logo
Civil service is ‘too remote' from people's lives across UK, says minister

Civil service is ‘too remote' from people's lives across UK, says minister

The Guardian14 hours ago

The Whitehall civil service is too remote from people's lives and needs to be 'turned inside out' as part of plans to drive three of Keir Starmer's missions from outside London, a Cabinet Office minister has said.
Georgia Gould, a former leader of Camden council who had a meteoric rise after her election as a Labour MP last year, said the government's plan to move thousands more civil service jobs out of London was not about just 'having offices in places' – and Whitehall civil servants needed to be more familiar with the day-to-day problems in frontline services from health centres to family hubs.
She said her job was to help close the 'big gap between those doing the frontline operational roles and those who are making policies' by helping them to work together, share data and come up with new ideas about how to improve people's lives – especially those who 'fall through the cracks' of different public services.
Gould told the Guardian that Whitehall working would be 'turned inside out', as the Cabinet Office announced Starmer's health mission would be based in Leeds, its opportunity mission in Sheffield and its growth mission in Darlington, with civil servants working with local government and frontline workers to pioneer new approaches.
The Cabinet Office announced in May that major Whitehall government buildings were to be shut by ministers as they seek to shed 12,000 civil servant jobs in London, while moving thousands of roles to cities across the UK.
It set a target of 50% of all senior civil servants being based outside London within five years, with the aim of policy being made closer to the communities affected.
Gould said the speed of change needed to rise, as some regional campuses of civil servants were still too divorced from where their work had an impact.
'I've gone to visit a lot of the hubs and it's great that people are coming from those places and working there, but sometimes they still have their departmental corners and they're not really working any differently with the places that they're situated in,' she said. 'So I think there's a massive opportunity to bring the civil servants together with … communities to design public services from the bottom up, work out what's going on on the frontline and change things.'
Gould said her approach to the job of public service reform was informed by her time at Camden, where the council transformed children's services on her watch.
'Camden is really not that far but Whitehall felt very, very far away and it often felt that the kind of experience of the frontline just wasn't taken into account when decisions were being made,' she said. 'There's one way of making policy – doing submissions, thinking about things in a room, about what works best – and there's another way, which is getting alongside those on the frontline, whether that's housing staff or jobcentre staff.'
She added: 'They know the problems, they know what doesn't work, and testing new approaches and then scaling them up … I think that is incredibly energising for civil servants to work in that way. They don't always feel like they have permission, they don't know how to start.'
Gould said civil servants she had spoken to were excited by her plans but also made clear that 'that's not how we've done things' traditionally.
'It's really a new approach,' she said. 'It is about giving people actively the space to test new approaches and they identify on the frontline barriers that we're creating at the centre.'
Gould was elected in Queen's Park and Maida Vale last year and became a minister immediately. She is the daughter of one the architects of New Labour, Philip Gould, and has previously described a childhood out delivering Labour leaflets before she could speak.
Her portfolio in the Cabinet Office, under Pat McFadden, spans from public service reform to public sector procurement.
Asked about the US 'department for government efficiency' and Reform UK's attempts to emulate it in Britain, Gould said the government was onboard with cutting waste through better procurement, but that innovating based on frontline experience could also save money.
'Everyone takes their own approach, and I think there is absolutely a role for looking at value for money through contracts. Basic efficiency should just be the baseline of doing good government … but I think when we're talking about people-based services, I think we have to design things differently, because often we have people costing millions of pounds who are using multiple services and we're not really supporting them. If we were much more focused on prevention or working with them at an earlier point we'd save a huge amount of money.'
She cited her experience working with someone who lacked the confidence to go to job interviews partly because of self-consciousness about his teeth. The human-centred approach that worked to help him had been enabling him to see a dentist.
On artificial intelligence, which is being embedded in the civil service as a way of speeding up processes, Gould said she did not see a conflict with a drive to provide human-based services and that AI could cut time spent on paperwork.
She said: 'If frontline officers are spending all their time on laborious processes, that is really, really frustrating, so I think they can free up their time so those processes are much easier through AI.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RAF fighter jets to be scrambled to Middle East after Iran missiles
RAF fighter jets to be scrambled to Middle East after Iran missiles

