
All lanes of the southbound 405 Freeway in Brentwood blocked for deadly crash
All lanes of the southbound 405 Freeway in Brentwood are blocked on Monday morning after a deadly crash.
The California Highway Patrol issued a Sig Alert for all southbound lanes at Moraga Drive until further notice. All northbound lanes remain open.
The CHP received a call at 1:58 a.m. for a multi-vehicle crash involving an LAPD patrol vehicle. The CHP reports that three people were involved in the crash. One person was pronounced dead at the scene and two others, including an LAPD officer, were taken to the hospital.
The cause of the crash is under investigation.
Drivers are urged to use alternate routes and travel with caution.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
21 minutes ago
- New York Times
Supreme Court to Hear Rastafarian Prisoner's Suit Over Shaved Dreadlocks
The Supreme Court said on Monday that it would decide whether a Rastafarian man may sue prison guards in Louisiana who shaved off his dreadlocks in seeming violation of an appeals court's ruling about how the state must treat members of his faith. The case concerns Damon Landor, whose faith requires him to let his hair grow long. When he started a five-month prison term for drug possession in Louisiana in 2020, his dreadlocks fell nearly to his knees. Mr. Landor was wary of the state's prison system, according to a lawsuit he later filed, and he kept a copy of a 2017 judicial decision with him. That ruling, from a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, said that Rastafarian inmates in Louisiana must be allowed to keep their dreadlocks under a 2000 federal law protecting prisoners' religious freedom. The first four months of Mr. Landor's incarceration were uneventful. Then he was transferred to the Raymond Laborde Correctional Center in Cottonport, La. According to his lawsuit, he presented a copy of the 2017 decision to a guard, who threw it in the trash. After consulting the warden, two guards handcuffed Mr. Landor to a chair, held him down and shaved his head to the scalp. 'When I was strapped down and shaved, it felt like I was raped,' Mr. Landor said in a statement last year. 'And the guards, they just didn't care. They will treat you any kind of way. They knew better than to cut my hair, but they did it anyway.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Associated Press
27 minutes ago
- Associated Press
New Jersey Gun Crime Lawyer Adam M. Lustberg Discusses Firearm Regulatory Violations
New Jersey gun crime lawyer Adam M. Lustberg ( ) provides important insights into NJ 2C:39-10, a statute that governs violations of the regulatory provisions relating to firearms in the state. In a recent blog post published by Lustberg Law Offices, LLC, Lustberg details how this section of New Jersey's criminal code targets actions that may not involve direct firearm misuse but still carry serious legal consequences. These include providing false information on firearm applications, failing to comply with licensing rules, and improperly transferring weapons. The New Jersey gun crime lawyer explains that N.J.S.A. 2C:39-10 is often informally called the 'falsification' statute. It emphasizes administrative compliance over misuse and serves as a framework to maintain integrity within the state's gun control system. Lustberg outlines that offenses under this law can range from third- and fourth-degree crimes to disorderly persons offenses, all of which carry potential prison time, hefty fines, and lasting repercussions. As a New Jersey gun crime lawyer, Adam M. Lustberg makes it clear that the law applies to both individuals and firearm dealers. It penalizes not just the false statements on applications but also illegal transfers to underage individuals, failures in mandatory reporting, and improper conduct by licensed dealers. 'This law is not just about criminal misuse of firearms—it's about maintaining transparency and accountability in every aspect of gun ownership and regulation,' Lustberg notes. One key area discussed is subsection (c), which focuses on providing false details on applications for firearm permits or ID cards. This is considered a third-degree crime and is punishable by up to five years in prison and fines reaching $15,000. Another critical section includes subsections (e) and (f), which address the illegal transfer of firearms to individuals under 18 or handguns to those under 21. These violations can escalate to second-degree felonies with mandatory minimum prison sentences. Lustberg also highlights subsection (a), which concerns firearm dealers and their responsibility to follow licensing and record-keeping rules. Violations here may result in fourth-degree criminal charges or disorderly persons offenses, depending on the specific breach. Selling a firearm without a proper license or failing to maintain transaction logs are examples cited that could attract penalties ranging from six months to 18 months in prison and fines up to $10,000. In the article, Lustberg provides further context by noting that 2C:39-10 works in tandem with other firearm laws. For instance, providing false information may also lead to obstruction charges under N.J.S.A. 2C:29-1, and fraudulent firearm acquisition can escalate to unlawful possession under N.J.S.A. 2C:39-5. The article also covers available defenses. Lustberg explains that these cases often revolve around regulatory breaches, meaning courts may weigh mitigating circumstances like lack of intent or honest mistakes. For instance, omitting a past conviction unintentionally or misunderstanding a question on an application form could serve as a basis to challenge the charge. 