‘You are always fighting the disease:' Cancer survivors face long-term health consequences years after treatment
We're in the midst of a cancer crisis. More young people being diagnosed. And while the treatments can be life-saving, years later they are life-altering.
Tina Chip is a two-time cancer survivor having fought the disease twice in her life.
Dr James Flaherty is an interventional cardiologist with Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute.
'Those that have come out of that experience often manifest cardiac problems 20, 30 years later,' he said.
More from Med Watch: Research shows resiliency of newborns' hearts and what it could mean for adults
For Chip, 30-plus years later, it's the aortic valve. Its function compromised by cancer treatment she received in 1989.
'I was 16, a senior in high school and just super excited to have that fun year and I felt a lump in my neck,' she said.
That lump was Hodgkins Lymphoma.
'So I went every day for four months and received the radiation from pretty much my entire body,' she said.
Just six years later, another cancer diagnosis. Breast cancer caused by the very treatment – radiation to her chest wall — that cured her Hodgkins.
'So very advanced disease,' she said. 'I was 22, just finishing college and not in the plan of what I wanted to do for my future.'
More Coverage: WGN's Medical Watch
The future for childhood and young adult cancer survivors is the potential for what doctors call the late effects of radiation and chemotherapy.
Dr Aarati Didwania is an internal medicine physician with Northwestern Medicine.
'I can't take away the therapies they received, nor would I want to because it helped cure them, put them in remission. But I would like to try to find things before they become a problem,' Didwania said.
That's where STAR comes in – Survivors Taking Action and Responsibility. Through the program at Northwestern Medicine, doctors monitor for liver, kidney and thyroid malfunction; secondary skin and breast cancers; and blood and heart abnormalities.
Karen Kinahan is a nurse practitioner with Northwestern Medicine.
'So we end up getting a lot of patients, sometimes in their 40s even 50s, that have not been in a pediatric survivor program because there wasn't one for them and now they have had a medical consequence,' she said.
'I've survived cancer as a young adult and now I'm going to make sure I stay on top of everything else my body may give into,' Chip said.
More News, Weather and Headlines at wgntv.com
For the mother of three, the fight is far from over.
'My aortic valve is part of the area that would have gotten hit by the radiation and also possibly chemo long-term effects,' she said. 'And as time progresses, my valve isn't pumping blood out to the rest of my body.'
'We did what's known as an aortic valve study,' Flaherty said. 'We went across the aortic valve and measured the pressure below it and above it, in the left ventricle and the aorta to see how much narrowing or pressure drop there was across that valve.'
'Even though you are further away, and you think it was so far in the past that (you) don't have to worry about recurrence or late effects, it's actually as we get further away, age also plays a factor into that,' Didwania said.
As survivors age – thanks to effective treatments — so does their tissue that was damaged long ago. Only exacerbating potential problems.
'It means we have a bigger survivorship population. There are more people surviving,' Didwania said. 'It's bad because there are more effects we have to look out for, and we have to train providers to be aware of these things and to know when and how to look for them.'
Doctors will continue to monitor Chip's heart. Eventually, she'll likely require a valve repair.
'You have to become your own advocate and fight for yourself and know that this is now part of your life,' she said. 'You are always fighting the disease.'
Radiation has changed since her treatment, more targeted and precise, in some cases lower doses. Still, even patients diagnosed and treated today will likely be at risk 20 or 30 years from now. Knowledge is power. You can learn more about the STAR program here.
