logo
Ireland's oldest university names its first building after a woman. It only took 433 years

Ireland's oldest university names its first building after a woman. It only took 433 years

CNN06-03-2025
Trinity College Dublin may have been founded by Queen Elizabeth I, but for over 400 years every building on the prestigious university campus has been named after a man. Until now.
This month, an official ceremony marks the renaming of one of the main libraries at Ireland's leading university — formerly named after a supporter of slavery — in honor of the internationally acclaimed Irish poet Eavan Boland.
'Eavan Boland's poetry helped write women back into history,' Mary Robinson, Ireland's first female president and a former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, told CNN via email. 'She redefined the literary canon to include women's voices and those on the margins,' Robinson said of the poet, who died in 2020.
The striking Paul Koralek designed library that will soon bear the feminist thinker's name is considered the country's best example of Brutalist architecture.
A concrete and ashlar granite cube, the late modernist building also comprises a soft side through curved glass bay windows in bronze frames. The built-in, individual study nooks are still used by students 60 years later. Concrete walls, poured on site into Douglas fir moulds, have a faint woodgrain.
Called the New Library when it opened in 1967, a decade later it was named after the renowned 18th-century philosopher George Berkeley. Berkeley, an academic and bishop, profited from the international slave trade and promoted ideas of enslavement throughout his life.
During the global Black Lives Matter movement that followed George Floyd's murder in 2020, students called for the denaming of the library.
Their petition sparked a three-year denaming and renaming process that engaged both the college community and the wider public.
Had the name gone unchallenged it would have been 'a quiet endorsement of a past in which other people had suffered,' said Philomena Mullen, assistant professor of Black Studies at the university.
On a personal level, Mullen said she found it 'very hard to go in and sit in the building commemorating somebody who thought that somebody like me didn't have any value.'
After almost a year-and-a-half of deliberation, Eavan Boland was chosen from the 855 public submissions made.
Boland, 'Ireland's leading feminist poet' according to the New York Times Book Review, taught at Stanford University in California for years, having served as director of creative writing for over two decades when she died at age 75.
Removing Berkeley's name 'created a freehold on a piece of architecture that was a really good fit for Eavan Boland,' said Gerardine Meaney, professor of Cultural Theory at University College Dublin.
Mullen told CNN she was also pleased with the choice because 'Boland was concerned with who gets written into history, and who is left out.'
It's not the first time Trinity has confronted questions over women's place in its history.
'Over my dead body will women enter this college,' George Salmon, university provost at the end of the 19th century, is reputed to have said.
A month after his death, Trinity enrolled three women students, becoming the first of the historic universities of Ireland and Britain to admit women, in 1904. (Other universities had opened their degree courses to women sooner.)
It now has a student body that is 60% female and elected its first female provost in 2021.
Boland had become the 'public poet' of Ireland, following in the footsteps of the late Nobel Prize-winning poet Seamus Heaney, Meaney told CNN. 'She embodied for people the possibility of being a poet and a woman and a mother.'
But the path to widespread recognition was not easy in a literary establishment dominated by men. Boland's daughter, Eavan Casey, recalled to CNN that her mother once said, 'it would be easier to write a poem about a bomb than a baby!'
'There was no place in Irish poetry for women,' Boland's friend, poet and novelist Theo Dorgan, told CNN. Referencing Boland's seminal 1982 book 'Night Feed,' he said, 'a lot of scholars don't like to go back that far, to poems about breastfeeding and the domestic — it's as if that's not important, and yet it was at the heart of what Eavan did.'
