logo
Naperville D203 school board candidates agree district moving too fast on proposed changes

Naperville D203 school board candidates agree district moving too fast on proposed changes

Chicago Tribune05-03-2025
The five candidates running for Naperville District 203 School Board say they do not support changes to the district's start and end times and implementation of middle and high school block scheduling as they are currently being proposed.
The candidates addressed the Innovative School Experience, the formal name for the plan currently under discussion at the board level, as part of a candidates' forum this week sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Naperville and the district's General Home and School Association.
Five people are seeking to fill four, four-year seats on the board, including incumbents Charles Cush and Amanda McMillen and newcomers Holly Joy Blastic, Jillian Langer and Marc Willensky. The election is April 1, which coincides with the district's spring break.
The Innovative School Experience is an administration-recommended plan to alter the start and end time of the elementary, middle and high school day, add 15 minutes to elementary school, add more time for math instruction for middle school students, decrease the time high school students are in school and switch to a block format with longer class periods for middle and high school students.
The proposal has not yet been voted on, but the administration has recommended that it take effect in the 2025-26 school year. The district has faced some pushback in the last two months from parents, teachers and students.
Candidates for school board said while they appreciate innovation, they aren't sold on the plan as it currently stands.
Cush, an incumbent who may be voting on the proposal, said that while he believes the reasons behind the Innovative School Experience proposal are the right ones, he doesn't support the plan right now.
'We have two major constituents, both the parents as well as the teachers who don't believe we are ready as the plan is currently constituted,' Cush said. 'I have concerns with the implementation side of it.'
McMillen, the other incumbent in the race, said that while she applauds the district for trying to close the achievement gap, especially in math, the district needs to take more time to determine how to implement the plan and perhaps look to pilot certain pieces, such as changes to the early childhood education, before moving forward.
Langer said the district is on the forefront of developing new curriculum and policies to push the students forward. However, she said, she is concerned for the teachers who will need to prepare new curriculum and concerned about students sitting through an 85-minute class as part of the block schedule. She said more engagement with the community is necessary to take their feedback into account.
'Trying to roll this plan out in August is going to be a big challenge and might put our students back,' Langer said.
Willensky said the district needs to separate the components that will benefit students versus those that improve the district's operations.
'August 2025 is just too soon to do this,' Willensky said. 'There's been a lot of pushback from the community about the timeline to get this all implemented in six months. We have to give teachers time to work on their lesson plans. Families need to plan their schedules. Students need to be prepared for the changes that they will be going through. Right now we have a great school district, and I'm concerned that if we don't do the implementation right, our children in the next year will suffer because of that.'
Blastic said families need more time. She noted parents like herself want to sign up for after-school care for the next school year, but they don't know what the school day will look like.
Parents also need to be given the data that shows the administration proposal meets the district's goals, she said.
In addition to the changes in the school day, candidates also addressed the importance of digital literacy, possible elimination of the federal Department of Education, mental health and how the board can be more accessible to the community.
On the topic of digital learning, Willensky said careers in artificial intelligence did not exist a few years ago, and it is important to embrace changes while teaching students how to use the tools in a responsible way.
Cush said digital learning tools are here to stay, but the district cannot lose focus of teaching critical thinking, communication and adaptability skills.
'These (digital) tools can enhance these skills but they are not going to be a replacement for them,' Cush said. '…Tools will come and go, and there will be new tools we don't know about right now, but it's the skill sets that are critically important.'
Candidates noted that the federal government funds about $10 million, or about 3% of the district's budget and would have to carefully prepare for any impacts that eliminating the Department of Education would bring.
Blastic noted that the federal dollars go towards low-income students, school lunch programs, special education, teacher training and English language learners, which are critical components of education. She said that education is mostly a state prerogative, and the state offers laws and protections for its students.
'We follow Illinois law. We follow Illinois curriculum,' she said. 'We would lose resources. We would lose funds, and I would hope we would be able to keep as many as possible. But we are Illinois. We are Naperville, so we will have state protections for … our students with disabilities to protect all of our students and protect our curriculum.'
McMillen said the district has always prioritized inclusion and equity, which would not go away if the federal government eliminates the education department. The district would have to adapt if necessary to covering the 3% of the district's budget that is federally funded.
'I think we are very fortunate not to rely too much on the federal government, so we will be able to easily adapt,' McMillen said.
On the topic of mental and physical health, Langer said she would advocate for teacher trainings to recognize some of the early warning signs for mental health issues.
'We did not get out of the pandemic for free,' she said.
Blastic said one of parents' concerns is the sense that they have to fight to get services for students with disabilities or special needs. She said it needs to be more of a collaborative rather than combative experience for families.
Willensky said the district should always do more and ensure mental health is as much of a priority as physical health. The district should strengthen existing and create new partnerships with community organizations.
'Early screening to identify issues and problems is very important,' he said. 'I also want to make sure we are bringing the community together to talk about what it is that we can do.'
Candidates agreed the school board can work on different ways they can be accessible to the community.
Cush said each board member has adopted various schools and the board utilizes emails and forums to talk with its stakeholders. He said he believed more outreach can be done on a one-on-one level.
Langer said parents have had enough of surveys and feel their feedback isn't taken into consideration so they don't bother to respond.
'I would like to improve the ways in which we engage with the community … in order to make it more meaningful for them,' she said.
McMillen and Willensky said it would be nice to have listening sessions to hear from the community in a way that doesn't violate the Open Meetings Act.
Blastic said the board needs to be more transparent in its communication. She cited the Innovative School Experience as an example in which high school students were coming home mentioning a block schedule. But block schedules or school start times weren't mentioned to parents during listening sessions before winter break, she said.
'We aren't using the plain clear language and being transparent with parents and the community about what we are really doing,' Blastic said.
Each of the candidates said they have a vested interest in the district and they have a passion for service.
Blastic, an attorney for crime victims rights, has four children in the district. She is co-founder of Naperville Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense.
Cush, a father of three who has served on the board since 2016, is the owner of a consulting business and an adjunct professor at College of DuPage and St. Catherine University in Minneapolis.
Langer, mother of two district students, has a master's degree in public health and is the current home and school president at Maplebrook Elementary School. She is a veteran of the U.S. Army.
McMillen, a licensed clinical social worker, has worked for 20 years in nonprofit organizations that focus on children and families. She has four children in district schools and is running for her second term.
Willensky has more than 30 years' experience in finance and is a former certified public accountant. He said the district's teachers inspired his daughter to study education at Illinois State University.
A video of forum is available on the league's YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/channel/UCYE64ojtgWXSvYyXdBtOkqQ.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Barre voters reject Prop 2½ override for police, other services
Barre voters reject Prop 2½ override for police, other services

