Long-Range ‘Deep Precision Strike' Missile To Be Developed By UK And Germany
The United Kingdom and Germany have announced that they will team up to produce a 'deep precision strike' weapon with a range of over 2,000 kilometers (1,243 miles). At this point, it's unclear whether a ballistic or cruise missile — or perhaps both types — will be the preferred solution. However, the project reflects growing ambitions among European NATO members to field long-range strike capabilities, faced by a growing Russian threat on the alliance's eastern flank.
The announcement about the new weapon was made yesterday in Berlin by German Minister of Defense Boris Pistorius and his British counterpart John Healey. It came ahead of today's meeting of defense ministers from the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, and Poland in Rome — the so-called European Group of Five (E5).
New heights in
military cooperation – Defence Ministers Healey & Pistorius agreed:
develop 2,000km Deep Precision Strike Capability
joint procurement of Sting Ray torpedoes for P-8 Poseidon aircraft
strategic land systems partnership
continue BOXER co-operation pic.twitter.com/W5U3cJaWAY
— German Embassy London (@GermanEmbassy) May 16, 2025
The plan to develop a deep precision strike weapon is the most ambitious development so far under the bilateral defense cooperation pact, the Trinity House Agreement, that the United Kingdom and Germany signed last October. You can read our full analysis of that partnership here.
According to a statement yesterday from the U.K. Ministry of Defense, the new weapon 'will be among the most advanced systems ever designed by the United Kingdom, to safeguard the British public and reinforce NATO deterrence, while boosting the U.K. and European defense sectors.'
A timeline for the development of the new missile has not been announced, and it's unclear how much the program could cost.
While the United Kingdom and Germany working together on a project of this kind is unprecedented, the capabilities the countries are seeking to develop and field are less surprising.
Russia's extensive use of ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles against Ukraine has highlighted a major gap in the inventories of many European NATO countries.
In fact, among European NATO members, only Turkey possesses a conventional ground-launched missile with a range of more than 186 miles — the indigenously developed Bora short-range ballistic missile. Meanwhile, Russia has various ground-launched systems with this kind of performance, able to carry conventional or nuclear warheads. This is before taking into account Russia's air-launched and maritime long-range strike capabilities, which also vastly outmatch their NATO counterparts in Europe.
When the Trinity House Agreement was signed, it was stated that the two countries would work together to 'rapidly develop' new extended deep strike weapons. No more details were provided at the time, but it was stated that the weapon or weapons would be expected to fly further and attack targets with greater precision than the Storm Shadow air-launched cruise missile used by the U.K. Royal Air Force and others. Considering the Storm Shadow is already extremely precise, it's not immediately obvious how such an improvement would be secured.
Previous reports had suggested that the British were looking at developing a strike weapon that would have a range of about 2,000 miles, which would allow it to reach Moscow after a launch from the United Kingdom. The weapon was said to be a deterrent to Russian tactical nuclear missiles, which are being fielded in increasingly advanced and long-reaching forms, including in Kaliningrad, the Russian enclave on the Baltic Sea. However, even the 2,000-kilometer range of the deep precision strike weapon would allow the Russian capital to be struck after launch from almost any location in Germany.
Under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, or INF, signed by the Soviet Union's Mikhail Gorbachev and U.S. President Ronald Reagan in 1987, Russia and the United States were prohibited from deploying nuclear or conventionally armed ground-based cruise and ballistic missiles with ranges between 310 and 3,420 miles.
U.S. President Donald Trump formally withdrew from the treaty in 2019, ostensibly over Russia's fielding of a prohibited ground-based cruise missile system, the 9M729 (SSC-8 Screwdriver), something the Kremlin continues to deny it has done. Since then, however, long-range strike capabilities are very much part of the defense landscape in Europe once again.
Last summer, France, Germany, Italy, and Poland launched the European Long-Range Strike Approach (ELSA) — later joined by Sweden and the United Kingdom. Once again, this effort calls for the development of a new capability for 'long-range strikes,' although the type of weapon being pursued is not mentioned. As with the Anglo-German program, it's not specified whether ELSA is looking to develop a cruise or a ballistic missile.
