
White supremacists are trying to reconquer the United States
Advertisement
Every day, our new overlords make it clear they believe white people, especially white men, are the only ones they can be sure truly deserve their jobs. They can tell the others are unqualified just by looking at them. So the only possible explanation for the presence of people of color and members of other marginalized groups in desirable positions is that they're getting unfair advantages.
Those of us who live in real reality call that being white supremacists.
These racist throwbacks have always been with us, rearing their heads higher after big civil rights advances they find appalling. But now it's the government leading the revanchism.
'What is shocking for many is, the perpetrator of these efforts is so clearly the federal government,' said Tatishe Nteta, provost professor of political science at UMass Amherst. 'That has not occurred since before the civil rights era.'
Advertisement
The message now is that the
only way to stop white men's suffering is to put everyone else back in their places. Which means shutting down every impulse to make ours a more equal society – purging those who seek to make schools and workplaces look more like the actual world, erasing from government websites the excellence and achievements of nonwhite people –
Black veterans buried in Arlington cemetery. At the Defense department, this came courtesy of Secretary Pete Hegseth, a veteran with a
Trump and his henchmen are turning back the hard-won gains of the civil rights movement, targeting the very people that movement rose up to protect. Now, we are told, it is white people who need the protection of the federal government against employment discrimination. It is they who are persecuted, they who are harmed when books and history lessons teach kids that slavery was a horror and Rosa Parks was a hero.
And so these two Boston law firms, both of them committed to diversifying their ranks, got their threatening letters from EEOC. Many other firms did, too.
'This administration doesn't seem to be bothered by wasting taxpayer dollars engaging in frivolous legal action,' said Sophia Hall, deputy litigation director at Lawyers for Civil Rights.
But even if their demands are frivolous, or found to be legally dubious, a weaponized EEOC can still make life miserable for a company, Hall said. They can issue subpoenas and demand reams of documentation, sucking up resources.
Advertisement
The letters alone could even be enough to chill diversity efforts at big law firms – or discourage them from representing clients who challenge Trump directives. We've certainly seen
The law firms did not respond to emails seeking comment. They have until April 15 to respond to Trump's demands, but they can also
resist them. Nteta's
If a bunch of high-priced lawyers won't stand up to Trump, who will?
Globe columnist Yvonne Abraham can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
20 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's takeover of D.C.'s police force isn't just another diversion from Jeffrey Epstein
It can be tempting to view President Donald Trump's meandering, deeply dishonest press conference on Monday as just the latest 'hey-look-a-squirrel!' distraction meant to divert the nation's attention from his involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein matter. Flanked by members of his cabinet, Trump invoked Section 743 of the Home Rule Charter, which permits him to send in the National Guard for a fixed period, and announced federal troops would be seizing control of the Washington, D.C., police force to address what he called a 'crime emergency.' Like many in his party, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., saw an ulterior motive for Monday's action. 'In another transparent ploy to distract America from his coverup of the Epstein file, Donald Trump now wants to militarize the District of Columbia,' Raskin said in a written statement, 'to attack crime and clean up graffiti in the capital city despite the fact that crime is at a 30-year low in Washington and graffiti seems to be pretty sparse.' Whether intentionally or not, Trump has indeed mastered the art of diversion. During his press conference, for instance, he bounced from D.C. crime to his forthcoming summit with Vladimir Putin, to tariffs on Chinese imports, to transgender athletes, to his own real estate experience. But his longstanding desire to deploy federal troops in blue state cities to bend them to his will should not be discounted as mere sleight of hand. 'Local 'youths' and gang members, some only 14, 15, and 16-years-old, are randomly attacking, mugging, maiming, and shooting innocent Citizens, at the same time knowing that they will be almost immediately released. They are not afraid of Law Enforcement because they know nothing ever happens to them, but it's going to happen now!' Trump explained in a comically hyperbolic post on Truth Social last Tuesday, explaining his rationale, adding, 'The most recent victim was beaten mercilessly by local thugs.' That recent victim was a 19-year-old Department of Government Efficiency employee, in case you were wondering what crime got Trump out of the golf cart this morning. To be clear, we're all against these ugly crimes, of course, and under the D.C. charter, sending in the National Guard isn't illegal. It's just ridiculously performative and profoundly unnecessary when you stop to realize that Justice Department data backs Raskin's assertion that crime in the district has hit a 30-year low, Data, of course, is beside the point for Trump. Just as his administration is busily rewriting federal scientific assessments that contradict Trump's view that climate change is a 'hoax,' declining violent crime rates in liberal-run cities are an inconvenient truth that doesn't square with his vision of a Washington that has been 'taken over by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals.' Trump's not-at-all hidden fantasy has been to become, to be charitable, something of an authoritarian. And the D.C. deployment is yet another dictatorship cosplay warm-up exercise. Under the Home Rule Charter, Trump's order expires in 30 days, but it remains to be seen whether he'll abide by it. After all, in apparent violation of the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, 250 National Guard troops he deployed are languishing around Los Angeles. Of course, Trump's newfound enthusiasm for mobilizing the Guard is in stark contrast to his delay in doing so on Jan. 6, 2021, the same day he suggested Vice President Mike Pence deserved assassination by the mob Trump had summoned to block the transfer of power. But that was then. 'We have other cities also that are bad. Very bad. You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is,' he said. 'We have other cities that are very bad. New York has a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore there.' Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said on X that 'Trump's raw authoritarian power grab in DC is part of a growing national crisis … He's playing dictator in our nation's capital as a dress rehearsal as he pushes democracy to the brink.' As his cabinet minions looked on, knowing they were props in yet another Trump late-night comedy fodder bit, Attorney General Pam Bondi dutifully executed Dear Leader's orders. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth seemed to relish the expanded marching orders. Only FBI Director Kash Patel briefly seemed to go off-script when he correctly noted that murder rates in the U.S. 'are plummeting.' Facts may not matter in the White House briefing room, but they could still matter in court. California's lawsuit against the Los Angeles troop deployment proceeded in San Francisco on Monday, where the state is arguing that the Trump administration doesn't have the right 'to execute or assist in the execution of federal law or any civilian law enforcement functions by any federal agent or officer.' During her own Monday press conference, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser struck a low-key response to the takeover of her police department, calling the action 'unsettling.' Oh, it's unsettling all right, just as it was in L.A, and this shock-and-awe arrival of U.S. troops could soon be coming to a blue state city near you. As Trump's long-winded presser drew to a close, some reporters shouted out questions about Epstein. By then, the president was already on his way out of the briefing room.


