Kevin Feige on The Fantastic Four - First Steps: It's the perfect time to launch into a new era
After Captain America and the Thunderbolts, it is now time for a new band of heroes to rise and save the day. The Fantastic Four are all set for take off in First Steps.
Marvel's first family, who was teased in the post-credit scene of The Thunderbolts, are all set to take over the big screens this July. For Marvel Studios President
Kevin Feige
, the return of Reed Richards, Sue Storm, Johnny Storm, and Ben Grimm was more than just a comic-book plotline; it was a deeply personal and creative opportunity.
In a statement, Feige said, 'When Disney bought Fox, it was really an unexpected dream come true. It came at the perfect time, to help us launch into a new era. They are Marvel's First Family, and I really wanted to do them justice.'
ssociation with the Fantastic Four goes back more than two decades, having worked on the early 2000s films directed by Tim Story. Reflecting on those versions, he acknowledged the limitations of the time: 'There was still a bit of fear of being silly.'
Now, he says, the creative team is embracing everything that makes the team iconic — including their colourful tone and larger-than-life villains.
Among the most talked-about changes is the commitment to a more comic-accurate version of Galactus. 'In another time, some might consider the notion of somebody with a big, angular helmet walking through a city goofy,' Feige said. 'I consider it awesome.'
The film is touted to unleash the full spectrum of their appeal, from their '60s retro-future aesthetic and groovy cosmic vibes to, crucially, a comic-accurate portrayal of their most formidable foe, Galactus.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
Feige says, 'In another time, some might consider the notion of somebody with a big, angular helmet walking through a city goofy. I consider it awesome.'
Directed by
Matt Shakman
, The Fantastic Four: First Steps will introduce the MCU versions of the characters, with
Pedro Pascal
as Reed Richards/Mister Fantastic, Vanessa Kirby as Sue Storm/Invisible Woman, Joseph Quinn as Johnny Storm/Human Torch, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach as Ben Grimm/The Thing. The team faces off against Galactus, played by
Ralph Ineson
, and his Herald, the Silver Surfer, portrayed by Julia Garner.
Set against a retro-futuristic backdrop, the film blends cosmic spectacle with intimate family dynamics, as the team is forced to balance heroism with their personal relationships in the face of Earth's destruction.
The Fantastic Four: First Steps is all set to release on July 25, 2025 in India in English, Hindi, Tamil and Telugu.
Check out our list of the
latest Hindi
,
English
,
Tamil
,
Telugu
,
Malayalam
, and
Kannada movies
. Don't miss our picks for the
best Hindi movies
,
best Tamil movies,
and
best Telugu films
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Vanessa Bryant Net Worth: Here's how much the widow of Kobe Bryant earns now
Social media is once again abuzz with Vanessa Bryant being at the focal point. The widow of the late NBA legend Kobe Bryant and the mother of three has recently been the subject of widespread speculation regarding a potential fifth pregnancy. Although these pregnancy rumors have gained traction on social media platforms like TikTok, Facebook, and X (formerly Twitter), fueled by doctored images and unverified captions suggesting she is expecting, there is neither any credible evidence or any official confirmation to support these claims, nor has Vanessa publicly addressed the rumors. View this post on Instagram A post shared by ColorsTV (@colorstv) Rather, the Bryant family was at Dodger Stadium vs. the Yankees, as well as a trip to Disneyland, where Vanessa spent quality time with her family. She seemed to be in good spirits and enjoying her life with her three daughters, quite evident from the photos shared on social media. But how does Vanessa Bryant keep up with such a luxurious lifestyle? Let's take a look at her net worth. Net worth of Vanessa Bryant: Vanessa met NBA legend Kobe Bryant in 1999 while working as a background dancer for a music video. The couple married in 2001 and had four daughters: Natalia (born 2003), Gianna (2006–2020), Bianka (born 2016), and Capri (born 2019). