
Why a major change at US's biggest credit card provider could make it harder to use your plastic abroad
Capital One has acquired its rival Discover after final approval from regulators — but experts warn the merger could cause headaches for customers traveling abroad.
The $35.3 billion takeover — which will create the US's biggest card issuer — was initially under scrutiny from the US Department of Justice over antitrust concerns.
However, the DOJ said it would not challenge the deal, and both the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, a banking regulator, signed off on the merger.
While the merger will be a major boost to Capital One's customer numbers it also gives the bank control of Discover's payment processing network — a rival to services offered by Visa, Mastercard and American Express.
Payment processors serve as intermediaries between merchants and card issuers — and take a small cut of every purchase.
Until now, Capital One has relied on Visa and MasterCard networks, which are widely accepted worldwide.
One major drawback for consumers is that once Capital One cards shift to Discover's network — less common outside the US — travelers could face limited payment options, according to experts.
'In most cases in the US, Discover is more or less accepted everywhere that Visa, MasterCard, and American Express are,' Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree, told Fortune.
'Where you may run into more issues is with international travel because Discover may not be as widely accepted.'
Although most Capital One cardholders will be moved over to the Discover network over time customers' cards and accounts remain the same as they were before the deal, a joint statement said on Monday.
The firms reassured consumers that any future changes would be communicated to them clearly.
'Capital One intends to continue to offer Discover credit card products as Discover-branded cards alongside the other consumer cards currently offered by Capital One,' the statement added.
Capital One CEO Richard Fairbank previously said he expected to move over 25 million Capital One cardholders and over $175 billion in Capital One purchase volume on to the Discover network by 2027.
'This injection and volume in the network will help Discover be competitive with the leading network.'
Capital One is the nation's ninth-largest bank by total assets, with 259 physical branch locations, 55 'Capital One Cafes' across the country and a major online banking operation.
Discover Financial, meanwhile, is a mostly online bank with a single physical branch in Delaware.
If the merger goes through, Capital One would be the largest card issuer in the country based on outstanding credit card loans, becoming even larger than JPMorgan Chase
Another key element of the merger is how it could affect competition within the payments network space.
There is a possibility the merger reduces competition among issuers, and progressive Democratic lawmakers have long fought against bank consolidation, arguing it increases systemic risk and hurts consumers by reducing lending.
New research from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) found that larger credit card issuers charged higher interest rates and annual fees than smaller banks, due to a lack of competition.
'Anytime there's more consolidation and less competition, there's always the possibility for rates and fees to increase, but I don't see it being a huge issue,' Schulz said.
He argues, however, that the deal could in fact make the payment processing space more competitive, challenging the dominance of MasterCard and Visa.
This could lead to better rewards on credit cards for consumers as issuers compete for customers.
'One thing that will be interesting to watch is how the credit card rewards programs are blended together,' Schulz added.
'Capital One will have to decide how they handle Discover miles and if they keep those two rewards programs separate or if they bring them together, and that decision will impact consumers.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Maja Stark captures U.S. Women's Open for first major title
June 2 - Maja Stark has won tournaments around the world, but a professional victory in the United States eluded her. Now she's a U.S. Women's Open champion. Stark carded an even-par 72 to win the second major of the year by two shots Sunday at Erin Hills in Erin, Wis. The 25-year-old from Sweden led the championship by one stroke through 54 holes and outlasted World No. 1 Nelly Korda, who got within a shot of the lead before petering out on the back nine. "I just didn't want to get ahead of myself. I thought there's still a lot of golf left to be played," Stark said. "I just felt like people are going to pass me probably, and I just had to stay calm through that. "I didn't look at the leaderboards until I was on like 17. I caught a glimpse of it. It was nice." Stark posted a 7-under-par 281 for the week. Korda (71) tied for second with Japan's Rio Takeda (72) at 5 under, and South Korea's Hye-Jin Choi carded a 68 to claim a share of fourth place at 4 under with countrywoman Mao Saigo (73) and China's Ruoning Yin (70). Korda had a 2-under front nine to get to 6 under for