Sir Edward Osmotherly, civil servant behind the Osmotherly Rules on select committees and Whitehall
Sir Edward Osmotherly, who has died aged 82, became the stuff of Whitehall legend by formulating in 1980 the rules governing how much information departments and senior civil servants need provide to Parliament's select committees.
To this day the 'Osmotherly Rules' – revised in 2014 by Francis Maude – govern that relationship. In 2016 one of the Cabinet Office's two new rescue cats was named 'Ossie' in his memory; its mother was christened Evie after Dame Evelyn Sharp, Whitehall's first female Permanent Secretary.
Osmotherly had a varied career in public service, including three years at the Department of Transport responsible for British Rail and eight as a tenacious local government ombudsman. But his early work during a few months heading the Civil Service Department's machinery-of-government section would prove his legacy.
The Osmotherly Rules were drawn up as the Commons, with Norman St John Stevas to the fore, set up a set of select committees to shadow and monitor each Whitehall department; previously the panels had been organised by theme, with considerable gaps.
Working to his political masters Paul Channon and Barney Hayhoe, Osmotherly produced a set of internal guidelines determining Whitehall's relationship to select committees of both Houses. And although they have 'no formal parliamentary standing or approval, nor claim to have', the Osmotherly Rules stuck.
A similar document had been circulating during the 1970s, but Osmotherly codified the rules. 'Prepared entirely for use within Government', they were formally issued in May 1980.
They start from the principle that civil servants are not directly accountable to Parliament, as are ministers and PPSs. Rather, they are carrying out actions under ministerial authority, so are protected by the same rule that prevents MPs being summoned. If there is a dispute about an official appearing, the relevant minister should attend instead as a courtesy.
Osmotherly set out the limitations of Select Committees' powers to 'send for persons, papers and records'; the procedures on committees summoning retired officials; the impact of parliamentary privilege; the point at which the cost of supplying information is reckoned excessive; the rules of sub judice with respect to current, likely and pending litigation; and when evidence can be withheld or redacted on grounds of national security and public interest.
During the Westland affair of 1985-86, ministers became concerned that MPs might question officials too closely about the conduct of individuals; they were reassured that the Osmotherly Rules were tightly drawn.
Edward Benjamin Crofton Osmotherly was born on August 1 1942, to Crofton and Elsie Osmotherly, and educated at East Ham Grammar School and Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge.
Graduating in 1963, he joined the Ministry of Housing and Local Government, serving from 1966 as a private secretary to ministers. He spent 1972-73 as a guest scholar at the Brookings Institution in Washington and at Berkeley in California.
Osmotherly returned to what had become the Department of the Environment as an assistant secretary, then in 1979 was briefly seconded to the British Railways Board before joining the Civil Service Department and drawing up his Rules. Soon after he had finished Margaret Thatcher abolished the CSD, and he moved to the DoT as Under Secretary (Railways), just as the Serpell Report suggesting drastic cuts in the network was published then hastily shelved.
In 1985 Osmotherly was given charge of the personnel, management and training departments of the DoE and DoT. From 1989 to 1992 he headed the DoT's public transport and research department, before briefly serving as its establishment and finance officer.
He left Whitehall in 1993 to be Local Government Ombudsman, then from 2003 to 2010 was clerk adviser to the Commons European Scrutiny Committee. Osmotherly also chaired the Commission for Local Administration in England, and in 1996 a review of Government business statistics.
He was appointed CB in 1992, and knighted in 2002.
Osmotherly developed a rare dementia called posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), which affected his spatial awareness, but left his memory largely intact. Aged 76 he took part in a study at University College London investigating the balance problems caused by PCA, in which he was fitted with motion sensors and asked to paint lines of yellow paint on a canvas.
He told the BBC's Fergus Walsh that he had enjoyed the experience ('much more fun than a drug trial') and he appealed to the public: 'Please talk to people with dementia as if they were human beings. Don't be frightened of them.'
Edward Osmotherly married Valerie Mustill in 1970. They had a son and a daughter.
Edward Osmotherly, born August 1 1942, died February 18 2025
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News24
10 hours ago
- News24
Fiscal framework passed with DA's support
On Wednesday at 14:00 both Houses of Parliament - the National Assembly (NA) and the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) - will consider the 2025 Fiscal Framework and Revenue Proposals. This framework outlines economic policy and revenue projections, setting the overall limits for government spending.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
FACT CHECK: Are politicians' claims about Scottish education data really true?
