RFK Wants to Send People to ‘Wellness Farms.' The US Already Tried That.
Collage by Liz Coulbourn
Stay up-to-date with the politics team. Sign up for the Teen Vogue Take
In a clip from a July 2024 virtual town hall that recirculated online earlier this year, now Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that the US should combat addiction by opening 'wellness farms' to help people get off opioids, antidepressants, and stimulants. Kennedy says people taking medications for conditions like depression and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), along with those living with addiction, could spend three or four years growing organic produce on these farms to be 're-parented' and 'reconnect with communities.'
RFK Jr. went on to declare during his confirmation hearing for the HHS secretary position that "a healthy person has a thousand dreams" while "a sick person has only one" — implying that the only dream a disabled person can have is of being cured.
And in an April speech addressing the 'epidemic' of autism affecting U.S. children, RFK Jr. claimed: 'Autism destroys families…these are kids who will never pay taxes, they'll never hold a job, they'll never play baseball, they'll never write a poem, they'll never go out on a date. Many of them will never use a toilet unassisted…and we need to put an end to it.' Repeatedly, the man leading the nation's health department has affirmed his view of people with disabilities as a burden.
Online, some users have compared RFK Jr.'s vision of 'wellness farms' with Nazi concentration or Japanese-American internment camps. Few, however, have made the connection to the disabled colonies established in the United States during the 19th and 20th centuries.
In short: America has already tried wellness farms. Beginning in the 1890s and continuing through the first few decades of the 20th century, epileptic and "feebleminded' colonies sprung up around the US. The initial purpose of these colonies was to remove patients from overcrowded, badly run asylums and poorhouses in favor of farm life where they would have access to the outdoors.
Under the colony model, patients generally lived in 'cottages' designed to be more homelike than institutional. Patients were also given jobs, and many were expected to work on colony farms where they grew their own food. Dr. William Spratling, the medical superintendent of the Craig Colony for Epileptics in New York, declared that the farm model meant, 'Nature, the great restorer, will have an opportunity to do her best.'
It didn't work.
Supporters of the colony model argued that — with time — clean air, sunshine, a restricted diet, and physical labor could heal patients of the medical conditions that ostracized them from society. But that didn't happen.
Data from the Craig Colony — one of America's first epileptic colonies, opened in 1896 — illustrates this point. During the 1940s, thanks to funding and staff limitations because of World War II, conditions in North American institutions were particularly grim. The institution's 1943-1944 annual report to the state Commissioner of Mental Hygiene shows that less than 1% of patients were discharged as 'cured' that year. During that same period, over 200 patients attempted to leave the colony without permission, and over 5% of the total patient population died.
If the goal was to actually segregate disabled people from public life, you could say the colony model succeeded. As Michael Rembis, associate professor and director of the Center for Disability Studies at the University at Buffalo, wrote in The Oxford Handbook of Disability History, the physicians, social workers, and state officials who ran colonies and other institutions for disabled individuals were 'driven by an ableist logic that was always infused with racialist, gendered, and class-based thinking' in their attempts at 'segregating, sterilizing, and generally restricting the world's disabled population.'
Colonies also assured that disabled people would be shielded from public view, similar to the 19th- and 20th-century 'Ugly Laws' that made it illegal to exist in public spaces as a person with a visible disability.
In the early 20th century, epileptic and feebleminded colonies became hotbeds for eugenics. In 1924, a teenage girl named Carrie Buck was institutionalized at the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded after becoming pregnant outside of marriage. In part because Carrie's birth mother had also been institutionalized, the medical superintendent of the Virginia State Colony sought to have her sterilized — so she wouldn't pass down her alleged mental defect to any additional children.
The resulting court case, Buck v. Bell, went all the way to the Supreme Court, where Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., who wrote for the majority, declared in reference to Carrie, her birth mother, and Carrie's daughter that 'three generations of imbeciles are enough.' In the end, Carrie Buck was sterilized against her will. Buck v. Bell was never overturned, and 31 states still allow the forced sterilization of disabled people, according to a 2022 report from the National Women's Law Center.
Across the country, up to 70,000 forced sterilizations took place throughout the 20th century, per NPR, with many of them occurring in colonies and other institutions. Rather than focusing on curing patients, colonies became about control: control over who got to live in communities and who didn't, and control over who would have the opportunity to have children.
RFK Jr.'s fixation on wellness farms also risks stripping disabled Americans of the right to choose how they live their own lives. In 1999, the US Supreme Court declared that disabled Americans have the right to live and receive support in their communities when medically appropriate, rather than be forced into state-run institutions.
Although RFK Jr. maintains that admission to his wellness farms would be voluntary, the Trump administration has essentially labeled people with disabilities, chronic health conditions, and neurodivergence — as well as the essential medications on which many of them rely — a threat to national security. This language makes it clear that disabled people are not welcome in this new 'Make America Healthy Again' era.