A silt of milk.The last suck.And now your eyes are openBirth-coloured and offended.Earth wakes.You go back to sleep.The feed is ended.
– From 'Night Feed'
At the same time, Dorgan said, 'she could write the most fierce and uncompromising vindication of the rights of women in her poetry and essays.'
That activist approach was shared by Robinson, who quoted her friend Boland – both of them Trinity College graduates – in her inaugural address as Ireland's first female president in 1990.
'I look back on our work together as important in the resurgence of Irish feminism in the 1970s,' she said.
Her work also had international resonance. Boland read her poem, 'Our future will become the past of other women,' at the UN in 2018 to mark 100 years of the first Irish women being able to vote.
And when Ireland served on the UN Security Council from 2021 to 2022, 'we used excerpts from the poem liberally throughout our term, whether working with women from Afghanistan, Myanmar or Northern Ireland; it was inspirational,' Geraldine Byrne Nason, Ireland's then-Ambassador to the UN and now its envoy to Washington, told CNN.
Boland was also 'an extraordinary mentor to so many younger poets,' Meaney said, holding workshops across Ireland during the 1980s which were 'pivotal' for those who attended.
Ireland is famed for its writers, many of whom studied at Trinity. Samuel Beckett and Oscar Wilde have their names on buildings to prove it. But until this moment Trinity has had a failing grade at commemorating its female literary greats.
It's a blind spot for the wider country too. In 2017, such was the prevalence of an all-male poster of Ireland's writers that the Irish Times felt compelled to create its own version featuring award-winning female best-sellers.
More recently, Irish novelists Sally Rooney and Claire Keegan have had huge international success.
Cillian Murphy starred in 2024's film adaptation of Keegan's Booker Prize- shortlisted novella 'Small Things Like These,' and Sally Rooney's novel 'Normal People,' which has sold over 3 million copies, was adapted into a TV show in 2020 that was streamed over 65 million times that year.
Much of Rooney's novel is in fact set in Trinity College, with actors Paul Mescal and Daisy Edgar-Jones crossing the cobblestoned squares to attend lectures, or, in Mescal's case, study in the library in question.
Boland's name is now part of that campus.
It's a fitting tribute for a writer who explored how women are kept outside of history, left out of the stories that nations tell about themselves with statues and monuments.
'Heritage is something we choose,' Laurajane Smith, professor of Heritage and Museum Studies at Australian National University, told CNN.
'We decide something is heritage because it has meaning for us in terms of what we want to remember and what we want to commemorate,' she said.
Heritage isn't a thing of the past, she added, but 'all about the present' and 'who we want to be.'
A plaque will be unveiled to mark the renaming of the library at a special event on March 10 but a date for the external signage - Eavan Boland's name in big letters for all to behold — has not yet been announced.
A spokesperson for Trinity told CNN there were regulatory restrictions on signage on a Protected Structure like the library, calling the ongoing process 'a procedural matter.'
The delay has frustrated some. 'The new sign needs to go up pronto,' said history student Méabh Scahill, who spoke in favor of Boland at a student-hosted debate on the subject of the renaming.
'I'm sure some people are still calling it the Berkeley library,' she tells CNN. 'I feel like people have reverted back'
Old habits die hard. But Eavan Casey has allowed herself to imagine her mother's name on the facade.
'It will become part of the language of the university,' she said in wonder, as if she couldn't quite believe it.
For Nessa O'Mahony, part of a network of female Irish poets who have campaigned for greater recognition for Boland, the long wait is nearly over.
'What a glorious thing, as an up-and-coming writer, to make an arrangement to meet a friend outside The Boland!' she said.
'Do you know, I'm looking forward to doing that myself.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump isn't trying to ‘erase history' at Smithsonian — he's reversing a destructive woke takeover
Trump isn't trying to ‘erase history' at Smithsonian — he's reversing a destructive woke takeover

