
In weekslong email exchange with state, fired Grand Forks jail administrator sought to fix 'misunderstanding'
The Grand Forks Herald obtained the emails between Burkholder and the grant office, sent between mid-February and March. They began on Feb. 18, when Burkholder asked if the grant's funds — set aside by the Legislature for recruitment and retention bonuses — could instead be used for employee incentive programs like personalized gift cards, and if so, how best to allocate funds within the framework of the grant.
"We have purchased a number of items under the umbrella of 'retention' to make (staff members') life a bit better while working here, enhancing much of their breakroom with amenities they never had," Burkholder wrote in the Feb. 18 email. "Is this permissible under the grant? We sure hope so as we believe this idea is much better than simply purchasing them appreciation gifts now or providing a cash outlay to them and then have 20% leave within the year."
On March 7, Grants and Contracts Officer Deanna Gierszewski replied to Burkholder saying that wasn't allowed, adding that the funds needed to be used by March 31 and within the 2023-2025 biennium.
"What you are requesting to do with the funds does not match the purpose these funds were intended for," Gierszewski wrote.
When Grand Forks County Sheriff Andy Schneider learned about the misapplied funds during his department's merger with the jail, he brought the issue to the Grand Forks County Commission on April 1 and explained measures he had taken to mitigate the issue. The roughly $38,000 that had already been spent from the $88,000 grant GFCCC received was to be covered out of other budgeted correctional center funds — such as office supply funds or general operations, depending on the expense — and the full $88,000 has now been given as a bonus to GFCCC employees, Schneider told commissioners at that time.
However, the incident led the commission to recommend, in a 3-2 vote, that Schneider
fire Burkholder.
Schneider, who has sole authority to discipline and terminate in his department, terminated Burkholder's employment on April 8, saying
that his service was no longer needed as GFCCC moves in a different direction.
The "Back the Blue" grant was created by the Legislature in 2023 to aid the recruitment and retention of law enforcement and correctional officers. Funds were disbursed through the Attorney General's office to 106 law enforcement and correctional agencies across the state. The Grand Forks jail is the only recipient of the grant to use the funds incorrectly, according to Gierszewski.
When grant agreements were signed in November 2023 to authorize the disbursement of the funds, Burkholder wrote in the grant acceptance letter that he intended to use the money for retention bonuses, length-of-service recognition garments, a recruitment bonus and other appreciation activities or materials.
Later, that evolved into more of a focus on improving working conditions for employees at the correctional center, with the idea that those improvements would invest this grant into GFCCC and "make a perpetual impact," Burkholder wrote in his December 2024 update to the grant office.
The philosophy, according to Burkholder, was this: Had the correctional center given out a flat monetary bonus, because of the department's high turnover, a quarter of the funds would have gone to people no longer employed by GFCCC.
On March 18 — after Gierszewski informed him the jail's purchases did not match the grant's intent — Burkholder asked for clarification on how the grant could be used.
"I apologize for the urgency of this request, but we are limited in time, and if this was a misunderstanding of uses of what the funds could be used for, I need to ensure that the cost of these things aren't applied to the grant and rather simply added to a one-time bonus," Burkholder wrote.
Later that day, the Grand Forks County Commission voted to merge
GFCCC into the sheriff's office and the sheriff became the head of the corrections center.
Gierszewski replied on March 20 and said that an agreement had been signed and that an update would be needed to reflect how the grant funds were actually used.
"After reviewing your application budget plan, I'd like to kindly remind you of the importance of adhering to the terms outlined in your original agreement," Gierszewski wrote. "While we understand that the funds may have been used differently than initially planned, the agreement itself remains unchanged."
The bill and grant language does not explicitly define a bonus, but the attorney general's grant office said that the intent was for a monetary bonus given directly to employees.
"When you go back and listen to the legislation that everyone was pushing for ... that is the route that they were intending to go down and that is what everyone in their (grant) statement said they were going to spend it," Gierszewski told the Herald.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
13 hours ago
- Boston Globe
She fell on a Boston sidewalk, fractured her jaw, and got nothing from the city. Why?
