Taliban says detained British couple receiving medical care
KABUL : An elderly British couple detained for months in Afghanistan are receiving medical care, the Taliban government's top diplomat said today, after UN experts warned they were at risk of dying.
Peter and Barbie Reynolds, 80-years-old and 75-years-old, had lived in Afghanistan for 18 years when they were arrested in February along with Chinese-American friend Faye Hall, who has since been released, and an Afghan translator.
'All their human rights are being respected,' Afghan foreign minister Amir Khan Muttaqi told a news conference in the capital Kabul.
'They are being provided with medical care. They are in occasional contact with their families.'
Muttaqi said 'efforts are underway to secure their release, but the process is not complete', echoing similar comments by the government in April.
Independent United Nations experts warned on Monday of the 'rapid deterioration' of their physical and mental health, stating that they 'risk irreparable harm or even death'.
The couple, against whom no charges have been brought, were held 'in a high-security facility for several months, then in underground cells, without daylight, before being transferred last week' to the intelligence services in Kabul, according to the UN.
The experts said Peter Reynolds requires heart medication following a stroke in 2023.
Since his detention, he has suffered two eye infections and intermittent tremors in his head and left arm.
His wife, who is anaemic, is 'weak and fragile' and has reported numbness in her feet, the experts said.
The couple, who married in Kabul in 1970, had been running education programmes in Afghanistan and held Afghan passports.
Taliban officials have refused to detail the reasons for their arrest but a source familiar with the case told AFP in April that the couple were in possession of several non-Islamic books.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
15 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Court to rule on Najib's house arrest judicial review appeal on August 13
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 7 — The Federal Court will decide on August 13 whether the attorney general (AG) can challenge the leave granted to Datuk Seri Najib Razak to seek judicial review over a royal decree for his house arrest. Senior federal counsel Shamsul Bolhassan confirmed the ruling date yesterday, Free Malaysia Today reported. A three-judge panel chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Hashim previously postponed its decision on July 9 after hearing arguments from Shamsul and Najib's lawyer, Tan Sri Shafee Abdullah. Justices Datuk Zabariah Yusof and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah also sat on the panel during the hearing. The AG is seeking to overturn a 2-1 Court of Appeal decision delivered on January 6 that allowed Najib to introduce new evidence and granted him leave to initiate a judicial review. Najib is asking the government to implement an addendum order allegedly issued on January 29, 2024, by the former Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah, which would allow him to serve his remaining jail sentence under house arrest. He reportedly became aware of the order shortly after the Federal Territories Pardons Board announced in early February last year that his jail sentence for the SRC International case had been halved and his fine reduced from RM210 million to RM50 million. Najib filed the judicial review leave application in April last year, supported by affidavits from Umno president Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Pahang Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail, who said they had seen the order on Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Aziz's phone. The High Court dismissed the application in July 2023, but Najib appealed, and his son Nizar later submitted an affidavit the claimed Comptroller of the Pahang royal household Datuk Ahmad Khirrizal Ab Rahman had authenticated. On July 2, AG Tan Sri Dusuki Mokhtar acknowledged the existence of the addendum but questioned its authenticity and legal standing, prompting Shafee to argue that the case could have proceeded to the High Court had the AG made that concession earlier.
