
A century later: A renewed open letter against the return of fascism
On May 1, 1925, with Mussolini already in power, a group of Italian intellectuals publicly denounced Mussolini's fascist regime in an open letter.
The signatories – scientists, philosophers, writers, and artists – took a stand in support of the essential tenets of a free society: the rule of law, personal liberty, and independent thinking, culture, art, and science. Their open defiance to the brutal imposition of the fascist ideology – at great personal risk – proved that opposition was not only possible, but necessary.
Today, a hundred years later, the threat of fascism is back – and so we must summon that courage and defy it again.
Fascism emerged in Italy a century ago, marking the advent of modern dictatorship. Within a few years, it spread across Europe and the world, taking different names but maintaining similar forms. Wherever it seized power, it undermined the separation of powers in the service of autocracy, silenced opposition through violence, took control of the press, halted the advancement of women's rights, and crushed workers' struggles for economic justice.
Inevitably, it permeated and distorted all institutions devoted to scientific, academic, and cultural activities. Its cult of death exalted imperial aggression and genocidal racism, triggering the Second World War, the Holocaust, the death of tens of millions of people, and crimes against humanity.
At the same time, the resistance to fascism and the many other fascist ideologies became a fertile ground for imagining alternative ways of organising societies and international relations. The world that emerged from the Second World War – with the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the theoretical foundations of the European Union, and the legal arguments against colonialism – remained marked by deep inequalities.
Yet, it represented a decisive attempt to establish an international legal order: an aspiration toward global democracy and peace, grounded in the protection of universal human rights, including not only civil and political, but also economic, social, and cultural rights.
Fascism never vanished, but for a time it was held at bay. However, in the past two decades we have witnessed a renewed wave of far-right movements, often bearing unmistakably fascist traits: attacks on democratic norms and institutions, a reinvigorated nationalism laced with racist rhetoric, authoritarian impulses, and systematic assaults on the rights of those who do not fit a manufactured traditional authority, rooted in religious, sexual and gender normativity.
These movements have re-emerged across the globe, including in long-standing democracies, where widespread dissatisfaction with political failure to address mounting inequalities and social exclusion has once again been exploited by new authoritarian figures.
True to the old fascist script, under the guise of an unlimited popular mandate, these figures undermine national and international rule of law, targeting the independence of the judiciary, the press, institutions of culture, higher education, and science; even attempting to destroy essential data and scientific information. They fabricate 'alternative facts' and invent 'enemies within'; they weaponise security concerns to entrench their authority and that of the ultra-wealthy 1%, offering privileges in exchange for loyalty.
This process is now accelerating, as dissent is increasingly suppressed through arbitrary detentions, threats of violence, deportations and an unrelenting campaign of disinformation and propaganda, operated with the support of traditional and social media barons – some merely complacent, others openly techno-fascist enthusiasts.
Democracies are not flawless: they are vulnerable to misinformation and they are not yet sufficiently inclusive. However, democracies by their nature provide fertile ground for intellectual and cultural progress and therefore always have the potential to improve. In democratic societies, human rights and freedoms can expand, the arts flourish, scientific discoveries thrive, and knowledge grow. They grant the freedom to challenge ideas and question power structures, propose new theories even when culturally uncomfortable, which is essential to human advancement.
Democratic institutions offer the best framework for addressing social injustices, and the best hope to fulfil the post-war promises of the rights to work, education, health, social security, participation in cultural and scientific life, and the collective right of peoples to development, self-determination and peace. Without this, humanity faces stagnation, growing inequality, injustice and catastrophe, not least from the existential threat caused by the climate emergency that the new fascist wave negates.
In our hyper-connected world, democracy cannot exist in isolation. As national democracies require strong institutions, international cooperation relies on the effective implementation of democratic principles and multilateralism to regulate relations between nations, and on multi-stakeholder processes to engage a healthy society.
The rule of law must extend beyond borders, ensuring that international treaties, human rights conventions, and peace agreements are respected. While existing global governance and international institutions require improvement, their erosion in favor of a world governed by raw power, transactional logic and military might is a regression to an era of colonialism, suffering and destruction.
