Tesla Model Y vs Kia EV6: The choice is clear
Kia has made a concerted effort to electrify its lineup, and its EVs have been well-received thus far. The EV6 leads the pack for Kia, rivaling its twin, the Hyundai Ioniq 5. Still, Tesla looms large in the EV space, and all roads lead to - or through - Tesla.
The Model Y is the best-selling EV on earth, and for good reason. It set the standard for what a good EV SUV is, and its long range and charging network are massive boons to buyers.
But which should you buy?Kia offers eight options for its EV6, with prices starting at $42,600 and scaling to $61,600.
The Tesla Model Y keeps things much more straightforward, and its pricing remains competitive.
Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive: $44,990
Long Range All-Wheel Drive: $47,990
Performance All-Wheel Drive: $51,490
New Model Y Launch Edition: $59,990
Light RWD: $42,600
Light Long Range RWD: $45,950
Light Long Range AWD: $49,850
Wind RWD: $48,700
Wind AWD: $52,600
GT-Line RWD: $52,900
GT-Line AWD: $57,600
GT AWD: $61,600
Tesla's pricing starts higher, but its top-end pricing is also lower than that of the Kia EV6. We appreciate Tesla's simpler, more straightforward options.A car's appearance, inside and out, matters to buyers. Modern EVs tend to have a minimalist interior, though several car makers are shifting away from that ethos.
Similarly, some automakers design EVs that are simple and effective. In contrast, others try to keep their EV options reflective of the brand's longstanding design principles.
The Tesla Model Y and Kia EV6 couldn't be further apart here.
The Tesla Model Y's interior is clean, minimal, and almost too simple. Many praise its simplicity, but there's a growing disdain for automakers who hide everything behind a screen.
The New Model Y has a slightly modified interior, but the overall design is unchanged. Tesla made iterative updates to please its core audience but still chooses to have the most features and settings in the software. Its dash and center console are largely uninterrupted plastic sheets with clean lines. The seats and steering wheel are about as basic as you can get.
Inside, the Kia EV6 resembles a traditional car or SUV. Its two dashboard-mounted displays—one behind the steering wheel and the other centrally on the dashboard—are encased in a single large pane. The dash has physical buttons for AC controls, and the steering wheel has cruise control and buttons for functions like volume control.
The center console on the Kia EV6 has a dial-based drive mode selector and a power button. Both SUVs have cup holders, armrests with storage, and wireless charging pads in the center console area.
The front and rear seats in the Kia EV6 have more personality. We'll stop short of saying they're more comfortable than the Tesla Model Y, but they are softer.The New Tesla Model Y also has a few exterior updates, namely a Cybertruck-esque lightbar running across the front. The rear gate also has a light bar running across the back, but other changes are minimal. Overall, the newest Model Y is largely unchanged and looks like any other Tesla, save for the Cybertruck.
The Model Y's curves and drop-rear roofline make the vehicle inviting, with a curvy, basic aesthetic that doesn't hint at its powerful underpinnings.
The Kia EV6, on the other hand, screams its prowess with its styling. It's a bit more squat, and its aggressively horizontal roofline and sloping hood make it look eager to go fast. Like the Model Y, the EV6 has a light bar racing across its rear end, but that's been part of Kia's design language for a few model years.
Around the front, the EV6 sports a lot of linear shaping below the hood and a normalized set of headlights. The curvy hood doesn't blend into the blocky body and roofline as much as we'd like. Still, the car is nonetheless aggressively styled to appeal to a younger buyer.
In short, the EV6 is a far more 'standard' crossover, while the Model Y's styling resembles that of a small SUV.Taller drivers may have issues with top-end EV6 models, specifically the GT line, which has a moonroof that cuts into headroom. The Model Y has no such issues and has more headroom overall. Both have plenty of overall interior space, but the Model Y's use of glass will make it feel much more spacious.
Each vehicle is comfortable, front and rear, so this is a toss-up. The Model Y has a third-row option, but we can only recommend very small children sit back there. Both vehicles also have poor rear and side visibility, leaving you glad they're laced with cameras.
Each car also handles well, though the Model Y's stiffer suspension makes it a touch livelier.
Let's start with the estimated range for both models:
Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive: 337 miles
Long Range All-Wheel Drive: 311 miles
Performance All-Wheel Drive: 277 miles
New Model Y Launch Edition: 327 miles
Light RWD: 232 miles
Light Long Range RWD: 310 miles
Light Long Range AWD: 282 miles
Wind RWD: 310 miles
Wind AWD: 282 miles
GT-Line RWD: 310 miles
GT-Line AWD: 252 miles
GT AWD: 218 miles
The Kia EV6 can charge from 10 to 80 percent in 18 minutes when connected to a 350kW fast charger, which is incredible if you can find an actual fast charger in the wild.
Tesla's Superchargers are a class-leading EV charging network. Still, as more vehicles are allowed to access them, they are becoming increasingly busy.
