Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds Are on Track to Run Out in Less Than a Decade. Here's What to Know
Social Security and Medicare are expected to need to cut monthly benefits in less than a decade as the trust funds for both programs are on track to run dry earlier than previously predicted.
A report released on Wednesday from the Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees pushed up the programs' go-broke dates, meaning the point at which they would not have enough money to fully cover benefits.
The worsening projections are in part because of a new law impacting Social Security and increasing health care costs, according to the report.
Here's what to know about the approaching funding cliffs.
How long will Social Security stay solvent?
The go-broke date for Social Security's trust funds was pushed up to 2034, from last year's estimate of 2035.
The funds cover old age and disability recipients. The program covers more than 60 million people in the U.S.
What about Medicare?
Last year's report set the go-broke date for Medicare's hospital insurance trust fund as 2036. But the latest report pushed up that date to 2033.
Medicare is a federal health insurance program that offers coverage for people 65 and older, as well as people with certain disabilities. More than 68 million people in the U.S. are enrolled in the program.
The hospital insurance trust fund pays for Medicare Part A, which covers care provided in hospitals and skilled nursing facilities, as well as some in-home care. It also helps pay for hospice care.
Why have the go-broke dates moved up?
The report largely attributes the Social Security go-broke date being pushed up to a new law, the Social Security Fairness Act, which took effect in January. The law repealed the Windfall Elimination and Government Pension Offset provisions of the Social Security Act, which 'increased projected Social Security benefit levels for some workers' and affected the go-broke date for Social Security's trust funds, according to the report.
Last year's expenses for Medicare's hospital insurance trust fund were also greater than initially anticipated, according to the report, which contributed to the go-broke date for the program being pushed up.
What happens after the go-broke dates?
The funds hitting their go-broke dates doesn't mean that there won't be any funds to cover any benefits after that point. After 2034, Social Security would only have enough funds to cover 81% of benefits. After 2033, Medicare's hospital insurance trust fund would only be able to pay 89% of costs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Social Security may run dry earlier than previously anticipated, trustees say
The trust funds for Social Security and Medicaid will run out of money in as little as 8 years, a shorter time frame than previously estimated, according to a report issued Wednesday by the programs' trustees. The Social Security fund will run dry in 2033, unless Congress combines the program's old-age and disability funds, in which case insolvency would arrive in 2034, the report found. A finding last year predicted Social Security would become insolvent in 2035 or 2036. Medicare's hospital insurance fund is expected to run out of money in 2033, the report said. MORE: Trump admin live updates: Trump to delay TikTok ban for 3rd time 'Social Security and Medicare are vital programs that support tens of millions of Americans across the country,' U.S. Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent said in a statement. 'This data underscores the need for lawmakers to take action to support the long-term viability of these programs.' If Congress fails to address the projected budget shortfalls, automatic cuts will dial back Social Security benefits by 23% and Medicare hospital benefits by 11% in 2033, the report found. Roughly 66 million Americans receive medical coverage through Medicare, while 70 million people are set to receive Social Security benefits this year. The Social Security and Medicare trust funds generate revenue through a payroll tax paid by employees and employers, setting the income apart from the overall federal budget. The programs routinely spend more money than they take in through such taxes. President Donald Trump has vowed to safeguard Social Security and Medicare, even as the White House pursues spending cuts at other federal programs and agencies. The Department of Government Agency, formerly led by Elon Musk, sought to eliminate what it described as 'waste, fraud and abuse' in Social Security and Medicare. In March, the White House backed such efforts in a memo. MORE: Fed holds interest rates steady, defying Trump Last year, the Government Accountability Office, a federal agency, estimated that taxpayers lose as much as $521 billion annually to fraud, much of which occurs in entitlement programs like Medicare. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have stopped more than $100 billion in potentially fraudulent expenditures over recent months, the agency said in a statement. Still, those possible savings make up a fraction of roughly $1.9 trillion in spending for Medicare and Medicaid in 2023, the most recent year for which data is available. 'Medicare provides essential coverage for millions of American seniors, but this year's report underscores the urgent need for serious, sustained reform to secure its long-term future,' CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz said in a statement.
Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary sounds alarm on 401(k) growing problem
Many American workers understand that employer-sponsored 401(k)s are a practical and efficient way to build retirement savings, especially when employers offer matching contributions. With automatic payroll deductions, they allow workers to invest in their future without much effort. Kevin O'Leary, an entrepreneur and investor on ABC's "Shark Tank," emphasizes the importance of 401(k) plans and the financial discipline required to benefit from them. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter However, O'Leary also issues a stark warning: Many Americans struggle to contribute meaningfully to their 401(k)s because they spend more than they earn. He describes the financial anxiety that accompanies the reality of people living paycheck to paycheck, burdened by debt, and clinging to unrealistic hopes of sudden wealth. In his words, they're "steeped in magical thinking about money," believing a lottery win or inheritance will solve everything. To break this cycle, O'Leary recommends a clear-eyed assessment of one's finances. He suggests calculating a "90-Day Number" - total income over three months minus total expenses. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on Medicare If the result is positive, it is time to increase 401(k) contributions. If it is negative, that is a wake-up call to cut spending and budget smarter. Ultimately, O'Leary believes that 401(k) plans are essential, but only effective if individuals take control of their financial habits. He urges Americans to start making deliberate choices that prioritize long-term security over short-term gratification. In order to contribute a sufficient amount of one's income to 401(k) plans, it is of vital importance for Americans to stay away from credit card debt because interest payments hinder the ability to save and invest. According to the 2025 first-quarter Household Debt and Credit Report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, total U.S. household debt rose to $18.2 trillion. Credit card balances alone reached $1.18 trillion, representing an increase of more than 6% compared to the same period the previous year. O'Leary minces no words in his warning. "Spending too much is a disease. And credit card debt is a cancer," O'Leary wrote in his book "Cold Hard Truth on Men, Women and Money." "The first time you get a credit card bill and don't pay off the full balance, it's as if you've allowed the first financial cancer cell into your life," he added. "The compounding nature of those frightening interest rates is a monstrous thing to behold." More on retirement: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs, 401(k)s O'Leary argues that credit card companies often justify their high interest rates as a safeguard against fraud or defaults, but in reality, these rates are a core part of their profit model. He believes the real earnings come from the large segment of consumers who carry a balance month to month and struggle to pay it off entirely. To O'Leary, this business strategy is incredibly lucrative - companies earning an average 16 percent return are sitting on a financial gold mine. He underscores that if an individual investor saw returns like that consistently, they would go to great lengths to defend it. In his view, credit card companies do exactly that - protecting and nurturing this high-yield system by keeping credit easy to obtain and encouraging spending behaviors that trap consumers in cycles of debt. It's not accidental. And that's the danger he wants people to wake up to. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security Social Security monthly paychecks are not enough to live comfortably on in retirement, so investing in 401(k) plans is a major strategy to live a satisfying life after one's working days are over. O'Leary believes that the profit incentive for credit card companies does great harm. That significantly applies to people striving to boost their 401(k) plan values. Credit is widely available by design, O'Leary explains, pulling in overspenders into deep debt cycles where compounding interest outpaces any realistic financial return, trapping them indefinitely. He makes an analogy to bring the point home. "The real tragedy, if not the real crime, of personal overspending is that any bartender is legally bound to cut off a dangerously drunk person. But you won't see that happening in a store," O'Leary wrote. "No cashiers at Neiman Marcus or Saks are going to place their hand over your credit card and suggest you don't really need three pairs of skinny jeans, that one pair will suffice," he added. "Nope. They'll congratulate you on your 'finds' and reinforce the fact that you 'deserve to splurge.'" Related: Tony Robbins sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Eric Adams gets big win from court in retired NYC worker health care battle — but most of his rivals vow to kill it anyway
Mayor Eric Adams scored a massive legal win in the controversial battle to move retired city workers to higher cost health-care plans — but nearly all the candidates running to replace him as mayor are already planning to stop the move in its tracks. The Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that the city could shift retirees to Medicare Advantage plans – a private healthcare program that utilizes Medicare subsidies in lieu of traditional Medicare and supplements – after years of fighting by retiree advocacy groups. The ruling found that retirees who sued over the change had insufficiently argued that adopting the advantage plans would lead to worsened care and that assurances that the city would keep them on Medicare plans wasn't legally enforceable. Advertisement 3 Mayoral candidates running against Adams, who is running for re-election as an independent, don't want to see the health care proposal get passed. Getty Images Adams' term is up at year's end and he dropped out of a Democratic Party primary that is set for next week. Adams is now running as an independent in a longshot bid, though the Democratic Party torchbearer would be far and away the favorite to win election in the deeply blue city. Advertisement Mayoral hopefuls Comptroller Brad Lander and frontrunner Andrew Cuomo have both publicly opposed the switch and have specifically called for 30-to-60 day grace periods for families to seek other insurance after the death of a retiree and expediting the reimbursements process, as part of their pledge to retiree groups. Every other candidate – with the exception of independent Jim Walden – also oppose the switch, according to a Citizen Budget Commission questionnaire. 3 The Court of Appeals granted Mayor Eric Adams a major victory as the city can shift retired city workers to Medicare Advantage plans. C Davids/ – While surging socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani recently opposed the plan on his campaign website, a source with knowledge told The Post that he didn't sign a pledge to support the retirees nor did he go to the debate hosted by the advocacy group New York City Public Service Retirees. Advertisement The source continued to say that this was in order to prevent losing an endorsement from the public service union DC37, which supports the switch to Medicare advantage plans. The Mamdani campaign pointed to a prior 2022 statement where the Assemblyman opposed switching to Medicare Advantage but declined to comment about allegedly staying tightlipped in an effort to lose support. The ruling even raised the ire of comptroller candidate Justin Brannan. 'Our city should never, ever be screwing retirees. And neither should the courts. No one will ever want to work for New York City again. Medicare Advantage is a bait and switch scam. Enough!' Brannan said. Advertisement 3 Democratic front-runner Andrew Cuomo and mayoral hopeful Brad Lander both oppose the plan. Paul Martinka Comptroller candidate and current Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine didn't respond to a request for comment but said in a recent debate that he would make a decision on 'the details of the plan in consultation with retirees, with current workers, with labor leaders.' The plan was first introduced by former Mayor Bill de Blasio in 2021, who argued the program would lead to over $600 million in annual savings by utilizing federal subsidies. The mayor's office did not respond to a request for comment by press time.