San Francisco Chronicle
20 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Texas Republicans plan another special session to deliver Trump more GOP congressional seats
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas Republican leaders said Tuesday that they were prepared to end their stalemated special session and immediately begin another standoff with Democrats in the GOP's efforts to redraw congressional maps as directed by President Donald Trump. It's the latest indication that Trump's push to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections will become an extended standoff that promises to reach multiple statehouses controlled by both major parties. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows confirmed the plans during a brief session Tuesday morning that marked another failure to meet the required attendance standards to conduct official business because dozens of Democrats have left the state to stymie the GOP's partisan gerrymandering attempts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Burrows said from the House floor that lawmakers will not attempt to reconvene again until Friday. If Democrats are still absent — and they have given no indication that they plan to return — the speaker said Republicans will end the current session and Gov. Greg Abbott will immediately call another. The governor, a Trump ally, confirmed his intentions in a statement. 'The Special Session #2 agenda will have the exact same agenda, with the potential to add more items critical to Texans,' Abbott wrote. 'There will be no reprieve for the derelict Democrats who fled the state and abandoned their duty to the people who elected them. I will continue to call special session after special session until we get this Texas first agenda passed.' Abbott called the current session with an extensive agenda that included disaster relief for floods that killed more than 130 people. Democrats balked when Abbott added Trump's redistricting idea to the agenda. Burrows on Tuesday did not mention redistricting but chided Democrats for not showing up for debate on the flood response package. The redistricting legislation would reshape the state's congressional districts in a design aimed at sending five more Republicans to Washington. The scheme is part of Trump's push to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of his first presidency, when the 2018 midterms restored Democrats to a House majority that blocked his agenda and twice impeached him. Current maps nationally put Democrats within three seats of retaking the House majority — with only several dozen competitive districts across 435 total seats. Texas Republicans have issued civil warrants for the absent Democrats. Because they are out of state, those lawmakers are beyond the reach of Texas authorities. Burrows said Tuesday that absent Democrats would have to pay for all state government costs for law enforcement officials attempting to track them down. Burrows has said state troopers and others have run up 'six figures in overtime costs' trying to corral Democratic legislators.


USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
Dana White says UFC fight on the White House lawn is 'absolutely' happening
A UFC fight at the White House looks primed to take place on the Fourth of July next year. 'It's absolutely going to happen,' UFC CEO and President Dana White told The Associated Press in a story published Aug. 12. White's comments come on the heels of a billion-dollar deal to bring UFC to CBS that was announced on Monday, Aug. 11. The agreement will give CBS and streaming service Paramount+ exclusive rights to broadcast 30 UFC Fight Nights and 13 marquee events each year beginning 2026, which could include the Fourth of July brawl at the White House. 'Think about that, the 250th birthday of the United States of America, the UFC will be on the White House south lawn live on CBS," White told the AP. White is scheduled to travel to Washington, D.C. on Aug. 28 to meet with Trump and his daughter, Ivanka, to discuss plans for the fight, the AP reported. The deal between UFC and CBS was announced just days after the network and Skydance officially closed an $8 billion merger and doubles the annual value of UFC's current U.S. rights deal with ESPN+, according to reporting from Sportico. The deal also signals the end of the existing pay-per-view model currently utilized by the UFC. Trump floated idea of UFC fight at White House this past 4th of July Trump first floated the idea of having a UFC fight on White House grounds on this past Fourth of July. "Every one of our national park battlefields and historic sites are going to have special events in honor of America 250," Trump said. "And I even think we're going to have a UFC fight. We're going to have a UFC fight on the grounds of the White House." "Championship fight − full fight," he added. Trump, no stranger to the mixed martial arts scene, has attended multiple events in the past, including UFC 309 at Madison Square Garden after winning the 2024 presidential election. White also introduced Trump on the stage on the final night of the 2024 Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. The first UFC fight held under the ownership of White and his partners was held at the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City. Trump "gave us our start when nobody would talk to us," White told Fox News in 2018. Trump's White House staff has ties to the mixed martial arts organization. After his campaign win in November 2024, Trump named Steven Cheung, a former UFC spokesperson, as the White House communications director. Contributing: Steve Gardner & Bart Jansen, USA TODAY Gabe Hauari is a national trending news reporter at USA TODAY. You can follow him on X @GabeHauari or email him at Gdhauari@