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Barre voters reject Prop 2½ override for police, other services

BARRE — Voters in Barre handily rejected a proposed $540,000 Proposition 2½ override in a townwide election Tuesday. Aug. 5. According to unofficial results the town posted online, the measure failed 798-154. There were 952 ballots cast, which represents about a fifth of the town's 4,369 registered voters. The vote, which town officials said would lead to cuts in services, including the police, comes after Town Meeting voters in June, by a 133-67 vote, approved the expenditures that would have flowed from a 'yes' vote. The Telegram & Gazette has reached out to members of the town's three-person Board of Selectmen for comment. At Town Meeting, officials said the override, which would have raised property taxes by $255 a year on the median $359,000 home in town, was needed to avoid cuts in services. The town's police chief – who was recently appointed interim town administrator – said the cuts would amount to an 11% decrease in his budget. He said the cut would lead to elimination of the town's school resource officer and to one-man overnight shifts he said would reduce response times and increase the danger to officers. The fire chief told residents he expected the town to lose its fire inspector. Return to for more on this story. This article originally appeared on Telegram & Gazette: Barre voters reject Prop 2½ override for police, other services Solve the daily Crossword

Trump admin dismisses all Democrats from Puerto Rico's financial oversight board
Trump admin dismisses all Democrats from Puerto Rico's financial oversight board

