André Pratte: Dialogue key to decreasing tensions between Alberta and Quebec
Last week, at a hearing held by the Alberta Next panel, Premier Danielle Smith made a derogatory comment about Quebec that went largely unnoticed. Regarding the possibility that her province might withdraw from the national supply management regime, Smith stated: 'Creating our own Alberta version of supply management, maybe as a pathway to a market system and … just because it would stick our finger in the eye of Quebec … might be (something) we want to do a little consultation on.'
Let's leave aside that sticking a finger in fellow Canadians' eyes is a very poor basis for crucial policy decisions. Her comment is of the kind that responsible politicians in Canada should not encourage, let alone make. There is enough anti-Alberta, anti-Toronto, anti-Quebec prejudice in our country; while defending their province's interests, provincial premiers should avoid language that escalates rather than calms tensions within our federation.
I understand why many Albertans are angry with Quebec. I also understand how Quebecers came to hold negative views about the oil sands. I believe that such misunderstandings can be alleviated by dialogue. Unfortunately, few of our elected officials, federally or provincially, appear willing to engage in such open-minded discussions.
Politically, it is often easier to ride on people's prejudices than to challenge them. This is certainly what Legault has been doing since being elected in 2018. Unfortunately, Mr. Legault has invested very little energy in improving relationships between Quebec and other provinces.
My impression is that Smith is doing exactly the same in encouraging the view that Alberta's problems are mainly caused by a federal government controlled by Ontario and Quebec. I noticed that the Premier's message on Canada Day said very little about what unites Canadians; it was all about Alberta.
It is unclear how Mr. Legault feels about Canada, so we should not expect more from him. But we know that Smith is a proud Canadian; her words and actions should reflect that. I am afraid that, for the moment, the Alberta Premier is more concerned about not losing the separatist vote than about promoting Alberta's interests within a united Canada.
This is a time where Canadians need to hold hands to face the new, threatening world we live in. This can only happen if we overcome our simplistic views of Canadians from other regions, cultures, religions, age groups, etc. Diversity is Canada's strength, we often hear. However, we need to go beyond flowery statements. Our national unity is based on respect for diversity. This requires hard work from everybody, especially our leaders.
I had the privilege of sitting in Canada's Senate for three and a half years. There are things I did not like in the Red Chamber, which is why I resigned. What I enjoyed the most was working with thoughtful Canadians from all walks of life and regions in order to solve common problems, from pipelines to supply management, from the environment to public finance, from official languages to national unity. The vast majority of Senators I worked with were willing to listen to my concerns, and I certainly tried my best to listen, really listen, to theirs. In the end, most of the time, we found a pathway to a win-win solution.
Sitting beside me in the Senate for two years was Murray Sinclair, who sadly passed last year. Murray, as we all know, had courageously chaired the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. I learned more from Senator Sinclair during those two years, not only about Indigenous issues but about life in general, than in my 35 years in journalism. I could say the same about quite of few of my former colleagues.
Listening and keeping an open mind is the key to keeping this country together at a crucial time in our common history. Our past demonstrates that we are up to the task if we put our hearts into it. Let's begin.
André Pratte, a former Senator, is a communications consultant and a doctoral student in history.