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Trump isn't trying to ‘erase history' at Smithsonian — he's reversing a destructive woke takeover

Liberals were up in arms this week after President Trump said he wanted a review of the Smithsonian Institute — saying their displays were too negative, and too focused on slavery. But Trump isn't trying to 'erase history,' he's looking to reverse a woke movement that has indeed rewritten the American story to highlight suffering rather than providing a balanced picture of our past. Trump's criticism that the Smithsonian is overly focused on slavery is not unreasonable: In nearly every exhibit, critical race theory in general, or slavery specifically, makes an appearance. For instance, its new Benjamin Franklin exhibit on his innovations includes a whole section on slavery — with assumptions, but no proof, that slaves assisted Franklin in his electrical innovations. Even if they hadn't, the curators argue that without their work around the house, Franklin couldn't have spent the time on his experiments! 'Franklin held people enslaved during the time he pursued his electrical experiments. Their labor in his household helped make time that he could use to study electricity. Family, friends, and visitors directly participated in electrical experiments. The records are few and unclear, but enslaved people may also have directly assisted his research.' Another example of the obsession with slavery comes from the National Portrait Gallery; nearly every early Founding Father's description includes a statement on slavery. For example, the description for Thomas Jefferson includes the statement: 'Although Jefferson once called slavery 'an abominable crime,' he consistently enslaved African Americans, including his late wife Martha's half-sister, Sally Hemings, with whom he had several children.' The overemphasis on the history of slavery is a fairly recent development, an offshoot of the Black Lives Matter movement. In 2019, Lonnie G. Bunch III took over as the Secretary of the Smithsonian. Prior to that, Bunch was the founding director of the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture, which is nearly exclusively focused on the legacy of slavery, with exhibits such as In Slavery's Wake, Slavery and Freedom, and Make Good the Promise, which deal with the history of slavery. Also in 2019, the Smithsonian collaborated with the New York Times on its 1619 Project, which falsely claims that the United States started, not with the Declaration of Independence or Revolutionary War, but when the first slave ship arrived. As curator Mary Elliot remarked at the time: 'This is a shared history, everyone inherited the legacies of slavery.' But America's history is more than just about slavery, and not everyone inherited this legacy — after all, America is also a nation of immigrants who came after the Civil War. In the Smithsonian 2020 annual report, more obsession with slavery comes into view. The Smithsonian is on a mission to have a completely searchable digital museum called 'The Searchable Museum Initiative.' One may think it would begin with digitization of some our greatest moments in history, such as the landing on the moon, the passing of the US Constitution, or even its great Natural History collections. You would be wrong; the digitization began 'with the museum's Slavery and Freedom exhibition.' The annual report claims that 'The Searchable Museum will provide rich, interactive, digital experiences that match the immersive experience of a visit to the physical museum' — unfortunately, likely as biased as a visit to the museum themselves. The problem with modern museums is not just about the obsession with slavery; it's also about dishonestly painting all of American history as evil and full of horrors — with little or no redeeming qualities. For instance, in the Smithsonian's American Indian Museum in NYC, George Washington hardly gets a mention, but his silhouette is used in a description of him as a 'town destroyer' — supposedly a nickname that Native Americans still use to describe our first President. And yet there's no mention in either of the American Indian Museums — in NYC or DC — about slavery practiced by Native Americans, both before Europeans' arrival and afterward. For example, the Cherokee owned slaves. In 1835, 15,000 Cherokee owned 1,592 African slaves; by the Civil War onset, 17,000 Cherokee owned 4,000 African slaves. While museums should provide an honest account of history, they should not be afraid to showcase and celebrate American achievement, which includes ending slavery. At present, however, museums seem more interested in pushing a woke, revisionist history of the United States. With two new Smithsonian museums in development, the National Museum of the American Latino and the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum, we can expect more of the same — unless we take action against woke propaganda now. Elizabeth Weiss is a professor emeritus of anthropology at San José State University and author of 'On the Warpath: My Battles with Indians, Pretendians, and Woke Warriors.'

Palestinian State Recognition Backed by Nearly 6 in 10 Americans: Poll
Palestinian State Recognition Backed by Nearly 6 in 10 Americans: Poll

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Palestinian State Recognition Backed by Nearly 6 in 10 Americans: Poll

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Nearly six in 10 Americans believe members of the United Nations should recognize a Palestinian state, according to a new poll. Newsweek reached out to the State Department for comment via email on Wednesday. Why It Matters The poll comes amid ongoing concerns about the humanitarian conditions in Gaza. On October 7, 2023, Hamas led an attack against Israel, killing 1,200 and abducting 251 people. Israel has said 58 hostages remain in Gaza, and that only about 20 are believed to be alive. Israel has since launched a massive counteroffensive in Gaza, killing more than 62,000 people, according to the Associated Press, citing Gaza's Health Ministry. Critics have sounded the alarm on Israel's military operation, with worries over the number of civilians killed or displaced. In recent weeks, more countries have moved to recognize a Palestinian state amid fears of the potential starvation of civilians in Gaza, an accusation denied by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. What To Know A majority of Americans—58 percent—believe every country should recognize Palestinian territory as an independent nation, according to a poll from Reuters and Ipsos released on Wednesday. Only 33 percent said they do not believe U.N. members should recognize a Palestinian state, while 9 percent did not answer the question, found the poll, which surveyed 4,446 adults across the U.S. and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. A Palestinian flag is waved as people walk along Gaza's al-Rashid Street on January 26. A Palestinian flag is waved as people walk along Gaza's al-Rashid Street on January 26. OMAR AL-QATTAA/AFP via Getty Images Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced earlier in August that Australia would recognize the Palestinian state as a nation in September. "Australia will recognize the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own, predicated on the commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority," he said in a video posted to X. France in July also said it would recognize a Palestinian nation. The United Kingdom said the same, if conditions are not met by Israel. But it has been U.S. policy across Democratic and Republican administrations to not recognize a Palestinian state. The administration of President Donald Trump has not signaled any shift from the status quo on the matter. Polling over recent months has shown a decline in American compassion for Israel. A Quinnipiac University poll released in June found that sympathies for Israel dipped to a record low, with only 37 percent of Americans saying they feel more sympathetic toward Israel. What People Are Saying U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in July: "I have always said that we will recognize a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution. I can confirm the U.K. will recognize the State of Palestine by the United Nations General Assembly in September, unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term sustainable peace reviving the prospect of a two-state solution." U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, after France announced it would recognize a Palestinian state: "This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace. It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th." Netanyahu, on X July 24: "A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel—not to live in peace beside it. Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel." What Happens Next Starmer will wait until September to render a formal decision on recognizing a Palestinian state. Israel continues facing international pressure over its military operations in Gaza, while Hamas has been pressed to return the remaining hostages. There have been recent attempts at peace talks to achieve a lasting ceasefire, but they have stalled.