As in 1925, we scientists, philosophers, writers, artists and citizens of the world, have a responsibility to denounce and resist the resurgence of fascism in all its forms. We call on all those who value democracy to act:
Defend democratic, cultural and educational institutions. Call out abuses of democratic principles and human rights. Refuse preemptive compliance.
Join collective actions, locally and internationally. Boycott and strike when possible. Make resistance impossible to ignore and costly to repress.
Uphold facts and evidence. Foster critical thinking and engage with your communities on these grounds.
This is an ongoing struggle. Let our voices, our work, and our principles be a bulwark against authoritarianism. Let this message be a renewed declaration of defiance.
Signatories include
Richard J Roberts, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (1993)
Leland Hartwell, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2001)
Paul Nurse, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2001)
Barry James Marshall, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2005)
Craig C Mello, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2006)
Mario R Capecchi, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2007)
Jack W Szostak, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2009)
Edvard I Moser, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2014)
May-Britt Moser, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2014)
Peter J Ratcliffe, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2019)
Charles Rice, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2020)
Harvey James Alter, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2020)
Victor Ambros, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2024)
Gary Ruvkun, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2024)
Wolfgang Ketterle, Nobel Prize in Physics (2001)
Anthony James Leggett, Nobel Prize in Physics (2003)
John C Mather, Nobel Prize in Physics (2006)
Brian P Schmidt, Nobel Prize in Physics (2011)
François Englert, Nobel Prize in Physics (2013)
Michel Mayor, Nobel Prize in Physics (2019)
Takaaki Kajita, Nobel Prize in Physics (2015)
Giorgio Parisi, Nobel Prize in Physics (2021)
Pierre Agostini, Nobel Prize in Physics (2023)
Jean-Pierre Sauvage, Nobel Prize in Chemistry (2016)
Joachim Frank, Nobel Prize in Chemistry (2017)
Eric Maskin, Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences (2007)
Roger B Myerson, Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences (2007)
Alvin E Roth, Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences (2012)
Lars Peter Hansen, Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences (2013)
Oliver Hart, Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences (2016)
Daron Acemoglu, Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences (2024)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Cyprus sends a message to Turkey
By John Solomou Nicosia [Cyprus], June 15 (ANI): Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the eastern Mediterranean island of Cyprus on Sunday, the first by an Indian Prime Minister in 23 years, is being viewed in Nicosia as a diplomatic signal to Turkey, which has occupied one-third of the island since 1974 and had backed Pakistan during Operation Sindoor last month. PM Modi is visiting Cyprus at the invitation of President Nicos Christodoulides and will be accompanied by a large delegation of around 100 officials. Despite historical ties between the two countries, visits by Indian Prime Ministers have been rare. Only two such visits to Cyprus have taken place in the past 40 years, by Indira Gandhi in 1982 and Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 2002. His stop in Cyprus is part of a three-nation tour that includes Canada for the G-7 Summit and the first-ever visit to Croatia by an Indian Prime Minister. Diplomatic sources say the visit is aimed at sending a message to Ankara, which has angered New Delhi with its support to Pakistan during the recent conflict and statements on Kashmir. India has expressed concerns over Turkey's position and actions, which led to a public backlash and boycott of Turkish goods in India. Cyprus, in contrast, has backed India on the issue of terrorism. After the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Cyprus condemned the act and said it would raise the issue of cross-border terrorism by Pakistan at the European Union level. Cyprus forms part of the energy corridor that will connect India with Europe and strengthen East-West connectivity through the India-Middle East-Europe Corridor (IMEC). President Christodoulides referenced this during his early May trip to Israel. IMEC, an international infrastructure initiative aimed at creating a connectivity corridor between India, the Middle East and Europe, represents a US-led initiative. PM Modi's visit is seen as quite significant from political and commercial perspectives. The visit will serve as a timely revival of high-level contacts, as Cyprus is set to assume the European Union Council Presidency in the first half of 2026. India has consistently supported a solution to the Cyprus problem according to the UN Security Council resolutions and international law, while Turkey seeks the recognition of the