logo
Oil company, landowner attorney collaborate on bill to avoid court battles in North Dakota

Oil company, landowner attorney collaborate on bill to avoid court battles in North Dakota

Yahoo24-03-2025

Landowners are compensated for the area needed for oil well pads, but there are sometimes disputes about the amount of compensation. (Kyle Martin/For the North Dakota Monitor)
Bismarck attorney Derrick Braaten says clients have paid him millions of dollars for court battles against oil and gas company Continental Resources over surface damages in North Dakota.
But a conversation between Braaten and a lawyer representing Continental Resources could lead to fewer court battles, something Braaten says benefits the company and his clients.
A result of that conversation is Senate Bill 2335, which would add a mediation step in negotiations between mineral resource developers and landowners in an effort to resolve disputes without a lawsuit. The bill has received support from Continental Resources, the North Dakota Petroleum Council and the Northwest Landowners Association, which Braaten represents.
Litigation only benefits the lawyers, Braaten said during a hearing before the House Energy and Natural Resources Committee earlier this month.
In these disputes, the developer has already leased the minerals. But, under North Dakota law, developers must pay the landowners reasonable compensation for damage to the land, such as putting in a well pad.
'Neither the landowners nor the developers are benefiting from litigating over every darn well pad,' Braaten said. 'I've got better things to do.'
Under the bill, if a landowner rejects a compensation offer from an oil and gas developer, the landowner can choose an appraiser to determine the value of the land being affected and present it to the developer. The developer pays for the appraisal, and after receiving it, has 30 days to make a new offer.
Braaten said the appraisal provides a third-party number that at least provides a starting point for negotiations.
'The best thing that can happen here is we figure out how to make landowners and operators come together and come to private agreements,' Braaten said.
William Hauser, an attorney for Continental Resources, said the value of the property is at the heart of the disputes. 'The appraisal helps both sides see the realistic value sooner in the process,' Hauser testified.
If there is no agreement, the case can still end up in court, though the appraisal is not admissible.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Ron Ness, president of the North Dakota Petroleum Council, said currently, talks stagnate after the initial offer.
'The landowner is just unhappy and there's no communication,' Ness said.
Troy Coons, chair of the Northwest Landowners Association, called the bill an 'excellent compromise.'
The bill received unanimous approval in the Senate, and the House committee gave it a unanimous do pass recommendation last week.
Two other landowner rights bills went before the House Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
Senate Bill 2321 would require that companies developing infrastructure projects such as pipelines reimburse legal fees for landowners, even if the company abandons or changes the project so that the landowner is no longer involved. It is awaiting committee action.
Senate Bill 2379 originally required that land surveyors get written permission from landowners before stepping onto a property. This bill has received pushback from some water resource development groups, saying it would add to water pipeline costs and slow the projects down.
The bill was amended to require providing written notice. The committee voted 9-4 Friday to give it a do-pass recommendation.
The North Dakota Supreme Court last year ruled against landowners in a survey access case involving carbon dioxide pipeline developer Summit Carbon Solutions.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Standing Rock appeals dismissal of latest Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit
Standing Rock appeals dismissal of latest Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Standing Rock appeals dismissal of latest Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit

Opponents of the Dakota Access Pipeline gather Nov. 1, 2023, in Bismarck ahead of a public meeting on an environmental impact statement. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe opposes the pipeline, citing concerns for its water supply and sovereign rights. (Kyle Martin/For the North Dakota Monitor) The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe is asking the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to review a federal judge's decision to dismiss its latest lawsuit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers over the Dakota Access Pipeline. Standing Rock filed the lawsuit in October, asking the court to find the pipeline must be shut down because it still lacks an easement authorizing it to pass under the Missouri River's Lake Oahe reservoir, which is regulated by the Army Corps. 'The Corps of Engineers has not earned the trust of our Tribe,' Standing Rock Chairwoman Janet Alkire said in a statement last week announcing the appeal. 'We cannot rely on the Corps to properly evaluate DAPL, so we are continuing our legal efforts to protect our water and our people from this dangerous pipeline.' Greenpeace seeks reversal of verdict, arguing jury wanted to 'punish' someone for pipeline protests The Army Corps originally granted the easement to the pipeline's developer in 2017, but Boasberg revoked it in 2020 after finding the agency had issued the permit without completing the full environmental review required by federal law. The matter was brought to him through a lawsuit the tribe filed against the Army Corps in 2016. Boasberg at the time directed the Corps to withhold making a decision on the easement until it completes a full environmental impact study. He also ordered the pipeline to be shut down, though that demand was later reversed by an appellate court. Five years later, the Army Corps still has not finished the environmental review. It published a draft in late 2023. Standing Rock in its latest suit argues that keeping the pipeline open without an easement is a violation of federal law. The tribe also alleges the Army Corps is at fault for a number of other regulatory violations related to the pipeline. In court filings, Standing Rock has said it intends to present new evidence related to the pipeline's safety. The pipeline company has indicated previously it does not consider that information credible. U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg tossed the suit in March, finding that the courts cannot intervene in the matter until the Army Corps wraps up its environmental study. 'No matter its frustration with Defendants' sluggish pace, it is not yet entitled to a second bite at the apple,' he wrote in his March order. Boasberg previously indicated that while the agency works on the study, it has the option of enforcing its property rights since the pipeline is operating on federal land without authorization. 'The Corps has conspicuously declined to adopt a conclusive position regarding the pipeline's continued operation, despite repeated prodding from this Court and the Court of Appeals to do so,' he wrote in a 2021 order. Standing Rock leaders say they hope the D.C. Circuit will overturn Boasberg's decision to dismiss the case. In her statement, Alkire said the tribe fears the Army Corps' study will 'whitewash' the pipeline's risk to the surrounding environment. The pipeline crosses Lake Oahe just north of the Standing Rock Reservation. The tribe opposes the Dakota Access Pipeline as a threat to its sovereignty, water supply and cultural heritage sites. Federal judge dismisses Standing Rock's latest lawsuit over Dakota Access Pipeline Alkire also underscored the tribe's dismay over a March jury verdict that found the environmental group Greenpeace at fault for damaging the pipeline developers property and business as part of its protests against Dakota Access Pipeline. The jury ordered Greenpeace to pay the company, Energy Transfer, roughly $667 million. Standing Rock has criticized the verdict as based on a false narrative that Greenpeace, and not Standing Rock and other tribes, led the protests. 'We saw Energy Transfer's efforts to re-write history as we know it and lived it in their lawsuit against Greenpeace,' she said. In April, another federal judge ordered the Army Corps to pay North Dakota $28 million in connection to the anti-pipeline protests, finding the agency's actions had wrongfully forced the state to pay millions policing the protests and cleaning up the aftermath. The Dakota Access Pipeline passes through unceded land previously recognized as belonging to the Sioux Nation in 19th century treaties with the U.S. government. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Türkiye announces estimated 6.1bbbl shale oil reserve
Türkiye announces estimated 6.1bbbl shale oil reserve