And she needs dental implants at an out-of-pocket cost of about $20,000. (Medicare pays medical bills, but not dental costs.) The section of sidewalk where she fell has a history. It was paved long ago by the city of Boston with five-foot sections of concrete. Advertisement Next to where Pagliarulo fell, a tree was planted in a carved-out section of the sidewalk. The tree's roots grew under the sidewalk and gradually lifted a section of concrete a couple of inches higher than its surroundings. Pagliarulo and a former neighbor say they reported the tripping hazard to the city of Boston a couple of years ago. They told me the city responded by placing a couple of shovelfuls of asphalt along each protruding lip. Related : I asked the city of Boston what it did and when, and whether it received reports of a hazard. The city said it was working on my request but did not answer my questions in time for publication. The asphalt patch helped but didn't eliminate the hazard, according to neighbors, who showed me pictures of the uneven and bumpy sidewalk. Advertisement And the city seemed to confirm the hazard when, a couple of months after Pagliarulo's fall, it removed the tree and the section of sidewalk next to it, replacing both with a smooth expanse of asphalt. Pagliarulo wants the city of Boston to pay at least some of her dental costs because she believes it was negligent in maintaining that section of sidewalk. What, if anything, does the city owe her? The dispute : Property owners, including municipalities, have a legal duty to keep their property safe for those who use it. That's why almost all homeowners have liability insurance, in case, for example, someone catches their foot on an unrepaired defect on the front stairs. But several laws passed long ago by the state Legislature are highly protective of municipalities, making it almost impossible for ordinary folks like Pagliarulo to get adequate compensation for injuries. Related : I've previously written about frustrated victims who took nasty falls in the There are three ways the law minimizes the number of cases brought against municipalities. First, That's an extremely short notice period. By contrast, In the days after her fall, Pagliarulo concentrated on merely surviving; it often felt like an hour-to-hour struggle. She had to be fed through a syringe and lost almost 25 pounds. Advertisement For a while, three nieces took turns staying overnight with her. A devout Catholic, Pagliarulo spent much time in prayer. Liability was not foremost in her mind. 'I was just so concerned about staying alive,' she told me. Pagliarulo, a widow and retired nurse, said she also felt disoriented and frequently cried. Tears came several times when we met and talked about her fall. Neighbors on Denton Terrace, near Roslindale Square, rallied around her. 'She was in no shape to be researching liability or anything else,' neighbor Josh Jacks said in an interview. After she fell on a Boston sidewalk and fractured her jaw, Tammy Pagliarulo (seated) got support from neighbors (from left) Kim Fanning, Josh Jacks, and Elana Wolkoff. Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff When she first contacted City Hall months later, Pagliarulo got one question from the legal department: When did she fall? When she gave the November date, the legal department representative said she had missed the notice deadline and no claim could be made. 'But I was incapacitated,' she recalled telling him. The legal department rep said he was sorry but there was nothing he could do, Pagliarulo said. Neighbor Elana Wolkoff then found But the city legal department told her the courts have narrowly defined 'incapacitated' in previous, precedent-setting cases. Pagliarulo looked for a lawyer, but none were interested. The reason is the second way the law protects municipalities: a $5,000 cap on compensation. Personal injury lawyers are paid one-third of any amount they win. But lawyers can't justify taking a case when the potential payout is limited to one-third of $5,000, or $1,666. That cap was enacted in 1965 and hasn't been updated. If the cap was adjusted for inflation, it would be about $50,000 today, making it more feasible to hire a lawyer. Related : Advertisement Finally, the law disallows such cases unless the victim can show the defective sidewalk was previously reported to the city or town and that the municipality took no action. The law does not define defects. The resolution : After Pagliarulo's fall, City Councilor Enrique Pepén, whose district includes Roslindale, helped arrange for the removal of the tree and section of the sidewalk. 'It was definitely something that needed repair,' he said. 'It was a big hazard, and they leveled it out.' When he found out about the 30-day notice requirement, Pepén said he was 'taken aback' by how short it is. 'It's not fair to citizens,' he said. Pepén said he wants to collaborate with state lawmakers in reviewing the state laws governing such cases. Bills to change the law get filed virtually every session of the Legislature, but none have passed. Related : The takeaway : The way the law favors cities and towns (and the state, too) is grounded in the centuries-old concept of sovereign immunity, which originated in England and is based on the antiquated notion that 'the King could do no wrong.' Keeping those laws undisturbed saves money for cities and towns. And municipalities do not lack influence on Beacon Hill. But imagine that you or a loved one were affected. You have thousands in medical or dental bills or you've lost income because you can't work, all because of a defective sidewalk and through no fault of your own. Advertisement Wouldn't you want fair compensation? Got a problem? Send your consumer issue to


Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Governor Healey signs pay raise for bar advocates
The Legislature passed the bill more than two months after many of the bar advocates stopped taking new cases. The attorneys typically represent about 80 percent of indigent criminal defendants, with staff public defenders covering the rest. In their absence, thousands of defendants Advertisement The stoppage has Advertisement Jennifer O'Brien, one of the leaders of the stoppage, said she and the 'vast majority' of bar advocates she's spoken with don't plan to start taking cases.'Nothing's really changed,' she said. 'We have the same problem.' The bar advocates' pay rates lag behind their equivalents in neighboring states, and fewer people are signing up for the role in recent years. The problem is especially acute in the Massachusetts' district courts, where, before the raise, the bar advocates made $65 an hour. The $20 increase amounts to about a 30 percent raise, but many of the most vocal members of the work stoppage have sought $35 an hour more this year and then $25 more on top of that next year. As the Legislature voted for the raise last week, several dozen bar advocates held a press conference in the State House in which they vowed to hold out for more money. The dynamics of the negotiation make the next steps hard to predict. The bar advocates are all independent contractors, so there's no unified group like a union for the state to negotiate with. Ultimately, each lawyer must separately make the decision of whether to take the new rate or leave it. 'Whether this legislation ... will significantly ameliorate the current shortage is unknown,' attorneys for the Committee for Public Counsel Services, the state's public-defender organization, wrote in a court filing about the crisis this week. The committee has begun interviewing potential candidates for staff public-defender positions and will be ready to make job offers in the coming weeks, the filing stated. Advertisement Most other states rely more heavily on staff attorneys, with private lawyers appointed more rarely. Because Massachusetts relies so heavily on them, the bar advocates have been able to wield significant leverage in the dispute. As of Monday, there were more than 2,700 people charged with crimes who didn't have access to lawyers, according to CPCS. Of that number, 94 are in custody. Courts remain under an emergency procedure known as the Lavallee protocol, which applies to district courts in Suffolk and Middlesex counties. The the stoppage is most severe there, and any defendant held in jail for more than seven days who doesn't have access to an attorney must be released. Separately, per the protocol, any cases that have languished for more than 45 days must be dismissed with prejudice, which means they can be refiled. Hearings to release defendants and dismiss cases are continuing this week. Prosecutors had sounded the alarm about a slate of hearings scheduled for Tuesday in Boston to dismiss more cases, saying hundreds would go free, including people accused of violent and sexual crimes. But only about 30 cases were brought before the court, and 26 people saw their cases dismissed. All were for low-level misdemeanors such as drug possession and trespassing. It appears the trial courts are trying to stretch the cases over more hearings. The dismissal hearings had been scheduled for every other week, but trial courts spokesperson Jennifer Donahue confirmed that an additional dismissal hearing will take place next Tuesday. In district courts outside of Boston, judges are holding 45-day hearings to dismiss cases as a part of regular business, and it's unclear how many people have had their cases thrown out. Advertisement According to a CPCS filing on Monday, about 22 people are up for release in a hearing Wednesday in Lowell, and 48 are up for release Thursday in Boston. 'I'd be lying if I didn't say that public safety is not a concern,' Suffolk District Attorney Kevin Hayden told reporters on Tuesday. 'But we're working through it.' Sean Cotter can be reached at


The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Texas showdown: Warrants, expulsion threats ratchet up fight
In today's issue: ▪ Abbott issues warrants for fleeing Dems ▪ Trump faces GOP skeptics on economy ▪ MTG on her place in the Republican Party ▪ How will tariffs affect back-to-school shopping? THE PRE-2026 MIDTERM redistricting battle has kicked into high gear as Texas Democratic legislators face arrest warrants and blue state governors plot to fight back against GOP maps. Texas Democrats' refusal to show up to the Legislature is part of a rapidly escalating political war over the state GOP's attempt to pass a highly unusual mid-decade redistricting plan. President Trump has encouraged the move, which could help the GOP win five additional House seats in next year's elections. Republicans, bracing for an unfavorable political environment in 2026, are hoping for an edge as they seek to ward off a Democratic takeover of the House that would likely open the Trump administration to numerous investigations. The group of 50-odd Texas Democratic lawmakers is threatening to wait out the remainder of the 30-day special session that gaveled in last month, depriving Republicans of a quorum. In response, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) ordered the arrest of the Democrats who fled the Lone Star State. The Texas House on Monday approved warrants to track down the missing lawmakers in an 85-6 vote. Abbott said he would strip lawmakers who failed to return to the state Capitol of their seats. Texas lawmakers already incur a daily $500 fine and threat of arrest for breaking quorum, and Abbott previously threatened the legislators with bribery charges if national Democrats pick up the tab. 