so-called Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which it has illegally established on the northern part of the island, occupied by the Turkish Army. For its part, Cyprus is a fervent supporter of India's campaign for a permanent seat at the Security Council as well as its membership of the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the International Atomic Energy Agency. PM Modi's visit to Cyprus comes at a time when economic and business relations between Cyprus and India are undergoing a period of continuous upgrading and rapid development, in a way that is beneficial for the two state entities, but also for their business communities, as new investment opportunities and prospects are created on both sides. One of the biggest banks in Cyprus, Eurobank, has recently announced that it is opening a representative office in Mumbai to help make Cyprus a gateway for Indian businesses entering the European Union and promote the interconnection of capital and businesses between Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia. It should be noted that PM Modi and President Christodoulides will visit the southern port of Limassol on Sunday. There, they will attend a round-table discussion with businessmen from both sides aimed at further boosting trade relations and cooperation between Indian and Cypriot businesses. On Monday, PM Modi will be officially welcomed at the Presidential Palace and will then have a private meeting with President Christodoulides, who will award him the Grand Cross of the Order of Makarios III - the highest honour in the Republic of Cyprus. This will be followed by extensive talks between the delegations of the two countries, after which the two leaders will make statements to the media. During the talks, the two delegations will discuss, among other things, issues relating to bilateral relations and ways to further strengthen them, particularly in the areas of economy, trade, infrastructure and investment, EU-India relations, and issues relating to the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). The situation in the Middle East and South Asia, and the latest developments in Cyprus, will also be discussed. (ANI)


India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Historic for several reasons": Indian envoy on PM Modi's visit to Cyprus
Nicosia [Cyprus], June 15 (ANI): Reflecting upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Cyprus, an island country in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, Manish, High Commissioner of India to Cyprus said that the upcoming visit, the first by an Indian Prime Minister in over two decades, and first by PM Modi is expected to be a historic milestone in the countries' friendship. Speaking to ANI, the Indian envoy said that the visit is expected to give a boost to India-Cyprus relations, with potential agreements in trade, technology, and investment. The two countries will discuss ways to deepen their strategic partnership, including cooperation in global and regional forums. 'The visit is going to be a historic visit for several reasons. It is after over two decades that a Prime Minister from our country is coming, and this would be the first visit of the Prime Minister (Modi) to this country... I think the most significant outcomes will be in trade, technology, tourism and investment. We will also discuss defence and security cooperation, business and people-to-people contact as well as global and regional discussions...,' he said. PM Modi will undertake a three-nation tour starting June 15. During which he will take part in the G7 Summit in Canada, and will also visit Cyprus and Croatia. India and Cyprus aim to leverage each other's strengths, with Cyprus serving as a gateway to the European Union. Talking about PM Modi's visit to Cyprus, Manish said that he is trying to push for the agenda of India-Cyprus Economic Corridor to realise the goal of Viksit Bharat by 2047. He said, 'I am trying to push the economic agenda between the India-Cyprus Economic Corridor. We have a policy to become a 'developed India' by 2047, and they have 'Vision 2035', so there is a synergy there, so we have to see how we can use each other's strengths and work together to achieve them. I think Cyprus' advantage is that it can serve as a gateway to the European Union as well as the larger region around it.' He further said that Cyprus also realises the necessity to work with India, the fastest growing economy of the world, and they are reaching out to India to build economic relations. 'Cyprus also understands that it has to work with India and it is quite evident that they are reaching out to India to build better relations, to focus more on economic issues, because they know that India is the fastest growing economy in the world. And similarly, if you see, Cyprus is the fastest growing economy in the European Union and they have their own advantages. We have our own strengths and advantages, so we have to work on every aspect of economic engageme,' he said. The two nations are exploring opportunities for economic collaboration, particularly in the context of the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA). Cyprus, which will assume the EU presidency in January 2026, has expressed support for India's bid for a permanent UN Security Council seat. The India-EU FTA is expected to be finalized by the end of 2025, with Cyprus playing a crucial role in its implementation. 