Daily Record

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

RAF fighter jets to be scrambled to Middle East after Iran missiles

The UK already has jets in the region as part of its Operation Shader contribution but more military assets, described by Keir Starmer as 'contingency support', are being deployed. Fighter jets and extra British military assets will be deployed to the Middle East as fears grow over an all-out war in the region, reveals Keir Starmer. The assets have been described by the Prime Minister as "contingency support" and it is understood aircraft began deployment preparations on Friday. The UK already has jets in the region as part of its Operation Shader contribution. ‌ The PM also urged the Iranian regime and Benjamin Netanyahu's Israeli government to de-escalate and pull back from the brink as he flew to the G7 in Canada, reports the Mirror. ‌ It came as Iranian missiles rained down on Tel Aviv in response to the Israeli government's assault on military and nuclear targets in Tehran. The country also warned the UK, US and France against stopping its strikes on Israel - or face their own bases and ships in the region being targeted. Speaking to reporters, the Prime Minister said: "I will always make the right decisions for the UK and our allies. "We are moving assets to the region, including jets, and that is for contingency support in the region. I will be clear-eyed in relation to our duties and obligations and my duties as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom." Pressed on whether the assets in the region would be involved in defending Israel, the PM told reporters he would not "get into operational issues". "We're having ongoing discussions with our allies all of the time, both myself and David Lammy, as you've seen, who also spoke to the Iranians, as I think is a matter of record now," he said. "Our constant message is to de-escalate, and therefore everything we're doing, all discussions we're having are to do with de-escalation. ‌ "In relation to Israel, I had a good and constructive discussion with the Prime Minister Netanyahu yesterday, and that included discussions about the safety and security of Israel, as you would expect, between two allies." The PM added: "We do have long-standing concerns about the nuclear programme Iran has. "We do recognize Israel's right to self defence, but I'm absolutely clear that this needs to de-escalate. There is a huge risk of escalation for the region. More widely in terms of conflict, you can see the impact already on the economy and oil prices. ‌ "And of course, all of this is linked to what's going on in Gaza. So you can see why my strong position is this needs to de-escalate, and that is the primary focus of the discussions that I've been having and will continue to be." Mr Starmer also refused to say whether the UK had been given advanced notice of Israel's strike." Mr Starmer also refused to say whether the UK had been given advanced notice of Israel's strike. He said: "I'm not going to go into what information we had at the time or since. But we discuss these things intensely with our allies. But I'm not going to get into precisely what we knew, because it's a constant flow of information between our allies, and between us and the US. I'm not going to start answering what goes around on intelligence channels." Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.

Reform is Corbynism with a flag: the Tories stand for economic freedom
Reform is Corbynism with a flag: the Tories stand for economic freedom

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Reform is Corbynism with a flag: the Tories stand for economic freedom

I confess I shudder every time I hear that word. Yet politicians from Keir Starmer to Nigel Farage are now gleefully chanting 'nationalisation!' as a solution to every economic challenge in the utterly deluded belief that the answer to our problems is getting civil servants to take control of business. The Conservative Party knows that the state is already too big, much too slow, and doing far too much and doing it badly. Some of that happened under previous Conservative governments. It's my job to fix this and to ensure that those mistakes are never repeated. The solution isn't more government, it's smarter government, better government – and that means getting out of the way of private enterprise. Growth comes from business, from the risk-takers, from the people who devote their time, money and energy to building things. It doesn't come from the politicians sat in offices dreaming up new ways to spend your taxes. Yet that is now the way Starmer and Farage are talking about economic growth. Let's start with oil and gas. As many as 10,000 jobs have been lost in this sector recently. According to Offshore Energies UK, capital investment in our domestic industry is set to collapse from £14.1 billion to £2.3 billion in just four years. The business environment is not friendly and not competitive. But what is Reform's answer? Give the Government a stake in new oil and gas fields. Labour's? Hike the so-called 'windfall tax' and make it permanent. Both will scare off serious investors. On Friday I called on the Labour Government to scrap the windfall tax on North Sea producers. The windfall is gone, but the tax is still there, strangling investment and killing jobs and growth. I am proposing a solution that puts business and workers first. But naturally Labour criticised it. The same fantasy economics is playing out in steel. British Steel in Scunthorpe is haemorrhaging money – losing nearly £1 million a day. Labour's answer is to nationalise it. Reform's is to do the same, but with even more gusto! When the Port Talbot steelworks faced a similar crisis, I worked with a private company – Tata Steel – to find a solution that made economic sense and secured a future for the community in South Wales. Because unlike Starmer and Farage, I know to be successful a business doesn't need politicians telling it how to operate. It needs politicians who will listen to what those who do the job says works. The Labour government started taking us backwards last year – sneaking through rail nationalisation, hoping voters had forgotten the British Rail disaster. It's not just farcical that the first nationalised train ended up being a replacement bus service, it's a warning of what's to come. And after oil, steel and rail, the next on their list is water. The drumbeat to nationalise Thames Water is getting louder. But the answer isn't to send civil servants in. The answer is to create a climate where investment flows in rather than out. That means protecting the profit motive, not punishing it. Everyone knows we Conservatives have a battle on our hands. Reform pretends to be a Right-wing party, but economically Reform is Corbynism with a flag: more benefits, more subsidies, more central planning, more control. It is socialism that is dressed up as patriotism. Under Labour, business taxes are at record highs. The Trade unions are running everything from education to business policy – hence the Employment Rights Bill that effectively makes everyone a union member unless they choose to opt out of it. The public sector is getting inflation-busting pay rises, while the private sector (the source of economic growth) is getting squeezed. It should tell you all you need to know that 10,000 entrepreneurs have already fled the country since Starmer took over last year. Reform and Labour both want to grow the state. Under my leadership the Conservatives will prioritise growing opportunity and prosperity. Margaret Thatcher once said progress comes from the 'inventiveness, ability, determination and the pioneering spirit' of ordinary people. She was right then and she's right now. The Conservative Party is not here to run your business, or burden you with endless taxes and pointless regulation. We are the last line of defence for economic freedom, and we will stop the other parties from taking away what belongs to you.

