
Takeaways from AP's report on why pre-Civil War hymnal 'The Sacred Harp' is getting an update
'The Sacred Harp' is a pre-Civil War compilation of sacred songs that uses music notes shaped like triangles, ovals, squares and diamonds, and it is getting an update.
Sung in four-part harmony, 'The Sacred Harp' is central to its more than 180-year-old American folk a cappella singing tradition that is as much about the community as it is the music. It's no accident 'The Sacred Harp' is still in use today, and a new edition — the first in 34 years — is on its way.
Since the beginning, groups of Sacred Harp singers have periodically worked together to revise it, preserving its history and breathing new life into it. It's a renewal, not a reprint, said David Ivey, a lifelong singer and chair of the Sacred Harp Publishing Company's revision and music committee.
'That's credited for keeping our book vibrant and alive,' said Ivey.
Why is the revision such a big deal to Sacred Harp singers?
First published in 1844 by West Georgia compilers Benjamin F. White and Elisha J. King, revisions of the shape-note hymnal make space for songs by living composers, said Jesse P. Karlsberg, a committee member and expert on the tradition.
The nine-member revision committee feels tremendous responsibility, said Ivey, who also worked on the most recent 1991 edition.
Sacred Harp singers are not historical reenactors, he said. Singing is a family tradition for many, and it's also a spiritual experience for some. Though many are Christian, Sacred Harp singers include people of other faiths and no faith, including LGBTQ+ community members who found church uncomfortable but miss congregational singing.
Singers use their hymnals week after week. Some treat them like scrapbooks or family Bibles, tucking mementos between pages, taking notes in the margins and passing them down. Memories and emotions get attached to specific songs, and favorites in life can become memorials in death.
'The book is precious to people,' said Ivey, on a March afternoon surrounded by songbooks and related materials at the nonprofit publishing company's museum in Carrollton, Georgia.
The upcoming edition is years in the making. The revision, authorized by the publishing company's board of directors in October 2018, was delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic. It now will be released in September at the annual convention of the United Sacred Harp Musical Association in Atlanta.
Ivey hopes singers fall in love with it, though he knows there is nervousness in the Sacred Harp community. For now, many of the changes are under wraps.
The committee is being methodical and making decisions through consensus, Ivey said. Though most will remain, some old songs will be cut and new ones added. They invited singer input, holding community meetings and singing events to help evaluate the more than 1,100 new songs submitted for consideration.
Fa, sol, la, mi and other peculiarities of shape-note singing
Sacred Harp singing events are not performances. 'The Sacred Harp' is meant to be sung by everyone — loudly.
Anyone can lead a song of their choosing from the hymnal's 554 options, but a song can only be sung once per event with few exceptions. Also called fa-sol-la singing, the group sight-reads the songs using the book's unique musical notation, sounding first its shape notes — fa, sol, la and mi — and then its lyrics.
'The whole idea is to make singing accessible to anyone,' said Karlsberg. 'For many of us, it's a moving and spiritual experience. It's also a chance to see our dear friends.'
'The Sacred Harp' is sung in a hollow square formation. Singers organize into four voice parts: treble, alto, tenor and bass. Each group takes a side, facing an opening in the center where a rotating song leader guides the group and keeps time as dozens of voices come from all sides.
The shape-note tradition emerged from New England's 18th century singing school movement that aimed to improve Protestant church music and expanded into a social activity. Over time, 'The Sacred Harp' became synonymous with this choral tradition.
'The Sacred Harp' was designed to be neither denominational nor doctrinal, Karlsberg said. Many of its lyrics were composed by Christian reformers from England, such as Isaac Watts and Charles Wesley, he said. It was rarely used during church services.
Instead, the hymnal was part of the social fabric of the rural South, though racially segregated, Karlsberg said. Before emancipation, enslaved singers were part of white-run Sacred Harp events; post-Reconstruction, Black singers founded their own conventions, he said. 'The Sacred Harp' eventually expanded to cities and beyond the South, including other countries.