Malay Mail
15 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Singapore court reserves judgment on Malaysian death-row inmate Pannir Selvam's post-appeal application
SINGAPORE, Aug 7 — Malaysian death-row inmate Pannir Selvam Pranthaman gained reprieve when the Singapore Court of Appeal reserved its judgment, following the second hearing on his post-appeal application held on Wednesday. The Singapore Ministry of Home Affairs' (MHA) policy on the scheduling of executions came under scrutiny during the proceedings, as Pannir Selvam's counsel and the Attorney-General's Chambers addressed the content of affidavits they submitted after the first hearing on May 7. At the initial hearing, the court observed that Pannir Selvam's request for a stay of execution — pending the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings arising from his complaint to the Law Society — rested fundamentally on the principle that the MHA's policy on execution scheduling must be applied equally to all. His lawyers argued that the MHA policy applied to him differs from an earlier policy, thereby violating his right to equal treatment under Article 12 of the Constitution. On this, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, who led the five-man bench, stated that Article 12 does not prohibit a state agency from changing its policy. 'Article 12 applies by looking at the current legislation, the current statute, or the current policy, and asking yourself whether that policy is being applied in a way that is unfairly discriminatory,' he said. Pannir Selvam's counsel further argued that the MHA had not provided an explanation for the differing application of its policy between state and non-state proceedings. In their submission, his counsel team argued that the MHA's approach to preserving a prisoner's life had changed. Previously, executions could be delayed if a prisoner's testimony was needed in any legal case. Now, the MHA says delays are only considered if the testimony is needed in a state-led case. 'There have been no reasons provided by the MHA as to why this differential treatment between a state and a non-state proceeding is reasonable,' said counsel Ng Yuan Siang. In response, Deputy Senior State Counsel Terrence Chua said the distinction exists because state-brought proceedings are, by definition, in the public interest. 'It goes beyond the interest of an individual PACP (prisoner awaiting capital punishment), whereas the PACP cannot claim to represent public interest in their private applications. But even then, I pointed out in my affidavit that state-brought applications are still assessed on a case-by-case basis,' he said. The court responded by saying that if the applicant can show that the policy can give rise to an unfair distinction between two categories of persons between whom there is no rational difference, he may be entitled to a finding that the policy offends Article 12. The proceedings, which lasted over an hour, ended with Chief Justice Menon stating that the Court would reserve its judgment. Seated in the dock wearing a purple-coloured prison uniform, Pannir Selvam appeared calm throughout the proceedings in a packed courtroom, which was also attended by his siblings who had arrived from Malaysia earlier in the day. The hearing marks the latest chapter in Pannir Selvam's ongoing legal battle against his death sentence. He was convicted by the High Court on May 2, 2017, for importing not less than 51.84g of diamorphine into Singapore and was sentenced to the mandatory death penalty. Pannir Selvam filed an appeal, but it was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on Feb 9, 2018. Together with his family and legal team, he submitted petitions for clemency to the President of Singapore, who subsequently declined to commute the sentence. Pannir Selvam and his family were informed that he would be executed on May 24, 2019. He then filed another application to the Court of Appeal, seeking a stay of execution on the grounds that he intended to challenge both the rejection of his clemency petition and the Public Prosecutor's decision not to issue a Certificate of Substantial Assistance (CSA). The court granted this application on May 23, 2019. Following this, he filed several other judicial review applications. Pannir Selvam received another notice of execution on Feb 16, 2025, for a scheduled execution on Feb 20. He then filed for permission to make a Post-Appeal Application in a Capital Case (PACC), seeking a stay of execution, which was granted on Feb 19. Judge of the Appellate Division Woo Bih Li, in his written judgment, stated that the stay was granted pending the determination of his PACC application. Singapore's PACC Act, which came into effect on June 28, 2024, allows prisoners awaiting capital punishment to make post-appeal applications, which can only be heard by the Court of Appeal. — Bernama
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Lim Hui Ying: Monthly pension-style payouts for EPF members only apply to new joiners, with voluntary opt-in for current contributors
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 7 — The proposed implementation of monthly pension-style payments for Employees Provident Fund (EPF) members, announced during the tabling of the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP), will not affect the withdrawal rights of existing members, said Deputy Finance Minister Lim Hui Ying. She said the proposal, as announced by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, would apply only to new members registering after the new mechanism takes effect. However, she said, existing members may choose to opt in voluntarily. 'The proposed restructuring of EPF accounts will introduce a new mechanism allowing part of members' savings to be allocated specifically for regular income during retirement,' she told the Dewan Rakyat during a question-and-answer session on Thursday. She was responding to a supplementary question from Mordi Bimol (PH-Mas Gading), on the rationale for introducing monthly pension-style payouts, as announced under 13MP. Lim said the new mechanism aims to ensure members' savings last longer throughout retirement, in line with rising life expectancy. 'The new structure will take effect once members reach the minimum retirement age. Their savings will be split into two main components — flexible savings, which can be withdrawn at any time based on members' needs, and income savings, which will be disbursed regularly or monthly until fully utilised. 'This proposal aims to strengthen retirement income security and support more sustainable financial management,' she added. — Bernama
