logo
NATO agrees to a big increase in military spending, pleasing Trump

NATO agrees to a big increase in military spending, pleasing Trump

Boston Globe9 hours ago

Advertisement
Trump was pleased.
'This was a tremendous summit, and I enjoyed it very much,' he said at a news conference at the end of the meeting. He added that he understood the central role the United States plays in the defense of Europe. 'They want to protect their country, and they need the United States and without the United States, it's not going to be the same,' he said.
Trump has long denigrated NATO allies as freeloaders, relying on the United States for protection, and Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have described Europe as a drain on US security resources. The president has even mused publicly about withdrawing from the alliance.
But the summit's brief communiqué, unanimously approved Wednesday, included a restatement of the allies' commitment to collective defense in Article 5 of the NATO pact. The president has often been reluctant to commit publicly to Article 5, though he often does in private.
Advertisement
At his own news conference, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte expressed frustration over continued questions about Trump's commitment to Article 5. He urged journalists and politicians 'to stop worrying,' adding: 'The United States is totally committed to Article 5. How many times do we want them to say this?'
The summit won praise from Senator Christopher Coons, a Delaware Democrat who is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. 'This will be remembered as a landmark summit,' he said in an interview in The Hague. 'The agreement to spend 5 percent is a significant step forward toward a shared commitment to our collective security.'
But he cautioned that 'this money has to be coordinated and spent well, or it will do little more than run up costs and inflation.'
Others were skeptical.
'All the big challenges were left off the agenda,' said Torrey Taussig, a former Europe director for the National Security Council under former president Joe Biden. There was 'no meaningful deliverable for Ukraine, despite a fourth year of a land war in Europe,' she said, and no discussion of future policy toward Russia or the rising challenges of China.
Also, the commitment is to raise spending to 5 percent over a decade, and that is a long time. Some countries may never reach these targets.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said before the summit that Spain would spend 2.1 percent of its GDP on defense, 'no more, no less.' Slovakia and Belgium also hinted that the 5 percent pledge was going to be impossible to meet.
Advertisement
But Rutte worked around Spain with a bit of mushy diplomatic language. The communiqué said 'the allies' — not 'all allies' — had agreed to the 5 percent figure.
Rutte presented the agreement as a victory for Trump, praising him for pushing the Europeans to do what was necessary in their own interests.
'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done,' Rutte told Trump in a private text message that Trump posted on social media.
Even if countries spend unevenly, the result would be a very large increase in Europe's military spending. The hope is that the money will be spent effectively and on critical areas such as air defense and satellite intelligence, where the US is currently indispensable. There will be a spending review in 2029.
Trump has ordered a review of where US troops are now stationed, and where they should be in the future. That is likely to affect what forces NATO wants each ally to have, from troop numbers to equipment.
Despite the promises, many governments, especially in the west of Europe, will have a difficult political task to convince their publics that the threat to their security is real, and that money must be spent for deterrence.
That is 'where the rubber hits the road,' said Rachel Rizzo, a European defense expert at the Atlantic Council. 'Will European leaders expend the political capital to sell this commitment to their publics?'
But speed is also crucial, with some intelligence agencies warning of a Russian threat to Europe within three to five years of the end of the Ukraine war.
Advertisement
Ukraine was reduced to the sidelines in this summit, though President Volodymyr Zelensky met with Trump. They were scheduled to meet last week at the Group of 7 summit in Canada but the president skipped their meeting, citing a need to return to Washington to handle the conflict between Israel and Iran.
In his news conference, Rutte promised 'continued support' for Ukraine with money and equipment.
The communiqué did not mention the prospect of Ukraine's future membership in the alliance, apparently as another gesture to Trump, who opposes it. But Rutte made a point of repeating NATO's long-standing pledge of eventually admitting Ukraine.
'Our aim is to keep Ukraine in the fight today so that it can enjoy a lasting peace in the future,' he said. 'We stand by Ukraine in its pursuit of peace and will continue to support Ukraine on its irreversible path to NATO membership,' echoing last year's communiqué in Washington.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate struggle over Medicaid cuts threatens progress on Trump's big bill

