Independent provincial review warns gender-based violence 'normalized,' outlines recommendations
Dr. Kim Stanton, who has a background in practising Aboriginal and constitutional law and who has worked to address gender-based violence throughout her career, was appointed in 2024 to conduct an independent, systemic review of the treatment of sexual and intimate partner violence in the province's legal system, and to propose recommendations to address them.
"Gender-based violence has been normalized somehow, but it shouldn't be," Stanton said during a Tuesday morning news conference.
"It's pervasive, but it's preventable."
Independent Systemic Review: The British Columbia Legal System's Treatment of Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence identifies barriers to change, and makes more than two-dozen systemic and legal recommendations.
B.C. Attorney General Niki Sharma said it will take time to review the report thoroughly, but that the government will "immediately" look into what can be done internally to improve how the legal system treats survivors.
"I know that this work will take some time, but we are not starting from scratch," Sharma said during the news conference.
The government will invest in culturally safe victim services to improve training within institutions, and also work on proposed changes to the family law act "including components specifically focused on intimate partner and family violence," she said.
'Repeated recommendations' that do not make a difference
According to the report, 94 per cent of sexual assaults and 80 per cent of intimate partner violence are not reported to police.
Stanton said she looked into why previous recommendations have been repeated without a marked improvement in access to justice for survivors and found institutional barriers such as the operation of silos within government, the lack of accountability within institutions and a focus on the cost of change while underestimating the cost of inaction.
"Silos are created when different ministries, branches, departments, units, or agencies focus on their own mandates without effectively sharing information or collaborating with the other entities that share common goals or address related issues," the report stated.
This has led to a lack of accountability, with "no identified leader with the authority to ensure that what needs to be done gets done."
It goes on to say that when it comes to addressing sexual and intimate partner violence, while there are many programs and initiatives underway in the province, "the whole system would be improved for survivors if there was an acknowledged locus of leadership to ensure that the disparate parts of the system work together to increase survivors' safety and their ability to access justice."
Stanton proposed nine steps to "disrupt the cycle of making repeated recommendations that do not make an appreciable difference to survivors," adding that changes to the legal system will be useful and sustainable only if systemic changes are made.
Among the recommendations is for the B.C. government to declare gender-based violence a provincial epidemic; to create an internal government accountability mechanism; and to appoint an independent gender-based violence commissioner.
In addition, it recommends providing stable funding for the hiring, training and retention of support workers, and for survivors navigating the legal system.
The report also recommends the government support accredited services for men who use violence, as well as services to reduce and prevent violence; and to strengthen education and training of institutions — including government agencies, police, and the courts — on gender-based violence, unconscious bias, and trauma-informed practice.
Prevention includes more than public education about the need for affirmative, ongoing consent, but also "education that challenges the longstanding forms of oppression that perpetuate the normalization and devaluing of gender-based violence, such as misogyny, colonialism, racism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, and other forms of systemic discrimination."
'Confirms what survivors...have known'
In a statement, the Battered Women's Support Services said they welcome the review and the clarity it brings.
"The report confirms what survivors, frontline workers, and feminist organizations have known for decades: the legal system continues to fail those experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) and sexual violence — not because of a lack of law or policy, but because of inconsistent implementation, lack of accountability, and systems not designed with survivors at the centre."
The organization added that while they support the majority of the report, they see some aspects of the issue differently, namely the use of restorative justice in intimate partner and sexual violence.
"These forms of violence are rooted in coercive control, fear, and structural power imbalances — conditions that are not adequately addressed in many restorative models," they said in the statement.
"Justice for survivors cannot be built on reconciliation alone. It must be rooted in safety, accountability, and structural change."
The report notes that to end gender-based violence, action needs to be taken "right now."
"The courage of survivors and the lives of those who did not survive must propel us into action," it stated.
During the Tuesday conference, Sharma said some of the immediate steps they're taking internally include creating and distributing "user-friendly guides for obtaining protection orders," and working with the courts and people with lived experiences "to find ways to learn from and mirror protections in criminal law, to design similar protections in civil and family law."
