Driver accused of stealing David Lammy's bags ‘thought he had a gun'
The French chauffeur accused of stealing cash and bags from David Lammy thought the foreign secretary had a gun, he has told a prosecutor.
According to court documents seen by The Times, Nasim Mimun, 40, from Avignon, made the claim when questioned by the deputy public prosecutor in Bonneville in the French Alps on May 6.
The chauffeur has been sent for trial in Bonneville on November 3 on charges of stealing luggage and €700 from Lammy and Nicola Green, the minister's wife.
Foreign Office sources have also claimed that he had a knife in the glove box of his vehicle, which he opened to show to Green amid a dispute over the fee.
Mimun had driven the couple on a 587km journey from Forli,
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Border Force officers left stunned with find in French teenager's suitcase at Aussie airport
An 18-year-old French woman could face life behind bars after allegedly bringing more than 10kg of methamphetamine into Australia on a flight from Paris. Australian Border Force (ABF) officials detained the teen upon arrival at Perth Airport on April 25, allegedly with plans to travel onwards to Sydney. Australian Federal Police (AFP) allege border officials discovered five sealed, plastic pouches inside her suitcase containing a white, crystalline substance. Initial testing of the substance, estimated to weigh 10.7kg, allegedly returned a positive result for methamphetamine. Border officials immediately reported the results to the AFP, who then seized the 18-year-old's suitcase and contents for testing along with her mobile phone. AFP and ABF released footage of the casually-dressed woman being escorted to an unmarked police vehicle by two officers while handcuffed. Separate images also showed the woman standing beside her opened suitcase during an inspection and seated across from two officials in an interview room. Authorities also released images of the plastic pouches allegedly removed from her suitcase. Federal police charged the woman with one count of importing a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug which carries a maximum penalty of life in prison. ABF acting superintendent Tim Sutton said border officials would continue to search for passengers suspected of acting as drug mules or smugglers. 'The ABF is at the frontline protecting Australia's border from these acts and we work closely with our law enforcement partners to make sure these plans are thwarted,' he said. The detainee appeared in Northbridge Magistrates Court in Perth on April 26 and was remanded in custody to reappear on Friday.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Asylum seeker suspected of recruiting child soldiers can stay in Britain
An asylum seeker suspected of recruiting child soldiers for the Tamil Tigers has won a human rights case to stay in Britain. The Sri Lankan has been allowed to remain in the UK despite claims he had 'enlisted children under the age of 15' in the militant group. The French justice system previously ruled that he should be denied asylum in France due to the allegations, an immigration tribunal heard. However, British judges ruled that there was not enough evidence to say the allegations were true, and he has been granted refugee status. The Home Office, which attempted to deport him, tried to fight the ruling, but lost its appeal. The identity of the migrant has not been revealed as he was granted anonymity by the Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber. The hearing, in London, was told that before he arrived in the UK, the Sri Lankan was alleged to have recruited child soldiers for the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) - also known as the Tamil Tigers. The LTTE is a militant terrorist organisation founded in Sri Lanka. It was heard that the unnamed Sri Lankan was working for the Tamils Rehabilitation Organisation (TRO) - a refugee charity - but was secretly supplying information. Before arriving in the UK, the French asylum court - the Cour nationale du droit d'asile - found that he 'ought to be excluded from a grant of asylum under Article 1F of the Refugee Convention due to his alleged involvement in war crimes, in this case the alleged recruitment of children'. In Britain, the Home Office refused him refugee status, but in 2023, he won an appeal at the First-tier Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber against the decision. At the time, the judge found that the Home Office 'had not shown serious grounds for concluding that [the Sri Lankan] was guilty of the war crime of conscription or enlistment of children under the age of 15 or using them to participate actively in hostilities'. The judge at the 2023 hearing concluded: 'I am not satisfied even on the evidence of his own admissions, accurate or otherwise, to the French that this goes far enough to show that the [Sri Lankan] was effectively collecting information which he knew was going to be misused, and misused specifically for the recruitment of child soldiers under the age of 15. 'Nor am I satisfied that there are serious reasons for considering on all the evidence adduced that the [respondent] has been shown to have knowingly materially assisted in the recruitment of child soldiers under the age of 15, by the work done by the TRO in gathering information, possibly subsequently used by the LTTE for that purpose.' The Home Office appealed that decision at the Upper Tribunal, but lost its case. Home Office lawyers argued that the judge in 2023 did not attach enough weight to the French court decision. Lawyers argued that the judge 'ought to have followed the French Court and that inadequate reasons were given by the judge for not doing so'. But, Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Adrian Seelhoff ruled that the 2023 hearing considered the French decision 'extensively'. Judge Seelhoff said: 'The Judge assessed that evidence to see if it supported the [Home Office's] case that [the Sri Lankan], whilst working for the TRO, supplied details which the LTTE used to recruit child soldiers. '[The Home Office's] position before us was not that the judge was bound to follow the French court decision, but that he had not given adequate reasons for reaching a different decision or that he failed to attach weight to the decision. 'We find that the judge did give adequate reasons for not following that decision, and for the weight he attached to it and that accordingly there is no error of law in the decision under appeal.'
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Man appears in court after assault in Chapel St Leonards
A man has appeared in court following a serious assault on another man in Chapel St Leonards on Marriott, 30, of Sunningdale Close appeared at Lincoln Magistrates' Court on Saturday morning charged with attempted said they were called to the incident at a property on South Road just after 09:30 BST on 2 Marriott was remanded in custody and is due to appear at Lincoln Crown Court on 7 July. Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