National Post
Jesse Kline: Give 16-year-olds the vote? Only if you want never-ending socialism
Adam Pankratz: Roberts and McAfee are right — no one cares what sports personalities think about politics
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TSX futures rise on US-Japan trade deal
(Reuters) -Futures tied to Canada's benchmark index rose on Wednesday, after U.S. President Donald Trump revived hopes for deals with its trading partners following an agreement with Japan. Futures on the S&P/TSX index were up 0.5% at 1,637.1 points by 06:20 a.m. ET (1020 GMT). Trump struck a trade deal with Japan, lowering tariffs on auto imports and sparing Tokyo from punishing new levies on other goods, in exchange for a $550 billion package of U.S.-bound investment and loans. Meanwhile, prospects of an EU-U.S. trade agreement improved after Trump said on Tuesday that EU representatives would come for trade negotiations on Wednesday. The news lifted market sentiment and sparked hopes of more U.S. agreements before the August 1 tariff deadline. In commodities, gold prices fell and oil prices were steady. Copper prices touched their highest in over two weeks. In corporate news, Zara founder Amancio Ortega's investment vehicle Pontegadea Inversiones has agreed to acquire a 49% stake in PD Ports from Brookfield Asset Management. In the U.S., Alphabet and Tesla will kick off the results season for the "Magnificent Seven" stocks later in the day. Canada's main stock index rose on Tuesday, led by mining shares. FOR CANADIAN MARKETS NEWS, CLICK ON CODES: TSX market report [.TO] Canadian dollar and bonds report [CAD/] [CA/] Reuters global stocks poll for Canada Canadian markets directory


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Concerns over class sizes, layoffs loom over back-to-school
As Indiana schools prepare to welcome students in the coming weeks, teachers are bracing for larger class sizes thanks to uncertainty with education funding. The big picture: The Trump administration is withholding more than $5 billion in funding for K-12 programs pending a reevaluation "given the change in administration," according to the Department of Education. That comes on top of cuts to state property taxes that fund local governments, including school districts. Driving the news: Warren Township Schools start Thursday, with many following suit next week. What they're saying:"We've heard quite a bit of talk about potential reductions in force," Jennifer Smith-Margraf, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, told Axios. Smith-Margraf said she's not aware of any layoffs, but knows some districts are choosing not to fill open positions as they wait to see what final openings and budget numbers look like. "It's been a good 15 years since we've really heard talk at this level about positions," she said. "Folks are really wondering about class size and caseloads and what that means for services for students." Why it matters: Research shows that even small reductions in class size can lead to gains in student achievement. Yes, and: Indiana just got back disappointing standardized test scores showing that students made little progress in English and language arts. Between the lines: Smith-Margraf says that teachers will also feel the squeeze of large classes in other ways. Providing extra classroom supplies is one of the first things that cash-strapped schools will cut, meaning teachers are often doing it themselves. "As families have to prioritize other things over school supplies … food, health care, making sure they have a roof over their head … educators have been digging deeper and deeper into their pockets to make up that gap," she said. Threat level: A smaller workforce could also mean larger ratios of students to school counselors, social workers and other positions. Flashback: Class size used to be something that teachers could negotiate in collective bargaining agreements, but that law changed in 2011. ISTA has unsuccessfully fought to win that right back in recent years. What we're watching: More than 20 governors have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for withholding the educational funding. The governors said the funding freeze has "caused chaos" in their states' educational systems.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Wild Quarter for Crude Puts Big Oil Trading Desks in Spotlight
(Bloomberg) — Big oil companies are forecast to post their lowest quarterly profits in four years after geopolitics whipsawed prices and left some of their traders on the wrong side of the volatility. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US Why the Federal Reserve's Building Renovation Costs $2.5 Billion Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom Milan Corruption Probe Casts Shadow Over Property Boom How San Jose's Mayor Is Working to Build an AI Capital Crude rallied 31% over a seven-week stretch in May and June, then plunged to end the quarter 10% lower than where it began as President Donald Trump's trade war and OPEC+'s supply increases outweighed the surge from Israeli and US attacks on Iran. The wild swings caused diverging performance at Shell Plc and BP Plc, which have larger trading divisions than their US rivals. Shell warned earlier this month of 'significantly lower' trading earnings while BP guided to 'strong' profits from its oil traders, providing a much-needed boost for Chief Executive Officer Murray Auchincloss. Overall, the combined second-quarter earnings for Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM), Chevron Corp. (CVX), Shell, (SHEL) TotalEnergies SE (TTE) and BP (BP) are forecast to fall 12% from the prior period to $19.88 billion, according to analysts' estimates compiled by Bloomberg. 