Perhaps, then, it shouldn't be surprising that under the 'Make America Healthy Again' mantra we are seeing a resurgence of eugenecist talking points and attempts by lawmakers to strip back disabled people's rights. Last month, as The Guardian reported, a University of Texas at Austin-owned venue hosted a natalism conference featuring a number of controversial far-right and eugenics-aligned speakers who promote high birth rates.
In her 'Disability Visibility' column for Teen Vogue, activist Alice Wong has called mask bans 'the new Ugly Laws.' And 17 state attorneys general are currently suing to fight the inclusion of gender dysphoria in a list of disabilities protected from discrimination under Section 504, the legislation that mandates any organization receiving federal funds must be physically accessible and provide accommodations to those who need it and that sets the foundation for the Americans With Disabilities Act. The lawsuit also challenges the constitutionality of Section 504, which many disability activists and legal experts fear could overturn protections disabled people rely on.
For the disabled patients forced into colonies during the 19th and 20th centuries, life was not easy. In addition to forced (unpaid) labor and the risk of sterilization, patients sometimes underwent experimental treatments and lived in overcrowded conditions. New York's Craig Colony was so chronically understaffed that, as of fall 1943, over 30% of the colony's total positions were unfilled.
Overcrowding became so severe at Craig that a 1944 state report described some buildings with 'conditions not duplicated in any other institution in the Department.' In one house designated for men deemed 'mentally incompetent,' the report found that:
'…nearly two hundred patients walk up and down [the day room] with no place for most of them to sit except on the floor and nothing to keep them in the least occupied. In a corner closet are piled sixty mattresses foul with the smell of urine, waiting to be laid out in rows on the floor of the Day-Room when evening comes. In this building young boys are herded together with middle-aged and old men, all of them mental incompetents and some admittedly sexual perverts…. The contrast between these crowded buildings and the cow barn, where the dairy herd of the institution is kept, is marked. The cows are kept in clean spacious quarters, well provided with fodder, while certain of the wards of the State in this institution have lived and slept under conditions which members of the Commission felt could never have existed in a civilized community….'
Wellness farms aren't about wellness at all. In practice, history shows us, they're about eliminating disabled people from public life.
In 1899 the Craig Colony's Dr. Spratling proclaimed, 'Epilepsy is not so much a disease that can be reached with a single drug or the contents of a written prescription. It is more a condition that pervades every part of the human economy, a condition that needs to be eradicated, educated out of the system, so to speak.' Compare this to RFK Jr.'s assertion that disabled people taking psychiatric drugs should 'learn to get re-parented.' When a statement from the US health secretary in the 21st century sounds like a quote from 1899, I'd argue that's a return to eugenics, not an endorsement of modern medicine.
Even if colonies did somehow 'cure' patients, disabled people deserve to choose how they live and to live with dignity. Disabilities don't ostracize the vulnerable from society or keep them in conditions worse than cattle; people do.
What if, instead of upholding toxic wellness culture, we reject the eugenicist beliefs underpinning Make America Healthy Again? As disabled activist Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha said, we can still dream 'a future where disabled people survive, but more than that, we lead, we shape the world, we create futures infused with disabled knowledge and ways of living and imaginings.'
Originally Appeared on Teen Vogue
Want to read more Teen Vogue health coverage?
How to Use Social Media Without Feeling Like Sh*t
How to Get Birth Control If You're a Teen
Students Face Worsening Mental Health, But How Will Schools Handle It?
