King Albert of Belgium, 91, undergoes cancer treatment for sixth time in 11 years
The recent surgery means that Albert, 91, has undergone cancer treatment at least six times in 11 years, the Belgium Palace confirmed to Dutch outlet Het Laatste Nieuws.
The news outlet published pictures of the former King of the Belgians with a scar running from his nose to his upper lip.
The royal palace confirmed that Albert had the procedure - but did not say when the surgery was performed, the outlet reported.
The photos were taken when Albert, father of King Philippe of Belgium, 65, attended a reception in Brussels last week.
It was the first time he had attended a public engagement in five months.
Albert has previously been treated for cancer, with some medical professionals believing it is the result of sun exposure from the royal's regular trips abroad.
In 2013, Albert was hospitalised with signs of dehydration.
The ex-king, then 89, 'was admitted to hospital as a precautionary measure,' the spokesman, Xavier Vaert, told AFP at the time, confirming reports by state broadcasters VRT and RTBF.
'Examinations are being done. He is conscious,' Vaert said.
Albert II, the father of Belgium's current King Philippe, was the third and youngest child of King Leopold III.
He became monarch on August 9, 1993 at the age of 59, taking over after his brother Baudouin died without children.
Albert II reigned until his abdication on July 21, 2013, handing the crown to Philippe, who today is aged 65. The former king and his wife, Queen Paola, 85, have spaced out their public appearances in recent years.
King Philippe cancelled his planned engagement at the University of Ghent in order to visit his father in the hospital, according to People.
Other relatives including Prince Laurent, King Albert's younger son, and Prince Emmanuel were reportedly spotted arriving at the Saint-Luc hospital in Brussels to be by his side.
Speaking to the BBC at the time of his abdication, King Albert said: 'I realise that my age and my health are no longer allowing me to carry out my duties as I would like to. Prince Philippe is well prepared to succeed me.'
At the time of his abdication his love child Princess Delphine launched a legal bid to be officially recognised as Albert's daughter - which she won in October 2020.
After Princess Delphine was born in 1968, the King initially remained in frequent contact with his child and her mother. But when Delphine reached her 16th birthday, the King began to distance himself.
Now she has the right to bear the royal name de Saxe-Cobourg and is formally recognised as a member of the Belgian royal family as are her two children Princess Joséphine of Belgium, 19, and Prince Oscar of Belgium, 14, who she shares with partner James O'Hare.
Speaking to Tatler in 2022, the princess, who is an artist, revealed her father's rejection when she was young still hurts, but added she doesn't blame him and holds no ill-will towards him.
She argued that royal life is 'isolating' and she believed her father had been badly advised at the time.
However, she said: 'You don't just have a child and kick it.'
Reflecting on her seven-year legal battle, Delphine said the action she brought was not about money or status but 'principles'.
Now Delphine has attended royal engagements and says her relationship with her father has healed after years of bitterness.
When she launched her legal action in 2013, she told Belgian radio show Matin Premiere: 'I feel like I have a right to exist. Not to exist in the royal family but as me.
'My decision to call for help through the law, I feel today that it was the right thing to do... The judicial system said that I was right and that I had the right to exist.'
Since the legal action has been settled, Princess Delphine has slowly become integrated in the Belgian royal family.
She met her brother, King Philippe of Belgium - who is one of 20 Belgian royals she is related to - in 2020, where they posted a socially distanced picture to Facebook, describing it as a 'warm meeting.' Her other royal half-siblings are Princess Astrid and Prince Laurent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
We banned cigarette ads for the good of public health – fossil fuels must be next
There was a time when doctors in both the United States and the UK were only too happy to promote 'the health benefits of smoking '. From the 1920s right through to the 1950s, actors were taken on to play the part of doctors to promote different cigarette brands, with the companies vying in their claims for the level of support they had among the medical profession, as in 'more doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette'. Today, this sounds completely outlandish. But I'm reminded that my own father, an eminent surgeon here in the UK, would have been completely comfortable about these adverts. As someone who smoked cigarettes (and then a pipe) enthusiastically for 60 of his 90-year lifespan, he was slow to embrace the increasingly authoritative research links between smoking and cancer. It was clear to me, as a rebellious teenager, that he was a complete addict. As was my mother. As was my sister. And brother. Unfortunately, many people are still addicted to nicotine today. But it's our addiction to fossil fuels that is causing by far the greatest damage to people and the planet. Improbably, back in 2006, it was the then US president, George W Bush, who acknowledged in his State of the Union address that 'we have a serious problem'. 