the championship. Stark was nursing a one-stroke lead over Korda when she birdied No. 11 from 14 feet. Korda bogeyed the par-3 13th and birdied the next hole, but only after an eagle opportunity slid by. Stark made a two-putt birdie at No. 14 to get to 9 under and had enough cushion to absorb bogeys at the difficult Nos. 17 and 18, where she missed each fairway. "You need to kind of think about every shot here," Stark said of the difficult course setup. "Maybe not the tee shot on 10. I think that's fine. But everything else, you've just got to have your brain working for you, whereas like on normal weeks, you can kind of bail out. Here, not really." Stark has six wins to her name on the Ladies European Tour. One of those, the ISPS Handa World Invitational in Northern Ireland, was co-sanctioned by the LPGA and earned her a tour card in 2022. Before Sunday, the highlight of Stark's minimal major resume was placing second to Korda at the 2024 Chevron Championship. Now, she is just the third Swedish woman to win a U.S. Women's Open after Liselotte Neumann and golf legend Annika Sorenstam. "It's so cool. They texted me yesterday and just kind of said, 'Bring it home,'" Stark said. "That was already cool to just get those texts. Just looking at all the names on the trophy. I love the U.S. Opens. I'm so happy that it's mine now." Korda came up short of a would-be third major victory. She earned her best finish at a U.S. Women's Open and her third top-10 after she missed the cut last year. "To have that showing last year definitely put a dagger into my heart, but that's just golf," Korda said. "You're going to lose more than you win a majority of the time. I feel like I actually learn a lot about myself and my game and where I need to improve playing the U.S. Women's Open because it does test every part of your game. "It's also super motivating ... to see where my game's at. Hopefully I can continue trending in the right direction for a long season ahead." Takeda made an early double bogey in an otherwise solid round to stay close to the top of the leaderboard all day. She tied for ninth at this championship last year in her major debut and followed that with a T2 on Sunday. "This is a major, of course, and it is a big tournament. So I always thought that I would like to do my best here," Takeda said. Julia Lopez Ramirez of Spain played in the final pairing with Stark after shooting a 68 on Saturday. She struggled from the outset and finished 1 over for the event after a triple-bogey 8 on the final hole destined her to a score of 79. --Field Level Media


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
China vows ‘forceful measures' after accusing US of violating tariffs truce
China said the US 'severely violated' the consensus reached during their recent trade talks in Geneva and threatened 'forceful measures' in response, dealing a big blow to the prospect of a thaw in the trade war between the two largest economies. The Chinese commerce ministry on Monday accused Washington of seriously undermining progress in mending trade relations with its series of actions, including the revocation of visas for Chinese students. The statement marked the latest sign of deteriorating relations between China and the US under Donald Trump, who imposed sweeping import levies on Beijing and sparked a tit-for-tat tariff war. The two sides had managed to dial down tensions after a meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, last month led to the lowering of tariffs on goods imported from each nation and even raised hopes of a phone call between Mr Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. The commerce ministry said China was 'strictly implementing' the consensus reached in Geneva but the US was taking steps that 'seriously undermine' it, state media reported. 'The United States has been unilaterally provoking new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' it said. 'If the US insists on its own way and continues to damage China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' This came after Mr Trump said in a Truth Social post on Friday that China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US'. The president said he had agreed to a fast deal with Beijing to 'save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation'. 'So much for being Mr NICE GUY!' he added. Mr Trump told reporters he wanted to speak with Mr Xi to resolve their ongoing disputes. China, on the other side, accused Washington of violating trade agreements by issuing "export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and announcing the revocation" of visas for students from the Asian country. As tensions resurfaced, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said on Sunday the negotiations with China were "a bit stalled'. "What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe, and that is not what a reliable partner does," Mr Bessent told CBS News. He suggested that a phone call between Mr Trump and Mr Xi would be necessary to break the stalemate. Mr Trump had signaled his wish to have a phone call with Mr Xi as early as February and even said he was willing to visit his counterpart, although no such arrangement was scheduled.