What Is A Period? 15 Things To Know About Your Menstrual Cycle
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Special report: A twist on capitalism
Editor's note: This is the fourth in a five-part series on the price of freedom, by exploring the work and experience of Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus in Bangladesh. Deseret News Opinion Editor Jay Evensen has known Yunus since 1997, when the world leader first visited Utah. Evensen traveled to Dhaka to speak again with Yunus, entrepreneurs, politicians in the country, and even revolutionaries seeking change to understand the risks Yunus is enduring and why peace and opportunity in Bangladesh are so important to the United States. DHAKA, BANGLADESH — It probably wouldn't take any American long to notice that the nursing college on the outskirts of this sprawling city operates differently than one would in the United States. The students are dressed in uniforms – blue dresses and head scarves in the official green shade of the Bangladeshi flag for the women, and blue checkered button-down shirts and dark slacks for the men. When I walk into a classroom with Deseret News photographer Scott Winterton and Salt Lake general surgeon Scott Leckman, the 30 or so students immediately stop what they are doing and stand at attention by their desks, facing us with a rapt gaze seldom seen in distraction-laden 21st century American colleges. But the important differences are more subtle. This is the Grameen Caledonian College of Nursing. It is meant to meet a desperate need in this impoverished country as much as to train bright young students. It is, as Vice Principal Kazi Shahina explained to us in a briefing before we entered the class, an enterprise designed to become an internationally regarded nursing college in a nation where 'nursing is not seen as an honorable profession.' Why is nursing not honored? Maybe it's because, as the World Bank reports, this country has only 0.6 nurses available for every 1,000 people, and average people seldom encounter one. (The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that Utah has 7.26 per 1,000.) Maybe it's because of old fears generated by a largely unregulated health care industry that allows pharmacies to operate despite dispensing expired or ineffective medicines. Maybe it's because of a lack of effective training. Regardless, the effects of this lack of trust are manifest by a statistic we were given earlier in the day — 27% of those who die in Bangladesh each year do so without receiving any medical care. More than just a nursing college, Grameen Caledonian is a 'social business.' Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, the current interim leader of Bangladesh, pioneered the concept of businesses that compete in a free market but whose aim is to solve a social need, not to generate profits for investors. Social businesses do indeed seek investors, but with the understanding that they stand to recoup their investments, plus an administrative fee, and nothing more. Nothing, that is, except the feeling that comes from making life better for people. An unofficial estimate by the British Council, Britain's organization for educational opportunities and cultural relations, said there may be 150,000 various social enterprises underway in Bangladesh. Many more exist in other nations. Exact numbers are hard to find. Elevating a social good over pure profits cuts against the core motivation behind American business and the idea that market needs can best be solved when consumers gain and entrepreneurs profit. Still, I can't help wonder — what if a business were created with the sole intent to save the Great Salt Lake, or to solve homelessness, heart disease or obesity? What if all the profits were dedicated to solving an urgent need that benefitted all? Would Americans, even in the bootstrap culture of the West, rally to the idea? In one such venture, Yunus partnered with Danone Yogurt to both provide needed nutrition and create employment opportunities. The result was a yogurt rich with the iron, zinc, vitamin A and iodine that was missing in the lives of many impoverished Bangladeshis. 'I have a choice,' Yunus, speaking in general terms about human motivations, told me in an interview, 'whether I become the richest man in the whole world, or I can change the whole world. 'Why should I be just the richest person? (Then), nobody cares for me. (Instead), I could change the whole world, and people would think, 'He's a great guy.'' Capitalism, he said, talks about choices, but the profits-above-everything version of it never grants the choice to pursue something other than money. Yunus reacts strongly when I press him on the notion, made popular by economists such as Milton Friedman, that all people are motivated by greed. 'That's absolutely wrong,' he said. 'If you take the worst part of it, humans are made up of both selfishness and unselfishness.' People need to discover how much of each part is in them. Maybe you are 99% selfish and 1% unselfish, he said, but being even just that much unselfish ultimately may influence your selfish part. 'Society's responsibility is to open the door for everybody so they can explore themselves,' Yunus said. 'Education's purpose should be to find out who you are. What do you want to do with yourself? That's the question that should be planted in our education system. 'Contributing to the world is a self-discovery.' It's clear which choice he believes most people would make after such self-discovery. Our social business tour includes presentations by Shukhee, a new startup that aims to provide quality health care to all Bangladeshis, including those in hard-to-reach rural areas. The CEO, Dr. Ahmed Atmaan Siddiqui, explains how Shukhee, Bangla for 'happy,' includes a smartphone app that gives people instant access to one of several qualified physicians working in a call center. People without smartphone access can contact these doctors via regular landline phones. A consultation costs the equivalent of 15 cents. Shukhee hopes to set up reputable pharmacies nationwide, bringing every Bangladeshi within two kilometers of one. The optimism of Shukhee's leaders is infectious. We watch as doctors answer calls. We watch humorous television commercials aimed at Bangladeshis who may be inclined to self-diagnose over the internet rather than seek out a physician. Social businesses often seek partnerships with established companies to help them succeed. The nursing school, for instance, has an agreement with Glasgow Caledonian University aimed at producing nurses and midwives using up-to-date curriculum and professional staff. There are signs that big things are in the works. Next to the Grameen Caledonian College of Nursing is the foundation of a building the college hopes will become a hospital and medical school, allowing the training of medical students and giving nursing students real human patients, rather than the plastic human-like figures that currently occupy beds. Back in the classroom, a young man has raised his hand in answer to our question about what he hopes to get from the program. He stands at attention next to his desk and explains how he desires a master's degree and would like to study in the United States before coming back to Bangladesh to serve. Others have opinions but are too shy to speak, obviously worried about their English. Many are from rural areas and are learning English for the first time as they study. This alone — the idea of low-income, rural young people gaining education and skills — seems justification enough for the social business concept. In his book, 'A World of Three Zeros: The New Economics of Zero Poverty, Zero Unemployment and Zero Net Carbon Emissions,' Yunus explains how 'many experts around the world insisted that his social business concept would fail because entrepreneurship is a rare quality in people – and even rarer in poor people, and extremely rare among poor women.' 'I took the reverse position — that all human beings are entrepreneurs, with no exceptions, men or women, rural or urban, rich or poor,' he wrote. It's a theme he hits hard in my interview with him, as he has previous times we have met. If it is true, and if enough people embrace it, it could change the world.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. includes vaccine misinformation spreaders among newly announced ACIP members