Trump admin strips ocean and air pollution monitoring from next-gen weather satellites
Trump admin strips ocean and air pollution monitoring from next-gen weather satellites

CNN

time4 hours ago

  • CNN

Trump admin strips ocean and air pollution monitoring from next-gen weather satellites

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is narrowing the capabilities and reducing the number of next-generation weather and climate satellites it plans to build and launch in the coming decades, two people familiar with the plans told CNN. This move — which comes as hurricane season ramps up with Erin lashing the East Coast — fits a pattern in which the Trump administration is seeking to not only slash climate pollution rules, but also reduce the information collected about the pollution in the first place. Critics of the plan also say it's a short-sighted attempt to save money at the expense of understanding the oceans and atmosphere better. Two planned instruments, one that would measure air quality, including pollution and wildfire smoke, and another that would observe ocean conditions in unprecedented detail, are no longer part of the project, the sources said. 'This administration has taken a very narrow view of weather,' one NOAA official told CNN, noting the jettisoned satellite instruments could have led to better enforcement and regulations on air pollution by more precisely measuring it. The cost of the four satellites, known as the Geostationary Extended Observations, nicknamed GeoXO, would be lower than originally spelled out under the Biden administration, at a maximum of $500 million per year for a total of $12 billion, but some scientists say the cheaper up-front price would come at a cost to those who would have benefited from the air and oceans data. 'Our information will be less rich, and our understanding of the whole phenomenon of a hurricane event, or of a fire event or of a drought event will be lesser because we don't have these context information instruments adding real time, integrated understanding of the events,' the official stated. Both instruments were already contracted to BAE Systems, which could now charge cancelation fees. The changes are aimed at curtailing costs and are due in part to the perception that some of the instruments were going to be focused on gathering data to study climate change. According to a Trump administration budget document, weather forecasting should be the 'exclusive' focus of the satellites. In addition to the reduced number of instruments, NOAA is now only building four satellites as part of the constellation, rather than six, with the first set to launch in 2032. Having fewer satellites in the sky means less redundancy and raises the risk of critical data outages, the NOAA official stated. 'It's gambling with the continuity of an operational system that we've relied on since the early 70s,' they said. The satellite series is meant to be the successor to the GOES satellites, which provide a wealth of data for weather forecasting, with the first launch set for 2032 and service lasting through 2055. CNN has contacted NOAA for comment. The atmospheric composition instrument, for example, would have enabled scientists to more precisely measure air pollutants, which could help reduce health risks from wildfire smoke events. It would also enhance US capabilities to conduct air quality monitoring and forecasting, as well as keep tabs on emissions of greenhouse gases and the pollutants that form smog. The atmospheric composition instrument would have been beneficial for both NOAA's weather and climate missions, according to an assessment of the instrument's value that NOAA performed and was signed off on by the Commerce Department, which oversees NOAA. The instrument, the report said, 'is fundamental to understanding changes in air quality, the stratospheric ozone layer, and climate, as well as their corresponding impacts on human health and natural and engineered ecosystems.' The report warned that without the instrument on GeoXO, the US would risk falling behind other countries' air quality monitoring capabilities, jeopardizing America's longtime leadership in Earth observations. Also cut from the planned GeoXO series of satellites is an instrument that would measure ocean color, which could provide insights into fisheries populations, algal blooms, ocean productivity and water quality. While it is not unheard of for NOAA or Congress to alter major satellite series, given a history of cost and schedule overruns in NOAA satellite programs, cancelling already contracted instruments — and doing so in part due to the administration's determination to focus NOAA more narrowly on weather forecasting, and away from climate change observations and research — stands out. The Trump administration's fiscal year 2026 budget request would close NOAA's extensive research facilities, shutting down its greenhouse gas monitoring network, among others. Congress is currently considering that proposal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store