Whether charging at home or on the go, we prefer Kia's fast charging capabilities. If you can set this up at home and are okay with popping your EV6 back into the garage on high-mileage days when you're running errands, we recommend it.
Those who need to travel long distances, take road trips, or can't charge from home may want to consider the Model Y. It has a slightly better range, and although Superchargers are becoming crowded, they are still superior.Kia's availability is suspect, but we think it's worth pursuing. Kia dealers can't always order the car you want and often have to trade with another dealership, but if you find the EV6 you want, jump on it.
Dealership service centers can be pretty bad, and Kia's are no exception. Still, having more of them around makes it easier to get your EV6 serviced when something goes wrong.
If you're dead-set on a Tesla Model Y, it's not a bad option, but more people will likely prefer the EV6.
Love reading Autoblog? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get exclusive articles, insider insights, and the latest updates delivered right to your inbox. Click here to sign up now!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Driverless Teslas Hit the Streets—Analyst Sees More Upside for Tesla (TSLA)
Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is one of the . On June 11, Piper Sandler reiterated the stock as 'Overweight' with a $400 price target. The firm said it sees more Tesla upside on robotaxi deployment. Analyst Alexander Potter is optimistic that the stock will likely sustain its upward momentum over the coming weeks. Driverless Teslas are now being spotted on the streets of Austin, Texas, with CEO Musk acknowledging the deployment and predicting licensing agreements. Another significant development noted by the analyst is new data from Kelley Blue Book, which shows rising new car prices across the market. The analyst told investors in a research note how, together, the developments signify how the 'key component' of the firm's bullish thesis has started to play out. However, the firm has also warned that any high-profile robotaxi accidents would likely result in 'violent downside'. 'Bottom line: a key component of our TSLA thesis has officially begun playing out. We expect the stock to sustain upward momentum in the coming weeks, as more information is disclosed.' Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is an automotive and clean energy company that leverages advanced artificial intelligence in its autonomous driving technology and robotics initiatives. While we acknowledge the potential of TSLA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
How Robotaxis, AI, and 170Mn Users Can Reinvent UBER Technologies Stock
The ride-hailing game used to revolve around one key factor: who could recruit enough human drivers to move passengers safely and efficiently at the right price. But in 2025, that narrative has shifted dramatically. In Austin, driverless white Jaguar I-PACEs now ferry Uber (UBER) riders without anyone behind the wheel. Just outside the city, Tesla is preparing to launch a fleet of camera-only robotaxis. Meanwhile, in London, start-up Wayve has gained regulatory approval to navigate the city's complex roads using 'embodied' AI. The race has moved from driver recruitment to deploying and managing autonomous fleets. Confident Investing Starts Here: Amid all this disruption, Uber has taken a surprisingly strategic—and perhaps underappreciated—approach. Rather than building its own sensors and hardware, it's leveraging its strengths: a massive user base, rich data, demand density, optimized routing, and a payments platform trusted by over 170 million users. That focus on core assets, while letting partners handle the hardware, is precisely why I still rate the stock a Buy. Uber Earns the Right to Experiment For years, Uber's financials felt like a rollercoaster—propped up by subsidies and weighed down by stock-based compensation. But Q1 2025 told a different story. Revenue rose 14% year-over-year to $11.5 billion, while adjusted EBITDA surged 35% to $1.9 billion. Even more impressive, both operating and free cash flow hit $2.3 billion, confirming that margin improvements are translating into real cash, not just accounting gains. Just as important, Uber is no longer relying solely on ride-hailing. While Mobility still accounts for just over half of gross bookings, the other half now comes from Delivery, Freight, and a fast-growing advertising unit. That ad segment alone is running at a $1.5 billion annual pace after growing about 60% year-over-year, requiring virtually no additional capital. This diversification matters: it buffers Uber against economic swings in travel and commuting, while also funding autonomous tech partnerships without shareholder dilution. Autonomous Excitement for UBER Shareholders Waymo now operates around 100 fully electric Jaguars on the Uber platform in Austin—and according to both companies, those vehicles already complete more trips per day than 99% of the city's human drivers. Autonomy isn't just about cutting labor costs—it's about maximizing utilization beyond human limits. Drivers need breaks; robots don't. The math adds up fast, especially since Uber doesn't own or depreciate those sleek Jaguars—it simply collects a booking fee, while Alphabet picks up the hardware tab. Competition, however, is heating up. Tesla is set to begin a limited rollout of driverless Model Ys on June 22, capitalizing on Texas's flexible regulatory stance. Elon Musk has promised 'thousands' of robotaxis within a year, though federal regulators have already requested safety disclosures. Interestingly, this could actually benefit Uber. If Tesla underprices rides to stimulate adoption, overall trip demand increases, and Uber's algorithm is designed to route users to the vehicle that is cheaper or closer, regardless of who owns it. In that way, the platform profits from competitors' capital investments without having to match them. Developers Need Uber Uber's partner-first strategy is looking smarter with each passing quarter. Running a driverless fleet is massively capital-intensive—lidar systems alone can cost tens of thousands per vehicle, battery supplies are still