If Nashville is a welcoming city, why are so many of its residents struggling?
Over the last two weeks, with ICE agents and Tennessee highway patrol officers arresting and detaining hundreds of undocumented immigrants, metros government has repeatedly emphasized one key message:
Nashville is for everyone.
It's a honorable position to take, and one that is incredibly important in this era of dividing and ostracizing, when it seems that many on the right want nothing more than to Make America Whiter Again—both demographically and culturally.
Yet two key reports released this week reveal that Metro's messaging is, honestly, just that: A message. A narrative. An approved talking point or soundbite meant to be repeated, even if not realized.
Indeed, all may be encouraged to come to Nashville, with its leftist sensibilities. But whether those who come will be afforded the same opportunities and advantages of all other residents remains another story altogether.
After all, Nashville is still struggling to care for the people who already live here, and whose families, in many cases, have been here for generations.
On May 14, the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, an organization that advocates for economic justice, released a study examining gentrification rates across the country, from 2010 to 2020. In its findings, Nashville exhibited the most "intense" gentrification of any American city.
Put differently, from 2010 to 2020, there were more historically Black neighborhoods transformed into predominantly white enclaves in Nashville than anywhere else in the U.S.
Here in Nashville, we tend to call this 'progress,' or 'growth.' We get excited about the new restaurant helmed by the James Beard Award-winning chef, now open in another one of Nashville's historic neighborhoods. And we bemoan the hikes in property taxes and costs of living now impacting the city's more affluent residents, those who are being shoved aside by the influx of moneyed out-of-towners.
But never do we acknowledge that a lot of folks were already priced out of this city—their city—decades ago.
Opinion: It will take strong leadership to address gentrification and affordable housing
Also on the 14th, Metro Social Services released its annual 'Community Needs Evaluation' report, its yearly analysis of Nashville's socioeconomic health. The theme of this year's report: There's a 'High Cost to Low Wages,' and, well, you can probably guess the demographics of the Nashvillians who most frequently face that reality.
Those low wages don't just make it hard to cover bills. They impact every aspect of life—from health outcomes (low-income workers are more likely to suffer from chronic disease and die prematurely) to education (low-income earners are also more likely to be zoned for underperforming public schools).
If you're keeping track, you may be starting to piece together the cyclical nature of marginalization. Low-wage earners are often confined to neighborhoods zoned for Nashville schools, which will drastically increase the likelihood of their children also working low-wage jobs.
Moreover, a neighborhood full of low income, Black and brown earners is also likely to have depressed property values—the kind of smoke signal that beckons to overzealous developers and the buyers of those properties, the ones happy to plant roots and Black Lives Matter signs in 'transitioning' neighborhoods in order to get the greatest return on their investment.
But the people forced out, low-income earners as they often are, aren't just pushed out of their homes. They're often pushed out of the city.
Mayor Freddie O'Connell attended the Metro Services-hosted event to mark the release of the 'High Cost of Low Wages' report. He also spoke before the presentation and subsequent panel, noting that the average Black and Hispanic residents of Nashville cannot afford to buy a home in 99% of the city's neighborhoods.
It's a startling truth, and one that runs directly counter to his earlier assessment that, 'broadly speaking, Nashville has been an amazing success story.'
I wrote recently about O'Connell's eagerness to tout the record-high graduation rates of Metro Nashville Public Schools during his State of Metro address. The idea that the number of graduating Nashvillians is higher than ever, and therefore some indication of district success and student achievement, may be accurate. But it's not completely honest.
The statistic doesn't reveal how, for many students in this majority-ministry district, those diplomas are little more than certificates of participation. Those students aren't prepared for the careers or post-secondary studies that will allow them to buy a home in their hometown—or, at minimum, to break or avoid a cycle of low-wage living.
More: How many in Nashville earn less than a living wage? New report details the 'high cost of low wages'
But it is the kind of thing you say when you lead a city that is more concerned about optics than reality. It's no different than saying that Nashville welcomes everybody, even though it hasn't done a good job caring for the citizens who've been here all along.
'Those of us in policy areas, we generally know these things because we're always getting reports, we're always getting questions about income,' said State Rep. Harold Love, D-Nashville. 'But to see the numbers in this report, I think, really brings it home because the data is the data. And you can look across the city, look at the football and hockey and soccer teams, and it gives an illusion that it's a different city.
'But then, when you look at the data, you really get to see what is underneath that beautiful skyline.'