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Kobe and his daughter Gianna 'Gigi' Bryant died in a helicopter accident in 2020 while traveling to Mamba Sports Academy for a basketball contest. Since the tragic loss of her husband and their daughter Gianna, Vanessa Bryant has transformed grief into a powerful legacy. According to Celebrity Net Worth, Vanessa Bryant's estimated net worth in 2025 stands at a whopping $600 million – which is a testament to her resilience, business acumen, and unwavering commitment to philanthropy. Let's break it down: Inheritance and estate management After Kobe's passing, Vanessa inherited the majority of his estate, which included his NBA earnings, endorsement deals, and investments. Kobe's career earnings from the Los Angeles Lakers exceeded $300 million, and his endorsement portfolio featured global brands like Nike, McDonald's, Coca-Cola, and Mercedes-Benz. Additionally, Vanessa serves as the executor of the Bryant estate, overseeing investments such as the Bryant Stibel venture capital firm and stakes in companies like BodyArmor, which was sold to Coca-Cola for $5.6 billion in 2021, yielding approximately $400 million for the estate. Legal settlements and philanthropy In 2022, Vanessa was awarded $16 million in a lawsuit against Los Angeles County for invasion of privacy after photos of the crash site were improperly shared. The case was settled in 2023 for $28.85 million. Vanessa pledged to donate the entire settlement to the Mamba and Mambacita Sports Foundation, reinforcing her commitment to philanthropy. Business ventures and brand collaborations Vanessa has actively expanded her financial portfolio through strategic business ventures. She took over as President and CEO of Granity Studios, a content company founded by Kobe, which produced his books and the podcast 'The Punies'. Under her leadership, the studio continues to honor Kobe's legacy through various creative projects. In 2021, Vanessa launched the Mambacita clothing line in memory of Gianna, collaborating with the brand Dannijo. All proceeds from the line benefit the Mamba and Mambacita Sports Foundation, supporting underserved youth athletes. Philanthropic endeavors Beyond financial success, Vanessa has dedicated herself to various charitable causes. In 2007, she and Kobe founded the Kobe and Vanessa Bryant Foundation, providing scholarships to minority college students worldwide. Following their passing, Vanessa renamed the foundation to the Mamba and Mambacita Sports Foundation, focusing on empowering young athletes in need. She has also collaborated with organizations like Baby2Baby, supporting women and children in poverty. Real estate and personal assets Vanessa and her daughters reside in a luxurious mansion in California, valued at approximately $10 million. The estate includes multiple properties, which is a testament to the family's affluent lifestyle despite their past hardship. Away from films, Shilpa Shetty's sister Shamita Shetty still manages to earn crores! Find out her net worth
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Kamal Haasan and Mani Ratnam's Nayakan is not timeless, nor has it aged well; let that sink in
Ok, first things first. My intention is not to dismiss or disregard the impact and influence Nayakan (1987) has had, nor the contributions Mani Ratnam and Kamal Haasan have made to Indian cinema, both of which have inspired many to pursue filmmaking and acting. These are well-documented facts. However, the Nayakan effect on the masses has been so strong, unwavering even with time, that it almost (just almost; not necessarily exactly) feels like a bandwagon effect, where a critical evaluation of the film rarely occurs. You're free to conclude that I have a contrarian bias and move on. But Mani Ratnam himself told The Indian Express back in 1988, 'Whenever I see a film, I view it critically.' Yet, I honestly don't think Nayakan is a bad movie. In fact, it contains several commendable elements, some never-before-seen in Indian cinema. So, let's keep aside the blind devotion to the crime drama, take a step back and ask: Is Nayakan truly 'peak cinema'? Has it aged well? And where all did it falter? Now that Kamal Haasan and Mani Ratnam gear up for their first movie in 37 years, Thug Life, this is the right time. For this, let's work our way inward from the surface by analysing the film's narrative and technical aspects. Undoubtedly one of the finest movie dialogues in Tamil cinema, and one that has repeatedly found its way into pop culture, is the question posed by Sakthivel 'Velu' Nayakkar's (Kamal Haasan) grandson to him at the end, 'Neenga nallavara kettavara? (Are you a good person or a bad person?),' which shatters the old man. As Mani Ratnam once remarked, it 