Coin Geek
25 minutes ago
- Coin Geek
Why blockchain's cultural adoption may still be years away
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... This post is a guest contribution by George Siosi Samuels , managing director at Faiā. See how Faiā is committed to staying at the forefront of technological advancements here . 'Technology changes fast. Humans change slowly.' In the blockchain space, we often mistake momentum for readiness . We see surges in transaction volume, new Layer 1s, enterprise pilots, or headlines about central banks and tokenized assets—and we assume that mainstream adoption is imminent. But a deeper look reveals a sobering truth: we're not even halfway there. Despite being popularized with Bitcoin in 2008, blockchain's mainstream adoption—let alone cultural integration —is still unfolding. In fact, if history is any guide, we may still be 15 years away from true normalization. Let me explain why. Artificial urgency vs. actual readiness Across tech circles, there's an unspoken pressure to 'move fast or miss out.' This artificial urgency is often driven by venture capital, hype cycles, or career incentives. Blockchain—especially post-2017 and post-2021—has not been immune. But urgency doesn't equal readiness. Pilots ≠ Platforms. Most enterprises are still experimenting, not integrating. Most enterprises are still experimenting, not integrating. Hype ≠ Habit. Most users still see crypto as speculative, not systemic. Most users still see crypto as speculative, not systemic. Adoption ≠ Acceptance. Tech may be used, but that doesn't mean it's trusted. It's not that the tech isn't ready. It's that we're not—at least not at scale. The 30-year arc of cultural adoption History tells us that major technological shifts typically require three decades to become culturally normalized: The push-button elevator took 20–30 years to replace human operators due to psychological discomfort with 'no driver.' took 20–30 years to replace human operators due to psychological discomfort with 'no driver.' The Internet , while technically available in the '80s and commercialized in the '90s, didn't achieve cultural ubiquity until the late 2000s. , while technically available in the '80s and commercialized in the '90s, didn't achieve cultural ubiquity until the late 2000s. Even electric vehicles, around since the 1800s, only became commercially viable and socially normalized in the 2010s–2020s. Why the lag? Because culture lags behind code. It takes time for people to reshape their mental models, trust new systems, and embed them into everyday workflows. Blockchain—despite its architectural brilliance—still struggles with this. Blockchain's hidden bottleneck: Human culture We tend to see scalability as a technical problem. But often, it's a cultural bottleneck: Compliance teams still default to paper trails. still default to paper trails. Boards struggle to distinguish between crypto noise and blockchain signal. struggle to distinguish between crypto noise and blockchain signal. Internal systems weren't designed with tokenization or auditability in mind. weren't designed with tokenization or auditability in mind. Language remains a barrier—terms like 'wallet,' 'hashrate,' or 'decentralization' confuse rather than clarify. Put simply: the infrastructure may be scalable, but the institutions—and instincts—aren't. Why 15 more years is not a problem—it's a pattern If we see blockchain as being in its teenage years (2008–2025), then what comes next is maturity—not more speed. The next 15 years will likely be less about technological breakthroughs and more about: Integration with legacy systems Cross-cultural regulation and harmonization Cultural onboarding and language reframing Trust-building through transparency and utility That's not stagnation. That's evolution. And it's where the long-term value will compound. A note for enterprise leaders If you're leading digital transformation at scale, the temptation to chase 'what's next' can be strong. But consider this: 'Culture is the invisible architecture of adoption.' Your blockchain strategy isn't just about ledgers and nodes. It's about human patterns, legacy instincts, and organizational memory. Success will come not from rushing adoption, but from aligning pace with place. Closing thought: Urgency is a signal—not a strategy Artificial urgency creates short-term buzz, but long-term burnout. In blockchain, as in most foundational innovations, what matters most is durable trust, not fleeting traction. So the real question isn't: 'How fast can we scale?' It's: 'How well are we integrating blockchain into the rhythms of human trust and institutional behavior?' The ones who win won't be the fastest—they'll be the most aligned. Curious how culturally aligned your blockchain strategy really is? Get in touch to get a free CSTACK Audit (worth $1K) — a diagnostic for enterprises navigating emerging tech with clarity and confidence. Watch: IPv6 & Blockchain: Pioneering the next digital revolution title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen=""> Blockchain Blockchain Adoption Culture Enterprise