'Demonstrating a lack of intent can lead to reduced charges or dismissal,' he explains. Other legal defenses discussed include challenging the sufficiency of evidence, invoking statutory exceptions such as supervised youth hunting or target shooting, and raising procedural errors committed by law enforcement during investigation. The possibility of Pre-Trial Intervention (PTI) is also raised, particularly for first-time offenders, as a way to avoid a criminal record if the program is successfully completed. Lustberg underscores the seriousness of facing a charge under 2C:39-10, as even procedural missteps can lead to a permanent criminal record and loss of firearm rights. These penalties can have a profound impact on a person's ability to find employment or pass background checks. Still, he emphasizes that understanding the statute and responding quickly can help defendants find viable legal paths forward. NJ 2C:39-10 represents a detailed and far-reaching part of New Jersey's firearm laws, with penalties targeting those who fail to comply with both minor and significant regulatory mandates. Adam M. Lustberg makes it clear that anyone facing such charges must approach the situation with care and seek guidance grounded in state firearm law. Violations of NJ 2C:39-10 are more than technical errors, they are treated as serious breaches of public safety. Anyone charged under this statute should understand their legal standing and take immediate steps to protect their rights and future opportunities. Lustberg Law Offices, LLC provides legal support to individuals dealing with NJ 2C:39-10 charges. The team reviews the facts, identifies defenses, and offers representation to minimize the consequences. Legal options may include negotiations, PTI programs, or building a defense around lack of intent or improper procedure by authorities. About Lustberg Law Offices, LLC: Lustberg Law Offices, LLC, led by Adam M. Lustberg, represents clients across New Jersey in criminal matters, including those involving firearm regulations. The firm handles a wide range of charges with a focus on providing accurate information and legal representation to those navigating the criminal justice system. Embeds: Youtube Video: GMB: Email and website Email: [email protected] Website: Media Contact Company Name: Lustberg Law Offices, LLC Contact Person: Adam M. Lustberg Email: Send Email Phone: (201) 880-5311 Address:One University Plaza Dr Suite 212 City: Hackensack State: New Jersey 07601 Country: United States Website: Press Release Distributed by To view the original version on ABNewswire visit: New Jersey Gun Crime Lawyer Adam M. Lustberg Discusses Firearm Regulatory Violations

Associated Press
27 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Contact Levi & Korsinsky by July 1, 2025 Deadline to Join Class Action Against Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI)
NEW YORK - June 23, 2025 ( NEWMEDIAWIRE ) - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Civitas Resources, Inc. ('Civitas Resources' or the 'Company') (NYSE: CIVI) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Civitas Resources investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between February 27, 2024 and February 24, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: CIVI investors may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500. CASE DETAILS: (i) Civitas was highly likely to significantly reduce its oil production in 2025 as a result of, inter alia, declines following the production peak at the DJ Basin in the fourth quarter of 2024 and a low TIL count at the end of 2024; (ii) increasing its oil production would require the Company to acquire additional acreage and development locations, thereby incurring significant debt and causing the Company to sell corporate assets to offset its acquisition costs; (iii) the Company's financial condition would require it to implement disruptive cost reduction measures including a significant workforce reduction; (iv) accordingly, Civitas's business and/or financial prospects, as well as its operational capabilities, were overstated; and (v) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. WHAT'S NEXT? If you suffered a loss in Civitas Resources during the relevant time frame, you have until July 1, 2025 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To learn more about this case, subscribe to the Bulls & Betrayals podcast, which features a dedicated episode unpacking the allegations against Civitas Resources. Listen now and find out if you are eligible to join the lawsuit. NO COST TO YOU: If you are a class member, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out-of-pocket costs or fees. There is no cost or obligation to participate. WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, the team at Levi & Korsinsky has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. Our firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. CONTACT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Joseph E. Levi, Esq. Ed Korsinsky, Esq. 33 Whitehall Street, 17th Floor New York, NY 10004 [email protected] Tel: (212) 363-7500 Fax: (212) 363-7171