GIA Redefines Lab-grown Diamond Grading Standards Discontinuation of 4Cs Grading System Enhances Differentiation Between Natural and Lab-Grown Diamonds
HONG KONG SAR - Media OutReach Newswire - 10 June 2025 - The Gemological Institute of America (GIA), the world's foremost authority in gemology announced a redefinition in diamond grading on June 2, 2025. Beginning at the end of 2025, GIA willInstead, GIA will implement a new descriptive grading system that lab-grown diamonds submitted to GIA will receive simplified descriptors—categorized broadly as either "premium" or "standard" or no grade at all if the quality is subpar. This transformative change marks a historic shift in the global diamond industry, not only redefining the value perception of lab-grown diamonds but also enhancing the differentiation between natural and lab-grown diamonds.This initiative is not merely a terminology adjustment; it represents a systematic effort to separate the grading systems for lab-grown and natural diamonds. As a non-profit organization, GIA emphasizes the fundamental differences between the two, including their formation processes, physical characteristics, and market values. According to Tom Moses, GIA Executive Vice President and Chief Laboratory and Research Officer, "More than 95% of lab-grown diamonds entering the market fall into a very narrow range of color and clarity. Because of that, it is no longer relevant for GIA to describe man-made diamonds using the nomenclature created for the continuum of color and clarity of natural diamonds."This revision of grading standards is another milestone following GIA's abandonment of the term "Synthetic" and its move to describe lab-grown diamonds in relation to natural diamond standards. GIA created the 4Cs—cut, colour, clarity, and carat weight—as a rigorous system to help consumers understand the unique and qualities of natural diamonds. With the new lab-grown diamond grading system, the core value of natural diamonds—rarity and emotional attributes are further emphasized.No two natural diamonds are exactly alike. Every natural diamond is unique, characterized by its distinct growth patterns, inclusions, and colour formed over billions of years. These nature's treasures, formed deep within the Earth, are considered valuable collectibles due to their beauty, rarity and non-renewability. They symbolize values associated with love, commitment, and eternity, while also contributing to the social and economy welfare of the diamond mining communities through responsible mining practices.In contrast, lab-grown diamonds are man-made and mass-produced using high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) or Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) processes. Their industrial nature limits their ability to embody the multiple values associated with natural diamonds, including emotional attributes, rarity, investment potential, and heritage. GIA's reform not only reaffirms the irreplaceable status of natural diamonds but also clarifies that lab-grown diamonds should not be assessed using the same criteria as natural diamonds.Over time, some lab-grown diamond sellers have been using ambiguous marketing terms such as "sustainability" and "equivalency" that may mislead consumers about the differences between lab-grown and natural diamonds. GIA's new approach ensures consumers can make informed choices without confusion, protecting their rights to knowledge, choice, and fair trade. By discontinuing the use of the 4Cs standard for lab-grown diamonds, GIA reaffirms its commitment to scientific integrity and public transparency.GIA's grading redefinition is poised to have a profound impact on the global jewellery industry. As this change takes effect by the end of 2025, it is anticipated that gemological institutes worldwide will follow suit. The boundaries between natural and lab-grown diamonds are clearly defined through GIA's new grading standards.Hashtag: #GIA #NaturalDiamonds #LabGrownDiamonds #DiamondCertification #DiamondGrading
The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
32 minutes ago
- The Star
Klook taps banks for US IPO, sources say
FILE PHOTO: A view shows the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Wall Street entrance in New York City, U.S., April 7, 2025. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper/File Photo NEW YORK: Klook, a travel booking services company, has hired investment banks to help arrange a potential initial public offering in the U.S., according to two people with knowledge of the matter. The Hong Kong-based company, backed by investors including SoftBank Group and Goldman Sachs Group, is working with bankers at Goldman, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan on the planned first-time share sale, said the people, asking not to be identified as the process is private. The deal could come as early as this year and raise around $500 million, they said, cautioning that the timing and deal size are subject to market conditions. U.S. IPO activity has gained momentum, bolstered by strong tech earnings and signs of progress in trade negotiations that have restored investor confidence. Recent listings, including cryptocurrency exchange operator Bullish, and design software company Figma, underscore the uptick in market debuts, reversing a period in the year when uncertainty over President Donald Trump's tariff policies weighed on new offerings. Klook, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan declined to comment. Morgan Stanley did not respond to a request for comment. It was not immediately clear whether Klook will be selling a stake in the IPO, or whether it will be an investor sell-down or a combination of both. Bloomberg News reported earlier the company was exploring a U.S. IPO. Founded in 2014, Klook turned profitable in 2023. It provides various booking services to travelers across a range of locations globally and competes with other global travel booking sites such as and TripAdvisor, as well as China's and South Korea's Yanolja. The company said in February it had raised $100 million in a funding round led by European investment firm Vitruvian Partners, but did not disclose its valuation at the time. Other investors in Klook include HSG, formerly known as Sequoia Capital China. - Reuters
The Star
14 hours ago
- The Star
Hong Kong's Cathay offers first post-Covid voluntary unpaid leave in 2 quarters
Hong Kong flag carrier Cathay Pacific Airways has offered voluntary three-month unpaid leave to cabin crew for the first time since the pandemic for two consecutive quarters, amid modest profit growth forecasts. The company informed its Hong Kong-based cabin crew that applications were open for the fourth quarter of this year via an internal memo, a copy of which was seen by the Post.
BusinessToday
a day ago
- BusinessToday
Market Review: Hong Kong Stocks End Week Up Despite China Data Drag
Hong Kong stocks closed the trading week in the positive territory after a midweek rally, though gains were trimmed on Aug 15 as weaker Chinese economic data revived concerns over growth momentum. The Hang Seng Index (HSI) surged as much as 2.6% on Aug 13, its strongest daily advance in three months, climbing to a two-week high of around 25,614. The rally was fuelled by softer US inflation data, which boosted expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut, as well as renewed optimism following an extension of the US-China trade truce. Tech heavyweights including Tencent and Alibaba led the charge, while property stocks gained on Beijing's latest stimulus measures. The momentum carried into Aug 14, with the index holding near recent highs. But sentiment turned on Aug 15 after a batch of disappointing data from mainland China showed slowing industrial output, weak retail sales and softer fixed asset investment. The HSI slipped 1.0% to close at 25,270, as investors pared positions ahead of the weekend. Despite the pullback, the benchmark ended the week up around 1.65%, supported by early strength and sustained policy optimism. Analysts said the index remained resilient above the key 25,000 level, though its short-term direction would depend on whether Beijing follows through with further economic support.
