decision to grant consent to Berwick Bank is a major step in Scotland's progress towards achieving net zero and tackling the climate crisis, as well as supporting national energy security and growing our green economy. 'It is also an important decision for Scotland's renewables sector, and this investment will be further built upon through the delivery of Scotland's significant future pipeline of offshore wind projects under the ScotWind and the Innovation and Targeted Oil and Gas (INTOG) leasing rounds. 'We will continue to work closely with the developer and key stakeholders, including those working in fishing and conservation — to minimise the impact of the development on the marine environment and other marine users – and balance the needs of people and nature.' Anne McCall RSPB Scotland Director Northern gannet Morus bassanus, adult pair courting, PHOTO Les Cater RSPB Northern gannet Morus bassanus, adult pair courting, RSPB Bempton Cliffs Nature Reserve, Yorkshire, June PHOTO Les Cater Atlantic puffin Fratercula arctica, adult with fish in its beak, Shiant Isles, Hebrides, Scotland, July PHOTO Chantal Macleod Nolan Like this: Like Related


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Sydney Harbour Bridge shut as nearly 100,000 join ‘historic' pro-Palestine march
Watch as thousands of protesters in Australia marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge as part of a pro- Palestine rally on Sunday (3 August). Aerial footage shows demonstrators walking through torrential rain across the iconic bridge, whilst other clips show protesters wielding flags and placards as they chant 'free Palestine' around the city. The planned protest, which involved around 90,000 people according to New South Wales police, was authorised by the Supreme Court just one day prior on Saturday (2 August) in what organises called a 'historic decision'. The Sydney Harbour Bridge was closed to traffic at 11.30am and reopened again at 5.00pm.


The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Beth Upton's life and identity have been dragged through the media
Often, some people's outrage is platformed, reported, given airtime, whilst others' is not. Take for example the biggest Trans Pride March in the history of the UK – which happened in London last weekend – where reportedly 100 thousand LGBT+ people and their allies stood in solidarity and showed their outrage at recent decisions affecting trans people's lives and at how this community are being scapegoated, demonised and weaponised. This was barely covered by the media. Read More: At the same time tens, perhaps even hundreds of pieces have covered the views of those against the progress of trans rights. This outrage shown in London doesn't fit the dominant narrative, and so it is not the story that is told. So, for many, it remains context unseen in the wider narrative. It remains hidden and remains unable to affect how people are thinking about these issues – people do not see the mounting support for trans people and the majority view that trans people should be afforded their rights and should be treated with respect and dignity. Missing pieces of the story such as this perpetuate the pushing aside of humanity. Or take as another example, the case of Nurse Sandie Peggie. In this case, voices have been ignored, and what has come to light in the past few days says an awful lot that perhaps would have changed the narrative around this case had it come to light some time before now. Much like with Trans Pride in London, the full detail and context may not support the dominant narrative. Often the parts left unseen tell the true story, paint the whole picture. The narrative that is presented across the mainstream media amplifies only a handful of voices. What is seen then is the creation of faux characters, martyrs, without critique and proper consideration. So much has been left out, not least the voice of Beth Upton, and of course the late revelation that Sandie Peggie seems to have more than one prejudiced view. Sandie Peggie has been coloured in the light of a society that deeply values our nurses and our NHS, as we should. This has been heavily utilised in the telling of this one-sided story. The value of our nurses and our NHS, that we hold as a society, has enabled her painting as someone vulnerable, innocent, 'a normal woman,' in need of defence - whilst the evidence, if accurate, would suggest she may not in fact be very nice. We, as a society, feel positive sentiment and kinship with our NHS. So, taking people along with this version of reality was made easier. Especially if much of the context was omitted from the narrative. The fact that Beth Upton is a doctor, side stepped in this as a secondary detail to the fact she is trans, is unusual given this storytelling thematic – and tells us how easy it is to demonise a trans person regardless of how much good they do or who they are. It was easy to convince people of her otherness, to displace her from our story. My family are all nurses, I know very well the good principles of nursing, and have discussed at length with them how far Sandie Peggie's alleged comments seem to fall from these principles – about how they fear the damage caused to the perception of those doing this work. Some of the key principles of nursing are compassion, inclusivity, care, teamwork, and transparency. How much have those been demonstrated in this case? Beth Upton, an ordinary person doing her ordinary job, has now suffered her very existence discussed as though public property. Without, of course, any insight into her life, her reality, her experiences, her truth. On the other hand, Sandie Peggie has had an unfathomable amount of space in the media, and access to elected officials, to share hers. The racist, anti-immigrant, Islamophobic and unarguably transphobic comments made by Sandie Peggie, that are now widely reported, are, despite her defence of 'dark humour', unacceptable. This speaks to a character that many would find impossible to defend. Indeed, some politicians have since gone very quiet with regards to their previous support for Sandie Peggie. No doubt they may have been unaware of her attitudes towards other minorities. Their support may or may not now be hanging by a thread. With more of the story visible, perhaps now they might take time to reflect on having championed someone who has been alleged to show clear prejudice towards minority groups and consider what that may tell them about this case and others like it. Many who have thrown their weight behind Sandie Peggie in the past months are perhaps surmising that maybe they hadn't been given the whole picture, perhaps they have been misguided. What is most shameful about this is that trans people are not given the space that those against their rights are. When the media paints a picture without context, with an agenda in mind to align with a dominant narrative - this of course shapes people's view of a situation and of people. I only hope this case can serve as a flashing red light – you are quite likely not being told the full story and are very likely being expected to accept a narrative that is patently untrue, that obfuscates context and in doing so fuels the anti-trans movement we have seen take hold in the UK. Beth Upton went to work on Christmas Eve as herself, she carried on as no doubt she would on any normal day. Since then, her life, her body and her identity have been dissected and dragged through countless media articles, through a lengthy, at times cruel and gruelling tribunal process. Her mere presence as herself at work was challenged. At no point did we hear from her in the media, at no point was her story told, at no point have we heard about the effect this has had on her, her working life, her family and loved ones. Instead, we have seen countless coverage sharing Sandie Peggie's side. Now we are seeing illuminated some of the other side of that coin. Though we still don't see Beth Upton's side – her story, her humanity, perhaps deemed irrelevant to the toxic narrative many are intent on furthering. The side that allows Beth Upton her humanity, allows her awful experience to be shared, her supporters to be seen is, much like Trans Pride in London, invisible. This, and this week's revelations regarding Sandie Peggie's views, should give people serious pause for thought. Dr Rebecca Don Kennedy is chief executive of the Equality Network