Iran-US nuclear talks: key points of contention
Long-time adversaries Iran and the United States held a fifth round of Oman-mediated nuclear talks on Friday in Rome, but with no breakthrough reported.
However, both sides still described the meeting as constructive and expressed a willingness to continue the discussions.
Here are some of the main obstacles seen to be hampering progress:
Iran's enrichment of uranium remains the main sticking point.
The United States and Western countries suspect Iran of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, but Iran denies having such ambitions.
It insists that its nuclear programme is solely for peaceful civilian purposes.
American officials including Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, who has led Washington's delegation at the talks, have spoken out against Iran's enrichment programme.
Witkoff said before the talks that Washington "cannot allow even one percent of enrichment capacity" for Iran.
Tehran has called its enrichment "non-negotiable", arguing that such a demand prevents a deal.
"Zero nuclear weapons = we DO have a deal. Zero enrichment = we do NOT have a deal," Iran's top negotiator and foreign minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X.
Experts say the fifth round of talks saw a collision of red lines.
"This round was uniquely sensitive, marked by the collision of seemingly irreconcilable public red lines over uranium enrichment," Sina Toossi from the Center for International Policy told AFP.
Iran remains the only non-nuclear state enriching uranium to 60 percent, well above the 3.67 percent limit set under its 2015 accord with Western powers, but below the 90 percent needed for weapons-grade material.
The 2015 deal was torpedoed in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term when he unilaterally withdrew the United States from the accord.
Iran wants the talks to remain strictly focused on its nuclear programme and lifting US sanctions, a stance it has held since April 12 when the first round was held in Oman.
Tehran has criticised what it calls "irrational" demands by Washington and inconsistent signals from US officials.
Araghchi warned that such "contradictory positions", if they persist, "will complicate the talks".
Before the negotiations began, some analysts suggested the United States might seek a broader deal that also addressed Iran's ballistic missile programme.
They believed the talks might touch on Tehran's support for the "axis of resistance", the network of anti-Israel armed groups that includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza and Yemen's Huthi rebels.
On April 27, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged Washington to block not only Iran's enrichment of uranium but also its missile development under any possible deal.
Iran opposes non-nuclear issues being discussed in the talks, citing its sovereign rights and defence needs.
Even with diplomacy under way, the United States has imposed new sanctions on Iran.
Tehran denounces what it calls Washington's "hostile approach", noting that new sanctions were imposed just ahead of negotiations taking place.
On Wednesday, Washington sanctioned Iran's construction sector, citing its potential links to nuclear, military or missile activities.
"These sanctions ... further put to question the American willingness & seriousness for diplomacy," Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei posted on X.
In late April, before the third round of talks, Washington also slapped sanctions on Iran's oil and gas sector.
The Iran-US talks, their highest-level contacts since Washington quit the 2015 nuclear accord, came after Trump wrote to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei in March.
Trump urged Tehran to reach a deal diplomatically, but also warned of military action if talks fail.
Iran has issued warnings of its own.
On Friday, armed forces Chief of Staff Mohammad Bagheri warned that "any US misstep in the region will end like Vietnam and Afghanistan".
His remarks came after CNN, citing US officials, reported on Tuesday that Israel was preparing to attack Iranian nuclear sites.
"We believe that in the event of any attack on the nuclear facilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran by the Zionist regime, the US government will also be involved and bear legal responsibility," Araghchi said in a letter to the United Nations published on Thursday.
According to the US outlet Axios, Witkoff met Israeli officials shortly before Friday's Rome talks.
Ultra-conservative Iranian daily Kayhan wrote on Saturday that "coordination between Trump and Netanyahu is leading the negotiations towards deadlock".