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday announced the new members of a key vaccine advisory committee, just days after he fired all sitting members in what he called 'a clean sweep.' The eight new voting members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) represent a significant downsizing from the 17 who previously served. Kennedy in a post on the social platform X said the new members will meet as scheduled on June 25 to discuss the COVID-19 vaccine. They will review safety and efficacy data for the current schedule as well, he said. 'The slate includes highly credentialed scientists, leading public-health experts, and some of America's most accomplished physicians. All of these individuals are committed to evidence-based medicine, gold-standard science, and common sense,' he added. The eight new ACIP members announced by Kennedy are: Joseph R. Hibbeln, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist who worked on nutritional neurosciences at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist formerly at Harvard Medical School. Retsef Levi, a professor of operations management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Sloan School of Management. Robert W. Malone, a biochemist who took part in early research of mRNA vaccine technology. Cody Meissner, a professor of pediatrics at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College who previously served on ACIP. James Pagano, an emergency medicine physician. Vicky Pebsworth, the Pacific region director of the National Association of Catholic Nurses. She formerly sat on the Food and Drug Administration's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. Michael A. Ross, a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at George Washington University and Virginia Commonwealth University. Kennedy on Tuesday said that none of the new ACIP members will be 'ideological anti-vaxxers,' but some of the new members are well-known COVID-19 contrarians and are known for spreading vaccine misinformation. Malone, who claims to be the inventor of mRNA vaccines despite what those who've worked with him say, became a fixture of conservative media during the pandemic. He promoted the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for treating the coronavirus and repeatedly claimed the COVID shots did not work. Kulldorff was one the leading authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, along with current NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya. Kennedy fired all 17 sitting members of ACIP on Monday, claiming a 'clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science.' The ACIP is an independent, expert panel that provides guidance on vaccine recommendations. The sweeping, abrupt firing of all sitting ACIP members this week was met with alarm and concern, with groups like the American Nurses Association saying it could further 'erode public confidence' in vaccines. The move also directly contradicted an assurance that Kennedy had given to Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chair of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, when he said he would 'maintain the [ACIP] without changes.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


CBS News
4 hours ago
- CBS News
CDC purges career officials from oversight of vaccine committee
Career officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention responsible for overseeing the agency's committee of outside vaccine experts have been removed from their role in the process, multiple CDC officials tell CBS News. News of their removal comes the same week Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all the members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, known as ACIP, and replaced them with eight new picks that include close allies and COVID vaccine critics. The next meeting of the committee is coming up at the end of June. The vaccine recommendations from the committee are closely watched by state and local authorities, health care providers and others because they are tied to several federal policies that enable access to the shots, including requirements for insurance coverage and programs for uninsured children. Multiple federal health officials said the staffers removed from overseeing the panel included Dr. Melinda Wharton, the associate director for vaccine policy, and her team at the agency's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. A CDC spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Wharton had served as the committee's executive secretary before she was pulled from her role. Among other things, she and her team had been responsible for vetting nominees for ACIP membership, which would usually include extensive screening for potential conflicts of interest before someone would be named to the committee. Multiple CDC officials said that Kennedy circumvented the CDC's process to pick his new members of the committee. HHS said in an "ACIP FAQ" document shared with members of Congress and stakeholders that Kennedy's new picks for the committee were being selected "through a rigorous examination of their scientific credentials and a comprehensive ethics review for potential conflicts of interest." Wharton and her team had also overseen the panel's operations, including prioritizing its agenda and planning meetings for work groups that huddle to discuss technical details between the committee's public discussions and votes. ACIP work group planning meetings have since been postponed due to the lack of voting committee members to attend them, multiple people familiar with the matter told CBS News. Those people said the CDC's chief of staff, Matt Buzzelli, an appointee of the Trump administration, was now effectively in charge of the committee's planning. Buzzelli is seen by many within the agency as the CDC's de facto head, in the absence of a Senate confirmed director or acting director appointed by Kennedy. One former CDC official said the move amounted to "putting RFK like-minded people and removing all potential internal CDC opposition" in the committee, calling it far from normal. Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, one of the CDC officials overseeing the work group on COVID-19 vaccines, resigned last week after Kennedy ordered edits to the CDC's recommendations to exclude children and pregnant women. Several medical groups criticized Kennedy's move at the time to bypass the committee and its COVID-19 vaccines work group. The American Pharmacists Association is among those now withholding endorsement of the CDC's new adult immunization schedule.