Sign up for our Medical Watch newsletter. This daily update includes important information from WGN's Dina Bair and the Med Watch team, including, the latest updates from health organizations, in-depth reporting on advancements in medical technology and treatments, as well as personal features related to people in the medical field. Sign up here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
8 hours ago
- Fox News
Billy Joel diagnosed with brain condition — what to know about his treatment options
Following his diagnosis of a brain condition, singer Billy Joel has canceled all scheduled concerts. The five-time Grammy winner, 76, announced on Friday that he has normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), which occurs when cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) builds up inside or around the brain. "This condition has been exacerbated by recent concert performances, leading to problems with hearing, vision and balance," the announcement on Joel's website said. "Under his doctor's instructions, Billy is undergoing specific physical therapy and has been advised to refrain from performing during this recovery period." Hydrocephalus is a general term describing the buildup of excess fluid in the brain. "The fluid, called cerebrospinal fluid, is constantly produced in fluid-filled spaces in the center of the brain called ventricles," Matthew Potts, M.D., a Northwestern Medicine neurosurgeon, told Fox News Digital. (He is not involved in Joel's care.) "It flows through the ventricles and then around the surface of the brain and spinal cord, where it is then reabsorbed." Hydrocephalus can happen for a variety of reasons, including infection, trauma to the brain or bleeding within the brain, the doctor said. "This condition has been exacerbated by recent concert performances, leading to problems with hearing, vision and balance." Normal pressure hydrocephalus is a version of the condition that is typically seen in older people, where the cerebrospinal fluid builds up without increasing the pressure in the brain. Despite the fact that pressure remains normal, NPH can impact brain function, particularly the areas of thinking, memory, movement and focus, according to Cleveland Clinic. The three main effects of NPH are gait issues, urinary incontinence and cognitive difficulties. Collectively, these symptoms are known as "Hakim's triad." The cognitive problems can include memory loss, slow thinking and difficulty, according to Mia Kazanjian, M.D., a board-certified radiologist in private practice based in Connecticut. "This can negatively impact someone's career and personal life, limiting the ability to do activities of daily living like eating, bathing and dressing," Kazanjian told Fox News Digital. "This can also lead to emotional changes, like depression." Urinary incontinence means loss of bladder control, which can cause discomfort, anxiety and embarrassment, according to the doctor. "This can predispose someone to bladder infection and skin irritation," she cautioned. "If someone has to get up in the middle of the night due to this, he or she is more likely to fall. Furthermore, it can lead someone to isolate socially, which can lead to feelings of loneliness." Gait impairment means the person's steps are unsteady, there is loss of balance, and the feet can stick to the ground, shuffle or freeze, Kazanjian said. "The danger is that someone can fall and sustain trauma with a significant injury," she said. The condition can often be mistaken for dementia, but some cases of NPH can be treated and reversed. The only known risk factor for NPH is age, Cleveland Clinic noted, with the average age of onset around 70. Other factors, such as race, gender or ethnicity, do not appear to impact the chances of the condition occurring. Approximately 0.2% of people between 70 and 80 will develop NPH, and it affects around 5.9% of those over 80, the above source stated. Only some 0.003% of people under 65 will get the condition. "About 30% of people with NPH also have Alzheimer's disease or a similar degenerative brain disease," Cleveland Clinic states. The condition is diagnosed through a combination of neurological exams, lab tests and diagnostic imaging (MRI or CT scans). The most common treatment for NPH is a surgical procedure called "shunting," in which a device with two tubes, called a shunt, is implanted to regulate the amount of fluid in the brain. "One end is placed into a pocket of cerebrospinal fluid, usually in the ventricle in the brain or a pocket of cerebrospinal fluid in the lumbar spine below the spinal cord," Potts told Fox News Digital. "The other end goes somewhere else in the body that can reabsorb the fluid, usually in the abdomen." The only known risk factor for NPH is age, with the average age of onset around 70. "Shunts are more complex than just a tube — there is often a valve that regulates how much fluid can flow through it." Some newer shunts can be programmed to change the rate of fluid flow from outside the body, Potts added. For more Health articles, visit Symptoms typically improve within hours or days of the shunt being implanted. The surgery itself usually entails days or weeks of recovery. Experts emphasized that timely treatment is essential to prevent severe or permanent damage to the brain from the pressure caused by the excess fluid.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Hawley says Trump told him ‘no Medicaid benefit cuts'