'I believe they have forfeited their seats in the state Legislature because they're not doing the job they were elected to do,' Abbott said Monday on Fox News. State Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) — who is running as a right-wing challenger to Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) this cycle — on Monday called the Democrats 'jet-setting runaways' and said it was 'imperative that they be swiftly arrested, punished, and face the full force of the law for turning their backs on the people of Texas.' Abbott and Paxton did not mention the redistricting efforts in their statements, which Democrats describe as a naked power grab. 'COME AND TAKE IT': Members of the Texas state House on Monday lashed out at Republicans' efforts to redraw the congressional district map, brushing off the governor's threats. State Rep. John Bucy (D) argued Democrats' quorum-busting actions were necessary, adding upholding their oaths of office sometimes means refusing to play along in a 'rigged game.' 'We're not running away,' Busey said. 'We're running into the fight.' Officials will have difficulty arresting the lawmakers as most are beyond the jurisdiction of Texas authorities. State Rep. Gene Wu (D-Texas), the chair of the chamber's Democratic caucus who fled to Illinois, challenged Abbott to 'come and take it,' referring to his seat. 'It's all bluster,' Wu told CNN when asked if he thinks Abbott could successfully take away their seats. 'Sound and fury signifying nothing.' The rapidly escalating tit for tat underscores how the redistricting battle has turned into an all-out national brawl ahead of what both parties expect to be a fiercely fought midterm election. While Texas is ground zero in the fight, The Hill's Caroline Vakil and Saul Elbein report Democratic lawmakers from Illinois to California and New York are promising to retaliate with their own maps. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) on Monday said the time for impartial political mapmaking had long passed. 'If Republicans are willing to rewrite these rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us no choice; we must do the same,' Hochul declared in Albany, flanked by several Texas lawmakers. 'I'm tired of fighting this fight with my hand tied behind my back. With all due respect to the good government groups, politics is a political process.' ▪ The Hill: Five things to know about Texas Democrats fleeing the state amid redistricting fight. ▪ The Washington Post: In their own words: Why Texas Democrats fled. PRESIDENTIAL SPOTLIGHT: 2028 hopefuls are using the Texas showdown as an opportunity to stand out, with heavyweights like California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) taking front-line positions in the battle, The Hill's Amie Parnes notes. Newsom is weighing several options in the national redistricting fight, with the Golden State eyeing redrawing its own maps and moving ahead through a ballot measure or the state Legislature. Pritzker vowed to protect lawmakers who traveled to his state from the threat of arrest from top Texas leaders. Their actions are welcome news to Democrats who have been itching for an opportunity to show voters they can put up a fight, Parnes reports. 'This is an issue that may not necessarily animate the electorate, but it ignites the base and the donor community,' said former Rep. Steve Israel (N.Y.), who led the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee from 2011 to 2015. 'Democrats like Newsom, Pritzker … among others, are at least showing that rolling over isn't a strategy. You have to fight fire with fire.' Smart Take with Blake Burman Here's a headline you may have missed as the week began: 'China is choking supply of critical minerals to Western Democracies.' As The Wall Street Journal reports, China is limiting critical minerals to Western defense companies, who use those rare minerals to build key technology that supports our military. The topic also came up last week in my conversation with Peter Navarro, White House senior counselor for trade and manufacturing. I asked him if the White House plans to continue investing taxpayer dollars in American companies who supply rare earth minerals. 'We are going to have a lot of deals to fill out the supply chain. That's the strategy across critical minerals,' Navarro told me. Rare earths are a new battleground between the U.S. and China, and it's worth watching to see which companies the government chooses to invest in, along with how many. Burman hosts 'The Hill' weeknights, 6p/5c on NewsNation. 