
My son's old school board owes me an apology
On May 28, my son did something I didn't think possible just a few years ago. He graduated from high school with honors, and as a member of the school board, I handed him his diploma as he walked across the stage.
If you'd told me this would happen five years ago, I would have laughed and then cried. My son, who has a learning disability, had been shut out of school during the pandemic. His grade point average fell from a 3.5 to a 1.5. For the better part of two years, I didn't see how he could get back on track.
But while my son is now on a better path, I'm still dealing with the fallout of the school's treatment of him – and me.
On June 12, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments in a case I brought. I'm asking that school board to apologize for violating my constitutional right to free speech. I exercised that right in defense of my special-needs son, only for my elected officials to try to get me fired and even investigated by the federal government.
I've been fighting this battle since the summer of 2020, when the Chippewa Valley School Board announced that classes would stay virtual for the 2020-21 school year. By then, my son had already spent three months in virtual learning, and every day was worse than the one before.
My son's learning disability means that he needs one-on-one time with teachers. I worried that if he didn't get that for a full year, his education and life would be permanently harmed.
The school board held public meetings that summer and fall, and out of concern for my son, I showed up to all of them. But the board members showed zero willingness to listen, much less show leadership by reopening school.
I got frustrated, no question. But I didn't act inappropriately. I've been a police officer for 27 years, so I know how to handle myself in public.
But while I never crossed a line, the school board did. In December, the deputy chief at my police station called me into his office and read an email he'd received from a school board member. It accused me of "veiled racism," and when that kind of language is leveled at a police officer, the meaning is obvious. I should be fired – simply for speaking in defense of my son.
How I wish that were the end of it. I kept going to school board meetings, and I kept my cool despite being targeted.
The following October, however, the school board president submitted a formal complaint to the Department of Justice. He accused me of "threatening comments," and once again, the subtext was clear.
The day before, Attorney General Merrick Garland had written his memo ordering the FBI to go after parents who criticize educators and school board members. The memo was an obvious invitation to those who wanted to silence parents like me, of which there were countless during the pandemic. My son's school board jumped at the chance.
I have no idea if the Justice Department took action. But I do know the school board—an elected government body – tried to punish me for daring to use my right to free speech.
I also know that while the school board was targeting me, my son's situation deteriorated further. In 2021, I moved him into a school in a neighboring district, and I also ran for an open seat on the board. But I refused to let the old school board get away with its actions.
Which brings me to the Sixth Circuit. I got here after a district court ruled that while I was targeted, I didn't suffer any harm. That's true – the school board didn't succeed in getting me fired or otherwise punished. But that's irrelevant.
Government officials shouldn't be let off the hook simply because their targeting failed. If the federal courts let that argument stand, government officials across America will go after their opponents like never before. They'll be free to frighten anyone who dares question them, silencing citizens who try to hold them accountable.
I refused to be silent, then or now. I'm asking the court to recognize that my constitutional rights were violated. And I want the court to order the school board to give me an apology.
I'm astounded that none of the elected officials who targeted me have said those simple words – I'm sorry. Thank God that despite their best efforts, I'm still employed, and my son finished his education with flying colors.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
What Powers Do US States Have to Resist Trump?
Republicans have long cast themselves as the defenders of state power and opponents of a strong central government — but don't always act that way when it's a Republican president trying to bend states to his will. Now, with Donald Trump testing the limits of presidential reach, Democratic governors such as California's Gavin Newsom are the ones asserting states' authority. On June 7, Trump called up California National Guard troops to quell protests against his immigration crackdown in Los Angeles — over the objections of Newsom. It was the first time a president has deployed troops in any state without the permission of the governor since the civil rights movement in the 1960s. In a statement, all of the country's Democratic governors called the move an ' alarming abuse of power,' and on June 9, Newsom sued the Trump administration.


CBS News
24 minutes ago
- CBS News
Residents make their voices heard amid proposed PRT cuts, "We need funding."
Citizens make their voices heard on last day of PRT public comment Citizens make their voices heard on last day of PRT public comment Citizens make their voices heard on last day of PRT public comment The third and final day of public hearings is underway regarding proposed service cuts by Pittsburgh Regional Transit. The public comment period ends next week -- before PRT's board makes a decision on its budget. It wasn't a packed house Thursday morning, but the transit supporters there are fervent ones. Linda Warman brought some company. It's a makeshift bus with significance, like the "53l" on the back. "It's to prove a point, basically," she said. That line could see a lot of service reductions. PRT faces a $100 million deficit for the next fiscal year. "We're on fumes – we're running on fumes," Warman said. The cuts would include nearly a third of PRT's service. "If they cut the buses, most of the time I'll be walking – and that will be putting my health at risk," Warman said. Fares would also go up by 25 cents to $3.00. That would make them the 5th highest in the country. "I'm just hoping something good comes out of all of this," Greene said. People here told KDKA-TV that having transit in their lives allows them some sort of freedom. "Work, shopping, just everything because I don't own a car," Greene said. Those abilities are now ones they want to protect. "No more Band-Aids, no more year-by-year crisis – we need funding," Warman said. There's gonna be a second session here too Thursday from 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. People will still be able to mail and use the internet, and phone to share their thoughts until June 18th at 5 p.m.


Bloomberg
33 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Texas Deploys 5,000 National Guard Soldiers Ahead of Protests
Texas Governor Greg Abbott is deploying 5,000 National Guard soldiers and 2,000 state troopers to assist local law enforcement during planned protests this weekend. Any demonstrators engaging in violence or damaging property will be arrested, Abbott warned in a statement Thursday.