bur-sbr/rkh/srm
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
S. Korea halts loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts against North
AP image South Korea on Wednesday halted loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts into the nuclear-armed North, the defence ministry said, adding it was a bid to "restore trust" under Seoul's new administration. The decision to suspend the broadcasts was "to make good on a promise to restore trust in South-North Korea relations and seek peace on the Korean peninsula", the defence ministry said in a brief statement. A ministry spokesperson told AFP the broadcasts were halted Wednesday afternoon. Ties between the two Koreas deteriorated under the hardline administration of hawkish ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol. But Yoon was impeached and stripped of office earlier this year over an abortive martial law declaration. After winning last week's snap poll, Seoul's new President Lee Jae-myung pledged to improve ties with Pyongyang. The loudspeakers were turned on in the demilitarised zone that divides the two Koreas in June last year in response to a barrage of trash-filled balloons flown southward by Pyongyang. The North claimed the balloons were a response to activists floating similar missives filled with anti-Kim Jong Un propaganda and US dollar bills northwards. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo The two Koreas technically remain at war because the 1950-53 conflict ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty. The anti-North Korea broadcasts infuriate Pyongyang, which has previously threatened artillery strikes against Seoul's loudspeaker units. South Korea's resumption of its broadcasts last year was the first time the tactic had been used in six years. They typically consist of blaring K-pop songs and news reports into the North. - North Korea response? - In response, North Korea turned on its own propaganda broadcasts, sending strange and unsettling noises into the South at all hours, prompting complaints from border residents. On Ganghwa island, which is very close to the North, villager Ahn Hyo-cheol told AFP that the North Korean noises had "not subsided at all" by Wednesday afternoon. "While I don't have high hopes for how North Korea might change, I think the government's decision to halt loudspeaker broadcasts toward the North is the right move," he said. Ganghwa county councillor Park Heung-yeol told AFP the move by Seoul was "long overdue". "Halting the loudspeaker broadcasts should not be the end -- we must also work to restore inter-Korean communication channels and initiate dialogue to stop the North's broadcasts targeting the South," Park added. Lee, who took office the day after last week's election, has vowed to improve ties with the North through dialogue. "No matter how costly, peace is better than war," he said after he was elected. North Korea has not commented on Lee's election except for a brief news report informing its public of his win. Lee comes to power with his party already holding a parliamentary majority -- secure for the next three years -- meaning he is likely to be able to get his legislative agenda done. The halt to loudspeaker broadcasts "is a clear signal from Lee that he intends to deliver on his campaign promise to improve ties with the North and that he has no hostile intent toward it," said Hong Min, a senior analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification. "We can expect Lee to take further steps to further this stance, such as attempting to revive a military agreement with the North that was scrapped last year," Hong said. "The North could reciprocate by halting its own noise campaign targeting South Koreans living on border-area islands."
Mint
35 minutes ago
- Mint
Russia Makes Iran Nuclear Offer for US Pact, Interfax Says
Russia proposed transferring Iran's excess nuclear material to its territory as part of efforts to assist Iran and the US in reaching an agreement over the Islamic Republic's atomic program, Interfax reported. 'We are ready to provide assistance to both Washington and Tehran, not only political assistance in the form of suggestions that could be used in the negotiating process, but also practical assistance,' Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said Wednesday, according to the news service. 'For example, through the removal of surplus nuclear material made in Iran and adapting it for the production of reactor fuel.' US President Donald Trump said this month that Russia may take a role in negotiations with Iran after a phone conversation with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin amid difficulties in the talks between Tehran and Washington. In 2015, Russia took delivery of a significant part of Iran's enriched uranium as part of the landmark nuclear accord, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action agreed to by Iran, the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Germany. The International Atomic Energy Agency on May 31 reported that Iran's accumulation of highly enriched uranium rose by almost 50% to 409 kilograms over the last three months, which could quickly be enriched to form the core of about 10 nuclear bombs. Iran will suggest a framework agreement in nuclear talks with the US, a senior official said Tuesday, raising the prospect of an interim deal that could be followed by further negotiations. Tehran is working on a fresh proposal ahead of a sixth round of talks with Washington in Oman on Sunday that 'can be used as a basis for work,' Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi told the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency. Ryabkov seemed to back that idea, saying an interim arrangement is a potential solution. 'For our part, we believe that the moment has not been completely lost, and now it would be necessary to redouble efforts in order to reach — even if only a palliative and not a comprehensive — solution to the problems,' he told journalists in Sochi, Interfax said. Iran and the US have been engaged in negotiations since April in a bid to end an acrimonious years-long standoff over Tehran's nuclear program including through an easing of US sanctions and have so far had five rounds of talks mediated by Oman. Last week, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei criticized a US proposal for a nuclear deal and called American officials 'arrogant' for expecting the Islamic Republic to cease uranium enrichment. With assistance from Patrick Sykes. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
"Decisive advantage in modern warfare lies in ability to see first, farthest, most accurately": Air Marshal Ashutosh Dixit