3 Things to Know Today President Trump is set to appear on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' this morning at 8 a.m. EDT for a rare interview as he goes on the defense over jobs numbers, tariffs and his firing of a top labor statistics official. Attorney General Pam Bondi directed the Department of Justice to launch a grand jury probe into how Obama administration officials handled intelligence about Russian interference in the 2016 election. NewsNation's Robert Sherman is in Ukraine this week reporting ahead of the president's deadlines for new Russia sanctions. Check out his latest dispatch on the ground here. Leading the Day GOP JITTERS: Republicans are on edge about the economy after the latest jobs report showed far fewer jobs were added over the past three months than previously thought, The Hill's Alexander Bolton reports. Trump and his economic team insist the economy is strong and poised for even more growth from his policies, but their optimism is facing skepticism from some in the Republican Party who worry the president's trade overhaul is creating uncertain economic headwinds. 'It definitely is indicative of a weakened economy, an economy that's not acting in a robust fashion. I've all along felt like there's a lag between tariffs and actual economic downturn,' Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) admitted. Trump's latest tariff plan — another modification of the 'Liberation Day' global trading overhaul he first unveiled in April — includes steep increases on imports from major trade partners Canada and Brazil. The executive order outlining the proposal was released the same day a disappointing jobs report was released, which ultimately prompted Trump to remove the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner. 'I think it is worrisome and I do worry that the news has been relatively benign on tariffs so far,' Paul said. 'The proof is really in the next couple months. ' The president is facing rare pushback from conservatives — normally staunch Trump allies in Congress — over fears of potential economic fallout. The Senate and House are both on a monthlong recess, a time when Republican lawmakers are broadly working to sell what they view as the successes of the first few months of Trump's second administration. 'My view is that there's no question that consumers, Americans, pay a price for tariffs. It increases the price of the goods coming into the United States,'' said Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.). 'The question is, 'Is there a reason that tariffs in a temporary way can solve trade barriers that have been artificially created against our products going somewhere else?'' DATA CONCERNS: Trump's firing of the BLS commissioner continues to send ripples across the world economy and raise concerns about whether the next labor statistics chief will be willing to manipulate job numbers to work in Trump's favor. The traditionally nonpartisan role, usually held by career professionals who serve across multiple administrations, has given all presidents bad news in recent years. But Trump's firing of Erika McEntarfer has provoked worry among data experts that the independent work could now be politicized, even as they acknowledge manipulating the figures is highly difficult. The Hill's Alex Gangitano and Brett Samuels report on the concerns here. HOLD UP: Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) has put a hold on three of Trump's nominees to the Treasury Department over anticipated administration rules that could hamper tax credits for wind and solar energy. Grassley announced his move to place the holds in the congressional record Friday. 'The Department of the Treasury is expected to issue rules and regulations implementing the agreed upon phase-out of the wind and solar credits by August 18, 2025,' he wrote. 'Until I can be certain that such rules and regulations adhere to the law and congressional intent, I intend to continue to object to the consideration of these Treasury nominees.' Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah), who entered the Senate in January, is also placing a hold on the same nominees — Brian Morrissey Jr., Francis Brooke and Jonathan McKernan — for the same reasons, a source told The Hill's Rachel Frazin. Grassley, who is currently the longest-serving senator with more than four decades under his belt, was recently embroiled in a rift with Trump that rankled the president's backers in the upper chamber. Trump lashed out at the 91-year-old Judiciary Committee chair for sticking to a long-standing Senate custom of allowing senators to have a say on judiciary appointees in their states. NOT EASY BEING GREENE: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) discussed her recent disconnect with the GOP on several issues in a new interview with The Hill's Emily Brooks in the latest edition of The Movement newsletter later today. (Click here to sign up for The Movement.) 'I'm an early indicator, and my complaints are felt and being said far and wide among your average American people who voted for the president and Republicans in 2024,' Greene told Brooks on Monday. 'The Republican Party is the one drifting away from what we campaigned on.' Greene had hinted in a recent interview with the Daily Mail that she's questioning her place in the GOP after repeatedly butting heads with other conservatives — including Trump, who she's staunchly supported. 'I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to the Republican Party as much anymore,' Greene told the Mail. 'I don't know which one it is.' 