'puts across the moral dilemma of the man in a nutshell'. This is despite Velu's lifelong adherence to his guiding motto, 'Naalu peru saapida udhavumna, edhuvume thappille (If your actions help feed four people, then there's nothing wrong with it).' Although the movie abstains from offering a direct narrative answer to this question, its very title, Nayakan, is a significant giveaway. Yes, one could argue that it's a variation of his surname, Nayakkar (also written as Nayakar, Naikar, Nayaka, Naik, et al) — which also highlights his dominant caste background — but it literally translates to 'Hero' in English. True, its hero cannot be confined to the binaries of good or bad. However, considering the era in which the movie was made and Indian audiences' long-standing obsession with on-screen male heroes, particularly when portrayed by beloved stars, naming a film that seemingly refuses to take a clear stance on its protagonist's morality 'Hero' was an avoidable move. Unless, of course, the intention was a kind of reverse psychology. One of the biggest shortcomings of Nayakan is its overt and unabashed obsession with Kamal Haasan. In a way, Nayakan could be seen as an 'Aandavar fanboy sambavam' by Mani Ratnam, decades before the phrase even entered the Indian cinema vocabulary. Almost every element in the film seems designed to give the actor a moment to deliver an extraordinary performance, whether in the same shot/scene or the subsequent one(s). Considering this was still Mani Ratnam's early period as a filmmaker — having debuted just four years earlier, though impressively directing five films in that time — he had yet to master the art of preventing the star/actor from overshadowing the narrative itself. He revealed recently that they didn't have a bound script for Nayakan initially. By the time he made Thalapathi (1991), Mani had developed a better grip on this balance. The script for Thalapathi reflected his significant growth as a writer, weaving together diverse elements that connected meaningfully to the film's core, which was not Rajinikanth the star-actor. However, in Nayakan, Kamal is the film's soul, the air it breathes and its all-encompassing lordship. While Mani did manage to draw exceptional work from all involved, particularly Kamal, composer Ilaiyaraaja, cinematographer PC Sreeram and editors B Lenin and VT Vijayan, the film ultimately revolves around the actor and his exceptional skill set, especially his ability to emote through facial expressions and body language. Even before Velu becomes Nayakkar of Dharavi — while he is still just a boy who fled his hometown of Thoothukudi after stabbing a police officer who murdered his union-leader father — Nayakan's focus is singularly on him. After the film opens with the murder of Velu's father and his escape to Mumbai, and once the young Velu appears, the film's fixation on Kamal begins immediately. It doesn't spend time offering exposition about young Velu; instead, it jumps straight into showcasing Kamal's acting prowess. From the moment he is arrested by the police for 'acting smart' during a forced eviction in the slums, the camera and script begin to serve the actor's range more than the character as such. Mani Ratnam crafted each shot from this point onwards to highlight the actor's many strengths, even if that meant compromising the script by making everything be about Kamal and not Velu. While the film features a handful of characters here — some named, most not — they are only relevant when in relation to Velu. They lack agency or defined identities when not in his orbit. Even as the movie progresses and we see Velu becoming Dharavi's Nayakkar — inspired by real-life Mumbai mafia don Varadarajan Mudaliar — saving the people, Nayakan doesn't care much to actually show who these people are. They all end up serving merely as contributors to his evolving character arc. The savarna saviour complex here is so pronounced that only the saviour occupies the foreground, while those Mani Ratnam deems in need of saving — members of oppressed communities — are, as usual, relegated to the background, appearing only as part of crowds. Even characters who have names and belong to Dharavi, such as Hussain (MV Vasudeva Rao), the man who raised Velu and meets a tragic end, his daughter Shakila (Tara), and Velu's friend Selvam (Janagaraj), exist solely through their connection to Velu. Although Selvam is almost always by the 'hero's' side and is the only one who has the guts to call him 'Velu' to his face even after he became Nayakkar, he, too, is just a background character with no story of his own. Despite Dharavi having enough people, we also see one 'Iyer' (Delhi Ganesh) appearing out of nowhere and becoming Velu/Nayakkar's source of knowledge. Once Velu becomes 'the chosen one' (self-appointed by the way; no one voted), Mani also cleverly overlooks Velu's illegal businesses, despite the clear historical knowledge that while the dominant caste people may run the operations, it is the marginalised who will ultimately bear the consequences (and they do as well in Nayakan, time and again). 