The UK has agreed to take part in the European Long-range Strike Approach (ELSA). Not unexpected given earlier signals from German-UK meetings in July. Helpfully though the UK MOD press release provides a planned in-service entry date 'by the 2030s'.https://t.co/jiv123Yfsi pic.twitter.com/aSD0nuYVKk
— Timothy Wright (@Wright_T_J) October 17, 2024
Previous announcements state that the French-led ELSA project intended to provide a missile with a range of between 1,000 and 2,000 kilometers (621 and 1,243 miles) and that it should be in service by the 2030s.
Many of the similar developments in this field have focused on ground-launched long-range strike capabilities, with the United States very much at the forefront.
The U.S. has announced that it will deploy to Germany, on a rotational basis, starting next year, a range of advanced ground-launched weapons. These include the SM-6 multi-purpose missile and Tomahawk cruise missile, as well as 'developmental hypersonic weapons.' This latter is a reference to the Dark Eagle and potentially others, like the Operational Fires (OpFires) ground-launched hypersonic missile system and the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) short-range ballistic missile, both of which are also now in development.
It is also possible that the Anglo-German effort might result in a weapon for launch from aircraft, ships, or even submarines.
Of these options, a ship-launched cruise missile might be the most practical.
The Royal Navy already operates the U.S.-made Tomahawk cruise missile, launched from its nuclear-powered attack submarines. Recently, it's been reported that Germany is also looking at acquiring Tomahawk to arm its forthcoming Type 127 frigates, although it could also be retrofitted on in-service German Navy surface combatants. Tomahawk, which is conventionally armed, has a range of around 1,000 miles with a 1,000-pound unitary warhead.
Tomahawk can be fired from the Mk 41 vertical launch system (VLS), found on most German frigate classes, while the U.K. Royal Navy is building two new classes of warship that will also have these launchers. The same VLS could also be an option for the deep precision strike weapon.
In terms of air-launched options, there will be a degree of commonality between the United Kingdom's F-35B stealth fighters and the F-35As on order for Germany, although it's questionable whether an air-launched cruise missile with this kind of range could be carried even externally by a Joint Strike Fighter. Certainly, it would be too large to fit internally in the stealth fighter's weapons bays, especially the F-35B, which has less space for internal stores. A more suitable air-launch platform might be the Eurofighter Typhoon, operated by both countries and already proven to be capable of carrying heavier external stores, notably in the shape of the Storm Shadow.
If a cruise missile is the chosen path toward achieving the deep precision strike weapon, the two countries may select one with hypersonic performance, which would make it considerably harder for hostile air defenses to intercept. Germany and the United Kingdom are already working on hypersonic powerplants, with the U.K. Ministry of Defense's Team Hypersonics (UK) program notably seeking to have a hypersonic weapon technology demonstrator ready by 2030. There is also the possibility that, from the British side, the effort could draw upon hypersonic missile research being undertaken as part of the trilateral Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) security cooperation agreement.
Developing a new ballistic missile to fulfill the deep precision strike criteria is also a possibility, but it's been many decades since either the United Kingdom or Germany were developing and producing these kinds of weapons.
Whether a cruise missile or a ballistic missile, the announcement about the new weapon does not mention the kind of warhead that it will carry. Recent developments suggest that a nuclear payload capability, even if a latent feature, should perhaps not be ruled out.
Currently, the United Kingdom maintains a submarine-based nuclear deterrent, based around Trident 2 D5 submarine-launched ballistic missiles. Germany does not have its own nuclear weapons, but is supplied with U.S.-owned B61 thermonuclear bombs under the NATO nuclear-sharing arrangement.
Under U.S. President Donald Trump, there have been increasing discussions about the future of nuclear deterrence among European leaders, reflecting a deepening crisis in the transatlantic alliance. Before he took office, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called for talks with his British and French colleagues about European 'nuclear sharing or at least nuclear security.' Meanwhile, France has reportedly looked at the possibility of deploying its own air-launched nuclear weapons to Germany in the future.
With these developments in mind, it's certainly conceivable that the United Kingdom and Germany might consider a nuclear-armed deep precision strike weapon, especially if Germany begins to have doubts about the reliability of Washington in helping to secure its nuclear deterrent.
Overall, the joint deep precision strike reflects the growing push by both the United Kingdom and Germany to bolster European security, while at the same time driving economic growth.