Today in the Scottish Parliament, education secretary Jenny Gilruth clashed with Scottish Labour education spokesperson over the state of Scottish schooling and the opportunities available to young people. Both made a number of specific claims as they 'traded statistics' and sought to defend their respective positions – but were their assertions true or false? Pam Duncan-Glancy said that 'attainment in schools is declining' and that 'the attainment gap is widening.' She then went on to give a number of specific examples to back up her claim. '…overall positive destinations are down…' True. The percentage of pupils in an initial positive destination for 2023/24 was 95.7%, down from 95.9% the previous year, confirming a decline of 0.2 percentage points. '…more pupils left school with no qualifications than ever before…' False. The number leaving with no qualifications at or above SCQF level 3 has been increasing and is now higher than almost every other year, but is still lower than the figures from 2009/10. In 2023/24 a total of 2.4% left school with no qualifications at level 3 or higher, which is up from 2.2% in both 2022/23 and in the final pre-pandemic year of 2018/19. In 2009/10 the figure was 2.8 percent. '…fewer pupils left with one pass or more at SCQF levels 5 and 6…' True. The percentage who left school last year with at least one level 5 qualification was 83.5%, which was a decline from the 84.8% recorded the previous year. The number achieving at least one level 6 qualification (which includes Highers) fell from 57.9% to 57.4%. Both figures are now at their lowest level since 2012/13. '…and the gap in attaining a pass or more at those levels is up…' True. In terms of those leaving with at least one level 5 qualification, the gap between the most affluent and most deprived pupils is now 22.7 percentage points, which is higher than at any point in the last decade. For level 6 qualifications the gap is 38.4 percentage points, which is the highest it has been since 2015/16. '…Modern Apprenticeship starts are down…' True. Between April 2023 and March 2024 a total of 25,507 Modern Apprenticeships were commended. In the previous year, the number recorded was 25,365. '…youth unemployment is up…' True. School leaver data shows that 4% were unemployed after three months, which is an increase of 0.2 percentage points on the previous year. Labour market statistics covering October 2022 to September 2023 also show that unemployment for those aged 16-24 increased by 0.7 percentage points compared to the previous year. In response to these claims, Jenny Gilruth pushed back and argued that the situation with attainment and opportunity in Scottish education is much more positive. '…the proportion of pupils achieving the expected level in literacy and numeracy across primary and secondary schools reached its highest level ever in 2023/24…' Partly true. The figures that Jenny Gilruth talks about have never been higher, but some are equal to the levels recorded in previous years. In primary schools, 74 percent of pupils met the expected standard in literacy, and this is indeed the highest level ever recorded. In numeracy, 80 percent of primary pupils reach the expected standard, which is the joint-highest level recorded alongside the figure for last year – although if we stop rounding to whole numbers, the data does show a small increase in the most recent year. In secondary school, 88 percent of S3 pupils meet the expected standard in literacy, which is the same as the level from the previous year, and just one percentage point higher than the levels recorded for 2016/17. If we look specifically at Reading levels (which are one of three components of literacy scores) we actually see that there has been a decline since 2018/19. For numeracy, the number achieving the expected level is 90 percent, which is equal to the figure for 2018/19 and higher than other years. It is important to note that the government changed the way it records this information when Nicola Sturgeon was First Minister, so when Jenny Gilruth refers to the 'highest ever' levels she is discussing data that only goes back to 2016/17. '…the poverty-related attainment gap between young people from the most and least deprived areas meeting standards in literacy has also reached record levels…' True. (It is reasonable to assume that Jenny Gilruth meant 'record lows') For primary literacy the gap is 20.2 percentage points, just beating the previous low of 20.5 percentage points; amongst secondary pupils, the literacy gap is 12.7 percentage points, which is just over half a percentage point lower than the previous record of 13.3 points. '…the gap in relation to our secondary pupils achieving third level in terms of literacy and numeracy has reached record lows too…' True. The attainment gap for secondary school literacy is 12 percentage points, while the previous low was 13.5 percentage points in 2017/18. '…the percentage of those in a positive destination three months after leaving schools is 95.7% - that's the second highest since records began…' Partly true. The percentage in a positive destination was 0.2 percentage points higher last year, but otherwise the 95.7 percent recorded for 2023/24 is higher than all previous years with the exception of 2021/22, when the figure was also 95.7 percent. '…the ACEL data tells us a much more positive story…' True. This refers to Achievement of Curriculum for Excellence Levels (ACEL), and is the source of the claims about literacy and numeracy levels in primary and secondary schools. This measurement system was introduced by the Scottish Government after Nicola Sturgeon promised to close the attainment gap and asked to be judged on her record for doing so. As part of these changes, the government scrapped the objective, national data that was previously generated by the Scottish Survey of Literacy and Numeracy and introduced a system that is much more subjective, far less precise, and much more open to manipulation. ACEL data does tell a much more positive story, but many would argue that this is because it was designed to do that very job. '…when we look for example at examinations data as well we are seeing a trajectory post-pandemic of improvement…' False. The pass rate for Highers has declined in each of the past three years and in 2024 stood at 74.9 percent. This is 0.1 percentage points up on the figure from 2019, but is significantly lower than the rates recorded in the rest of the pre-pandemic period (2016, 2017, and 2018). The overall Higher attainment gap is now larger than at any point since the new qualifications were introduced nearly a decade ago. At National 5, the overall pass rate is the lowest ever recorded and the attainment gap is higher than it has ever been. The same is true for Advanced Higher. In terms of overall examinations data, things have been getting worse in the post-pandemic period, not better. Data sources: School leaver data (positive destinations and leaver attainment of qualifications) Achievement of Curriculum for Excellence Levels (Literacy and numeracy) Modern Apprenticeships statistics Youth unemployment labour market data Examinations data


New York Times
13 hours ago
- New York Times
Britain Allocates Hundreds of Billions to Bolster Its Economy
The British government announced on Wednesday hundreds of billions of pounds in spending on defense, health care and investment in infrastructure and housing, as it laid out its economic priorities for the next few years. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor of the Exchequer, presented a breakdown of the public finances in Parliament, detailing how much money each government department will have to spend until 2029, around the time of the next general election. It brings to an end months on tense negotiations between Ms. Reeves and other ministers as she seeks to balance competing priorities and navigate economic challenges at home and abroad. 'We are renewing Britain,' Ms. Reeves told lawmakers. 'But I know that too many people in too many parts of our country are yet to feel it.' The multiyear spending review is the clearest signal yet of how the government will fulfill its top mission to increase economic growth. It follows announcements in recent days to spend heavily to improve local public transport, construct a nuclear power plant and build more affordable housing. A vow to 'fix the foundations' When the Labour Party came to power less than a year ago, they inherited an economy under serious stress. Public services were struggling, with long wait lists for medical appointments; productivity growth had been stagnant for more than a decade; and recent tax cuts put the public finances under strain. The bond market revolt over former Prime Minister Liz Truss's spending and tax plans was still fresh in people's minds. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.