'Naalu perukku udhavumna, edhuvume paavamille (If it helps four people, there's no sin in it)' is the line he keeps repeating. But when the situation demands, he is financially secure enough to send his children, Charumati (Karthika) and Surya (Nizhalgal Ravi), to Madras for safety. What about those without names, identities or financial backing? What about the rest of Dharavi? Nayakan simply doesn't care. Though he is positioned as a saviour, the 'celebration' of which happens in the scene where he refuses to sleep with the underage sex worker Neela (Saranya Ponvannan) after learning she has an exam the next day and wants to study, is he truly one even for his dear ones? Despite knowing her aspirations, Velu soon chains her with a thaali (mangalsutra) without her consent. She lived the rest of her life as a housewife before ultimately being killed by her husband's enemies. Even later, when Charumati questions his system of running a parallel government, Nayakkar insists that he can't stop since he never chose this life of his own free will. 'Are we doing all this because we actually want to? We have no other option, dear,' he tells her. But didn't he? Despite wielding enormous influence, political connections and wealth, we never see him attempting to uplift the broader living conditions of Dharavi's marginalised population, which would have allowed him as well to slowly give up everything. 'I'll buy five ambulances for Dharavi. They won't ply for the rich, only for the poor,' he says at one point. But even after this, we never see Nayakkar stepping back to reflect on or challenge the deeper social stigma against the people of Dharavi. Instead, he grows wealthier by the day, while the marginalised remain his loyal foot soldiers, ever ready to lay down their lives for his protection (they literally do this as well towards the end). So, is there really any doubt left about whether he's a good person or a bad one? While Nayakan presents one of its central themes, 'he who lives by the sword shall perish by the sword', through Velu's gradual downfall, including the loss of his son Surya as well following his wife's murder, Charumati leaving him, and his eventual death on the street after being shot by Inspector Kelkar's son Ajit (Tinnu Anand) whom Velu had been raising ever since he killed Kelkar himself, another question arises: Was the overt humanisation of a man involved in numerous illegal activities really necessary? Although Francis Ford Coppola's The Godfather (1972), based on Mario Puzo's novel and an inspiration for Nayakan, also delved into the inner world of mafia bosses, particularly their interpersonal relationships, it did not overtly humanise them. Their moral ambiguity remained intact and unsoftened. However, in Nayakan, partly because the role was played by Kamal Haasan and partly due to the Indian audience's penchant for melodrama and hero worship, Mani Ratnam un/knowingly infused the character with such a level of drama and cues to make the audience subconsciously perceive Nayakkar as the hero. Circling back to the intro, I wouldn't call Nayakan 'peak cinema'. Pandering to a largely savarna audience, who made up the lion's share of the movie-going public at the time since watching new releases regularly was a luxury only the privileged could afford, and to 'Aandavar' fans does not inherently make a film great. At the same time, completely disregarding the masses among whom the story is set is nothing short of ignorance. And no, the film hasn't aged particularly well. That said, Nayakan is undoubtedly a good film, where the blending of words and visuals happens organically and beautifully, with Ilaiyaraaja's music, as always, elevating the entire experience. One of the strongest aspects of Mani Ratnam's script is how efficiently it omits the unnecessary and includes only what is needed to deliver the filmmaker's vision; unlike the current trend of overwriting and over-filming and