tight, and companies need an entire depot network for charging and upkeep. Yet all that infrastructure is worthless if the cars are roaming without riders. In autonomous transport, the real bottleneck isn't hardware—it's passengers. Uber already owns the most valuable asset in autonomous mobility: the passengers. Around 28 million trips happen on its platform every day. For any autonomy start-up, partnering with Uber instantly solves the 'cold start' problem—vehicles don't need to roam empty looking for riders. Instead, the app routes them directly to waiting customers. In return, Uber takes its cut, typically a high-teens to mid-twenties percentage of the fare, with zero added capital investment. Layer on advertising, and the upside grows even more compelling. A captive rider staring at a screen in the back of a sleek, electric Jaguar is prime real estate for marketers. Equip those robotaxis with rear-seat displays, and the monetization potential accelerates. Even one ad per 10-minute ride could translate into billions in high-margin revenue by the end of the decade. Plentiful Risks and Real-World Friction As optimistic as the outlook may seem, none of this is a sure thing. A serious robotaxi accident could halt regulatory momentum, just as GM's Cruise experienced when one of its vehicles struck a pedestrian and lost its permits in California. Insurance costs in the U.S. remain steep compared to Uber's international markets, and litigation risk from aggressive plaintiffs' lawyers is always looming. Plus, if Tesla floods city centers with underpriced rides, Uber's take rate could shrink faster than trip volumes grow. Still, Uber's diversified business model offers a buffer. Even if autonomous rollouts stall, the core business is now profitable on its own. And if pricing pressure intensifies, Uber can rely on its growing ad revenue, delivery upsells, and loyalty programs, such as Uber One, to help protect margins and maintain resilience. Uber's Valuation To put these possibilities into a valuation framework, I built a ten-year discounted cash flow model. I project that gross bookings will grow at an average annual rate of 15% through 2028, gradually slowing to 8% as urban markets mature. Adjusted EBITDA margins are expected to expand from the current ~11% to 18% by 2030, driven by a growing contribution from high-margin advertising and fee-based robotaxi services. Applying an 8% weighted average cost of capital and a 3% terminal growth rate, the model yields an estimated equity value of approximately $108 per share. A couple of reality checks reinforce that result. At about 15x forward earnings, the stock trades at a discount to the S&P 500's 28x, despite better cash conversion. UBER's performance against its peers is also impressive, ranking highest on TipRanks' indicators and Smart Score. What is the Prediction for UBER Stock? On Wall Street, UBER stock carries a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 30 Buy, three Hold, and zero Sell ratings over the past three months. UBER's average stock price target of $99 implies approximately 15.5% upside potential over the next twelve months. Uber's Autonomous Advantage and Robotaxi Economics A few years ago, Uber's story hinged on whether part-time drivers could make city life more manageable without wiping out the company's margins. Today, the question has evolved: can removing drivers entirely push profitability to levels few envisioned back in 2017? Uber's decision to rent out its massive rider base to whichever autonomous platform proves safest and most cost-effective looks, for now, like the smartest, most capital-efficient move on the board. The company is generating sustainable profits, funding innovation through operating cash flow, and preserving the flexibility to pivot between partners or renegotiate terms as technology advances. Autonomous taxis won't take over every city street overnight—but the real contest over who profits from them is already underway. And because Uber controls the demand side, it's positioned to earn economic rent, regardless of which lidar, camera, or neural net ultimately powers the vehicle. With shares still trading at traditional software multiples—ignoring the platform's optionality—I'm happy to stay in the back seat with my Buy rating, and let the algorithms do the driving.


Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Tesla's (TSLA) Full Self-Driving Could Expand in China Due to New Data Export Rules
China has released draft guidelines that could help EV maker Tesla (TSLA) expand its advanced driver-assistance features in the country, according to a Bloomberg report on Friday. For the first time, Beijing has provided clear rules on how data generated in China, including from driver-assistance systems and product development, can be accessed, used, and exported. This is an important step for companies like Tesla, which need to send data abroad in order to improve their systems. Confident Investing Starts Here: The proposed guidelines were published by China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, along with seven other government agencies, and are now open for public comment. The framework covers key types of information, such as autonomous driving algorithms, training images, operational data, and vehicle-to-road perception data. These are all critical for developing and improving advanced driver-assistance technologies like Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system. Being able to export this data is especially valuable for Tesla because the core team working on FSD is based in the U.S., and having access to real-world data from Chinese roads would help optimize the system's performance in China, the world's largest car market. It's worth noting that, until now, strict data controls have been a barrier for foreign automakers. However, the new guidelines could provide Tesla with a clearer path to making its most advanced driver-assistance features more competitive in China. What Is the Prediction for Tesla Stock? Overall, analysts have a Hold consensus rating on TSLA stock based on 14 Buys, 12 Holds, and nine Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average TSLA price target of $285.97 per share implies 12.1% downside risk.