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who has pushed back against a House proposal to reduce Medicaid spending by hundreds of billions of dollars, says President Trump told him Monday that the final bill encompassing his domestic agenda will not include any cuts to Medicaid benefits. 'Just had a great talk with President Trump about the Big, Beautiful Bill. He said again, NO MEDICAID BENEFIT CUTS,' Hawley posted on the social platform X. That post appeared to prompt a response from Texas Rep. Chip Roy (R), a vocal proponent of adding additional deficit-reducing reforms to the reconciliation bill, who argued that Medicaid needs to stop subsidizing able-bodied adults. 'Just had a great talk with my kids. They said again, STOP BORROWING MONEY TO PROP UP WASTEFUL SPENDING & TO SUBSIDIZE THE ABLE-BODIED OVER THE VULNERABLE,' Roy posted. The Congressional Budget Office estimated on a preliminary basis that the House bill would cut gross Medicaid and State Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) by more than $800 billion over 10 years and reduce Medicaid enrollment by 10.3 million people, according to the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy. Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) have also raised concerns about the potential impact of Medicaid spending cuts on constituents and rural hospitals. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: Medicaid cuts will harm children and education in Utah
Federal and local funding cuts to the Medicaid program, as well as unnecessary eligibility requirements, could cost thousands of Utahns access to continual and preventative healthcare. On the surface, it appears that Medicaid is sometimes viewed as a line item on the budget and a candidate for cutting back to save pennies and offset tax cuts. However, I caution our federal and local representatives to not underestimate the benefits of our social programs, like Medicaid, beyond their budgetary justification. My mother enrolled in Medicaid for her three children. When I fell sick, she could afford to take me to a doctor and get the medication I needed. Because she had access to the program, I was able to return to school and I was ready to continue my educational success. Without this public health service, it is likely I would have missed more days of school, and my mind would have often been foggy, interfering with my concentration in school. No school resource, excellent teacher, textbook or private school voucher could have overcome these health-related speed bumps. Not only did having access to healthcare through Medicaid benefit my health, but it also facilitated my academic achievement. My experience with Medicaid is not unique. Any parent knows that children frequently get sick. In addition, the proportion of children enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) range from 8% to 43% across school districts in Utah including 27% and 23% of students within Granite and Salt Lake City School Districts, respectively, and 43% within San Juan School District. While these numbers sound like a health-related budgetary challenge, they also play a significant role in our educational system. Although logical on face value, substantial data show that sick children underperform and miss more days of school compared to their peers. For example, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that, in 2022, nearly 6% of students nationwide missed 15 or more days of school because of health-related issues; among those students, around 29% had fair to poor health compared to only 5% among healthy students. Additionally, acute and chronic health conditions, as well as risky health behaviors, have been associated with lower school grades. Children have a greater opportunity at succeeding in school when they can take care of their health. Considering that reading comprehension has dipped, on average, and about 20% of Utah students are considered chronically absent, it is crucial for our decision makers to consider all of the holistic factors that contribute to or impede educational success. So why is public health insurance important for education? In 2023, over 50,000 Utahns under 19 years old were uninsured, a figure that will likely increase with cuts to Medicaid. Children without insurance coverage are less likely to receive preventative care and have access to prescriptions compared to their insured peers, even when insured for part of the year. In fact, prior expansions of Medicaid were associated with increases in healthcare utilization and decreases in preventable hospital visits and mortality, as well as increased reading test scores, greater rates of graduating high school and upward economic mobility. Restricting eligibility to Medicaid will have negative consequences, not only on children's health, but also on their educational journey, undermining our state's investment in public education. The relation between Medicaid eligibility, educational attainment, future health and economic success creates an inter-related cycle; one that can lead to more successful and healthier Utah families. In other words, families eligible for Medicaid can care for their children's health needs and, in turn, these children will have a greater chance of graduating from high school, having higher earnings and being more productive, therefore potentially offsetting the costs of the program. In Utah, we spend billions of dollars on public education. We should be focused on strengthening all social services that get the most out of our constitutional investment. Medicaid is one of those programs. I encourage our federal and state representatives to see Medicaid as more than a budgetary line item. Instead, view it as an investment in Utah's education and an investment in our future.