Andrea Williams is an opinion columnist for The Tennessean and curator of the Black Tennessee Voices initiative. She has an extensive background covering country music, sports, race and society. Email her at adwilliams@tennessean.com or follow her on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @AndreaWillWrite and BlueSky at @andreawillwrite.bsky.social.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Reports reveal truth that Nashville's 'It-City' status hides | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
30 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump might be the most accessible president ever — for spies or scammers
President Trump reportedly picks up when his cell rings even if he doesn't know who's calling. Senior members of his team also love chatting on their personal devices. That makes the administration uniquely vulnerable to basic scams like spoofed calls and impersonation attempts. Why it matters: If Trump is willing to answer unknown numbers, as The Atlantic reported this week, there's no guarantee a scammer, impersonator, or even a foreign intelligence operative couldn't have a chat with the president. There's no evidence that has actually happened. But recent reports involving Trump and other top officials have raised red flags about the security of their communications. Driving the news: Federal authorities are investigating a scheme where someone spoofed the phone number of White House chief of staff Susie Wiles to impersonate her in calls to senators, governors, and CEOs, per the Wall Street Journal. Meanwhile, Chinese hackers reportedly penetrated U.S. telecom networks as early as summer 2023, according to Bloomberg — a year earlier than previously known. That access has been used by China-backed group Salt Typhoon to spy on Trump, Vice President Vance, and other officials, the NYT reported. Then there are the series of Signal-related scandals involving former national security adviser Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and others. Between the lines: Eavesdropping on world leaders isn't new — but it's a lot easier if the leader in question is using a personal phone and eschewing standard cybersecurity practices. Flashback: In 2017, Trump had two phones — one issued through the White House and only capable of making phone calls, and a less secure phone equipped just for social media. At the time, he was urged to swap out his Twitter phone at least once a month. Politico reported he'd instead go months without security checks. It's unclear how many of those security protocols were brought back in this time around. "I think people gave up on that years ago," one adviser told The Atlantic. In a written statement, White House communications director Steven Cheung said the administration would "not discuss or disclose security measures regarding the President." "President Trump is the most transparent and accessible President in American history," Cheung said. "World leaders, heads of state, elected officials, and business titans all reach out to him because they know America is back under President Trump's leadership. "Whereas, Joe Biden was hidden and sheltered by his handlers because he was a total embarrassment and bumbling idiot during his time in office," Cheung added. The big picture: Since returning to office, the Trump administration has: Ignored basic security norms, including heavy reliance on Signal and personal numbers. Gutted existing federal cybersecurity leadership, with one-third of CISA's staff already gone. Empowered security-weakening tech initiatives through Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has been pursuing projects like using a buggy AI tool to crawl sensitive government data. Threat level: AI tools can clone a voice using just a few seconds of audio, and the FBI warned last month that scammers are already using them to impersonate senior officials.


San Francisco Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Chinese hackers and user lapses turn smartphones into a 'mobile security crisis'
WASHINGTON (AP) — Cybersecurity investigators noticed a highly unusual software crash — it was affecting a small number of smartphones belonging to people who worked in government, politics, tech and journalism. The crashes, which began late last year and carried into 2025, were the tipoff to a sophisticated cyberattack that may have allowed hackers to infiltrate a phone without a single click from the user. The attackers left no clues about their identities, but investigators at the cybersecurity firm iVerify noticed that the victims all had something in common: They worked in fields of interest to China's government and had been targeted by Chinese hackers in the past. Foreign hackers have increasingly identified smartphones, other mobile devices and the apps they use as a weak link in U.S. cyberdefenses. Groups linked to China's military and intelligence service have targeted the smartphones of prominent Americans and burrowed deep into telecommunication networks, according to national security and tech experts. It shows how vulnerable mobile devices and apps are and the risk that security failures could expose sensitive information or leave American interests open to cyberattack, those experts say. 'The world is in a mobile security crisis right now,' said Rocky Cole, a former cybersecurity expert at the National Security Agency and Google and now chief operations officer at iVerify. 'No one is watching the phones.' U.S. authorities warned in December of a sprawling Chinese hacking campaign designed to gain access to the texts and phone conversations of an unknown number of Americans. 'They were able to listen in on phone calls in real time and able to read text messages,' said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois. He is a member of the House Intelligence Committee and the senior Democrat on the Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, created to study the geopolitical threat from China. Chinese hackers also sought access to phones used by Donald Trump and running mate JD Vance during the 2024 campaign. The Chinese government has denied allegations of cyberespionage, and accused the U.S. of mounting its own cyberoperations. It says America cites national security as an excuse to issue sanctions against Chinese organizations and keep Chinese technology companies from the global market. 'The U.S. has long been using all kinds of despicable methods to steal other countries' secrets,' Lin Jian, a spokesman for China's foreign ministry, said at a recent press conference in response to questions about a CIA push to recruit Chinese informants. U.S. intelligence officials have said China poses a significant, persistent threat to U.S. economic and political interests, and it has harnessed the tools of digital conflict: online propaganda and disinformation, artificial intelligence and cyber surveillance and espionage designed to deliver a significant advantage in any military conflict. Mobile networks are a top concern. The U.S. and many of its closest allies have banned Chinese telecom companies from their networks. Other countries, including Germany, are phasing out Chinese involvement because of security concerns. But Chinese tech firms remain a big part of the systems in many nations, giving state-controlled companies a global footprint they could exploit for cyberattacks, experts say. Chinese telecom firms still maintain some routing and cloud storage systems in the U.S. — a growing concern to lawmakers. 