As part of the burgeoning military cooperation between the two countries under the Trinity House Agreement, yesterday also saw the announcement of a joint procurement program for Sting Ray torpedoes to arm P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol and reconnaissance aircraft. These are being procured by both the United Kingdom and Germany, which previously unveiled plans to operate their fleets closely together, to provide better anti-submarine warfare coverage of the critical North Atlantic region.
Since the agreement was signed in October, German crews have joined U.K. Royal Air Force personnel in flights on Poseidon aircraft.
Other elements of the Trinity House Agreement that have previously been announced include a new artillery gun barrel factory in the United Kingdom, a commitment to manufacturing Boxer armored vehicles in the United Kingdom, and a pledge to work jointly with undisclosed partners to integrate air defense systems 'to better protect European airspace against the threat of long-range missiles.'
As for the Anglo-German effort to develop a new deep precision strike weapon, the details of what this will look like are still to be resolved. While this is very likely a longer-term initiative, it points again to a growing focus on long-range fire capabilities in Europe and may well ultimately have a significant effect on the strategic balance on the continent.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FBI Chief Kash Patel Stuns Joe Rogan With Swatting Admission
FBI Director Kash Patel left podcast bro Joe Rogan virtually speechless as he casually revealed that his house had been swatted. 'What?' asked a stunned Rogan. 'The head of the FBI gets swatted?' 'These people play, it's the ultimate hypocrisy. They have two sets of rules: One against you, and one for them,' Patel said, having just lit a cigar, during an episode of the Joe Rogan Experience published Friday. Patel did not specify who he meant by 'these people,' but instead stoked fears that broader corrupt actors in the government were attempting to snuff out his 'mission' to 'put out the truth.' Patel added that he was committed to 'congressional oversight' as he used most of the interview to stir the same claims of government corruption and 'bad actors' outlined in his 2024 book, Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy—which Rogan plugged. Patel also backed up President Donald Trump's allegations that he was being spied on as part of an investigation into Russian election interference. Patel alleged that former FBI director Andrew McCabe and then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein as privy to the scheme, and he claimed they lied to cover it up. However, Patel claimed that he 'caught' them because they were 'arrogant' enough to 'write everything down.' 'Why would they write everything down?' Rogan asked. 'They are so arrogant. They think, 'No one is gonna catch us. I'm going to write everything down. We are gonna put it in a vault, and no one is gonna find it,'' claimed Patel. 'Well, you know what? I found the vault.' Patel claimed they had committed 'illegal activity' by pushing a 'disinformation campaign.' Patel cryptically added with a grin, 'And now I'm going to work.' The Daily Beast has contacted both McCabe and Rosenstein for comment. Rogan, taking Patel's word that crimes had been committed, asked, 'Is there a statute of limitations on these crimes?' Patel said 'generally' there is a five-year statute of limitations on what are known as 'process' crimes. 'But if you can tie them to an overarching conspiracy, there is no statute of limitations,' claimed Patel. 'So if there was more egregious conduct that no one knew about before that we are just finding, then we will have to relook at it.' Yet Patel promised, 'The one thing we will do is put out all that information to the American public.' He added, 'And if we can work with our partners at the DOJ to come up with a prosecution, that will be their decision.' The Daily Beast has contacted Patel for further comment.