She also said a cross-government committee will be tasked with reviewing the report and making recommendations for next steps.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Garma organiser urges action on 'horrors in statistics'
Political leaders have been warned their attendance at one of Australia's largest cultural festivals is not enough to make progress for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Speaking at the annual Garma Festival at Gulkula, in northeast Arnhem Land, to a crowd that included several senior ministers and the prime minister, Yothu Yindi Foundation chief executive Denise Bowden said their presence was a powerful signal. "But don't leave Garma and leave things on endless repeat," she said. "Don't be here to think your attendance here is enough." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese used his time at Garma to announce an economic partnership with Indigenous organisations, which he said built on Closing the Gap commitments and would empower communities to advocate for infrastructure on their lands. In her powerful address to the festival on Saturday, Ms Bowden told the crowd that despite the success of Garma, now in its 25th year, visitors would be leaving behind a "world that remains in crisis mode". "On Tuesday, we will return to a life dominated by the simple fact that Aboriginal people in remote areas of Australia remain the most marginalised people in the country, if not the world," she said. Ms Bowden highlighted high rates of rheumatic heart disease in Arnhem Land, saying the community of Maningrida, in the Northern Territory, has the highest rate of the condition in the world. She also pointed to the over-representation of First Nations people in custody to bring home her point, with the NT second only to El Salvador when it comes to incarceration rates. "We've become numb to this data and immune to the horrors that lie in the statistics," she said. Ms Bowden said the status quo was not acceptable, with recent Closing the Gap statistics showing four targets going backwards - adult incarceration, children in out-of-home care, suicide rates and child development. She said the Yothu Yindi Foundation had long argued the Closing the Gap data reflected a fundamental failure in Australia's governance systems, and that must change to make a real difference. "There are good intentions and what is described as hard work, but without crunching systemic change, there will be no betterment," she said. "People suffer because of these failures of governance that are imposed upon us." 13YARN 13 92 76 Lifeline 13 11 14


Hamilton Spectator
6 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Three candidates may be ineligible in Kanesatake election
With voting underway, Derek Denis, Francis Phillips, and Todd Simon are on the ballot conditionally, The Eastern Door has learned, because of evidence of possible criminal records. The three candidates for chief in the Mohawk Council of Kanesatake (MCK) election must provide fingerprinted criminal record reports demonstrating their eligibility before polls close or votes for them will not be counted, according to chief electoral officer Graeme Drew, but none has yet done so at the time of writing. Phillips acknowledged his ineligibility to The Eastern Door. When asked if he would be submitting the required report, Simon said, 'I was never mentioned anything about this when I did my ballot, so it's kind of too late for that.' Denis said he was led to believe last weekend that his restricted firearm permit was sufficient to indicate he did not have a criminal record. However, Drew confirmed Denis has, at the time of writing, still not met the criteria to demonstrate his eligibility. Denis has provided an online criminal record check, Drew said, but it was inconclusive, and a fingerprinted report is still required. The three candidates at issue - and their nominators - all signed declarations attesting to their eligibility, including that 'the nominee has never been convicted of a criminal offence for which he/she has not received a pardon or a record suspension in respect of the offence, other than any criminal offence involving the exercise of Aboriginal rights.' The evidence indicating possible criminal convictions arose from contestations, but Drew wanted to give them a chance, he said, characterizing this as the fairest way forward in a complex situation. 'Innocent until proven guilty is the approach I take with nominations,' said Drew. This is because of the small window of time allowed by the contestation period and the need to print ballots in a timely manner and because standard background checks can be unreliable, producing inconclusive results when multiple people have the same name and date of birth, he said. This is why fingerprinted checks were requested. 'I was giving these three the benefit of the doubt to include them on the ballot because I didn't want to exclude them,' he said. 'That would be guilty until proven innocent. In good faith, they were all given the opportunity, because they declared in front of me, they swore an oath, saying they are compliant, and then I get evidence to the contrary. I have to make a determination.' Reached by The Eastern Door to provide his final election pitch, Phillips said he'd been told he's ineligible for having a criminal record and expressed frustration about the situation. 'I said if you know I'm not eligible to run, just take my name off the ballot right away. You shouldn't keep my name in there and waste people's votes on me knowing I can't win, which is wrong, right?' he said, adding he ran because people wanted him to. Phillips said his criminal conviction at issue goes back to 2001; documentation on his legal history has not been viewed by The Eastern Door. 'He chose to keep my name on the ballot knowing there was no way I was going to be elected, and everybody that voted for me, they're just not going to count the votes, which I find is absurd,' said Phillips. The nomination form on which a candidate declares they are eligible, with the criteria outlined, was signed by all of the election's nominees and their nominators, according to Drew. Advance voting took place on July 26. Election day is this Saturday, August 2. marcus@ Marcus Bankuti, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