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
40 minutes ago
- Times
Online antique buyer lost my 91-year-old mum's treasures
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Putting trigger warnings on George Orwell's 1984 is the most stupid, 1984ish thing ever
' Orwell will be turning in his grave,' read one of the online comments posted in response to yesterday's piece about 1984 getting a trigger warning. 'Turning'? I think it's more likely he'll be laughing. What, after all, could be more of a validation, a rubber-stamping, and an 'I told you so' – delivered through a megaphone – than a thoughtcrime conviction for a futuristic cautionary tale… about thoughtcrimes, published 76 years ago? In the introductory essay featured in the new 75th anniversary edition, US novelist Dolen Perkins-Valdez describes the book's protagonist, Winston Smith, as 'problematic'. So much so that it may once have led to her abandoning the book, she admits. Warning modern readers that they may find his views on women 'despicable', she writes: 'For example, we learn of him, 'He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones.'' Whoa, wait a minute, Orwell. There's so much to unpack here. First, that with everything currently going on in the world – you know, the rise of modern totalitarianism, technology spying on us and all that – Winston Smith's view of women should be the main area of focus. Second, that word 'problematic', which almost always precedes something cretinous, but in this context was genuinely baffling. Name one successful novel, TV show or film that doesn't feature a 'problematic' character, and I will show you something I have no interest in reading or watching. Do you know anybody who enjoys reading about nice, blameless people going about their nice, blameless lives? I don't. Also, by all means, find Smith's views of women despicable – when you start reading the book, but not before. If and when you are appalled by his behaviour, let that not be off-putting, but a jumping-off point for meaty discussions; an opening up of your mind to human complexities. Someone who has been eloquent on this subject is the British Museum's brilliant new director, Nicholas Cullinan. Asked recently whether he agreed with the idea of trigger warnings and apologies on museum labels, Cullinan replied: 'Labels should be accurate, not partisan or political or conforming to a contemporary fad.' For me, the most extraordinary aspect of trigger warnings has always been their pomposity: the implicit conviction that in 2025, our view is not only more enlightened than any view that came before, but the final word on the subject. Unlike Orwell's, I suspect that those words will look embarrassingly outdated in just a couple of years.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Blix Not Bombs review – former UN weapons inspector revisits the Iraq war
At the age of 97, entirely lucid, still writing books and physically spry enough to be shown swimming in a Norwegian lake, former UN weapons inspector Hans Blix has given an extended interview to the Czech-born Swedish film-maker Greta Stocklassová about his life and times, about George W Bush Jr, Saddam Hussein and the weapons of mass destruction that were not there. The result is insightful and a vivid time capsule for the grim and mendacious era of the 'war on terror', during which Blix was tasked with discovering the truth about Saddam's supposed weapons. The film is also unexpectedly spiky, with Blix at one stage threatening to walk out, as Stocklassová presses him on his apparent fence-sitting, then as now, insisting on an absence of evidence for WMD but also reluctant to commit himself definitively to this being evidence of absence, and apparently unable to state where the onus of proof lies. But as he himself says … how do you prove a negative? How do you prove that there is not a mouse in this room at this very moment? After 9/11, Blix found himself at the very centre of international pain and American dysfunction, with the US government grimly set on finding someone to lash out against, and Saddam's Iraq, already semi-defeated in the first Gulf war of 1991, being the obvious candidate. America needed the fiction of Iraq's 'weapons of mass destruction' as the pretext – although it was presmably their absolute conviction that there were no WMD that emboldened them to attack. (Osama Bin Laden was actually discovered in Pakistan, a nuclear power on whom regime change could not be imposed.) So Blix – calm, professional, conscientious and diplomatic, showing up at various Iraqi sites with his UN team in the burning heat and finding nothing – was the face of this objective, non-partisan assessment. He didn't realise until it was too late, and perhaps still doesn't realise, that the protracted theatre of his polite frustration was being used by the US government to build up the necessary drumbeat of rage to facilitate the final assault: Blix the dupe, Blix the chump, Blix the internationalist liberal being laughed at by Saddam. Stocklassová suggests that over the 20 years since then, the calamity of the Iraq war led to the rise of Islamic State, to the tidal wave of refugees and to the new mainstream normalisation of the far right. She could be correct. Yet Blix's inspections seem part of a different world; certainly Putin didn't feel the need to go through the motions of a UN inspector who could confirm or fail to disprove his allegations of a Nazified Ukraine aggressor. Blix himself is good-natured and decent; his faith in the primacy of facts still has something heroic about it. Blix Not Bombs is on True Story from 13 June.