
Tenant advocates say Toronto's new renoviction bylaw already making ‘positive impact'
The Rental Renovation Licence Bylaw was implemented on July 31 and is designed to protect tenants from 'bad faith' evictions by their landlords under the guise of a renovation — an increasingly common tactic critics say is used by landlords to evade rent control and increase rent prices.
Toronto landlords must now obtain a licence from the city before carrying out repairs or renovations that force tenants to move out, and must apply for this licence within seven days of giving a notice of ending tenancy — known as an N13 notice — to the renter.
With the new bylaw in effect, some tenant advocates say they are already noticing a difference in landlords' actions.
Story continues below advertisement
'We're seeing far fewer calls regarding renovictions leading up to the implementation date of July 31, so it's already had a positive impact in that sense,' said Douglas Kwan, director of advocacy and legal services at the Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario.
'We're going to monitor how that goes for the rest of the year, but we anticipate that we're going to see a gradual decline with the number of N13s or renoviction calls to our organization and others in Toronto,' Kwan said.
Renovictions have been on the rise in Toronto and the province for the past decade, and became a 'massive' issue in the last five or so years, said Alejandra Ruiz Vargas, president of ACORN Canada.
Since 2017, there has been a nearly 50 per cent increase in the number of N13 notices filed in Toronto, according to a 2024 renoviction report by ACORN.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'I know a couple that has been renovicted three times last year,' Ruiz Vargas said, adding that the bylaw's implementation is a 'huge win' for renters.
People in lower-cost rentals are commonly targeted by renovictions, and they face immense difficulties in finding places they can afford to move into after being evicted, anti-poverty advocates say.
'The huge increase in evictions has fuelled a massive increase in homelessness in Ontario,' said Jeff Schlemmer, executive director of Community Legal Clinic of York Region.
Story continues below advertisement
'Thank goodness municipalities are stepping up.'
New Westminster, B.C., was the first municipality to adopt a renoviction bylaw in 2019, with several other municipalities in Ontario, such as Hamilton and London, following in its footsteps.
These bylaws are beneficial not only for renters but the entire housing system in a city as they help preserve affordable housing stock and are a simpler and quicker solution than putting shovels into the ground to build more affordable housing, said Kwan.
'It doesn't mean that legitimate landlords who have to renovate their units are prevented from doing so. It's really to capture situations or people who aren't even considering renovating their unit and it gives them pause,' he said.
There are several requirements under Toronto's new bylaw that make it especially strong, such as the need for a landlord to have an architect or engineer confirm that the unit must be empty for the renovation work, and the requirement for the landlord to make rent gap payments if the tenant has to move elsewhere and pay higher rent, said Kwan.
'The rent gap payments ensure that a landlord mitigates the work. In other words, they don't sit on their hands,' said Kwan.
Though the bylaw does not apply retroactively to tenants who have already received N13 notices, advocates say it strengthens their fight as it puts the burden on landlords to prove their renovations require vacant units.
Story continues below advertisement
The City of Toronto says on their website that they will use an 'education-first approach' to encourage compliance, with enforcement action to follow when appropriate.
According to the bylaw, landlords could face fines of up to $100,000 if they force a tenant to leave and re-rent the unit to someone else for financial benefits, or if they fail to comply with other aspects of the new licensing requirements.
'The fines are quite high and I think they might be sufficient disincentive for these corporate landlords from acting,' Kwan said.
'I think if there is a concern, it would be uneducated, smaller landlords who perhaps unknowingly or knowingly are just trying to take the risk of renovicting their tenant. That's probably the group of landlords that should be more of a concern than the larger corporate ones.'
Chiara Paravani, co-chair of York South-Weston Tenant Union, said she is aware of several landlords who are particularly 'aggressive' in pursuing renovictions.
The particularly relentless actors may be willing to take a financial hit, Paravani said.
'Absorbing those fines is just part of the cost of doing business in terms of evicting people and replacing them with higher paying tenants, she said, adding that provincial fines were already in place and didn't do much to change landlords' actions.
Story continues below advertisement
The provincial government doubled maximum fine amounts for unlawful evictions in 2020, setting the fine rates at $50,000 for individuals and $250,000 for corporations.
But the Ministry of Housing was 'vastly overwhelmed' with requests to enforce the violations, said Schlemmer, from the community legal clinic.
'You can make the penalty capital punishment, but if the person knows they're not gonna get caught, they're still gonna try it, which is what we have for renovictions,' Schlemmer said, stressing the importance of enforcement.