'Volatility usually is good because it means more trading profits, but because it was led by geopolitical risk it was more difficult to grab,' Goldman Sachs (GS) Managing Director Michele Della Vigna said in an interview. 'Not disastrous — but definitely a tougher quarter.' Big Oil earnings kick off Thursday when Total releases results. Shell reports July 31, followed by Exxon and Chevron on Aug. 1, and BP on Aug. 5. Higher supplies from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its partners along with concerns that Trump's tariffs will dampen global demand kept average crude prices below $70 a barrel in the quarter, making it harder for the world's largest energy companies to fund the shareholders returns that have become a focal point for investors. The five supermajors are expected to increase their combined net debt this quarter to meet the payouts, even after several trimmed buybacks or spending earlier in the year. 'This isn't 2023 anymore,' HSBC analyst Kim Fustier said in a research note. 'After two years of over-distributing, room to fund buybacks through debt has shrunk.' Average debt metrics are now 'slightly above long-term historical levels.' The weakness in oil and gas prices is likely to be partially offset by improvements in refining margins in both the US and Europe as summer driving season spurs additional demand. Exxon, BP and Shell all noted better refining earnings, though the size of the gains pales in comparison to the size of their larger production divisions. Trading will be of particular interest this quarter. European oil stocks fell earlier this month after Shell disclosed a weaker-than-expected performance from its trading division, usually one of its most reliable profit centers. /Even so, Shell (SHEL) has been the standout performer among the five largest energy majors this year, with its stock rising about 10%, despite the 8% decline in Brent crude. Shell's outperformance compared with BP prompted speculation that it will bid for its London-based rival, which has lagged after its pivot toward low-carbon energy failed to pay off. The Anglo-Dutch major said it has no intention of making an offer in late June, a move that bars a bid for at least six months under UK securities laws. But the episode is likely to prompt analysts to pepper CEO Wael Sawan with questions about his long-term strategy. With a looming Shell takeover bid off the table, BP's (BP) push to refocus on its oil and gas roots is crucial to reverse years of poor performance. The struggling British major, which is under pressure from activist investor Elliott Investment Management, appointed former CRH Plc (CRH) CEO Albert Manifold as its new chairman Monday, replacing Helge Lund. BP expects to report rising production, and 'slightly' lower net debt. Lower borrowing would be welcome news given the company had previously said its already-large debt pile would rise through the first half of the year, Della Vigna said. Chevron reduced spending on buybacks in the second quarter, though kept within its annual guidance, as it adjusted to lower oil prices. CEO Mike Wirth will be keen to show progress on plans to generate $10 billion in additional free cash flow at $70 Brent from new projects in Kazakhstan and the US Gulf and lower capital spending in the Permian Basin. Wirth is also apt to tout his company's recent acquisition of Hess Corp. that came after prevailing in an arbitration fight with Exxon. The victory gives Chevron a stake in a booming oil field that Exxon operates in Guyana. For Exxon (XOM), the focus will be a list of key project start-ups. In contrast to rivals, the Texas oil giant increased its capital spending this year as it seeks to drive low-cost production growth later this decade and beyond. Yellowtail and Bacalhau, offshore oil developments in Guyana and Brazil respectively, are scheduled for the second half of this year. Golden Pass, a liquefied natural gas export plant in Texas, is set to begin by the end of 2025. But the growth comes at a cost. Analysts expect Exxon's net debt to increase 18% to $24.28 billion as it funds the expansion on top of its dividend and $20 billion in annual buybacks. Affordability of shareholder returns, ramped up after the industry posted record profits in 2022, will be a common theme. For the third consecutive quarter, the five supermajors' combined free cash flow won't be enough to meet amount they plan to pay out in dividends and buybacks, according to analysts' estimates compiled by Bloomberg. Chevron and BP have already reduced buyback spending, raising the prospect that others will follow, especially with earnings expected to be 66% lower than the 2022 record. 'With oil around $70, I think they will pretty much all maintain the buybacks,' Della Vigna said. 'If we did go down to $60 or below as we expect in the second half, then I think we will get more differentiation with some companies potentially cutting the buyback and others maintaining it.' Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border Thailand's Changing Cannabis Rules Leave Farmers in a Tough Spot How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign up for the Yahoo Finance Morning Brief By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Sign in to access your portfolio