'The American people deserve to know if Beijing is quietly using state-owned firms to infiltrate our critical infrastructure,' U.S. Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Mich. and chairman of the China committee, which in April issued subpoenas to Chinese telecom companies seeking information about their U.S. operations. Mobile devices have become an intel treasure trove Mobile devices can buy stocks, launch drones and run power plants. Their proliferation has often outpaced their security. The phones of top government officials are especially valuable, containing sensitive government information, passwords and an insider's glimpse into policy discussions and decision-making. The White House said last week that someone impersonating Susie Wiles, Trump's chief of staff, reached out to governors, senators and business leaders with texts and phone calls. It's unclear how the person obtained Wiles' connections, but they apparently gained access to the contacts in her personal cellphone, The Wall Street Journal reported. The messages and calls were not coming from Wiles' number, the newspaper reported. While most smartphones and tablets come with robust security, apps and connected devices often lack these protections or the regular software updates needed to stay ahead of new threats. That makes every fitness tracker, baby monitor or smart appliance another potential foothold for hackers looking to penetrate networks, retrieve information or infect systems with malware. Federal officials launched a program this year creating a 'cyber trust mark' for connected devices that meet federal security standards. But consumers and officials shouldn't lower their guard, said Snehal Antani, former chief technology officer for the Pentagon's Joint Special Operations Command. 'They're finding backdoors in Barbie dolls,' said Antani, now CEO of a cybersecurity firm, referring to concerns from researchers who successfully hacked the microphone of a digitally connected version of the toy. Risks emerge when smartphone users don't take precautions It doesn't matter how secure a mobile device is if the user doesn't follow basic security precautions, especially if their device contains classified or sensitive information, experts say. Mike Waltz, who departed as Trump's national security adviser, inadvertently added The Atlantic's editor-in-chief to a Signal chat used to discuss military plans with other top officials. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had an internet connection that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols set up in his office so he could use the Signal messaging app on a personal computer, the AP has reported. Hegseth has rejected assertions that he shared classified information on Signal, a popular encrypted messaging app not approved for the use of communicating classified information. China and other nations will try to take advantage of such lapses, and national security officials must take steps to prevent them from recurring, said Michael Williams, a national security expert at Syracuse University. 'They all have access to a variety of secure communications platforms,' Williams said. "We just can't share things willy-nilly.'
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 5th District deserves better than Andy Ogles. Here's why.
When I heard that U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles held a press conference at the State Capitol on Memorial Day, my first reaction was, "I guess he does know where Nashville is." Now in his second term, the 5th District Congressman has been scarce in the northernmost part of his district. Usually, you'll find him in Washington, at a Republican Party event in Williamson or Maury Counties, or on the other end of a telephone town hall where he can control the narrative and screen the questions. When he did make the trip to Nashville, he was in a locked building, holding constituents outside, while he accused Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell of obstructing justice. Ogles' accusation stems from the action taken by ICE and the Tennessee Highway Patrol in May that resulted in 468 traffic stops and the arrest of 196 people. According to Ogles, Mayor Freddie O'Connell has "weaponized his office to dox and surveil federal agents trying to stop violent criminals." For his part, Mayor Freddie O'Connell appears to take seriously his role to look out for all the residents of Nashville, while acknowledging that immigration enforcement can and will be carried out by federal authorities. Letters: Rep. Andy Ogles' telephone town hall meeting stifled dialogue with constituents "The trauma inflicted on families is long-lasting, and I'm doing everything in my power consistent with applicable law to protect anyone who calls Nashville home," O'Connell said. 'So yes, I continue to be concerned about the mechanism for these actions," he added, "and I think what they've demonstrated is that they can occur at times and locations of their choosing without our involvement.' Unfortunately, Ogles' reaction to ask two House committees to open an investigation into the mayor isn't a surprise. After all, he's known more for attention-grabbing stunts – like proposing a constitutional amendment to give President Trump a third term days into his second term – than he is for solving problems. When the state legislature gerrymandered the House districts, splitting Nashville into three, we were told this would give the city a greater voice in Washington. While most people saw through that thinly veiled argument, it's no less devastating to have representatives who are openly hostile to their constituents. I wonder how many times Andy Ogles has communicated with the mayor's office before this. What steps has he taken to understand the issues of not only his district, but the biggest, most dynamic city in the state? More: National Democrats to target US Rep. Andy Ogles as 'vulnerable Republican' in 2026 While the average citizen may struggle to get in touch with him, does he provide access to other elected officials to better understand their concerns, even if they hold differing political views? Immigration is a complex and challenging issue. There is a broad spectrum of people caught in the outdated and neglected laws of the United States – from known criminals to Dreamers brought to the country as babies. I believe elected officials, including O'Connell, are right to address these concerns with nuance and respect for human dignity. It would be great if Nashville had a partner in Washington with whom it could collaborate in navigating these issues, even when policy recommendations differ. I have no faith that Andy Ogles is that person. I encourage both the Democratic and Republican parties to begin recruiting an alternative for the 2026 election now. I believe in the will of the voters of the 5th District, even if their choice differs from mine. However, the entire district deserves a representative who will be accessible, listen respectfully, and seek solutions rather than engage in ideological grandstanding. Bob Faricy has lived in Nashville for 25 years, working in marketing leadership roles for various media organizations, including The Tennessean. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: TN Rep. Andy Ogles is known more for stunts than policy | Opinion