Manhunt launched for driver after police chase through Basildon ended in crash
Police have launched an appeal after a chase through Basildon ended in a crash and the driver fleeing the scene.
The driver of a black Ford Ranger failed to stop for officers when requested in Dry Street at just after 11am on Thursday. Following a short police chase, the Ranger smashed into other cars in Lower Dunton Road.
There were five people in the vehicle. Two were spoken to at the scene, and one was arrested on suspicion of aggravated burglary, but the other three, including the driver, fled the scene.
Four people were taken to hospital following the incident.
Essex Police want to hear from anyone with information or dashcam footage relating to the incident. PC Adam Wright, who is investigating, said: 'The driver behaved very recklessly. Poor and dangerous driving decisions affect everyone's safety.
'This type of driving on our roads can lead to serious injury and death. We won't tolerate this and are committed to bringing anyone who commits these types of offences before the courts.' If you can help contact Essex Police quoting incident number 0390 of Thursday 27 March.
Visit essex.police.uk/digital101 or call 101. To make an anonymous report contact independent charity by calling 0800 555 111.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rear-end collision on Sherwood Way causes accident
SAN ANGELO, Texas (Concho Valley Homepage) — A two-vehicle crash on Sherwood Way occurred around 2 p.m. on Monday, June 9. Both vehicles were heading eastbound on Sherwood when a Cadillac attempted to turn into the Buick parking lot, where the Ford Ranger rear-ended it. According to SAPD, the driver of the Cadillac commented about minor pain but refused to be seen or treated on site. The driver of the Ranger was cited for failure to control speed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Three drivers clocked at over 100mph in an hour
A road policing chief said he was left "horrified" after three drivers were caught driving at over 100 mph on a stretch within the space of an hour. Adam Pipe, from Essex Police, said one of his officers, who was carrying out speed checks on the A12 between Chelmsford and Witham, detected a total of 180 offences in just 60 minutes. One motorist was clocked driving at 140mph, another at 121mph - and a third at 110mph. They will all receive court summons, the force added. "It's totally unacceptable and is putting road users, as well as themselves, at risk of serious injury or death," Mr Pipe said. "I'm horrified to see drivers reaching twice the legal speed limit on our roads," he added. "We've seen a number of serious collisions on our roads this year, with people losing their lives." He said the force was committed to reducing speeds and officers were patrolling the roads network 24 hours a day, to catch irresponsible drivers and keep people safe. The patrol was carried out on Friday afternoon. Mr Pipe said: "I urge people to think about the consequences of driving too fast and the irreparable damage that can be caused. "Don't resort to speeding, it's never worth the devastating cost," he warned. The fixed penalty for speeding is a £100 fine and three points on a driving licence. Drivers who exceed the limit by a significant margin can expect six points on a licence, as well as a court appearance and a driving ban, the RAC said. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Speeding driver caught doing 84mph in 30mph zone Hundreds of motorists caught speeding by police Almost 100k speeding offences recorded in one year Essex Police
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
US Supreme Court to review death row inmate's intellectual disability ruling
By John Kruzel WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to hear an appeal by Alabama officials of a judicial decision that a man convicted of a 1997 murder is intellectually disabled - a finding that spared him from the death penalty - as they press ahead with the Republican-governed state's bid to execute him. A lower court ruled that Joseph Clifton Smith is intellectually disabled based on its analysis of his IQ test scores and expert testimony. Under a 2002 Supreme Court precedent, executing an intellectually disabled person violates the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment bar on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices are due to hear the case in their next term, which starts in October. Smith, now 54, was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of a man named Durk Van Dam in Alabama's Mobile County. Smith fatally beat the man with a hammer and saw in order to steal his boots, some tools and $140, according to evidence in the case. The victim's body was found in his mud-bound Ford Ranger truck in an isolated, wooded area. The Supreme Court's 2002 precedent in a case called Atkins v. Virginia barred executing intellectually disabled people. President Donald Trump's administration backed Alabama's appeal in the case. At issue in Smith's case is whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple intelligence quotient (IQ) scores in assessing a death row inmate's intellectual disability. Like many states, conservative-leaning Alabama considers evidence of IQ test scores of 70 or below as part of the standard for determining intellectual disability. Supreme Court rulings in 2014 and 2017 allowed courts to consider IQ score ranges that are close to 70 along with other evidence of intellectual disability, such as testimony of "adaptive deficits." Smith had five IQ test scores, the lowest of which was 72. A federal judge noted that Smith's score could be as low as 69, given the standard of error of plus or minus three points. The judge then found that Smith had significant deficits from an early age in social and interpersonal skills, independent living and academics. The Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judge's conclusions in 2023, setting aside Smith's death sentence. This prompted Alabama officials to file their first of two appeals to the Supreme Court in the case. In November, the justices threw out the 11th Circuit's decision, saying that the lower court's evaluation of Smith's IQ scores can be read two ways, and requires clarification. Ten days later, the 11th Circuit issued an opinion clarifying that its evaluation was based on "a holistic approach to multiple IQ scores" that also considered additional relevant evidence, including expert testimony. This prompted a second appeal by Alabama officials to the Supreme Court. Alabama in its filing to the Supreme Court argued that the lower courts in the case applied the wrong legal standard in establishing Smith's intellectual disability and urged the justices to take up the appeal to provide clarity on the issue. Friday's action by the court was unexpected. The court had planned to release it on Monday along with its other regularly scheduled orders, but a software glitch on Friday prematurely sent email notifications concerning the court's decision in the case. "As a result, the court is issuing that order list now," said court spokesperson Patricia McCabe. It is not the first time the court has inadvertently disclosed action in sensitive cases. Last year, an apparent draft of a ruling in a case involving emergency abortion access in Idaho was briefly uploaded to the court's website before being taken down. That disclosure represented an embarrassment for the top U.S. judicial body, coming two years after the draft of a blockbuster ruling rolling back abortion rights was leaked.