Yahoo

time23-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Türkiye announces estimated 6.1bbbl shale oil reserve

Turkiye's Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar has announced that US oil producer Continental Resources has estimated a shale oil reserve of around 6.1 billion barrels (bbbl) in the country's south-eastern Diyarbakir Basin, according to a Reuters report. This figure could position Türkiye in the global oil market above some OPEC countries. Bayraktar emphasised the importance of the discovery, considering Türkiye's current annual crude oil imports are approximately 365 million barrels (mbbl). Türkiye, which relies on imports for more than 90% of its energy needs, is actively seeking to reduce its import bill and enhance supply security through the development of domestic resources and international exploration partnerships. 'If confirmed, these reserves would elevate Türkiye above some OPEC members such as Congo or Gabon, and other major producers like the UK,' Bayraktar stated during a visit to Sirnak province. In March, Continental Resources and Turkish national oil company TPAO signed an agreement to develop shale fields in the Diyarbakır Basin. The Energy Minister previously described the March agreement as "a new era," indicating Türkiye's strategic focus on shale oil and gas discoveries. The country is aiming to commence shale gas production in the north-western Thrace region. Continental Resources has not provided comments on the estimation. The announcement comes shortly after President Tayyip Erdogan's revelation of a new 75 billion cubic metres (bcm) natural gas reserve found during drilling in the Black Sea. The country previously announced its largest-ever onshore oil discovery of 1bbbl of crude in Sirnak two years ahead of the presidential elections. The discovered oil had an API gravity of 41, indicating a lighter grade than Türkiye's existing production. In 2024, Türkiye's crude production stood at 127,000 barrels per day, with imports nearly reaching 1mbbl per day of oil and refined products. Data from the country's Energy Ministry and regulator revealed that discounted Russian oil and refined products constituted two-thirds of Türkiye's imports last year. "Türkiye announces estimated 6.1bbbl shale oil reserve" was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio

Estimated 6 billion barrel shale oil reserve in southeast Turkey, minister says
Estimated 6 billion barrel shale oil reserve in southeast Turkey, minister says

Yahoo

time21-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Estimated 6 billion barrel shale oil reserve in southeast Turkey, minister says

By Nevzat Devranoglu SIRNAK, Turkey (Reuters) -U.S. oil producer Continental Resources estimates there is a shale oil reserve of 6.1 billion barrels in Turkey's southeastern Diyarbakir Basin, the Turkish energy minister said. Continental Resources and Turkish national oil company TPAO signed a joint venture agreement in March to develop shale fields in the basin. "Turkey's current annual (crude) oil import amounts to 365 million barrels. So a 6.1 billion barrel reserve is a great figure," Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar told reporters during a visit to southeast Turkey this week. The minister previously heralded the March agreement as "a new era in local crude oil exploration" with Turkey viewing shale oil and gas discoveries as a key development. It is aiming to produce shale gas from the northwestern Thrace region, Bayraktar said. "Shale oil and shale gas could be a game changer," he said. Continental Resources did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Turkey is not a major oil and gas producer and currently imports more than 90% of its energy needs. The government is looking to cut its import bill and boost supply security by developing domestic resources and expanding international partnerships in oil and gas exploration. President Tayyip Erdogan recently announced that Turkey had discovered a new reserve of 75 billion cubic metres (bcm) of natural gas during drilling works in the Black Sea.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store