'America is addicted to oil, which is often imported from unstable parts of the world.' He was particularly concerned about imports from Iran. What comes around … That's why today's debate in Parliament is so important. MPs are discussing a petition calling for a ban on fossil fuel advertising and sponsorship, much like the existing bans on tobacco advertising. The petition, signed by more than 110,000 people, argues that such advertisements 'encourage the use of products and sponsorship promotes a positive reputation and creates a social licence of trust and acceptability'. The debate reflects growing public concern about the legitimacy of fossil fuel companies sponsoring cultural, sporting and educational events. Societal addiction is even more of a problem than individual addiction. And those whose job it is today to reinforce that collective addiction to fossil fuels – through advertising, public relations, marketing and sponsorship – are no less reprehensible than those agencies which profited so handsomely from promoting cigarettes over many, many decades. It's a surreal situation we find ourselves in. Governments are committed in principle – with varying degrees of ambition, integrity and policy consistency – to transitioning away from fossil fuels, by far the most important priority in terms of getting to grips with the climate crisis. Yet their actions belie that intent at every turn. To cite but one example, government subsidies to fossil fuel companies in 2023 amounted to an astonishing $1.4 trillion. And this is just the tip of the problem, as the level of advertising by fossil fuel companies at the Formula 1 British Grand Prix at Silverstone at the weekend demonstrated. The easiest way to understand the astonishing reach of the fossil fuel incumbency is to see it as a global imperial power, operating in every corner of the Earth, regardless of the political status of countries – whether democracies, autocracies or failing states – subject only to partial and ineffective regulation by those countries once they've been effectively 'captured'. This is achieved by the limitless amounts of money and other inducements the industry has deployed throughout that time to persuade politicians where their best interests lie. Equally limitless amounts of money are available for marketing and advertising campaigns of every description, for sponsorship arrangements and for high‑profile charitable activities. What is even more extraordinary is that none of these companies has ever, at any stage in their history, been required to pay for the social and environmental costs incurred in bringing their products to market. Governments have simply permitted them to 'externalise' the cost of all those billions of tonnes of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere. That doesn't mean those costs disappear: it means that they're paid by individuals and communities affected by their often grotesque polluting activities, by the environment – in the form of pollution of soil, water and forests – and, of course, by future generations. Which is why Elisa Morgera, the UN's special rapporteur on human rights and climate change, is now urging the UN General Assembly to support a total ban on both lobbying and advertising by the fossil fuel industry. She is pressing for its continuing, pernicious misrepresentations about the reality of the climate crisis to be criminalised. Emphasising the obligation that all states have to inform their citizens about climate change, she could not have been clearer that the 'fossil-fuel playbook' needs to be completely shredded. At the heart of her report to the UN General Assembly is the conviction that continuing to promote fossil fuels – directly and indirectly – represents an astonishing betrayal of young people today. There's never been an incumbency as pervasive and powerful as this one. It's not just the companies themselves, comprehensively dominating the visible foreground, that make up this incumbency, but just behind the scenes there is an even more extensive network of financial and professional interests that provides the funding; facilities; insurance, legal and consultancy services; and the vast array of transport, infrastructure, logistics and retail businesses that distribute and sell the industry's products. Whichever way you look at it, this is indeed such a shocking example of intergenerational injustice that it's hard to believe the level of invective young climate campaigners are subjected to simply for trying to get today's 'grown‑ups' to start paying a bit more attention. Any suggestion that the industries primarily responsible for these current and future bills should now be held to account – both politically and financially – is still peremptorily dismissed as unworldly or, worse yet, as prejudicial to shareholder interests and to capitalism itself. We must start to address these issues. A ban on fossil fuel advertising – which is already being adopted by cities like Edinburgh and Sheffield, and by other local authorities – would be an ideal first step. This would mean, for example, ending fossil fuel sponsorship of our leading cultural institutions – including BP's long-standing sponsorship of the British Museum and Science Museum; its arrangement with the Tate galleries ended in 2017 after protests by climate change activists. It would also put a stop to advertising by oil and gas companies on the London Underground. Only then can we say we're getting serious about undertaking the much‑needed total transformation in our relationship with the fossil fuel industry.