'Cyprus has been a great friend of India in the India-EU context and Cyprus will take over the presidency of the EU from 1st January work is going on in concluding the India-EU is information that we are in the process of finalising this document by the end of the year and it gets implemented during the Cyprus presidency...,' said the Indian envoy. Manish, High Commissioner of India to Cyprus said that the country's support to India for a permanent seat in the UN Security Council is a stated position and there is support for India to fight against terrorism. He said, 'This is a stated position. In the past visits and joint statements, this has been emphasised and reiterated. Their support for us to fight against international terrorism or cross-border only the leadership here but people in general are very excited that PM Modi is coming here because he is a very popular leader PM Modi coming here, new dimensions of friendship will be achieved.' The Indian diaspora in Cyprus, numbering around 11,500, has a significant presence in sectors like shipping and IT. They are well-respected, and Indian culture, including yoga, is popular in the country. Manish said, 'Indians have been coming to this small island country for several years now. They work in all sectors, but the primary ones are the shipping and IT sectors... Around 11,500 Indians live and work here... Everywhere, the Indian diaspora is well respected. There is a great respect for India and Indians and the Indian culture is quite popular here.' He also further talked about the popularity of Yoga there and that they are planning a Yoga outreach session on the International Day of Yoga on June 21. 'Yoga is very popular here and we will be celebrating International Day of Yoga. We are planning a huge outreach and Yoga visit of PM Modi will give strength and impetus to our relations,' he said. (ANI)


India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Why Iran, Israel are trading strikes: Middle East conflict explained
In a major escalation against archrival Iran, Israel launched a wave of strikes against Tehran's military and major critical establishments early on Friday, including its nuclear facilities and ballistic missile factories. Following that, Iran targeted key Israeli cities on Saturday, prompting the Jewish state to launch a barrage of missiles on Israel on Sunday. At least 60 people were killed in head of the UN nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, confirmed to the UNSC that Israel's airstrikes have destroyed Iran's above-ground pilot enrichment facility at the Natanz nuclear nuclear facility in Natanz houses the country's main uranium enrichment site, which has been a key target for Israel for years. While Iran insists its nuclear program is for civilian purposes, Israel and its ally, the United States, have long opposed it, citing concerns that Iran is close to enriching uranium to weapons-grade exchange of missiles between Iran and Israel comes even as the US and Shia nation were engaged in talks over Tehran's nuclear program. These developments have pushed West Asia into a dangerous cycle of violence, and a potential regional war. Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said its Operation Rising Lion was aimed at dismantling Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile ago, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, a targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival. This operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat," Netanyahu said on Friday, stressing that Iran's nuclear and ballistic ambitions posed an "existential danger" to the Jewish INVOKES HOLOCAUST IN JUSTIFYING STRIKE ON IRANThe Israeli PM accused Iran of producing "enough highly-enriched uranium for nine nuclear bombs" and taking unprecedented steps toward weaponisation. Invoking the Holocaust of the 1930s-40s, Netanyahu said the operation was a pre-emptive measure."Eighty years ago, the Jewish people were the victims of a Holocaust perpetrated by the Nazi regime. Today, the Jewish state refuses to be a victim of a nuclear holocaust perpetrated by the Iranian regime," he asserted that history had taught Israel to act before danger fully materialises, declaring, "Never again is now".Analysts believe that Netanyahu has finally acted on his long-standing warnings against Iran — that many within the Iranian leadership had dismissed as rhetorical posturing. After nearly twenty years of sounding the alarm and pressing the international community to intervene, Netanyahu has now chosen to take matters into his own hands, going into a war with Iran.A LOOK AT IRAN-ISRAEL CONFLICTadvertisementIt is important to note that throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Iran, as part of its anti-Israel strategy, waged proxy wars against Israel through non-state militant groups such as Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and the between the two countries primarily deteriorated after Iran's former supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, adopted an explicitly anti-Zionist stance following the 1979 Iranian Revolution, branding Israel an illegitimate occupier and advocating for its