NBC News

time2 days ago

  • NBC News

Trump admin dismisses all Democrats from Puerto Rico's financial oversight board

Sylvette Santiago, a spokesperson for the board, did not immediately return a message seeking comment on whether the board members would fight the decision. Meanwhile, Rep. Nydia Velázquez, a New York Democrat, criticized the dismissals though she acknowledged what she said were 'serious and longstanding concerns' about actions the board has taken, including implementing austerity measures. 'This sudden purge by Donald Trump is not about justice or reform,' she said in a statement. 'It simply creates an opening to stack the Board with even more extreme, pro-bondholder appointees who will continue to put the needs of hedge funds over the Puerto Rican people.' The board was created in 2016 under the Obama administration, a year after Puerto Rico's government declared it was unable to pay its more than $70 billion public debt load and later filed for the biggest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history. In remarks to the AP, the White House official claimed the board had operated ineffectively and in secret and said it 'shelled out huge sums to law, consulting and lobbying firms.' The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the subject, also accused the board's staff of receiving 'exorbitant salaries.' Puerto Rico is struggling to restructure more than $9 billion in debt held by the state's Electric Power Authority, with officials holding bitter mediations with creditors demanding full payment. It's the only Puerto Rico government debt pending a restructuring, with the White House official accusing the board of preferring to 'extend the bankruptcy.' In February, the board's executive director, Robert Mujica Jr., said it was 'impossible' for Puerto Rico to pay the $8.5 billion that bondholders are demanding. He instead unveiled a new fiscal plan that proposed a $2.6 billion payment for creditors. The plan does not call for any rate increases for an island that has one of the highest power bills in any U.S. jurisdiction as chronic power outages persist, given the grid's weak infrastructure. Alvin Velázquez, a bankruptcy law professor at Indiana University, said he worries the dismissal of the board members could spark another crisis in Puerto Rico. 'This is really about getting a deal out of (the power company) that is not sustainable for the rate payers of Puerto Rico,' he said. Velázquez, former chair for the unsecured creditors committee during the bankruptcy proceedings, also questioned if the dismissals are legal, since board members can only be removed for just cause. 'What's the cause?' he said. 'What you're going to see is another instance in which the Trump administration is taking on and testing the courts.'

McFarland asks voters to consider city sales tax measure for public safety, city improvement
McFarland asks voters to consider city sales tax measure for public safety, city improvement

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

McFarland asks voters to consider city sales tax measure for public safety, city improvement

BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KGET) — The city of McFarland is asking voters to provide input on a suggested city sales tax measure, which will be voted upon during the special municipal election set in November. The city is asking the Kern County Board of Supervisors to consolidate a new special election with the one already scheduled in November. If approved Tuesday, the city can submit a ballot measure to the voters so they can consider an ordinance that would establish a 1% general sales tax, according to the board agenda. According to the city of McFarland's website, voters will consider the McFarland Essential City Services and Public Safety Measure during the Nov. 4 election. The measure proposes a 1% local sales tax to support city services. Kern County Fair to host admission, ride wristband flash sale on Friday These services include police patrols, emergency response, fire protection, road and pothole repair, downtown revitalization, community facility improvements, parks and senior services. The measure, if approved, is expected to generate about $1 million each year and remain in effect until ended by voters, the city said on its website. The measure would also require citizen oversight, independent audits and locally controlled funds. The McFarland City Council can use tax for general reasons if the measure is approved by at least four of the five councilmembers and the tax is approved by a majority vote during an election of the issue, the agenda said. The population of McFarland in 2020 was 14,161 and there are 5,065 registered voters in the city as of Monday. According to McFarland's adopted budget for fiscal year 2025-2026, the total general fund is projected to be $4,229,403 by June 30, 2026, with $2,749,886 of that being for capital improvement projects. The city said without an additional source of revenue, it will lack funds to repair and manage infrastructure, build a new police station and revitalize the downtown area, according to the agenda. The police station construction is expected to cost around $14 million, the city's budget report said. Other major capital projects include road reconstruction and water and sewer system improvements, which are estimated to cost $16.7 million and $58.9 million, respectively. The agenda also said the measure will allow the city to provide police services like quick responses to 9-1-1 emergencies, neighborhood patrols, crime prevention, investigations and more. Never miss a story: Make your homepage The deadline for the public to submit arguments for or against the tax measure is Wednesday, Aug. 6, at 4:30 p.m. Each argument should be less than 300 words and include the printed name and signature of the author(s), according to city officials. Arguments can be submitted to the McFarland City Clerk's Office, located at 401 West Kern Ave in McFarland. Changes or withdrawals for the arguments are allowed until the deadline. Rebuttal arguments must be less than 250 words and submitted within 10 calendar days after the final date for submitting direct arguments. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store