The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
I thought my leg ached from walking too much but doctors asked me a chilling question and uncovered the sinister truth
WAKING up in the night in pain, Megan Skalska blamed her aches on walking too much. At the age of just 23, she was fit and healthy and had no reason to suspect anything sinister. 8 8 The first signs that something was wrong came in October last year. But soon after the ' bone deep' pains began to disturb her sleep, Megan noticed a lump on the left side of her hip. 'At first I just thought it was a swelling,' she says. 'But I decided it would be best to get it checked.' It was a decision that could prove to save her life. She went straight to hospital where she had an X-ray and was sent home in the early hours of the morning. Later that day, at about 7am she received the phone call that would change her life, forever. 'The first question they asked me was: 'Do you have any cancer in the family?'' Megan tells Sun Health. 'That's when I knew that something wasn't right, especially because they got back to me so quickly.' After an MRI scan, a CT scan, another X-ray and lots of blood tests, Megan's mind was put at ease when medics told her the lump was a benign tumour. But her relief soon disappeared and was replaced by panic, when it emerged that doctors feared the tumour had a 'malignant transformation'. Video explaining the different types of bone cancer, symptoms and treatments Megan, from Sittingbourne in Kent, was sent for a consultation at the specialist Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital in Stanmore. She was told that doctors suspected the tumour was cancerous, but that they wouldn't know until they'd conducted a biopsy. 'By that point, everything felt surreal,' she says. 'It was inexplicable; I thought everything was against me. 'The doctor prepared me for the worst, but my doctor was really positive, which helped.' Megan then faced an anxious wait for surgery. Experts made a custom tool to remove the tumour - but by the time the operation took place, the mass had grown so much that it couldn't be used. The surgery on January 28 was long and complicated - and involved surgeons removing half of Megan's hip, but it was a success. 'At first, I was supposed to have a small operation, which would have only had a four-week-long recovery,' she says. 8 8 'But on the day of my operation, I found out that they just kind of went in and removed everything as they probably suspected the cancer was already there. 'The tumour was just growing so quickly at that point.' Being in hospital was harder than Megan thought it would be. She woke from the anaesthetic full of tubes and her recovery was exhausting and long. SURVIVAL MODE 'I thought I'd be in the hospital for three days max, but I ended up being in hospital for three weeks, and I had an epidural in my back for the first week, so I couldn't feel anything from the waist down and couldn't even move my toe, which was pretty scary,' she says. 'Even just sitting up in bed was really difficult. 'Luckily my mum Jo was by my side constantly, which really helped. And the nurses were super supportive in getting me everything I needed.' On Valentine's Day Megan was finally told she had stage 1 chondrosarcoma, a rare type of bone cancer. Initially she felt numb. 'I thought that my mental health would really suffer throughout the cancer diagnosis,' she says. 'But oddly, I think the survivor mode just kicked in, and I persevered. 'I just thought there's no point in me asking, 'Why has this happened to me?' 8 'I had to keep positive because being sad wasn't going to change anything. So I just kind of stayed strong through it all.' Before her diagnosis, Megan says she was a 'lot more emotional" and would 'cry over nothing at all'. But with her cancer diagnosis came a sense of perspective, she tells Sun Health. 'I think it made me realise that my worries previously weren't real worries at all,' she adds. 'I wanted to stay strong for my family and friends, as well as myself. 'It could've been a lot worse.' Aside from facing her cancer diagnosis, Megan was also haunted by a fear that her leg would have to be amputated. 'I Googled chondrosarcoma and just saw lots of girls having their legs amputated,' she says. 'That was really scary and I was having panic attacks. It's frightening to think about losing part of your body.' Three days after her diagnosis Megan was able to go home without any further treatment. Despite having to learn to walk again, eager to move on from the traumatic illness and in desperate need of distraction, she started a new marketing job one week after surgery. 8 8 'Going through this has totally given me a new perspective on life,' she says. 'I worry less about the small things. 'I now realise I didn't really have any problems until I had health problems. 'It was really scary looking at survival rates and the percentage chances of the cancer coming back.' Megan has been told that she has a 30 per cent chance of her cancer coming back. But rather than focus on that statistic, the 23-year-old is holding on to the fact it means there is a 70 per cent chance it won't. As soon as she was given the green light from her doctors, she grabbed her crutches and booked holidays to Barcelona and Morocco. And tomorrow she will hold a fundraiser to raise money for the Bone Cancer Research Trust. Reflecting on her ordeal, Megan says she is so grateful she went to A&E when she did, and she wants to encourage others to go straight to the doctor if they fear something is wrong. 'There's no point waiting – if I had waited, I could have lost my leg or even my life.' she says. 'If your body doesn't feel right, get it checked. 'It's just so important not to let doctors and your GP turn you away because you're young, because when something's not right, it's not right. 'You never think it's going to happen to you, but just because you're young, that doesn't mean you're immune. 'I am worried about it coming back. But I'm just super grateful to even have that fear. 'Because so many cancer patients don't have the positive outcome that I had. 'I'm still in physio and I have a huge scar on my hip, but I've just kind of accepted that. 'It's nothing to be embarrassed about and I was happy to wear my bikini in Barcelona and not give it another thought. 'It shows me who I am, what I've been through, and how strong I am. I'm still here, and that's something to appreciate. 'I appreciate everything these days.'
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Jessie J reveals cancer operation success
Singer Jessie J says results from tests following surgery to remove one of her breasts after an early cancer diagnosis show no spread of the a social media post she wrote that she was crying "happy tears" after receiving the June she revealed her diagnosis and underwent surgery to remove her thanked her 14 million followers for the "prayers, the love, the well wishes, the joy and all the positive energy". Jessie J has posted openly about her experiences of undergoing a mastectomy and received comments in support of her doing Monday she released a video, taken the night before her surgery, of her young son saying: "Mummy's gonna be OK.""And... I am OK" she wrote, saying she'd received results showing no cancer post was flooded with positive comments, including from celebrities like TV presenter Rochelle Humes. Singer Paloma Faith also offered her congratulations on the who have been impacted by breast cancer also replied to the post. According to Cancer Research UK more than 56,000 women a year are diagnosed with the popstar revealed she has "lots of healing to go" and is now awaiting an operation to "make these cousins look more like sisters", referring to reconstructive surgery on her signed off the post in good humour saying she is in the meantime changing her name to "The LopJess monster".