32 minutes ago
Wagner Group leaving Mali after heavy losses but Russia's Africa Corps to remain
DAKAR, Senegal -- The Russia-backed Wagner Group said Friday it is leaving Mali after more than three and a half years of fighting Islamic extremists and insurgents in the country. Despite Wagner's announcement, Russia will continue to have a mercenary presence in the West African country. The Africa Corps, Russia's state-controlled paramilitary force, said on its Telegram channel Friday that Wagner's departure would not introduce any changes and the Russian contingent will remain in Mali. "Mission accomplished. Private Military Company Wagner returns home,' the group announced via its channel on the messaging app Telegram. It said it had brought all regional capitals under control of the Malian army, pushed out armed militants and killed their commanders. Mali, along with neighbors Burkina Faso and Niger, has for more than a decade battled an insurgency fought by armed groups, including some allied with al-Qaida and the Islamic State group. As Western influence in the region has waned, Russia has sought to step into the vacuum, sweeping in with offers of assistance. Moscow initially expanded its military cooperation with African nations by using the Wagner Group of mercenaries. But since the group's leader, Yevgeny Prigozhin, was killed in a plane crash in 2023, after mounting a brief armed rebellion in Russia that challenged the rule of President Vladimir Putin, Moscow has been developing the Africa Corps as a rival force to Wagner. Africa Corps is under direct command of the Russian defense ministry. According to U.S. officials, there are around 2,000 mercenaries in Mali. It is unclear how many are with Wagner and how many are part of the Africa Corps. Beverly Ochieng, a security analyst specializing in the Sahel for Control Risks consultancy, said the Russian defense ministry had been negotiating with Mali to take on more Africa Corps fighters and for Wagner mercenaries to join Russia's state-controlled paramilitary force. 'Since the death of Prigozhin, Russia has had this whole plan to then make the Wagner Group fall under the command of the Ministry of Defense. One of the steps they made was to revamp or introduce the Africa Corps, which is the way in which the Russian paramilitaries would retain a presence in areas where the Wagner group has been operating,' Ochieng said. Wagner has been present in Mali since late 2021 following a military coup, replacing French troops and international peacekeepers to help fight the militants. But the Malian army and Russian mercenaries struggled to curb violence in the country and have both been accused of targeting civilians. Last month, United Nations experts urged Malian authorities to investigate reports of alleged summary executions and forced disappearances by Wagner mercenaries and the army. In December, Human Rights Watch accused Malian armed forces and the Wagner Group of deliberately killing at least 32 civilians over an 8-month span. The announcement of Wagner's withdrawal comes as the Malian army and the Russian mercenaries suffered heavy losses during attacks by the al-Qaida linked group JNIM in recent weeks. Last week, JNIM fighters killed dozens of soldiers in an attack on a military base in central Mali. Rida Lyammouri, a Sahel expert at the Morocco-based Policy Center for the New South, said the major losses might have caused the possible end of Wagner's mission. 'The lack of an official and mutual announcement from both the Malian authorities and Wagner indicate possible internal dispute which led to this sudden decision. Simultaneously, this could point to a new framework for Russian presence in the country," he said. Replacing Wagner with Africa Corps troops would likely shift Russia's focus in Mali from fighting alongside the Malian army to training, said Ulf Laessing, head of the Sahel program at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. 'Africa Corps has a lighter footprint and focuses more on training, providing equipment and doing protection services. They fight less than the 'Rambo-type' Wagner mercenaries,' Laessing said.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wagner Group announces withdrawal from Mali
The Wagner mercenary group announced on June 6 that it was withdrawing its presence from Mali, ending its fight with rebel groups. "Mission accomplished. Private Military Company Wagner returns home," the group, founded by the late Yevgeny Prigozhin, announced on social media. Wagner mercenaries have been fighting alongside Malian government forces since 2021, in attempts to fend off Islamic insurgents. The group said that it was ending its presence as "all regional capitals have returned to the control of the legitimate government," providing little rationale for the group's exit from the war-torn nation. Wagner mercenaries and Malian soldiers have reportedly suffered heavy losses in their engagements with Tuareg-led rebels. The Russian mercenary group, known for its deployment in Ukraine and short-lived rebellion against the Kremlin in 2023, has a strong presence across the African continent, backing Russian business interests and Moscow-friendly regimes. The mercenaries have been particularly active in Mali since late 2021 and has been of perpetrating war crimes and widespread looting. In December 2024, Human Rights Watch accused Wagner mercenaries and Malian government forces of deliberately killing 32 civilians. The so-called "Africa Corps," under the command of Russia's Defense Ministry, who fought alongside Wagner mercenaries, will continue to have an active presence in Mali. Mali broke diplomatic ties with Ukraine over its alleged support of Tuareg-led rebels without providing any evidence of direct cooperation. The step was taken after comments by Andrii Yusov, Ukraine's military intelligence (HUR) spokesperson, about the rebels receiving "useful information, and not just that, which allowed them to carry out a successful military operation against Russian war criminals." Ukraine's Foreign Ministry later denied the country's involved with rebel groups. Read also: Ukraine war latest: Russia hits Ukraine with large-scale attack days after Operation Spiderweb; Ukraine targets Russian air bases in 'preemptive strike' We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.