New Delhi [India], June 11 (ANI): Air Marshal Ashutosh Dixit, Deputy Chief of Air Staff, on Wednesday highlighted the strategic role of surveillance and electro-optic systems in the current combat scenarios and said that the decisive advantage in modern warfare lies in the ability to see first, see farthest, and see most accurately. Drawing parallels from recent global conflicts--including the Armenia-Azerbaijan war, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the ongoing Israel-Hamas hostilities--Air Marshal Dixit noted that superior situational awareness has consistently tipped the balance in favour of the side with better eyes on the battlefield. Speaking at the Surveillance and Electro Optics India seminar, Air Marshal Dixit said, 'When we look at global conflicts commencing from Armenia-Azerbaijan to Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Hamas, and to our own experiences in Operation Sindoor, one truth emerges with crystal clarity: the side that sees first, sees farthest and sees most accurately, prevails.' 'This axiom has guided military thinking for centuries, but never has it been more relevant than in our current era of precision warfare and multi-domain operations,' he added. The Air Marshal referred to Operation Sindoor as a demonstration of India's readiness to adapt to these evolving realities. 'This brings me to the critical importance of deep surveillance in contemporary warfare. The lessons from Operation Sindoor have reinforced what military strategists have long understood but perhaps not fully appreciated until now. Modern warfare, thanks to technology, has fundamentally altered the relationship between distance and vulnerability,' he said. 'It has given a new meaning to simultaneity and non-linearity. The existing principles of war are being challenged, and new ones are emerging. Earlier, the horizon marked the limit of immediate threat. Today, precision-guided munitions like SCALP, BrahMos and HAMMER have rendered geographical barriers almost meaningless, as strikes with BVR AAMs and supersonic AGMs have become commonplace.' Air Marshal Dixit said that the rapidly advancing domain of surveillance and electro-optics is no longer just an operational enabler but has emerged as the very foundation of contemporary military strategy. Reflecting on the significant transformation in the field, Air Marshal Dixit noted that these technologies have shifted from being supplementary force multipliers to becoming central to how nations plan, execute, and dominate in future conflicts. 'As someone who has witnessed this transformation firsthand, I can attest that we stand at the cusp of a revolution that will redefine how we perceive, process and project power in the 21st century,' he said. He said, 'When weapons can strike targets hundreds of kilometres away with pinpoint accuracy, he traditional concepts of front, rear and flanks combat zones and depth areas all become irrelevant. What we call the front and the theatre merge into one. This new reality demands that we extend our surveillance envelope far beyond what previous generations could have even imagined. We must detect, identify and track potential threats not when they approach our borders, but when they are still in their staging areas, airfields and bases, deep within adversary territory. This existed as a concept even earlier but today we have the means to realise it.' Adding further, he said, 'The compressed timelines of modern warfare amplify this need. When hypersonic missiles can traverse hundreds of kilometres in minutes and drone swarms can reach their targets before traditional decision-making processes can respond, real-time or near-real-time surveillance becomes not just advantageous but essential for survival.' Air Marshal Dixit said that the speed of modern weapons has fundamentally altered the OODA loop, compressing it from hours to minutes, sometimes even seconds, and this new reality is being shaped by mega satellite constellations that are revolutionising battlefield awareness. 'The fusion of Electro-Optical, SAR and SIGINT capabilities now enables a 24x7 dynamic, persistent and predictive mosaic of the battlefield. We no longer merely observe; we anticipate, predict and pre-empt,' he said. 'As we look to the future, it becomes clear that government efforts alone cannot meet the pace of technological change we face. This is where our private sector emerges as a critical partner in our surveillance evolution. The dynamism, innovation and agility that characterise India's technology companies are precisely what we need to maintain our edge in this rapidly evolving domain. We need our private sector to push the boundaries in several critical areas. Integration of AI with electro-optic systems has the potential to revolutionise surveillance capabilities. AI-driven imaging seekers, automated threat recognition and predictive analytics can transform passive monitoring into active. and intelligent surveillance that anticipates rather than merely observes,' he said. He added, 'The development of multispectral, all-weather surveillance systems that can operate effectively in our diverse geographical and climatic conditions is essential. From the Siachen glacier to the hot arid deserts down to the Indian Ocean, our surveillance systems must maintain effectiveness across all environments. We also need scalable and interoperable systems that can seamlessly integrate with existing military networks while remaining flexible enough to accommodate future technologies. The days of standalone, siloed systems are behind us. The future belongs to networked, collaborative platforms that multiply rather than merely add capabilities.' Speaking at the seminar on national security, Lieutenant General Vineet Gaur, DG Capability Development, underscored the critical role of advanced surveillance in contemporary warfare. 'In today's modern era, advanced surveillance is not a luxury but a necessity. We witnessed its significance during the Kargil conflict, and its relevance has only grown in today's evolving security landscape,' he said. He further emphasised the increasing importance of space-based surveillance, particularly as the Indian Air Force undergoes a transformative phase. 'We are set to launch 52 satellites in the coming year, out of which 31 will be built by private sector firms,' he revealed. These satellites will be equipped with cutting-edge camera lenses, advanced sensors, and a suite of modern technologies to enhance India's situational awareness and defence preparedness. Air Vice Marshal Tejpal Singh highlighted the indispensable role of advanced surveillance and technology in modern warfare, stating that enhanced battlefield imagery and superior monitoring capabilities have become vital components of military success. 'Advanced surveillance is no longer optional--it is essential in any modern conflict,' he said. 'Clearer imagery and stronger surveillance systems provide a critical edge on the battlefield.' He further stressed that Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) has emerged as a key element in today's combat environment. 'ISR is central to modern-day warfare, and Remotely Operated Systems (ROS) serve as its backbone,' he explained, adding that the importance of these systems has been demonstrated in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. Referring to developments in West Asia, Air Vice Marshal Singh pointed to the use of unmanned aerial attack systems in Yemen, which have drawn global attention. 'These examples show that ISR capabilities are vital for achieving dominance in today's contested airspace,' he said. (ANI)