PM announces national inquiry into grooming gangs scandal
PM announces national inquiry into grooming gangs scandal

STV News

timean hour ago

  • STV News

PM announces national inquiry into grooming gangs scandal

Sir Keir Starmer has announced the government will launch a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal, despite resisting calls for one for months. It comes after the government commissioned a review into the scandal by Baroness Louise Casey, which has recommended a national inquiry and is due to be published in full next week. The prime minister told reporters as he travelled to the G7 summit in Canada: 'I have read every single word of her report and I am going to accept her recommendation. That is the right thing to do.' Since the scandal became a point of fierce political discussion earlier this year, the government has repeatedly insisted there was no need for a national inquiry, instead launching five locally-led investigations. The prime minister had previously argued another inquiry would delay justice for the victims of the scandal, saying the government wanted to get on with implementing the recommendations of a 2022 inquiry into child sexual exploitation. Baroness Louise Casey was commissioned to carry out a 'rapid' national audit on the scandal. / Credit: James Manning/PA 'From the start I have always said that we should implement the recommendations we have got,' the PM told reporters. 'I have never said we should not look again at any issue – I had wanted to be assured that on the question of any inquiry, that's why I asked Louise Casey, who I hugely respect, to do an audit.' Pressed on the detail of the inquiry, the PM said: 'It will be statutory under the inquiries act, that will take a bit of time to sort out exactly how that works and we will set that out in an orderly way.' Debate around tackling grooming gangs raged earlier this year after tech billionaire and X owner Elon Musk began attacking Sir Keir Starmer and his government, accusing them of being 'complicit' in the scandal. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK have repeatedly called for a national inquiry into the scandal. Starmer previously accused Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch of 'jumping on the bandwagon', by calling for a national investigation. The Conservatives had tabled an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill that was due to be voted on in Parliament next week, calling for the government to set up a national statutory inquiry within three months. In response to the announcement on a statutory inquiry Badenoch said: 'Keir Starmer doesn't know what he thinks unless an official report has told him so. 'Just like he dismissed concerns about the winter fuel payment and then had to u-turn, just like he needed the Supreme Court to tell him what a woman is, he had to be led by the nose to make this correct decision here. 'I've been repeatedly calling for a full national inquiry since January. It's about time he recognised he made a mistake and apologise for six wasted months.' The government had previously argued that there had already been a national inquiry into the grooming gangs, referring to the 2022 Jay Inquiry into child sex abuse. Debate around grooming gangs was reignited this year after tech billionaire Elon Musk attacked Starmer and his government. / Credit: AP The Jay inquiry described the sexual abuse of children as an 'epidemic that leaves tens of thousands of victims in its poisonous wake'. It looked into abuse by organised groups following multiple convictions of sexual offences against children across the UK between 2010-2014, including in Rotherham, Cornwall, Derbyshire, Rochdale and Bristol. In November last year, Professor Jay said she felt 'frustrated' that none of the probe's 20 recommendations had been implemented more than two years after its conclusion. Reports in The Times newspaper suggest the Casey review will say that white British girls who were targeted by grooming gangs were 'institutionally ignored for fear of racism'. The Casey audit was originally due to take three months from when it was announced in January. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store