the formation of Israel in 1948, its Arab neighbours, including Egypt, Jordan, and Syria, opposed its existence and launched multiple wars to challenge its legitimacy. While in recent years many Arab states have softened their stance and even normalised ties with Israel, Iran remains staunchly opposed to its existence and continues to support anti-Israel the years, Israel has responded to these threats by carrying out targeted assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists and top military commanders, a pattern it followed again in Friday's the decades, Israel also conducted repeated military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and numerous military targets in Syria, with the key objective of preventing Iran from re-establishing its strategic foothold in the this is the first time that Israel has launched an indefinite military offensive against Iran with an official declaration by the prime to veteran journalist Crispian Balmer, Netanyahu's decision to launch a unilateral strike on Iran may be driven by a desire to cement his place in history, a subject he is known to have a keen interest Netanyahu concluded his Friday address by saying, "Generations from now, history will record that our generation stood its ground, acted in time, and secured our common future. May God bless Israel. May God bless the forces of civilisation everywhere."NETANYAHU THANKS TRUMP; US PREZ SAYS 'I KNEW ABOUT ATTACKS'On Friday, Netanyahu also thanked US President Donald Trump for his leadership in confronting Iran's nuclear weapons program. Incidentally, speaking to reporters on Thursday, Trump had warned that there was a "chance of massive conflict" in West Asia, confirming that an Israeli attack on Iran is "possible".Just a day prior to the strikes on Iran, the US State Department and Department of Defence reportedly began coordinating the departure of non-essential personnel from various sites across West after Israeli strikes, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio released a statement saying Israel had taken "unilateral action" against Iran, warning Tehran to not retaliate against the US. However, a few hours later, speaking to Fox News, Trump said he was aware of the Israeli plan to attack Iran beforehand, but US was not involved in the to Fox News, Trump also said, "Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, and we are hoping to get back to the negotiating table. We will see..."Later, two American officials told news agency Reuters that the US military helped shoot down Iranian missiles headed for ROLE IN IRAN-ISRAEL CONFLICTThe United States has consistently opposed Iran's nuclear program, expressing concerns over Tehran's potential to develop weapons-grade uranium. In the Iran-Israel conflict, the US has largely backed Israel diplomatically and militarily, while also engaging Iran in negotiations to curb its nuclear US, like Israel, also views Iran's nuclear ambitions as a major threat to regional and global at the same time, it is also a key player in diplomacy with Iran. The US was a founding signatory of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) under former president Barack Obama, an agreement aimed at curbing Iran's uranium enrichment in exchange for lifting tensions have prevailed since Washington's unilateral exit from the JCPOA in 2018 under the first Trump administration, followed by the reinstatement of stringent sanctions on sanctions include targeting Iran's oil exports, which is its main source of revenue, prohibitions on global financial systems, and restrictions on foreign aid over its designated status as a "State Sponsor of Terrorism", among retaliation, Iran has reportedly scaled back its commitments under the agreement, resuming uranium enrichment at levels beyond those permitted by the when Joe Biden came to power in 2021, he again pursued re-engagement with Iran, though he kept the sanctions in RESUMED TALKS UNDER TRUMPThree months after Trump came to power again, he made a surprise announcement that the US and Iran were poised to begin direct talks on Tehran's nuclear program, and senior officials met in Oman in April. A month later, Iranian and US negotiators again met in Rome. However, with the ongoing deadlock over uranium enrichment on Iranian soil, the sixth round of negotiations between the two countries has been called has insisted it is not pursuing nuclear weapons. It says its nuclear energy programme is only for peaceful purposes, and maintains that it has the sovereign right to enrich uranium both Israel and the US do not buy this reason, and have consistently maintained that Iran must relinquish its enrichment capabilities to prevent the potential weaponisation of its nuclear with several Iranian hardliners dead in the Israeli strikes, including Iran's military chief Mohammad Bagheri and other top commanders, such as Major General Hossein Salami, commander-in-chief of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Trump has issued a stern warning to Tehran to "just do it (agree to the deal)". Trump warned that US makes the most lethal weapons in the world and several of them are with after Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has pledged a "bitter and painful" retaliation against Israel, the situation in West Asia remains Watch