'I think the Republican Party has turned its back on 'America First' and the workers and just regular Americans,' she added. Among their differences: Greene has accused Israel of carrying out a 'genocide' in Gaza; vocally pushed for the release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, despite the president's desire to move on from the story; and criticized the U.S. strike on nuclear facilities in Iran. SAVING SANTOS: Despite some friction with the administration, Greene is urging the president to grant clemency and facilitate an early release from prison for former Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.), who is serving seven years behind bars for wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. 'A 7-year prison sentence for campaign-related charges is excessive, especially when Members of Congress who've done far worse still walk free,' Greene wrote online Monday. 'George Santos has taken responsibility. He's shown remorse. It's time to correct this injustice. We must demand equal justice under the law!' Santos was expelled from the House in 2023 after serving less than a year after his personal background unraveled as a series of elaborate deceptions. He reported to prison last month. ADMINISTRATION ROUNDUP: ▪ The Hill: The State Department is testing a program aimed at curbing visa overstays by requiring migrants from some countries to pay bond as high as $15,000 to secure a visa for business or personal travel. ▪ The New York Times: Trump's demand to trading partners: Pledge money or get higher tariffs. ▪ The New York Times: Trump is expected to unveil a task force to boost the federal government's involvement in the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles. ▪ The Wall Street Journal: The White House is preparing to issue an executive order to step up pressure against big banks over perceived discrimination against conservatives and crypto companies. ▪ The Washington Post: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth 's acting chief of staff tried and failed to oust a senior White House liaison assigned to the Pentagon. ▪ The New York Times: Judges are starting to openly doubt the government as the Justice Department misleads and dodges orders. When and Where Trump will sign an executive order at 4 p.m. The Texas state House is scheduled to meet at 2 p.m. EDT. The U.S. House and Senate are on recess until September. Zoom In HITTING THE (POCKET) BOOKS: Parents may be wary about early back-to-school shopping this year, as tariff hikes and rising prices start to strain family budgets. New surveys suggest some are bracing to pay more in back-to-school costs this year, and many blame Trump's trade wars for the spike. 'Consumers are navigating an uncertain environment right now, and uncertainty is coming from they just don't know how much things are going to cost later in the year, and they're trying to deal with that by buying ahead of time, stocking up now, while they know what prices will be, and trying to get ahead of potential price increases later in the season or later in the year,' the National Retail Foundation's Katherine Cullen said. As more people turn to 'buy now, pay later' purchases for things, including back-to-school items, NPR has a breakdown of how those purchases can affect your credit score. ▪ The Wall Street Journal: A Generation Is Turning to 'Buy Now, Pay Later' for Botox and Concert Tickets. CULTURE CLASH: The president has leaned into the latest front on the culture wars: an ad for blue jeans featuring a 27-year-old actress. Trump, 79, weighed in Monday over 'Euphoria' actress Sydney Sweeney and the American Eagle denim ad that has sparked widespread debate. 'Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there. It's for American Eagle, and the jeans are 'flying off the shelves.' Go get 'em Sydney!' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday morning. Trump's comments sent American Eagle's stock soaring. The ad features Sweeney and plays up her 'great jeans,' a play on the idea of the actress's 'good genes.' It has spawned backlash online, with critics claiming there are racist undertones. Online sleuths found Sweeney's voter registration records that show she's a registered Republican in Florida. American Eagle defended the ad, saying it's only about their denim line Sweeney was paid to promote. 'You'd be surprised at how many people are Republicans,' Trump told reporters Sunday. 'If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic.' POWERING UP: Big Tech has poured billions into artificial intelligence (AI) development, and it could be paying off. Wall Street has given its fickle stamp of approval, and the major industry players — Google, Microsoft and Meta — are celebrating after outperforming investors' lofty expectations. 'There are some moments that will be remembered in the market for many years… last night was one of them with the eye-popping results from Microsoft and Meta,' Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives wrote in an investor note last week. 'These massive results seen by Microsoft and Meta further validate the use cases and unprecedented spending trajectory for the AI Revolution on both the enterprise and consumer fronts.' ▪ Smithsonian magazine: You can now have a conversation with the statues at Versailles using AI. ▪ The Hill: Elon Musk donates $5 million to Trump super PAC. ENERGY UNCERTAINTY: The president has been focusing on promoting U.S. energy in his sweeping trade negotiations, but announcements about the agreements reached have been light on details. Actual outcomes remain uncertain. 'There's still a lot we don't know about what these deals look like, including in terms of how ambitious these actually are,' said Clara Gillispie, a senior fellow for climate and energy at the Council on Foreign Relations. 