time32 minutes ago

Senate struggle over Medicaid cuts threatens progress on Trump's big bill

WASHINGTON -- One key unsettled issue stalling progress on President Donald Trump's big bill in Congress is particularly daunting: How to cut billions from health care without harming Americans or the hospitals and others that provide care? Republicans are struggling to devise a solution to the health care problem their package has created. Already, estimates say 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage under the House-passed version of the bill. GOP senators have proposed steeper reductions, which some say go too far. 'The Senate cuts in Medicaid are far deeper than the House cuts, and I think that's problematic,' said GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. Senators have been meeting behind closed doors and with Trump administration officials as they rush to finish up the big bill ahead of the president's Fourth of July deadline. Much of the package, with its tax breaks and bolstered border security spending, is essentially drafted. But the size and scope of healthcare cuts are among the toughest remaining issues. It's reminiscent of the summer during Trump's first term, in 2017, when Republicans struggled to keep their campaign promise to 'repeal and replace' the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, only to see the GOP splinter over the prospect of Americans losing health coverage. That legislation collapsed when then-Sen. John McCain famously cast a thumbs-down vote. Senate Majority Leader John Thune is determined to avoid that outcome, sticking to the schedule and pressing ahead with voting expected by the end of the week. 'This is a good bill and it's going to be great for our country,' Thune said Wednesday, championing its potential to unleash economic growth and put money in people's pockets. The changes to the federal health care programs, particularly Medicaid, were always expected to become a centerpiece of the GOP package, a way to offset the costs of providing tax breaks for millions of Americans. Without action from Congress, taxes would go up next year when current tax law expires. The House-passed bill achieved some $1.5 trillion in savings overall, a large part of it coming from changes to health care. The Medicaid program has dramatically expanded in the 15 years since Obamacare became law and now serves some 80 million Americans. Republicans say that's far too high, and they want to shrink the program back to a smaller size covering mainly poorer women and children. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Republicans are 'trying to take away healthcare from tens of millions of Americans.' Democrats are uniformly opposed to what they call the 'big, ugly bill.' Much of the health care cost savings would come from new 80-hour-a-month work requirements on those who receive Medicaid benefits, even as most recipients already work. But another provision, the so-called provider tax that almost all the states impose to some degree on hospitals and others that serve Medicaid patients, is drawing particular concern for potential cuts to rural hospitals. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said several senators spoke up Wednesday during a private meeting indicating they were not yet ready to start voting. 'That'll depend if we land the plane on rural hospitals,' he said. States impose the taxes as a way to help fund Medicaid, largely by boosting the reimbursements they receive from the federal government. Critics decry the system as a type of 'laundering' but almost every state except Alaska uses it to help provide the health care coverage. The House-passed bill would freeze the provider taxes at current levels, while the Senate proposal goes deeper by reducing the tax that some states are able to impose. 'I know the states are addicted to it,' said Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. But he added, 'Obviously the provider tax needs to go away.' But a number of GOP senators, and the hospitals and other medical providers in their states, are raising steep concerns that the provider tax changes would decimate rural hospitals. In a plea to lawmakers, the American Hospital Association said the cuts won't just affect those who get health coverage through Medicaid, but would further strain emergency rooms 'as they become the family doctor to millions of newly uninsured people.' 'And worse, some hospitals, especially those in rural communities, may be forced to close altogether,' said Rick Pollack, president and CEO of the hospital group. The Catholic Health Association of the United States noted in its own letter that Medicaid provides health insurance coverage for one in five people and nearly half of all children. 'The proposed changes to Medicaid would have devastating consequences, particularly for those in small towns and rural communities, where Medicaid is often the primary source of health care coverage,' said Sister Mary Haddad, the group's president and CEO. Trying to engineer a fix to the problem, senators are considering creating a rural hospital fund to help offset the lost Medicaid money. GOP senators circulated a proposal to pour $15 billion to establish a new rural hospital fund. But several senators said that's too high, while others said it's insufficient. Collins has proposed that the fund be set at $100 billion. 'It won't be that big, but there will be a fund,' Thune said. Hawley, who has been among those most outspoken about the health care cuts, said he's interested in the rural hospital fund but needs to hear more about how it would work. He has also raised concerns about a new $35 per service co-pay that could be charged to those with Medicaid, which is in both the House and Senate versions of the bill. 'Getting the fund is good. That's important, a step forward,' Hawley said. But he asked: 'How does the fund actually distribute the money? Who will get it to hospitals? ... Or is this just going to be something that exists on paper?' A new analysis from the White House Council of Economic Advisers estimates the package would result in up to $2.3 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years, a markedly different assessment from other analyses. In contrast, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's dynamic analysis of the House-passed measure estimates an increase in deficits by $2.8 trillion over the next decade.

Mousavian: Full Damage To Iran Nuclear Sites Unknown
Mousavian: Full Damage To Iran Nuclear Sites Unknown

Bloomberg

time42 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Mousavian: Full Damage To Iran Nuclear Sites Unknown

President Trump says the US will meet with Iran next week, while casting doubt on the need for a diplomatic agreement on Tehran's nuclear program. President Trump continues to insist that US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities had obliterated them. Seyed Hossein Mousavian, Former Iranian Ambassador to Germany spoke to Bloomberg's Horizons Middle East and Africa anchor Joumanna Bercetche on the extent of damage to these sites. (Source: Bloomberg)

Donald Trump Makes Major Change to Mortgages: What to Know
Donald Trump Makes Major Change to Mortgages: What to Know

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Makes Major Change to Mortgages: What to Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is calling on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to consider cryptocurrency as an asset on mortgage applications, in a move director William J. Pulte described as in line with the Trump administration's agenda. "After significant studying, and in keeping with President Trump's vision to make the United States the crypto capital of the world, today I ordered the Great Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prepare their businesses to count cryptocurrency as an asset for a mortgage," Pulte wrote on X, sharing the directive issued by the agency on Wednesday. In the document, the FHFA called on the two housing giants to prepare a proposal for considering cryptocurrency as an asset for reserves in their respective single-family mortgage loan risk assessments, without conversion to U.S. dollars. Only crypto assets that can be evidenced and stored on a U.S.-regulated centralized exchange subject to all applicable laws should be taken into consideration, it said. Use of crypto for home buying has been limited. Only 1 percent of those who made a down payment said they used crypto cash, a National Association of Realtors survey of people who bought a home between July 2023 and June 2024 found. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference following the 2025 NATO Summit on June 25, 2025, in The Hague, Netherlands. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference following the 2025 NATO Summit on June 25, 2025, in The Hague, is a breaking news story and will be later updated with more information.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store