29-07-2025
- Yahoo
Fox News expert suggests that ‘bystander apathy' is to blame for Manhattan shooting
A frequent Fox News guest, who touts himself as a law enforcement expert due to his brief tenure with the New York Police Department, groused that 'bystander apathy' led to the deaths of four people in a deadly Manhattan shooting Monday, urging citizens to 'deputize' themselves and confront gun-wielding suspects. Shane Tamura, 27, opened fire at a Midtown Manhattan skyscraper with an assault-style rifle around 6:30 p.m. after traveling to the city from Las Vegas, authorities say. He killed four people, including an NYPD officer and a senior executive at the company Blackstone, before turning the gun on himself. New York police said that Tamura had a 'documented mental health history', and wrote a suicide note claiming he suffered from a CTE brain injury, suggesting football was to blame. He appeared to have been targeting the NFL, which had offices in the building, but took an elevator to the wrong floor, Mayor Eric Adams said Tuesday. Around two hours after the shooting, 'Wild' Bill Stanton, a private investigator and one of Fox News' go-to police experts, appeared on Sean Hannity's primetime show to discuss the latest developments. Stanton is regularly referred to as a 'retired NYPD officer' during his Fox News appearances but left the department in the late 1980s after roughly two years on the job, following an accident that left him with an injured trigger finger and allowed him to collect a pension. According to Stanton, the Midtown shooting not only suggests the need for more police officers in New York City and across the nation, but also means that ordinary citizens should be prepared to stop an armed suspect. 'But we need to deputize ourselves,' he declared, before referencing Hannity's self-proclaimed martial arts expertise. 'Sean, let's take you as an example. My understanding is that you train really hard in MMA. I'm guessing you train with your firearm, as well.' After Hannity affirmed that he has been trained with guns, Stanton said that 'we each need to empower ourselves not to be a victim' because 'bystander apathy is what occurred' during this latest shooting. 'This cretin walked with a long gun down the street. No one said anything. I'd be curious to see how many 9-1-1 calls were made. We need to empower ourselves, deputize ourselves,' Stanton added. Turning back to Hannity, he reiterated that the Fox News star's fighting skills would have come in handy at the scene of Monday's massacre. 'If you would've seen that person, I guess you would've acted a lot different, as would have I,' Stanton boasted. 'These businesses that have security in the lobbies, there's a knee-jerk reaction. They may enhance it, but they do a cost-benefit analysis, and it'll go right back to the same.' Over the years, Hannity has regaled his viewers and guests with tales of his deadly martial arts training, describing himself as something of a lethal human weapon due to his 'street fighting' and 'blade' skills while sharing video footage of himself in the gym. The Fox host even touted his MMA training and 'personal security plan' when covering the 2023 Maine mass shooting. Stanton, meanwhile, also used his Fox News appearance to fume about the so-called 'defund the police' movement while claiming that it is loss of respect for law enforcement that leads to mass casualty events. 'We see this perpetrator, this sicko, as well as criminals all over Manhattan, all over the country, not respecting the law, feeling they can do what they want. Only when we collectively push back, fight back, and act will this lesson hopefully stop,' he declared. 'Yeah, it's sad,' Hannity responded. 'I do think people need situational awareness. And you know, if you see something, say something. Make the phone call. Call the police. Try and get on top of it.' Stanton's status as a security and law enforcement expert, who is regularly featured on Fox News and other networks to provide analysis, has been criticized by police accountability activists who have labeled him a 'copagandist'. It has prompted Stanton to sue several NYC civic association leaders for trying to 'cancel' him with 'defamatory' social media posts. A Bronx Supreme Court judge, however, largely dismissed Stanton's claims last year, asserting that 'cancellation' is not an actual cause of action while specifically taking issue with his argument that he's not a public figure. 'Plaintiff may not be a major 'celebrity,' but by his own admission he regularly appears on national TV to promote his security business and personal brand,' the judge stated last year. 'Plaintiff also took the step of running for and being elected to a leadership position with a local civic organization. Hence, plaintiff took purposeful steps to thrust himself into the spotlight as a security expert and local politician. Therefore, plaintiff is a limited-purpose public figure. As such plaintiff must prove by clear and convincing evidence that defendants' defamatory statements were made with actual malice to recover.'