'You have in some of the detail deals references to energy products. Some say energy exports from the U.S. LNG is often referenced as part of a suggestive, but not necessarily all inclusive list,' she added. As The Hill's Rachel Frazin reports, 'decisions are made by private companies, rather than anything run by the state, and in many cases, if deals were economic, it's possible they would have already been made with or without a trade deal.' Meanwhile, the Trump administration is weighing more ways to curtail the development of solar and wind energy on public lands, calling the endeavors 'highly inefficient uses of Federal land.' 'Gargantuan, unreliable, intermittent energy projects hold America back from achieving U.S. Energy Dominance while weighing heavily on the American taxpayer and environment,' Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement on the effort. The renewable industry argues that the move could have significant impacts on developing energy projects already planned. SHIELD LAWS: Republicans are waging a multipronged campaign against abortion shield laws — legislation passed in states where the practice is legal that protects abortion providers from liability for violating anti-abortion laws in other states. Republicans are hoping to force the federal government to ultimately ban the laws. Legal experts say the effort will be difficult — as some states have already learned. Fifteen Republican attorneys general sent a letter to GOP congressional leaders last week urging federal action to preempt abortion shield laws, arguing they interfere with state criminal laws. 'Congress should consider stepping in to remedy this problem,' they wrote. 'Instead of allowing pro-abortion States to disrespect the decisions of other States regarding abortion and trample the Constitution, Congress should assess whether it should tackle this issue head on with legislation that preempts state shield laws.' Here is a breakdown from the University of California, Los Angeles law school tracking shield laws across the states. Elsewhere GAZA: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will convene his security Cabinet this week to decide on Israel's next steps in Gaza following the collapse of indirect ceasefire talks with Hamas. Netanyahu is reportedly pushing for a full occupation of Gaza, including areas where hostages are held, even as Palestinians in Gaza face a dire humanitarian crisis with mass hunger and inadequate access to aid. Over the weekend, special envoy Steve Witkoff had said he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza. The failed ceasefire talks aimed to clinch agreements on a U.S.-backed proposal for a 60-day truce, during which aid would be flown into Gaza and half of the hostages would be freed in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. ▪ CNN: The Israeli government voted unanimously to dismiss the country's attorney general, Gali Baharav-Miara, a critic of Netanyahu who is leading the corruption case against him. The controversial move was immediately blocked by a Supreme Court injunction. ▪ NPR: New images of emaciated Israeli hostages have horrified Israelis and added pressure on Netanyahu to reach a ceasefire. RUSSIA: Trump is rattling the U.S.'s formidable nuclear saber amid his growing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin 's refusal to halt the war in Ukraine, just days ahead of Trump's deadline for a ceasefire. Trump last week said he was moving two 'nuclear' submarines closer to Russia in response to threatening rhetoric from a top Kremlin official. On Sunday, he confirmed the vessels were now 'in the region.' Experts say it's a risky tactic unlikely to sway Putin, who has stood in the way of the president's campaign promise to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of returning to the White House. Trump's promises, threats and cajoling have failed to shift the Kremlin's position, with Putin shrugging off the pressure. Meanwhile, Ukraine is losing more territory on the front line. Witkoff is expected to travel to Moscow on Wednesday or Thursday. Trump said his special envoy is seeking to broker a truce 'where people stop getting killed.' Witkoff heads to Russia amid building frustration in the White House. Trump in July issued a 50-day ultimatum to Putin, threatening sanctions and tariffs if the Kremlin failed to agree to a ceasefire. Last week, he cut the window to 10 days, citing continued Russian drone and missile strikes on Ukraine. That deadline will expire on Friday. ▪ NewsNation: Life under siege in Kyiv. ▪ CBS News: Ukrainian refugees face an uncertain future as their U.S. work permits are set to expire. ▪ CNN analysis: Ukraine is now Trump's war. ▪ The Washington Post: Locals beg for Putin's help as Russian-occupied Ukraine runs out of water. Opinion Our president is economically illiterate, by Steven Rattner, columnist, The New York Times. Trump's 'Queen of Hearts' moment with the BLS echoes Putin's purges and Orwell's omens, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, Judith Chevalier, Stephen Henriques and Steven Tian write in Fortune magazine. The Closer And finally … 🐻 Release the Kraken grizzly! Seattle's hockey team and its lovable troll mascot, Buoy, were trying to film some online content in Alaska when they received a surprise recently. A hefty grizzly bear came charging at them, and it appeared particularly interested in the costumed mascot, who was wearing waders and fly fishing in a stream. The team posted a video on social media of Buoy and the players' narrow escape from the wild beast.