mindlessly splitting a movie into multiple parts. Kamal Haasan's performance is undoubtedly exceptional, so much so that it has helped mask many of the film's flaws over the years, leading audiences to blindly believe that Nayakan is 'the one'. He won his second National Film Award for Best Actor for his performance here. Nonetheless, Nayakan proves that just because a movie is good, it doesn't mean it's great or free of flaws. And it's important to analyse cinema critically — to call a spade a spade — and point out its shortcomings and misrepresentations. After all… Cinema cannot exist in a vacuum; it's all about the discussions that follow. In the Cinema Anatomy column, we delve into the diverse layers and dimensions of films, aiming to uncover deeper meanings and foster continuous discourses. Anandu Suresh is a Senior sub-editor at Indian Express Online. He specialises in Malayalam cinema, but doesn't limit himself to it and explores various aspects of the art form. He also pens a column titled Cinema Anatomy, where he delves extensively into the diverse layers and dimensions of cinema, aiming to uncover deeper meanings and foster continuous discourse. Anandu previously worked with The New Indian Express' news desk in Hyderabad, Telangana. You can follow him on Twitter @anandu_suresh_ and write (or send movie recommendations) to him at ... Read More
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bhool Chuk Maaf box office collection day 10: Rajkummar Rao, Wamiqa Gabbi film inches closer to Rs 60 crore; faces Housefull 5, Thug Life challenge ahead
Debutant director Karan Sharma's romantic comedy Bhool Chuk Maaf, starring Rajkummar Rao and Wamiqa Gabbi, crossed the Rs 50 crore mark over its second weekend. In the process, it's come close to breaching the Rs 60 crore mark. The movie is backed by Dinesh Vijan's Maddock Films. On its second Sunday, Bhool Chuk Maaf collected Rs 6.25 crore, an improvement on its Saturday earnings of Rs 5.25 crore, which registered a further spike from its Friday collection of Rs 3.25 crore. Its earnings on the second Sunday were the highest since its collection on its first Sunday (Rs 11.5 crore). As per Sacnilk, the current domestic box office collection of Bhool Chuk Maaf stands at Rs 58.85 crore. When it crossed the Rs 50 crore mark over this past weekend, it already surpassed other films of this year, like John Abraham's The Diplomat (Rs 40.73 crore), the Hindi dubbed version of Ram Charan-starrer Game Changer (Rs 37.47 crore), the re-release earnings of Sanam Teri Kasam (Rs 35.55 crore), and Shahid Kapoor-starrer Deva (Rs 33.97 crore). On Sunday, Bhool Chuk Maaf had the maximum occupancy in the evening shows (31.65%), followed by the afternoon shows (27.80%), the night shows (18.95%), and the morning shows (9.02%). It scored the maximum occupancy in Chennai (80.67%), followed by Chandigarh (26.75%), Jaipur, Hyderabad, and Bengaluru (26.25%). Bhool Chuk Maaf's next target is a tall one — Gopichand Malineni's action film Jaat, starring Sunny Deol, which earned Rs 90.34 crore at the domestic box office. However, given its current trajectory, it's highly unlikely the film will get even close. It only has four weekdays before its exceptionally early digital premiere on Prime Video India this Friday on June 6. Also, other tentpole films like Akshay Kumar-starrer whodunit comedy Housefull 5 and the Hindi dubbed version of Kamal Haasan and Mani Ratnam's crime thriller Thug Life will hit cinemas on June 6 and June 5 respectively. These would further thwart Bhool Chuk Maaf's chances of growth at the box office. Last month, leading multiplex chain PVR INOX had moved the court challenging Maddock Films' decision to release Bhool Chuk Maaf on OTT instead of theatres due to the heightened national security concerns amid the India-Pakistan conflict. PVR Inox alleged a breach of contract by Maddock Films. As per the agreement dated May 6, the film was to release in cinemas across India on May 9 and would not be released on OTT or any other platform for a period of eight weeks thereafter. But the producers terminated the agreement just a day before the release and announced an OTT release on May 16. Also Read — Bhool Chuk Maaf movie review: Rajkummar Rao, Wamiqa Gabbi film feels like poor man's Brahmastra Later, it was agreed that Bhool Chuk Maaf will first release in cinemas on May 23. As a one-off case, it'll then release on Prime Video India just two weeks later on June 6. The usual window between theatrical and streaming release is eight weeks.