'I really hope that the City of Toronto does allocate meaningful resources to enforcement, because if they do, they could make a real dent in these unlawful evictions and significantly reduce the ongoing increase in homelessness.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Short-term rental restrictions blamed for Kelowna's soft tourism season
At Priest Creek Family Estate Winery in Kelowna, B.C., sales have been plummeting for two summers in a row now. 'Last year they were 30 per cent,' said winery owner Darren Sawin. 'This year, we are probably down another 10 per cent on top of that.' According to Sawin, the slowdown in tourism coincided with provincial restrictions on short-term rental accommodations in May 2024. 'We noticed it immediately. Our sales dropped. Our traffic dropped,' Sawin said. 'We used to have lineups out the door and now our bar is empty.' The winery is far from alone, as a number of restaurants and boat rental companies have reported feeling the hit, too. The economy is believed to be a big factor but according to tourism officials, the rental restrictions are also having an impact. Story continues below advertisement 'If we had that additional accommodation that had kitchenettes in them, we would see people wanting to book those, so there is that layer of guest that isn't here,' said Ellen Walker-Matthews on Monday, the CEO and president of the Thompson-Okanagan Tourism Association (TOTA). 2:14 Kelowna re-examines short term rental rules In an email to Global News, Kelowna mayor Tom Dyas said, 'While we have heard from some businesses reporting a busy season and others indicating a slower pace for them, it is important to wait for the official tourism data before drawing conclusions about the season's performance.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Dyas added, 'We look forward to reviewing the full report when it is released and continuing to work collaboratively with the tourism industry to support a strong and sustainable local economy in Kelowna.' The provincial restrictions were implemented in an effort to bolster the long-term housing supply amid a severe shortage and bring down housing costs. Story continues below advertisement They prohibit short-term rentals in secondary homes, allowing them only in principal residences. B.C.'s minister of housing Christine Boyle said she does sympathizes with tourism-reliant businesses struggling. 'Very aware of it and very sympathetic to these challenges,' Boyle said. But the minister stood firm on the restrictions, saying they are having the desired effect as vacancy rates rise across the province. Boyle said that includes Kelowna, where securing affordable housing has been a huge challenge including for those who are the backbone of the tourism industry. 'That industry, along with many others, was struggling to find a workforce who could afford local homes,' Boyle said. 'We know that tourism and hospitality not only rely on spaces for visitors, but rely on the availability of affordable housing for their own workers.' 2:14 Okanagan business owners concerned over slow tourism season Boyle added that municipalities can opt out of the principal residence requirement once a community maintains a minimum 3 per cent vacancy rate for two consecutive years. Story continues below advertisement According to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), Kelowna's vacancy rate jumped to 3.6 per cent last October. If it stays above that threshold until October 2026, the city will have the option to opt out. Dyas said that while the city is encouraged by the positive trends in the vacancy rate, it is too early to predict whether Kelowna will meet the threshold to apply for an exemption or to speculate on potential changes. 'We will continue to closely monitor the situation and advocate for an approach that reflects the unique needs of our community,' Dyas added. But even if Kelowna does opt out, Sawin said rebuilding tourism numbers won't happen overnight. 'It's going to be a couple of years before people get the message and come back,' Sawin said.


Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
CFLT Investors Have Opportunity to Join Confluent, Inc. Fraud Investigation with the Schall Law Firm
The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Confluent, Inc. ('Confluent' or 'the Company') (NASDAQ: CFLT) for violations of the securities laws. The investigation focuses on whether the Company issued false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information pertinent to investors. Confluent announced its Q2 2025 financial results on July 30, 2025. The Company's CFO announced during its earnings call that "consumption growth was impacted by continued optimization with month-over-month trends trailing the same period in prior years" and that "an AI-native customer has been making a broad-based move towards self-management of internal data platforms, reducing their Confluent Cloud usage as a result." Based on this news, shares of Confluent fell by more than 32.8% on the next day. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate. We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at or by email at bschall@ The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.


Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
SJM Investors Have Opportunity to Join The J. M. Smucker Company Fraud Investigation with the Schall Law Firm
The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors of The J. M. Smucker Company ('Smucker' or 'the Company') (NYSE: SJM) for violations of the securities laws. The investigation focuses on whether the Company issued false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information pertinent to investors. Smucker announced its Q4 2025 financial results on June 10, 2025. The Company announced a $867 million impairment charge related to the goodwill of its Sweet Baked Snacks segment and a $113 million impairment charge to the Hostess trademark due to "continued underperformance of the Sweet Baked Snacks segment." The Company had previously referred to its acquisition of Hostess Brands as "highly complementary" and claimed to investors that "underlying trends in snacking and specifically sweet snacking still bode well for the category." Based on this news, shares of Smucker fell by more than 18% on the same day. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate. We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at or by email at bschall@ The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.